The invalidity of the claim that new species evolve every year

Celal Şengör has claimed that 40,000 species disappear every year and
that 1,000 new species evolve to replacethem. But the idea that new
species evolve is an invalid one.
It is true that new species are discovered every year. There may betwo
explanations of this:
Newly discovered species may be one that already exist but have never
been encounteredbefore. Indeed, the regions where such species are
discovered are arid lands, distant oceans or the sea bed, where no
research has been conducted before. These species that emerge as new
research is performed, are very probably ones that have been around
for years but that no one has come across before.
A second possibility is that these new species have just been created.
Allah's creation out of nothing takes place out of human sight, where
itcannot be seen. (Allah knows the truth.) Allah creates as a
miracle. But unless He wills otherwise, nothing of this kind happens
beforepeople's eyes, in a zoo, for instance.
Two important points need to be clarified here:
This is that if it is to be claimed that the species in question have
evolved, we should also be able to find species inthe course of
evolving, alongside these perfectlydeveloped ones. A thousand new
species a year is a large number, and the signs of this supposed
evolution should be visible. But there is not the slightest evidence
of this. All the life forms discovered arecomplete, perfect and
flawless.
Second, the living things described as new species are usually
variations . Darwinists frequently engage in propaganda and describe
variations as "species." The fact is that the newly discovered life
form carries information of the frog that has been living for 200
million years. This is no new life form. No new information has been
added to the frogs we are already familiar with, and they have not
turned into a new species somehow different from the frog. This
difference is nothing more than that between a white man and a black
man.
The purple-patterned atelopus frog newly discovered in Surinam may
differ in terms of appearance and pattern,but it is simply a variation
of normal frog species. It is not a new species, as has been claimed
in Darwinist publications. In terms of its anatomical structure it is
identical to the frog below, which dates backsome 200 million years.
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

The invalidity of the claim that man's ancestors lived in caves

Celal Şengör claimed in the program that humanbeings' ancestors were
primitive, cave-dwelling creatures. This is the "stone age" deception
put about for many years in order to be able to impose the idea of
evolution.
All the evidence for perfect civilizations existing tens of thousands
of years ago has been discovered in various archeological excavations.
But timber, of course, does not survive for tens of thousands of
years. It is oxidized by iron and rots. What remains from those times
is generally stone and bone. Lookingat these, Darwinists thenclaim
that odd-looking humanoid types lived primitive lives at a time they
refer to as the "stone age." The fact is though, that even if all
that has come down from that time is stone and bone, the evidence that
a perfect civilizationexisted at that time has still survived. Flute,
needle and many other discoveries from the time of the human race
Darwinists refer to as theNeanderthals all refute these claims. A
flute dating back 60,000 yearshas been shown to produce perfect notes
and half-notes. A needle made out of bone, on the other hand, is
exceedingly straight andhas a hole for thread to be passed through. It
is of course impossible to describe as primitive people who enjoyed
music and had a clothingculture such as to require the services of a
sewing needle. For moredetails, see http://www.thestoneage.org - -
▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

The invalidity of the claim that the idea that whales evolved from bears did not originate with Darwin

Since they are unable to account for a mammal that lives in the sea,
Darwinists are unable to invent a scenario that might account for the
existence of the whale. They merely make do with claiming that a
land-dwelling life form returned to the sea. Darwin claimed that
whales evolved from bears hunting small insects on dry land. But Celal
Şengör rejected this embarrassing claim on Darwin's behalf, saying
that no such thing had ever appearedin any edition of Darwin's book.
But the fact is that in the first, 1865 edition of his The Origin of
Species , Darwin wrote:
"In North America the black bear was seen . . . swimming for hours
with widely open mouth, thus catching, like a whale, insects in the
water. Even in so extreme a case as this, if the supply of insects
were constant, and if better adapted competitors did not already exist
in the country, I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being
rendered, by natural selection, more and more aquatic in their
structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature
was produced as monstrous as a whale."( The Origin of Species , 1st
edition, chapter 6, p. 184)
This passage was removed from later editions of the book, buthe
regretted its removal.In one of his letters he said:
"I still maintain that there is no special difficulty in a bear's
mouth being enlarged to any degree useful to its changing habits." (
More Letters of Charles Darwin , Francis Darwin, 1903, p. 162)

--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

Women In Traditional Jewish Society

Women in traditional Jewish society were not more fortunate than those
previously described.
In the Old Testament women were described as follows: "I applied mine
heart to know and to search, and to seek out wisdom, and the reason of
things, and to know the wickedness of folly, even of foolishness and
madness: And I find more bitter than death the woman, whose heart
snares and nets, and her hands as bands...
[Ecclesiastes(7:25-26)]
In the Septuagint, it says, "And if a man sells his daughter to be a
maidservant, she shall not go outas the menservants do. If she pleases
not her master, who has betrothed her to himself, then shall he let
her be redeemed: to sell her unto a strange nation he shall have no
power, seeing he has dealt deceitfully with her. And if he had
betrothed her unto his son, he shall deal with her after the manner of
daughters. If he takes him another wife, her food, her raiment, and
her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish. If he does not do these
three unto her, then shall she go out free without money".
[Exodus (21:7-11)]
Thus, if a Jewish woman got married, her guardianship was transferred
from her father to her husband and she became as one of his
possessions such as hishouse, his slave, his maidservant or his money
or wealth. Jewish teachings and laws deprived the girl of her father's
inheritance if the father had other male children. In the Old
Testament, the Septuagint, it says:
"And thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel, 'If a man dies, and
has no son, then ye shall cause his inheritance to pass unto his
daughters'."
[Numbers (27:8)]
Moreover, Jewish men never sleptin the same bed with a menstruating
woman, or ate with her or drank with her. Jewish men used to isolate
themselves fully from a menstruating woman until she was completely
free from her menses. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -