A call for Justice - details - B) THE SECOND FOUNDATION OF DIFFERENCES. (Incorrect Beliefs Of The Deobandi School).

You have read in the previous pages that the first basic cause of our
differences with the Deobandi scholars, is their disrespect of the
Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), and their denial of
the basic tenets of Islam. Youwould have definitely assessed by now
that our hatred and abhorrence of the Deobandi scholars because of
their blasphemy can never end - for it is a requirement of our faith.
The first basic cause was quite sufficient for our separation from the
Deobandi school, but you will be astonished toknow that there are
quite a few special beliefs upheld by the Deobandi scholars, which are
also playing a vital role in widening the gulf between us. Provided
below are some of their beliefs, with reference to their books:
1. A follower (member ofthe Ummah) can surpass the Prophets in deeds.
(Tahzeer-ul-Naas)
2. It is not necessary for the Prophets to be immune from saying
blatant lies. (Tasfia-ul-Aqaid)
3. It is wrong to considerthat saying lies is againstthe dignity of
Prophethood.(Tasfia-ul-Aqaid)
4. It is wrong to believe that Prophets are innocent of sinning.
(Tasfia-ul-Aqaid).
5. A person engaged in prayers becomes a polytheist (mushrik) upon
diverting his thoughts towards the Prophet. (Siraate-Mustaqeem)
6. To think about the Prophet whilst one is in prayer is worse than
being engrossed in the thoughts of adultery, or thinking about a
donkeyor an ox. (Siraate-Mustaqeem)
7. It is possible for Allah to tell lies (Yakrozi).
8. It is a heresy to deem Allah free from time and space (Idha-ul-Haq)
9. The deceptions of magicians are greater than the miracles of the
Prophets. (Mansabe-Imamat).
10. A person, who labels the Companions of the Holy Prophet (peace and
blessings be upon him) as "infidels", is not out of the fold of Jamaat
Ahle Sunnah. (Fatawahe Rashidiah)
11. Whoever is named"Mohammed" or "Ali" does not have authority over
anything. (Taqwiat-ul-Iman)
12. All creations - whether small (such as common men) or great (such
as prophets and saints) - they all are, before Allah's majesty, more
lowly than even a cobbler. (Taqwiat-ul-Iman)
13. One who considers the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon
him) as his mediator andintercessor on the Day ofResurrection, is
equal to Abu Jahal in polytheism. (Taqwiat-ul-Iman)
14. It is polytheism to have names such as"Rasool Baksh", "Nabi
Baksh", "Gulam Mohiuddin" and "Gulam Moeenuddin". (Taqwiat-ul-Iman)
15. To be "A mercy for the entire creation" (Rehmatul Lil Alameen)
isnot an exclusive attribute of our Holy Prophet (peace and blessings
be upon him). The followers can also be the "A mercy for the entire
creation" (Rehmatul Lil Alameen). (Fatawahe Rashidiah)
16. Eating from the food prepared for Fateha of the saints, causes the
heart to die. (Taqwiat-ul-Iman)
17. The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is our elder
brother, we are his younger brothers. (Taqwiat-ul-Iman)
18. It is polytheism to say, "if Allah and His Prophet will a thing,
it will be accomplished". (Bahishti Zewar).
19. To travel for the sakeof visiting the mausoleums of any Prophet
(peace be upon them) or any saint, or to illuminate their mausoleums,
to carpet them, to sweep there, give people water to drink or make
arrangements for their ablution and bathing - (all this) is
polytheism. (Taqwiat-ul-Iman).
Here I will request my readers to reflect upon the above mentioned
beliefs of the Deobandi school with justice and sincerity. Among these
beliefs are a few that affect the belief of Tauheed (the Oneness
ofAllah) and a few others which if accepted as truewould put the faith
of a billion Muslims in danger- and this does not stop here. Billions
of our ancestors, who acceptedfaith contrary to these beliefs as true
Islam, will also come within the purview of such beliefs.
For a little while, put the Bareillvi scholars aside, and with your
religious temperament, decide whether you agree with the above
mentioned beliefs and actions or not - and without any hesitation just
decide in a clear YES or NO - whether the present Muslim society is
based on these beliefs or not. Ifnot and obviously not, then please
give a decision regarding the scholars of Bareilly who have disagreed
with the above noted beliefs and have struggled to save the Ummah from
these filthy beliefs & actions, and have also striven to keep the
Ummah associated with the correct beliefs of Islam.
It is now up to the Muslim masses to decide whether this significant
achievement of the righteous Ahle Sunnah Bareillvi scholars was in the
interest of the Ummah or otherwise - and whether the services they
rendered caused dissension withinthe Ummah or have saved it from
breaking up.
If you agree that the faith of the majority of the Muslims worldwide
is the same as that whichthe scholars of Bareilly upheld, you will
then have to accept that it was these scholars who were the true
leaders of the Muslim masses. Those who, under the influence of false
propaganda of the opponents, accuse the Ahle Sunnah Bareillvi scholars
of sowing the seeds of dissension within the Ummah, deserve to be
called the worst ingrates in history.
Even if you do not call yourself a Bareillvi, you must be thankful to
the Ahle Sunnah Bareillvi scholars for the noble role that they played
by saving you from falling victim of the incorrect teachings of the
Deobandi school - and for keeping the Muslim Ummah associated with
proper beliefs.

--

- - - - -

And Allah Knows the Best!

- - - - -

Published by :->
M NajimudeeN Bsc- INDIA

¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤

A call for Justice - detail

A CALL FOR JUSTICE
The first root cause of our disagreement with the Deobandi scholars
with references to their books, is before you. It should be clear that
this basic cause of disagreement is concerned with (1) Insulting the
Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), and (2) Denial of the
necessities of Islam. And there is no doubt in their infidelity. A
number of verses of the Holy Qur'an bear testimony to the fact that
even a minor disrespect towards the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings
be upon him), breaks one's relation with faith and Islam. Under no
circumstances can superiority in knowledge or worship save one from
the evil consequences of insolence.
Here I will request my readers NOT to read the defamatory writings of
the Deobandi scholars with a view that it is justa religious dispute
between Bareilly and Deoband. Rather what must be kept in mind is that
the attack of the Deobandi scholars is upon the great personality of
the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). The attack of
their insolent pen is NOT uponthe Ahle Sunnah Bareillvischolars, but
especially on the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)
himself!
If you read these lines with a view that it is justa dispute between
the scholars of Bareilly and Deoband then the sincerity you need to
make a fair decision, willvanish. The purpose of my above request is
because to prefer the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)
above any other belovedperson is a requirement of our faith. Therefore
put aside the scholars of Bareilly for a while and ask your faithful
conscience the followingquestions: -
(a) Do the writings of the Deobandi scholarsattack the
sanctity of ourHoly Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), or not?
(b) Do these writings deviate from the basic requirements and
tenets of faith, or not?
If you have any doubt regarding the authenticity and the location of
the references given, you can yourself find and read them - these
books are openly available at bookshops, even to this day.
So what did the Ahle Sunnah Bareillvi scholarsdo? It was just that
after going through these defamatory writings of the Deobandi
scholars, the Ahle Sunnah Bareillvischolars openly displayed the
reaction ofthe unbearable distress and the spiritual agony that they
were made to suffer all of a sudden. The hurdle of relations did not
come in their way.
They contacted the Deobandi scholars and with authentic proofs asked
them to first seek repentance according tothe Shariah from those
writings - which vilify our Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon
him), and which deny the necessities of Islam - and secondly to delete
those writings from their books. But the spurious fame of the Deobandi
scholars came in their way and they preferred the everlasting
punishment of fire to the disgrace of this world.
A1) A Common Trait Among Those Who Disrespect The Holy Prophet (peace
and blessings be upon him).
Deviating from the above conversation, I would like to clarify a point
to my readers, trusting that the extra moments of waiting will not be
a burden upon them.
Going through the annals of history you willnotice a common trait
among those who were insolent towards the Holy Prophet (peace and
blessings be upon him). After uttering or writing any blasphemous word
due to hypocrisy, insteadof seeking repentance for their infidelity,
they resort to wrong interpretations and verbal jugglery when they are
called to account and admonished.
During the era of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him),
the very same attitude existed in the hypocrites of Medinah. Once when
the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) was returning froma
journey, the hypocritesused a derogatory word for him - and when the
Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) called them to account
after he was informed by the honorable companions, the hypocrites
resorted to giving wrong interpretations and lameexcuses. It was
revealed in the Holy Qur'an to the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings
be upon him) as follows: -
"Do not feign excuses, you have turned disbelievers after becoming
Muslims" (Surah Tauba -9:66 - from the Holy Quran's English
Translation"Treasure of Faith" by Mohammed Aqib Qadri)
Had the revelations not been going on, the hypocrites' fraud would not
have been disclosed and they would have concealed their infidelityby
reciting Kalema in theMuslim society.
A2) A Recent Example Of Verbal Jugglery
If you wish to know about the role of the hypocrites of Medinah inthe
present age, read about the Pro Vice Chancellor of Jamia MilliaIslamia
of New Delhi. In order to be called a supporter of secularism, he
expressed his views about the banned book of Salman Rushdie in an
interview for an English Magazine that "the ban on this book (Satanic
Verses) enforced by the Indian Government should be lifted because
everyone has a fundamental right to express his views."
The clear meaning of this phrase is that Rushdie cannot be calledto
account of the Blasphemy he has done in his book because he has a
fundamental right to express his views. In other words,
Mushir-ul-Hasan with his above phrase has openly supported the
disrespecttowards our Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him).
The courageous and sacrificing students of Jamia Millia deserve praise
and applause. When they read the interview of Mushir-ul-Hasan, and
based on his crime of supporting ablasphemer, they joined hands in the
spirit of defending the honor of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings
be upon him) and demanded from the then Indian Government that since a
supporter of a blasphemer is also a blasphemer, Mushir-ul-Hasan should
be sacked from his post - and that they cannot tolerate a blasphemer
and cruel person at any cost.
As this was a question of defending the honor of our Holy Prophet
(peace and blessings be upon him), a large number of teachers of the
Jamia Millia became indifferentof the consequences andannounced their
supportwith the students. When the Muslims of Delhi learned about the
incident, a wave of hatred and detestation spread, and the people of
the city also started supporting the students. The manner in which
Anjuman-e-Raza of Zakir Nagar displayed their anger against
Mushir-ul-Hasan, gave correct advice to the students and encouraged
everyone, should be written down in letters of gold.
But The Scholars Of Deoband! Only accordingto the Deobandi
Scholars(among whom Maulvi Salim Ibne Qari Tayyab Sahab and Maulvi
AhmedAli Qasimi and the secretary general of Abna-e-qadeem
Dar-ul-Uloom Deoband Maulvi Fuzail Ahmed are worth mentioning) the
blasphemy of Mushir-ul-Hasan is NOT proved. This is evident from
theirjoint statement in the daily "Qawmi Awaz" dated 18 May 1992 as
follows: -
"The students should seein the light of Islamic teachings, whether the
one who is being termed an insulter of theHoly Prophet (peace and
blessings be upon him), is really an insulter or not."
How regretful and astonishing it is, that thestudents and the teachers
of Jamia Millia and the general public who are not scholars understood
the blasphemy of Mushir-ul-Hasan, but the scholars of Darul Uloom
Deoband could not understand it - although the appeal of the
Chancellor Mr. Bashiruddin Ahmed about Mushir-ul-Hasan was published
on the last page of Qawmi Awaz, and the following excerpt from it
perfectly reveals the crime of Mushir-ul-Hasan.
"The Pro-Vice Chancellor of the Jamia, Prof. Mushir-ul-Hasan has
expressed his opinion about lifting the ban on this book (Satanic
Versesby Salman Rushdie). As this is a cause of annoyance, an
environment of anger and revolt has been created."
It is clear from the statement of the Vice Chancellor that the charge
