Stop lying!

Darwinists are wretched out of desperation!
They attempted to show the complete lemur fossilnamed Ida--which is an
extinct species--as a transitional form.
And about 90 percent of the animal and plant species on earth
becameextinct. [1] There are 99 species of lemurs. And 16species of
lemurs became extinct and many other species are now being determined
as extinct. And many more species have been lost. All the extinct
species are all perfect living forms with no signof the so-called
transitional forms.
Ida, is one the extinct species of lemur. It is aperfect developed
lemur and it shows nosign of intermediary form. It is an evidence of
creation.
THE TRUE FACTS ABOUTTHE FICTITIOUS 'MISSING LINK' IDA THAT DARWINISTS
NEVER MENTION >>>
[1] Science in Africa, Africa's First On-Line Science Magazine,
Nobody Attaches Any More Credence to Evolutionists' False Evidence!
* Darwinism is now finished. Darwinists and materialists have been
belittled in the public eye. They must now renounce their meaningless
pride and obstinacy and free themselves from the spell of the last 150
years. Life did not come into being by chance, and living things are
notdescended from one another. Almighty Allah (God) created the
universe and everything,living and inanimate, within it.
* Evolutionists who invent lie after lie and keep raising false
evidence in order to keep the theory of evolution alive are
beinghumiliated in the public eye. The latest evolutionist false
evidence is the fossil dinosaur known as Tyrannosaurus, depictedas the
"ancestor of birds." The results of a study conducted on proteins
obtained from this fossil, discovered in the state of Montana in the
USA in 2003, were again made public in a sensational manner.
Evolutionists compared the proteins they obtained from this fossil
with those of 21 modernspecies of bird and cameup with the lie that
this creature was directly related to the chicken and the ostrich.
* The fact is, however, that the idea that birds evolved from
dinosaurs is an invention opposed by leading ornithologistswho produce
clear evidence to back their case. Similarities among living things
represent no evidence for the theory of evolution. It is of course
utterly normal for there to be molecularsimilarities among
livingthings, because they are made up of the same molecules, use the
same water and atmosphere and consume nutrients made of the same
molecules. It is perfectly natural for their metabolisms and therefore
their genetic structures to resemble one another.
* If attempts are madeto prove evolution on the basis of molecular
comparisons, the picturethat emerges leaves evolution in a totally
helpless position. When evolutionists' illusory family trees are
prepared in the light of molecular comparisons, all previous family
trees have to be thrown away and it even has to be maintained that
there is an evolutionary link between human beings and the potato.
* Based on findings from the field of microbiology, the renowned
biochemist Prof. Michael Denton makes this comment:
"Each class at a molecular level is unique, isolated and unlinked by
intermediates. Thus, molecules, like fossils, have failed to provide
the elusive intermediates so long sought by evolutionary biology… At a
molecular level, no organism is"ancestral" or"primitive" or"advanced"
compared with its relatives…" (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, London:
Burnett Books, pp. 290-91)
* The oldest-known bird fossil is Archaeopteryx, which dates back
some 150 million years. With its perfect flight muscles and feathers
ideally suited to flight, this animal was a flying bird.The dinosaur
fossil in thelatest study seeking to establish a relation with birds
is only 68 million years old. This means that birds were in existence
some 80 million years before this dinosaur. For that reason, the idea
that there is an evolutionary link to this dinosaur, andthat birds
"evolved from dinosaurs" is a fantasy.
* These efforts are all in vain. Modern science has revealed that
the extraordinary complexity in the origin of life cannot be explained
from a materialist perspective. Reports of this kind on the press are
just hopeless and misleadingtactics on the part of various circles
holding a materialist world view. Living things were created through
Almighty Allah commanding them to "Be!" not through a chance process
of evolution.
The newly announced Tyrannosaurus fossil, which is claimed to havea
familial link to birds, is 68 million years old. Yet the fossil known
as Confuciusornis, shown above and belonging to an extinct species of
bird, is fully 120 million years old.
1. Not one single proteincan come into being by chance.
Proteins are complex molecules that both represent the building
blocks of living cells and also assume various functions within the
cell.When the chances of an average protein molecule emerging by
chance are calculated, the result is a number consisting of 10
followed by 950 zeros. Inpractical mathematical terms, such a figure
represents "zero probability."
2. Irreducibly complex organs refute evolution.
Irreducible complexity is a characteristic that invalidates the
claim of gradual development that lies at the basis of the theory of
evolution. For example, there is irreducible complexity inthe eye and
in wings. It is impossible for the organelles that combine to make up
the eye, suchas the tear gland, the retina and iris to form
individually by chance. Because sight will only occur when all the
components of the eye are all perfectly formed. The same thing applies
to the wing.
