Jokes

Share ::-

*AS'SALAMU ALAIKUM (WR, WB)*
-
Friday - Feb- - 3 -2017
-
Jamathul Avval - - 5- -1438
-
* JUMMA MUBARAK! *
-:-
அமலா : தானே சமையல் செய்றோம்ங்கிற திமிர் என் புருசனுக்கு இருக்கு.
-
விமலா : எப்படிச் சொல்ற?
-
அமலா : ஏதாவது சொன்னா பூரிக்கட்டையால மண்டைய உடைச்சுருவேன்னுமிரட்டுறாரு.

PUBLISHERM.NajimudeeN. MD,IRI

General Dought clear, -* Reasons for the difference of opinion among the fuqaha’ about reciting behind the imam

Share ::-

*AS'SALAMU ALAIKUM (WR, WB)*
-
Friday - Feb- - 3 -2017
-
Jamathul Avval - - 5- -1438
-
* JUMMA MUBARAK! *
-:-
I have read your answer to the question "reciting surah fatiha behind the imam" but i have a confusion in it.
What Ive heard is that imam Maalik lived his life in madinah and learnt religion from there, then why does he suggest that surah fatiha should not be recited when imam recites out loud?
He was born in 93 AH and was the closest in all the imam such as imam Shafi and imam Hunbal to the time of Prophet (peace and mercy be upon him). Then why is there a difference in his teachings and the teachings of the others?
A similar difference is on keeping the hands by ones sides while qiyaam.
Please explain and if possible please give references from mauta imam malik as well.
I understand that imam abu hanifa was the closest to the time of Prophet (peace and mercy be upon him) but since he was in iraq his teachings are different in many matters. But is this true that his students corrected many hhadees when they came to madinah? Like I've heard that one of his students Abu Abdullah corrected nearly 3000 ahadees he learnt from imam abu hanifa when he came to Madinah.
-
Praise be to Allah
Firstly:
Reciting al-Faatihah behind the imam in a prayer in which recitation is done out loud is a matter that is subject to ijtihad. What each imam said concerning it is the conclusion to which his ijtihad led him. We mentioned the evidence supporting the view that it is obligatory to recite it, and the evidence quoted by those scholars who disallowed that. Please see the answers to questions no. 66742and 10995.
You may also refer to the books of the Maalikis for more information concerning that.
Secondly:
The matter has nothing to do with Imam Maalik (may Allah have mercy on him) having lived in Madinah or having lived close to the time of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). This could be relevant with regard to the issue of whether the hadith reached him or not, but the deciding factor in this issue mostly has to do with the scholars examining and understanding the relevant text. Inal-Muwatta’(193), Imam Maalik quoted as evidence the hadith of Abu Hurayrah, according to which the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) completed a prayer in which he recited out loud, then he said: “Was one of you reciting with me just now?” A man said: Yes, O Messenger of Allah. He said: “I was saying to myself, what is wrong with me that someone is fighting to wrest the Qur’an from me?” So the people stopped reciting with the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in prayers in which the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) recited out loud, when they heard that from the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
This indicates that he thought that reciting (behind the imam in a prayer in which recitation is done out loud) was initially allowed, then it was prohibited.
Among contemporary scholars, a similar view was held by Shaykh al-Albaani (may Allah have mercy on him), who thought that reciting behind the imam in a prayer in which recitation is done out loud was abrogated. We responded to the claims that it was abrogated and explained that the words “So the people stopped reciting…” were not the words of Abu Hurayrah; rather they are the words of Ibn Shihaab az-Zuhri, so they cannot be quoted as evidence. Please see the answer to question no. 231217.
Maalik (may Allah have mercy on him) quoted as evidence the command (in the Qur’an) to listen attentively when the Quran is recited, this hadith, and the practice of the people of Medina.
Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr (may Allah have mercy on him) said: How could anyone suggest anything that is different from the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), the clear meaning of the Book of Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, and the practice of the people of Medina? Do you not see what Ibn Shihaab said: So the people stopped reciting with the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in prayers in which the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) recited out loud, when they heard him say, “what is wrong with me that someone is fighting to wrest the Qur’an from me”?
Maalik said: In our view, no one should recite with the imam in a prayer in which recitation is done out loud. So this indicates that this was an inherited practice in Medina.
End quote fromat-Tamheed, 11/34
Al-Baaji said: The words “So the people stopped reciting with the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in prayers in which the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) recited out loud, when they heard that” mean: They responded to his objection to their reciting the Quran in prayers in which the imam recites out loud by giving up what he told them not to do and by refraining from what he objected to them doing. This hadith is the foundation of the view of Maalik (may Allah have mercy on him), that the one who is praying behind an imam should not recite behind him in a prayer in which recitation is done out loud, because of the reason explained in the hadith for which the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) told people behind him not to recite when he was reciting out loud. So it seems that reciting out loud was the reason for that ruling.
The evidence for the soundness of Maalik’s view is the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“So, when the Quran is recited, listen to it, and be silent”
[al-A‘raaf 7:204].
This implies that all types of recitation and all types of talk are disallowed (when Quran is recited), and everyone should listen attentively when any reciter is reciting, unless there is any evidence for some exception.
Our evidence from the Sunnah is the report narrated by Abu Saalih from Abu Hurayrah, who said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “The imam is only appointed to be followed. So when he says takbeer, then say takbeer, and when he recites then listen attentively.” This is a command, and a command implies that something is obligatory.
Our evidence on the basis of analogy is that this is a case where others are following the imam, therefore the recitation is waived in the case of one who is following the imam.
End quote fromal-Muntaqa Sharh al-Muwatta’(1/161)
Our aim here is not to discuss all the views on this issue; rather our aim is to explain that Maalik and other leading scholars reached their conclusions after examining the religious texts; thus it became clear to them that a specific view was the correct view, while other scholars thought that another view was the correct view.
Ash-Shaafa‘i was of the view that it is obligatory for the one who is praying behind an imam to recite in all cases. Think about it. The hadith of Abu Hurayrah tells us that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “what is wrong with me that someone is fighting to wrest the Qur’an from me?” And in the hadith of ‘Ubaadah ibn as-Saamit, it says: We were behind the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in Fajr prayer, and the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) recited Qur’an and stumbled in his recitation. When he finished he said, “Perhaps you recite behind your imam?” We said, Yes. He said, “Do not do that, except for the Opening of the Book (al-Faaithah), for there is no prayer for the one who does not recite it.” Narrated by Abu Dawood (823).
This clearly indicates that it is not allowed to recite behind the imam in a prayer in which recitation is done out loud, except for al-Faatihah; it is excluded from the general instruction to listen attentively, because of the general meaning of the Prophet’s words: ““Whoever offers a prayer in which he does not recite the Essence of the Qur’an (al-Faatihah), it is deficient,” three times, “not complete.” Narrated by Muslim (395).
As for the practice of the people of Medina, that is subject to further discussion. Many of the Sahaabah in Madinah narrated that they recited behind the imam. An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: The practice of the majority of the Muslims is to recite behind the imam in prayers in which recitation is done silently and those in which recitation is done out loud. Al-Bayhaqi said: This is the most sound and prudent view. Then he narrated the hadiths about that, then he narrated that with numerous isnaads from ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab, ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib, ‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ood, Ubayy ibn Ka‘b, Mu‘aadh ibn Jabal, Ibn ‘Umar, Ibn ‘Abbaas, Abu’d-Darda’, Anas ibn Maalik, Jaabir ibn ‘Abdillah, Abu Sa‘eed al-Khudri, ‘Ubaadah ibn as-Saamit, Abu Hurayrah, Hishaam ibn ‘Aamir, ‘Imraan, ‘Abdullah ibn Mughaffil, and ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with them all). He said: We narrated it from a number of the Taabi‘een. And he narrated it from ‘Urwah ibn az-Zubayr, Mak-hool, ash-Shu‘bi, Sa‘eed ibn Jubayr and al-Hasan al-Basri (may Allah have mercy on them).
End quote fromal-Majmoo‘(3/365)
Thirdly:
What was said about this issue may be said about other controversial issues, such as holding the hands (on the chest) when standing in prayer. Indeed there is a report from Maalik which suggests that his view is the same as that of the majority.
Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar said: Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr said: There is no report from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) contrary to that, and it is the view of the majority of the Sahaabah and Taabi‘een. This is what Maalik narrated inal- Muwatta’, and Ibn al-Mundhir and others never narrated anything other than that from Maalik.
Ibn al-Qaasim narrated from Maalik that he used to hold his arms by his sides (when praying), and most of his followers adopted that view.
And it was narrated from Maalik that he differentiated between obligatory and naafil prayers (regarding the position of the hands when praying).
Some of them regarded it as disliked to hold the hands on the chest (when praying). Ibn al-Haajib narrated that this refers to when the worshipper holds his hands and leans on them in order to rest.
End quote fromFath al-Baari, 2/224
Fourthly:
Imam Abu Haneefah (may Allah have mercy on him) was one of the foremost scholars, and in terms of fiqh the scholars depend on his knowledge, as ash-Shaafa‘i (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
He had the utmost respect for the Qur’an and Sunnah, and did not say anything except on the basis of the conclusion he reached after examining the religious texts. So he will receive either a double or single reward (depending on whether his ijtihad was correct or not – the scholar is rewarded for his effort even if his conclusion is mistaken), in sha Allah. Perhaps he missed out on some reports of the Sunnah because he lived far away from Madinah; hence his two companions and his students may have differed from him regarding some issues, if they found out about some report of the Sunnah that did not reach him, and they may have differed from him when their examining of the religious texts led them to a conclusion different to his. We have not come across what you mentioned about one of his students regarding as saheeh the number of hadiths mentioned, etc.
For more information, please see the answers to questions no. 128658and 219303.
Our advice to you is to seek knowledge, and do not be distracted by differences of opinion among the leading scholars, for all of them are mujtahids who will be rewarded. Examining differences of opinion and the evidence on which views are based can only come after one has become well-versed in knowledge and attained a great deal of knowledge and prominence in many fields, such as Arabic language and usool al-fiqh.
We ask Allah to bless and guide us and you.
And Allah knows best.

PUBLISHERM.NajimudeeN. MD,IRI

Jokes

அமலா : என் புருசன் கூட சண்டை போட பயமா இருக்கு.
-
விமலா : அடிச்சுப் போடுவாரா?
-
அமலா : இல்ல சமையல்ல உப்ப அதிகமாப் போட்டு பழிவாங்குவாரு.
*
*
Our organization's MD's websites.
If likes visit once
Most useful Islamic and general informations availables.
So visit once. Thank you!
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• http:// aydnajimudeen.bl ogspot.com/?m=0
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
https:// mobile.facebook. com/ mNajimudeenBscIn dia/
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • —

Jokes

Share ::-

அமலா : என் புருசன் கூட சண்டை போட பயமா இருக்கு.
-
விமலா : அடிச்சுப் போடுவாரா?
-
அமலா : இல்ல சமையல்ல உப்ப அதிகமாப் போட்டு பழிவாங்குவாரு.
*
*
Our organization's MD's websites.
If likes visit once
Most useful Islamic and general informations availables.
So visit once. Thank you!
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • http:// aydnajimudeen.bl ogspot.com/?m=0
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
https:// mobile.facebook. com/ mNajimudeenBscIn dia/
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • —

PUBLISHERM.NajimudeeN. MD,IRI

Belief, Dought & clear,- * Commentary on the hadeeth, “No one who has an atom’s weight of faith in his heart will enter Hell”

I have heard that no one who has an atom's weight of faith in his
heart will enter Hell, and that the one who has an atom's weight of
arrogance in his heart will enter Paradise. Is this true?
-
Praise be to Allah.
What is indicated by the texts of the Qur'an and Sunnah, and the
consensus of the early generations of this ummah is that no one who
has an atom's weight of faith in his heart will abide in Hell for
eternity. If a Muslim who was a sinner died without repenting from his
sin, then his case will be decided by Allah: if He wills He will
pardon him, and if He wills He will punish him, but he will not abide
in Hell forever in any case.
Al-Bukhaari (44) and Muslim (193) narrated from Anas that the Prophet
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: "Whoever says Laa
ilaaha ill-Allah and has in his heart goodness the weight of a grain
of barley will be brought out of Hell, then whoever says Laa ilaaha
ill-Allah and has in his heart goodness the weight of a grain of wheat
will be brought out of Hell, then whoever says Laa ilaaha ill-Allah
and has in his heart goodness the weight of an atom (or a small ant)
will be brought out of Hell."
This idea is repeated in other hadeeths, the wording of which is similar.
With regard to your saying that no one who has an atom's weight of
faith in his heart will enter Hell, this is also proven, but some of
the scholars interpret it as meaning that such a one will not enter it
as the disbelievers do, i.e., he will not abide therein for eternity,
although he will may enter it. Thus this hadeeth may be reconciled
with the many texts that say that some of the sinners among the
believers will enter Hell even though they have faith in their hearts,
then they will be brought out by means of intercession and so on.
At-Tirmidhi (1999), Abu Dawood (4091) and Ibn Maajah (59) narrated
from 'Abdullah ibn Mas'ood that the Prophet (blessings and peace of
Allah be upon him) said: "No one will enter Paradise in whose heart is
an atom's weight of arrogance and no one will enter Hell in whose
heart is an atom's weight of faith." A man said: What if I like my
clothes to look nice and my shoes to look nice? He said: "Verily Allah
loves beauty; rather arrogance means rejecting the truth and looking
down on people."
Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh at-Tirmidhi.
Imam at-Tirmidhi (may Allah have mercy on him) said, after quoting
this hadeeth: Some of the scholars said, commenting on this hadeeth,
that no one who has an atom's weight of faith in his heart will enter
Hell; the only meaning is that they will not abide in the Fire
forever. This was narrated from Abu Sa'eed al-Khudri from the Prophet
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) who said: "Everyone in
whose heart there is an atom's weight of faith will be brought out of
Hell." More than one of the Taabi'een interpreted the verse
(interpretation of the meaning), "Our Lord! Verily, whomever You admit
to the Fire, indeed, You have disgraced him" [Aal 'Imraan 3:192] as
meaning: whomever You cause to abide forever in the Fire, indeed, You
have disgraced him. End quote.
With regard to the second sentence, in which you say, "that the one
who has an atom's weight of arrogance in his heart will not enter
Paradise", this is also proven, as in the hadeeth quoted above. It was
quoted by Muslim (91), with this sentence only, from 'Abdullah ibn
Mas'ood from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)
who said: "No one will enter Paradise in whose heart is an atom's
weight of arrogance." A man said: What if a man likes his clothes to
look nice and his shoes to look nice? He said: "Verily Allah is
Beautiful and loves beauty; arrogance means rejecting the truth and
looking down on people."
What this hadeeth means is that no one will enter Paradise without
being exposed to the possibility of requital or punishment; he may be
punished or he may be pardoned, unlike the obedient believer who is
free of this major sin, who will enter Paradise without being exposed
to the possibility of entering Hell.
An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said inSharh Muslim: Rather
the apparent meaning is that which was favoured by al-Qaadi 'Iyaad and
other scholars, which is that he will not enter Paradise without
bringing him to account and punishing him if He wills, or He may let
him off. Rather it is inevitable that all of those who affirm the
Oneness of Allah will enter Paradise, either initially or later on,
after some of those who committed major sins and died whilst
persisting in them have been punished. And it was said that he will
not enter Paradise with the pious in the first group to enter.
End quote.
To sum up:
What you asked about is the text of one or two saheeh hadeeths, the
meaning of which is as we have said. It is not correct for anyone to
imagine that it is impossible for the one who has an atom's weight of
faith in his heart to enter Hell no matter what major sins he has
committed, and he should not imagine that it is impossible for the
Muslim in whose heart there is an atom's weight of arrogance to enter
Paradise, no matter how great his faith.
Two groups of people did not understand these texts corectly, the
Khaarijis and the Murji'ah. The Khaarijis focused only on the texts
that contain the warning, such as the second hadeeth, and the Mujri'ah
focused only on the texts that contain the promise, such as the first
hadeeth. But Allah guided Ahl as-Sunnah wa'l-Jamaa'ah to the correct
view, which reconciles between the texts.
And Allah knows best.

Belief, Dought & clear,- * The hadeeth “Whoever says in Rajab ‘I ask Allah for forgiveness, there is no god but He’…” is fabricated and is not saheeh

This hadeeth came to me on my phone, and I want to know how sound it is:
it was narrated that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon
him) said: "Whoever says in Rajab 'I ask Allah for forgiveness, there
is no God but He alone, with no partner or associate, and I repent to
Him' one hundred times, and ends it with charity, Allah will decree
for him mercy and forgiveness. And whoever says it four hundred times,
Allah will decree for him the reward of one hundred martyrs."
-
Praise be to Allah.
There is no basis for this hadeeth in the books of Sunnah and reports,
and no narration is known for it with any of the scholars. Similarly,
we could not find it in the books which deal with false and fabricated
hadeeths.
Rather we found it in some of the books of the Shi'ah that are filled
with fabricated reports that are narrated without any isnaad or proof.
It was mentioned by Ibn Tawoos – 'Ali ibn Moosa ibn Ja'far (d. 664 AH)
– in his bookIqbaal al-A'maal(3/216). But we did not find any basis
for this hadeeth in any earlier book of the Shi'ah. Ibn Tawoos
mentioned it in a comment without any isnaad, and said:
Chapter on what we have mentioned about the virtue of seeking
forgiveness, repeating Laa ilaaha ill-Allah and repenting in the month
of Rajab. We found this narrated from the Prophet (may Allah send
blessings upon him and his family), that he said: "Whoever says in
Rajab 'I ask Allah for forgiveness, there is no God but He alone, with
no partner or associate, and I repent to Him' one hundred times, and
ends it with charity, Allah will decree for him mercy and forgiveness.
And whoever says it four hundred times, Allah will decree for him the
reward of one hundred martyrs, and when he meets Allah on the Day of
Resurrection, He will say to him: You affirmed My sovereignty, so wish
for whatever you want so that I may give it to you, for there is none
who prevails but Me."
It was transmitted from him in some of the other books, such
asWasaa'il ash-Shi'ah(10/484) by al-Hurr al-'Aamili (d. 1104 AH) and
others.
Thus the signs of fabrication in this hadeeth become clear:
Firstly:
The hadeeth is devoid of any isnaad.
Secondly:
It is only the books of the Raafidah that mention this hadeeth. From
their books the hadeeth has become well known in some Internet chat
rooms and websites. Hence it is essential to be cautious about many of
the hadeeths that are quoted in chat rooms when their sources are the
fabricated books of the Raafidis.
Thirdly:
The hadeeth has to do with the virtues of the month of Rajab. We must
be cautious about all reports that speak of this matter, because there
are so many fabricated reports concerning it that some of the scholars
wrote books dealing specifically with that, such as al-Haafiz Ibn
Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) in his bookTabyeen al-'Ajab bima
wurida fi Fadl Rajab. He (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
No saheeh hadeeth that is fit to be used as evidence has been narrated
concerning the virtue of the month of Rajab or of fasting that month
or any specific part of it, or praying qiyaam al-layl specifically
during that month. This has been stated categorically before me by
Imam Abu Ismaa'eel al-Harawi al-Haafiz, and we have narrated it from
him with a saheeh isnaad as we also narrated it from others. But it is
well known that the scholars are deviant in narrating hadeeths about
virtues, even if they are da'eef, so long as they are not fabricated.
Nevertheless we should stipulate that the one who does that should
believe that the hadeeth is da'eef and he should not make it
well-known, lest people act upon a da 'eef hadeeth and prescribe
something that is not prescribed, or lest some of the ignorant see
that and think that it is a saheeh Sunnah.
End quote fromTabyeen al-'Ajab(p. 11)
Fourthly:
Exaggeration about the reward, whereby a small deed in the month of
Rajab is said to bring the reward of one hundred martyrs and more.
Such as it is not narrated in the saheeh reports.
And Allah knows best.