of the students against Mushir-ul-Hasan is not baseless because he has
based his statement on the fact that every one has the right to freely
express his views. Therefore whatever Salman Rushdie has written
against our Holy Prophet(peace and blessings be upon him), is
Rushdie's permitted right. But it is a matter of great regret that
despite so much explanation, the Deobandi scholars consider
Mushir-ul-Hasan guiltless. The most important justification given by
them for his innocence isas follows: -
"The one who is being termed an insulter of theHoly Prophet (peace and
blessings be upon him) has clarified that he is free from this sin and
has complete respect in his heart for the Holy Prophet (peace and
blessings be upon him)".
The inanity of the Deobandi scholars is really pathetic that they do
not even know that in order to prove any charge, the confession or
admission of guilt is NOT required. His statements and the words he
has used are more than enough to prove his guilt - or else itshould be
pointed out where in the history of Islamic punishments has a criminal
been punished on the basis of his confession. Whoever has been
punished, has been punished on the basis of his words and statements.
Can Dar-ul-Ifta of Deoband prove that has anyone who was termed an
infidel byit because of uttering blasphemy, been made to confess his
infidelity? But it is obvious here that the Deobandi scholars would
not have uttered such immature statements if their love for the Holy
Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), had not beenovercome by the
motive of supporting Mushir-ul-Hasan. They have nowto answer what was
the reason of their supporting and advocating for Mushir-ul-Hasan.
We have referred to this event just to clarify to our readers how the
love of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), unites the
believers against the insulters - and how those whose hearts are
devoid of this noble spirit resort to indecent and ridiculous
interpretations in order to defend a blasphemer.
In order to expose the mentality of the blasphemers as well as their
supporters, I think Ihave swayed far from the main subject. I now
request you to direct your attention to the discussion in the previous
pages regarding the charges against the elders of Deoband for
insulting the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him).
The very same thing happened at that time. In order to protect the
insolent writings of theirelders, the Deobandi scholars adopted a
stance of hostility and stubbornness, and with all their might began
propagating among the masses that they were completely free from
thecharges of blasphemy. And furthermore, they claimed that the
scholarsof the Ahle Sunnah Bareillvi school had created this entire
dispute and that the accusation against them - that of insulting the
Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) - is totally untrue,
and baseless.
They had a large numberof resources and means of communication at
their disposal. When people started getting influenced from their
false propaganda, we were left with no other option but to go for
discussions and debates and to reveal the fact that the charges on the
elders of Deoband school for writing insolent remarks againstthe Holy
Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), are NOT baseless, but in
fact a reality.
Therefore in every debate, the insolent writings of their elders were
read before them along with proper reference to the page numbers and
the Deobandi scholars never said that the books from which the
reference were given were not written by their elders or that these
insolent writings were not present in their books.
The most important benefit derived from these debates was that the
general public realized that the chargesof blasphemy on the Deobandi
scholars are based on solid grounds -and that the protest and
agitation of the Ahle Sunnah scholars which isreflected in their
speeches is to defend the honour of the Holy Prophet (peace and
blessings be upon him).

A call for Justice - Part1

PART ONE
THE THREE FOUNDATIONS OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AHLE SUNNAH SCHOLARS &THE
DEOBANDI SCHOLARS:
The religious enmity between Deoband and Bareilly, and its
negativeeffects that are prominent from the press to the stage, and
which started in the previous century is not abaseless one. If your
mind is open to the truthread below the real foundations of the
differences of this religious dispute that has divided the Muslim
nation into two groups.
A) THE FIRST FOUNDATION OF DIFFERENCES (Insolent Writings Of Deobandis
Against The Holy Prophet- peace and blessings be upon him).
Everyone is aware that a Muslim has a very strong and devoted relation
with his Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). The belief
regarding the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is so
reverential and sensitive that a Muslim cannot bear any insult towards
the Holy Prophet. In order to protect his honor, the Muslims of the
subcontinent have offered sacrifices in every era and with such an
exemplary spirit that it is now a part of history. This aspect of a
Muslim's love for the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)
should be remembered -that while expressing anger and regret
againstthe insolent, a Muslim has never bothered to see who will be
targeted. Whoever commits any disrespect or blasphemy against our Holy
Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) - whether the individual is
an outsider or from among us - the swords of the Muslims have become
unsheathed against suchpeople.
The contemporary example of the outcast Salman Rushdie is beforeyou.
He made the entire Muslim world his enemy by attacking the honor of
our Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). Indeed all those
who gave numerous sacrifices to defend the donor of the Holy Prophet
(peace and blessings be upon him), deserve immense praise.
This itself is the main foundation of our anger against the scholars
of the Deobandi school - because their elders have written insolent
words and phrases against our Holy Prophet(peace and blessings be upon
him). A few examples of such insolent writings are as follows: -
1. The religious leader ofthe scholars of Deoband,Maulvi Ashraf Ali
Thanvi in his book entitled"Hifz-ul-Iman" (The Protection of Faith)
has compared the knowledge of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be
upon him), with the knowledge of lowly creatures such as animals and
beasts - andhe himself has confessedto this heinous crime! (May Allah
protect us!)
Learned people know that if anything is compared with a respectable
thing, it implies respect - whereas on the contrary, if anything is
compared with a disgraceful and shameful thing, it implies defamation
and disrespect. This principleis so well known and widely accepted in
the Urdu language, that no learned person can denythe authenticity of
this interpretation.
On this basis we claim that, beyond doubt, Mr. Thanvi is guilty of
insolence towards the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him).
By comparing the knowledge of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be
upon him) with that of animals and lowly creatures, he has definitely
committed theheinous crime of insulting the Holy Prophet (peace and
blessings be upon him).
2. The second and third leaders of the Deobandi school i.e. Maulvi
Khalil Ahmed Ambethvi and Maulvi Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi have written in
their book "Baraheene Qatia" (The Definite Proofs), that on the
issueof encompassing the knowledge of the earth, the knowledge of
Satan exceeds the knowledge of our Holy Prophet (peace and blessings
be upon him). Furthermore,they claimed that if one believes that the
knowledge of our Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)
exceeds that of Satan, such a person will become a "polytheist"
(Mushrik), because the vastness of Satan's knowledge is proven from
Qur'an and Hadith, whereas no such proof exists in respect of the
knowledge of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). (May
Allah protect us!).
In the above-mentioned case, there are no two opinions that assessing
the knowledge of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) to
be inferior to that of Satan, is a blatant blasphemy and insolence
towards the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him).
Similarly, it is a blatant insolence and a blasphemy to say that in
contrast to Satan, anyone who believes in the vast extent of the
knowledge of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is a
"polytheist" (Mushrik), but having the same belief about Satan is not
polytheism!
Likewise it is also a clear disrespect towards our Holy Prophet (peace
and blessings be upon him) to say that there is no clear proof in the
Qur'an on the vast extent of his knowledge, but there is proof in
Qur'an as well as Hadith regarding the vast knowledge of Satan!
3. The most important leader of the Deobandi school, and also the
founder of the Deoband Madressah i.e. Maulvi Qasim Nanotvi, in his
book "Tahzeer-ul-Naas" has refused to accept our Holy Prophet (peace
and blessings be upon him) as the Last Prophet - whereas to believe in
Prophet Mohammed (peace and blessings be upon him), as the Last
Prophet of Allah is proven both from the Qur'an and the Hadith.
He has gone to the extent of writing that"even if it were assumedthat
a New Prophet can come during the era of the Holy Prophet (peace and
blessings be upon him), or after the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings
be upon him), it would not have an effect on the "Finality"
(Khatemiat) of our Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon
him)".Whereas every sane person can easily understand the simple
principle that the belief regarding the Finality of the Holy Prophet
(peace and blessings be upon him) gets negated upon the arrival of a
new Prophet. It is this very book of Maulvi Qasim Nanotvi - i.e.
"Tahzeer-ul-Naas" which the Qadianis term a precursor to validate
theprophethood of Mirza Gulam Ahmed Qadiani (May Allah protect us).
It should be clear that our dispute with Deobandi scholars on the
issue of Khatm - e- Nubuwat (The Finality ofProphethood) is not a
secondary one, but is regarding Islamic principles and is fundamental.
It is not concerned just with the permissibility (hillat) or
prohibition (hurmat), but with infidelity and Islam.

A call for Justice

ALLAH - In The Name Of - The Most Gracious, The Most Merciful. A CALL
FOR JUSTICE
This book is written for all those:
· Who sincerely want to know about the differences between the
scholars of the Ahle Sunnah School and the scholars of the
DeobandiSchool and who wish to remove the real obstacles towards
unification.
· Who in their private meetings address these serious and principled
differences as (1) a deceit of the Maulvis, (2) a means of making
money, (3) a way of making a living etc., - and who receive applause
from the people, for expressing such thoughts.
· Who, despite being highly educated, consider making attempts at
understanding and removing such differences as a waste oftime.
· Who consider the differences between the Ahle Sunnah scholars and
the Deobandi scholars, as merely trivialor secondary.
· Who spend their scholarly and research capabilities in clarifying
and interpreting the insolent writings of the Deobandis. (Perhaps
religion will remain incomplete without suchexplanations!)
· Who consider researching the differences between the Ahle Sunnah and
Deobandi scholars just a waste of time, whereas at the same time they
are the most zealous advocators of unification!
· Who consider that Teejah (meals for the poor on the third day of
passing away of a Muslim), Daswaan (mealsfor the poor on the tenth day
of passing away of a Muslim), Chaleeswan (meals for the poor on the
fortieth day of passing away of aMuslim), and visits to mausoleums are
the actual differences between the Ahle Sunnah scholars and Deobandi
scholars.
· Who consider the publication and sale of literature based on
blasphemous and insolent writings, as the most important service to
Islam!
· Who feel uneasy at the mention of religious differences, but who
spend all their physical and monetary resources in tolerating and
solvingwith elegance all their official problems and business affairs.
· Who advise that as per the circumstances, disputed writings &
problems should not be discussed - but do not render this advice to
the institutions that are ceaselessly publishing such literature.
· Who term the issues of (a) Respecting our Holy Prophet (peace and
blessings be upon him), (b) The status of the HolyProphet (peace and
blessings be upon him), (c) The attributes of the Holy Prophet (peace
and blessings be upon him), (d) Veneration of the Companions and of
the members of the family ofthe Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be
upon him), (e) Sainthood and (f) other Islamic issues, as
"Sectarianism" perpetrated by the Ahle Sunnah school of thought - and
in this way such persons intentionally or unintentionally support
infidelity and heresy.
· Who understand the real causes of the differences and have thetrue
spirit of presenting a program on the national (or international)
level, through which the wide gulf of differences can be bridged and
an initiative can be taken towards unification.
If you have a soft corner in your heart for the scholars of Deobandi
school, the obvious effect of reading this booklet will be that you
will close it and put is aside with frustration. However, if you are a
great thinker and have the spirit for searching facts by going deep
into events, you will definitely attempt to find out why the
foundations of this dispute were laid - and what are the causes owing
to which the dispute still continues allover the world, after so many
years.
If the dispute was limited to a few people, it could be ignored by
considering that personal or family interests may be involved - but
the range of this dispute is so widethat not only the whole country
(Indian Sub Continent) but a very large region abroad has been dragged
into it. From mosques to religious schools (madressahs), all aspects
of our religious life havebeen so deeply affected by it that from
villages tocities, the entire country has been divided by it.
Therefore the real reasons that actually started the dispute cannot be
overlooked byjust terming it just as an individual strife between
Bareilly and Deoband.
Regretfully until now historians have not attempted make an impartial
research into the real basis of our dispute with the scholarsof the
Deobandi school - a dispute which is going on among millions of
Muslims at home and abroad since the last several decades. Due to it,
the entire Muslim society has fallen prey tospiritual agony and
confusion. Can there be a greater mockery of ourinnocence that our
protest is termed as"Spread of Dissension", whereas it the right of
every innocent individual to disclose his anger and sorrow?
After these introductory words, we now present the details of this
religious dispute before our readers trusting thatthey will ascertain
the real causes in light of what is written here below. Even if
reading this booklet is a burden on you, I would still request you to
read the details, because a seekerof the truth does not have a bias
towards any group.

--

- - - - -

And Allah Knows the Best!

- - - - -

Published by :->
M NajimudeeN Bsc- INDIA

¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