3. The inconceivable amount of information in DNA repudiates chance.
The information concerning all characteristics, from a person's
physical appearance to the structure of their internal organs is
encoded by a special system in their DNA. If we were to try to put the
genetic information in DNA down on paper, we would need to createa
huge library of 900 volumes of 500 pages each. But this inconceivable
quantity of information is contained in those parts of DNA known as
"genes." And it is an absolute fact that DNA cannot emerge by chance.
4. The fossil record points to Creation.
Although some 100 million fossils belonging to 250,000 different
species have been unearthed, not even onesupports Darwinism. Each one
of the fossils discovered, belongs to fully formed and
flawlessorganisms. Were evolutionists' claims true, a large part out
of so many fossils should belong to "intermediate life forms," though
not asingle one actually does.
5. Life forms appeared suddenly in the Cambrian Period.
Nearly all the main physical structures in living things (categories
such as arthropods, chordates etc.) emerged in the Cambrian Period,
some 530 million years ago. While only 1 or 2 of these main categories
existed prior to the Cambrian, more than 50 emerged suddenly in
different parts of the world during the Cambrian Period. Pre-Cambrian
life forms have simpler structures, while those from the Cambrian are
incomparably more complex. For example, there is no difference between
the structure ofthe eye of the trilobite, which emerged during this
period, and that of eyes today.
6. "Living fossils" are a response to evolutionist myths.
Living fossils are striking proof that, totally demolish the
theory of evolution's claim of "gradual development." The reason why
they are known as "living fossils" is that despite being hundreds of
millions of years old, they are identical to specimens living today.
There are many specimens of living fossils, from ants to trees and
from bats tosharks. This is definitive evidence that no evolution ever
took place in the course of natural history.
7. Reptiles are not the ancestors of birds.
Evolutionists are no longer able to point to Archaeopteryx as an
intermediate form between reptiles and birds. Examinations of this
fossil shown that it is not a transitional form, and that it is an
extinct bird with a few different features to those of present-day
birds. The presence of a breastbone indicating powerful flight
muscles and an asymmetric feather structure identical to that in
modern-day birds show that the animal was ableto fly to perfection.
8. Fish did not emerge onto dry land.
Evolutionists used to point to the fish known as the Coelacanth
as evidence for the myth ofa transition from water to dry land. It
used to be thought that the Coelacanth represented an intermediate
form between fish and amphibians. However, a "living" specimen of a
Coelacanth was caught in the Indian Ocean in 1938. More than 200 other
specimens have been caught since. Examinations of living Coelacanths
revealed that it is a perfectly structured fish and that all the
previous conjectures about the fossils was mistaken.
9. Mutations do not form new species.
Mutations are breakages or dislocations occurring asa result of
radiation or chemical agents in the DNA molecule in the nucleus of the
living cell that carries genetic information. DNA has a highly
complex structure. Therefore, anyrandom change in the molecule will be
damaging to it. Mutations usually lead toirreparable damage and
deformity, and even to death. The people exposed to the disasters at
Hiroshima, Nagasaki or Chernobyl are living indications of this. The
claim that mutations are an evolutionary mechanism is proof of the
dead-end in which the theory of evolution finds itself.
10. Natural selection does not lead to evolution.
Natural selection is an expression of the survival of strong
living things best suited to their surroundings. But this does not
give rise to any new species. For example, in a herd of zebra under
threat from predators, those zebras able to run fast will survive and
the herd willeventually come to consist of fast-running individuals.
But this process is a limited one and cannot turn the zebra into any
other species. Because zebra have their own unique skeletal structure
and physiology recorded in their DNA, and the struggle against
predators cannot alter that information nor bestow any new genetic
information on the zebra.
11. Human beings never evolved, but were created as humans.
It has emerged that the human family tree is a diagram drawn up
solely in the light of evolutionists' imaginations. Evolutionists
maintainedthat human beings emerged gradually in the following line of
progression:"Australopithecines > Homo habilis > Homo erectus> Homo
sapiens" They sought to give the impression that each one of the life
forms in that list was the forerunner of the one after it. But the
discovery of these life forms, which evolutionists portray as one
another's ancestors, right beside one anotherhas demolished this
family tree. The latest discoveries by paleoanthropologists show that
Australopithecines, Homo habilis and Homo erectus existed at the same
time in different parts of the world.
12. Evolutionists resort to frauds.
Evolutionists also resort to frauds in order to "prove" their
theory. To date, there has been a great deal of such evolutionist
fraud as that in embryo drawingsand in fossils being hidden away or
destroyed. The most striking example is the Piltdown Man fraud.
It was suggested thata skull discovered in 1912 near Piltdown in
England belonged to an "ape-man." This fossil, the skull of which
exhibited human features and the jaw those of an orangutan, was
displayed in the famous British Museum for 40 years. However, it was
finally exposed as a forgery in 1953. The fossil had been produced by
evolutionists who combined a human skull and an orangutan jaw and used
chemicals to give it an aged appearance.
WORKS BY HARUN YAHYA THAT DEMOLISH THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION
A total of 9,000 pages and 10,000 illustrations out of the author's
works deals with the collapse of the theory of evolution.
Adnan Oktar has written some 250 works under the pen name Harun Yahya.
These represent of 48,000 pages and 35,500 illustrations. You can read
the works written by Adnan Oktar under the pen name Harun Yahya and
watch the documentaries based on them free of charge on the
www.harunyahya.org, www.harunyahya.netand www.harunyahya.comweb sites,
or else you can obtain them from Global Yayıncılık by calling
[Turkey]0212 4444 441.
Darwinism has been annihilated across the world
Darwinism has deceived the world for around a century and a half and
has attempted to indoctrinate people withmaterialist philosophy using
hoaxes and lies. HARUN YAHYA'S ATLAS OF CREATION HAS ANNOUNCEDTHE
DEMOLITION OF THIS FALSE THEORY , which for years convinced people
that life forms were descended, by chance, from other forms.
The Turkish public came to see this reality with enormous joy and
excitement, following which and by virtue of Atlas of Creation , the
people of Europe who had for so long been subjected to materialist and
Darwinist indoctrination, also came by the opportunityof seeing the
true facts. The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with
Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living
creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that
evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change
of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by
well-known publishing institutions in different European countries
haverevealed a major drop inthe numbers of people believing in
Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe.
Some survey findings from across Europe are:
FRANCE/ Science Actualités / 16 February 2007
logo science160207
Following the major impact of the distribution of Atlas of Creation in
France, the French website Science Actualités carried out a public
opinion poll. The results of the survey showed that Darwinism has been
annihilated in France. According to the findings, set out under the
caption "Your Views on Evolution," revealed that 92% of the public no
longer believe in evolution.
GERMANY / Die Welt / 17 April 2008
Darwinism has also beendemolished in Germany, which now says, "Allah
Created Life."
logo welt170408
welt
DENMARK / Ekstra Bladet / 29 June 2007
The Danish People No Longer Believe in Evolution.
logo ekstrab290607
According to the results of a survey conducted on its web site by the
daily Ekstra Bladet, one of Denmark's highest-circulation
publications, "Danes no longer believein evolution." Asked "Do You
Think That Human Beings Are Descended from Apes?", 88% of the Danish
public answered "No."
nyt
GERMANY / Süddeutsche Zeitung / 8 July 2007
According to a poll in Germany, the public no longer believe in
evolution. The findings appeared under the caption "Evolution – no,
thanks?".
logo suded080707
sudde
SWITZERLAND / Blick / 4 May 2007
According to a survey in Switzerland, the public say that "Creation
shouldbe taught."
logo blick040507
The level of people believing in the fact of Creation stood at 85% in
a poll conducted on the web site of Blick, one of Switzerland's
widest-read newspapers.
blick
What the findings of the polls, a few of which are cited above, make
crystal clear is this: ATLAS OF CREATION HAS HAD AN EXPLOSIVE IMPACT
ON THE ENTIRE WORLD .
In the face of the scientific evidence people have now abandoned
belief in the fraud of evolution. They now realize that Darwinism is a
deception being kept alive for ideological reasons.
In the wake of the facts set out in Atlas of Creation, people have now
come to see that all living creatures are brought into being by the
will and at the command of our Lord, Allah. That is what the poll
results show.
DARWINISM HAS BEEN ANNIHILATED AND DEMOLISHED ACROSS THE WHOLE WORLD,
BEFORE THE VERY EYES OF THE LOYAL ADHERENTS OF MATERIALIST PHILOSOPHY.
The level of people believing in the fact of Creation stood at 85% in
a poll conducted on the web site of Blick, one of Switzerland's
widest-read newspapers.
According to a poll regarding whether or not evolution actually
happened that appearedon the web site of Süddeutsche Zeitung, one of
Germany's main dailies, the level of thosebelieving that human beings
are the work of aCreator stands at 87%.
The German daily Die Welt, one of the countries most important
publications, conducted a poll about Creation on its website.
Eighty-six percent of the participants responded to the question "How
do you think life came into being?" by saying "Allah created it." -
- ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -