1,5 million year old footprints is a brand new, shocking, severe blow to the imaginary evolution

The 21st century is the century when the collapse of Darwinism is
declared. Following the unveiling of 100 million fossils declaring the
collapse of Darwinism, the greatest blow to the theory is a newly
found human foot print fossil. Contrary to all the Darwinist claims,
this fossil indicates that CONTEMPORARY MAN WAS LIVING 1,5 MILLION
YEARS AGO
Darwinist scientists who uncovered the fossil agree that the fossil
theydiscovered in Kenya is THE SAME WITH THE CONTEMPORARY MAN. Among
the foot prints discovered, there is also one belonging to a child.The
measurements madeaccording to the size of the foot print, gaps between
fingers and thedepth of the earth revealthat the particular feet
print, which was discussed in Science magazine and then in news
channels such as Reuters and BBC News , belongs to a human being of
1.79-1.80 (5 feet 9 inches). The very same measurements alsomake it
possible to understand the weight, stride length and the gait. ALL
THESE MEASUREMENTS MADE ON THE FOOTPRINT REVEALED THOSE OF THE
CONTEMPORARY MAN. 1
As is also understood from the footprint, the thumb of this person, AS
IS THE CASE WITH CONTEMPORARY MAN, is parallel to other fingers. These
prints had an arch in the foot THE WAY CONTEMPORARY MAN HAS and short
fingers DEFINITELY CERTIFY UPRIGHT POSITION. 2
David Braun, a researcher of the South Africa Cape Town University,
states the following about the fossil:
"It was kind of creepy excavating these things to see all of a sudden
something that looks so dramatically like something that you yourself
could have made 20 minutes earlier in some kind of wet sediment just
next to thesite,"
Braun added:
"These could quite easilyhave been made on the beach today."
This fact, which is openlyconfessed by Darwinist scientists and
Darwinists publications, is not likelyto be rejected. Claiming until
presence that contemporary man appeared on Earth 200,000 years ago,
Darwinists made up an imaginary scenario of evolution and made
speculations upon it. However this foot print dating back to 1.5
million years, has the potency to remove all Darwinist speculations.
There are millions of fossils refuting Darwinism. However, as is
seen openly, even a single one of them has the potency to totally
eliminate this obsolete theory.
It is High Time DarwinistsShould Put an End to Homo Erectu s Hoax
Despite this definite, clear and perfect fact, some of the Darwinist
publications have not neglected to continue evolutionist propaganda,
which theyhave made a tradition of, and claimed that these footprints
belong to Homo Erectus . HOWEVER, THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT LIE.
Homo Erectus story is thefalse ring required by the fraudulent
sequence made up by Darwinists for the imaginary evolution of man.
Darwinists deceived people for years by placing Austrolapitecus ,
which is in its real sense an ape lineage, in this imaginary sequence,
and Homo Erectus , which is no different from contemporary man,between
man and ape.
The most important references of evolutionists in calling Homo Erectus
"primitive"are its skull's volume (900-1100 cc.), which is smaller
than contemporary man's average skull volume, and its thick eyebrow
protrusion. However, there are also many people living in our day
having the same average skull volume with Homo Erectus (for instance,
pigmy) and there are also eyebrow protrusions in various races. (for
instance Australian Aborigines). Itis a known fact that intelligence
changes not according to the brain's volume but according to the
organization within the brain. Consequently, it is not possible to
label Homo Erectus as "primitive."
In this particular example it is clear that readers are face to face
with Darwinist propaganda. The fossil in question is a footprint. We
can understand the basic features of the living being mentioned above
from the footprint and itprovides important information. However, itis
not possible to determine the skull volume of a human or the thickness
of eyebrow protrusion from this footprint. As mentioned before, even
if the living being possesses the features inquestion, this will not
show that it is different from contemporary man.It will only show that
it isthe same with one of theraces in our day, that is all.
Homo Erectus story is an outdated claim that is not even advocated by
Darwinists themselves. Making up such a great lie even in the case of
such an important footprint fossil related tothe fraudulent nature of
the story of the evolution of man, simplymeans to disdain readers and
scientists, and is a grave accusation directed toward them. The
scientific evidence refuting Darwinism will no longer be removed with
the same fake methods.
Conclusion:
The process that began with the emergence of 100 million fossils
proving Creation, which Darwinists strive to hide with care, is going
on today with acceleration. The scenario of human evolution Darwinists
try to inculcate in people's minds for years by displaying fake skull
s hasended in an amazing defeat. By the hands of Darwinist scientists,
Allahunearthed an extraordinary evidence from the soil. In an
undeniable way, Allah showed them that no living being, including
human beings, has ever changed. Darwinist scientists have
confessedthis in Darwinist publications in their own words. Allah,
with His name al-Jabbar (The Powerful, the Irresistible) made them
confess Darwinism's collapse. THIS IS AN INEVITABLE END OF DARWINISM.
THIS IS THE PROMISE OF OUR LORD. The Glorious Allah will eliminate
this deviant hoax and definitely solidify the truth.
... By His Words Allah wipes out the false and confirms the truth. He
knows what the heart contains. (Surat ash-Shura, 24)
1 http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE51P82420090227?feedType=nl&feedName=usmorningdigest
2 http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE51P82420090227?feedType=nl&feedName=usmorningdigest
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ -
-

The Vatican has surrendered to Darwinists

The Vatican, the symbol of Christianity, HAS OFFICIALLY SURRENDERED TO
THE DARWINIST DICTATORSHIP.
Instead of praising Almighty Allah (God), introducing the
beautiescreated by Him and joyfully reaching out to people and
remembering our Lord as the One and Only by showing Allah's sublime
creative power, THE VATICAN IS MAKING PROPAGANDA FOR DARWINISM, which
is currently leading the world toward atheism and a system of
repression.
The Vatican HAS SUBMITTED TO THE THREATS OF THE DARWINIST
DICTATORSHIP,which has taken over the whole world with threats and
despotism.
The way the Vatican plays host to Darwinist propaganda is truly
disgraceful. Not only has the Vatican hosted the best-known
representatives of Darwinist propaganda and supported their ideas, it
has also led the way IN SILENCING proponents of Creation during an
activity it arranged under the name of a scientific conference. At
this conference, held at the Vatican and the scene of evident and
blatant atheist propaganda, PROPONENTS OF THE FACT OF CREATION WERE
PREVENTED FROM TAKING PART, THE MICROPHONE WAS TAKEN AWAY FROM
PROPONENTS OF CREATIONwho wished to ask questions during the
proceedings, and those people WERE EVEN ESCORTED OUT OF THE HALL. The
only reason forthis utterly unscientific and despotic behavior is that
Darwinists cannot tolerate the question "Do you have a single piece of
transitional fossil evidence?" that they have no answer to give to it
AND HAVE BEEN DEFINITELY VANQUISHED IN THE FACE OF IT. Under the
effect of their total rout, Darwinists sought asolution in completely
uncivilized behavior andimagined that they could secure victory, not
with scientific evidence, but by taking microphones away and trying to
have their intellectual adversaries thrown out of the conference hall.
According to the Reuters report, however, "charges of censorship,
undemocratic and unacademic behaviour began flying," and the Vatican
blatantly sided with Darwinism instead of with faith in Allah.
The Vatican is making a terrible mistake by playing host to such major
Darwinist propaganda. Terrified by the threats of Freemasons, atheists
andcircles intent on inflicting irreligiousness and oppression on the
world, it defended a deviant religion instead of the truth. It made
the mistake of thinking that these forces that act out of falsehood
are actuallyvery powerful. Yet they failed to consider that they have
no power at all in the face of the Omnipotence of Almighty Allah, and
that they are supporting a cause that has been defeated right from the
very start. And the Vatican IS FALLING INTO AGRAVE ERROR with that
attitude. It has rocked true believers' trust in it. The whole world
now knows, through the evidence provided in the Atlas of Creation ,
that evolution is a lie. By claiming that evolution is not
incompatible with Christianity and, moreover, being a mere spectator
to the silencing of proponents of Creation by the Darwinist
dictatorship inits own home, the Vatican has attracted thecriticism of
the whole Christian world.
Almighty Allah will definitely protect sincerebelievers who strive on
His path and definitely grant them victory. The Vatican, which has
forgotten this under pressure from a superstitious ideology, must put
matters right. Itmust not forget that no power other than Allah can
bestow any good or harm, and it must espouse belief in Allah by
opposing Darwinism.
Darwinists imagine they can succeed with these sinister plains aimed
against the Christian world. Yet all their activities of this kind
have always ended in people turning to Allah and embracing Him more
closely. Indeed, that seems to be what is happening now from the
global reactions to the Vatican. Darwinists and those across the world
who have undertaken to espouse Darwinism and atheism HAVE BEEN ROUTED.
By Allah's leave, they will see the signs of that defeat in an even
more powerful manner in the days ahead. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

How can Dawkins explain the perfect eye in our brains?

The main reason why Darwin said, "the thought of the eye mademe cold
all over" is the fact he had no explanation to offer in the face of
the eye's extraordinary complexity. But the fact is that Darwin knew
verylittle about the eye. Genetics had not been discovered in his day,
there were no electron microscopes and nobodyeven dreamed what
microbiology was to reveal. Subsequent scientific advances revealed
the extraordinary structure of the eye in all its glory. Since even
the level of knowledge of the 19th century was sufficient toalarm
Darwin, who knows what he would have done had he known what we know
today.
Modern-day Darwinists are silent in the face of this extraordinarily
complex structure. Underthe burden of this defeat, the atheist Richard
Dawkins is trying to supposedly offer an explanation for the
complexity of the eye. He maintains that an organ such as the eye,
which possesses irreducible complexity and can only function when 40
components are all present and fully formed, can actually function if
not fully formed, despite this being scientifically impossible.
The fact is that the eye ceases to function entirely even in the
absence of ocular fluid alone. It is deprived of all function if there
are no eyelashes, no oil producing glands inside the eye or if the
optical focusing function ceases.If the eye is to function as an eye
it is essential that it have its perfect structure together with all
its component parts.
However, the really essential matter, and that which inflicts the
greatest defeat on Darwinists when it comes to the eye, is that IT IS
NOT IN FACT THE EYE THAT SEES AT ALL. Dawkins and other Darwinists
appear quite certain that it is the eye that sees and seek to bring a
materialist explanation to bear. But they are mistaken.
It is the photon that strikes the eye, and an electric signal that
travels from the eye to the brain. Departing from the eye, the
electricsignal reaches an area the size of a lentil known as the
visual cortex. And an image forms in this lentil-sized area. THERE IS
AN EYE thatsees the image that forms here. AND THAT "EYE" IS THE
ACTUAL PERFECT EYE. That eye sees the electricity reaching it. And it
perceives it with a perfect sense of depth, vividly, in motion and in
three dimensions, in bright colors and flawlessly. Yet that area is
totally dark. The place the signal is transmitted to, the visual
cortex and the interior of the brain are all in pitch darkness. But
the eye there sees a vivid image, clearer and more perfect than any
produced by even the most advanced technology. And it interprets these
images, feels sadness, joy, love and liking, performs analyses,
remembers things and draws conclusions. How is Dawkins supposed to
account for this eye?
It is impossible for Dawkins to account for itat all.
That is because the eye that perceives this moving, colored and
three-dimensional worldin our brains is OUR SOUL . The soul is
completely metaphysical and cannotbe explained in terms of any
material concept. That is why materialists, atheists and Darwinists,
who seek to account for the existence of the soul and everything in
material terms are in a state of panic. The soul bestowed on human
beings by Allah (God) totally demolishes Darwinism and all
intellectual systems espoused by Darwinists. That is why all atheists,
such as Dawkins, avoid all face-to-face discussion of the subject.It
is understandable for them to seek a solution by avoiding the issue
because they will alwaysbe defeated in the face of the perfection of
the seeing eye in our brains and the soul created by Allah.

--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

Fathwa - She took Khul' from her husband after spending all her earnings on him

Question
I have separted from my husband throgh khoula 3years before. after 24
years we lived together.we have 2 daughters. within 6 months he got
his secondmarriage and now his second wife delivered a boy. my both
daughters married. I am a working lady and i have spent all earning
with him and bought 2 houses which isunder his name. because of khula
i could not claimany maint. fees from him.now he is inviting me to
re-union and promising he will look after me. but he refused to give
any property on my name. because of his short temperd and making
problems always at homeand beating when he was angry i got separated
him. i feel alone and even now also i am always remembering him. is
there any sin for me afterdivorce and he got second marriage still i
amremembering him? now he got a son so my daughters will not get any
share from his property if he is not willing to give anything for them
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
, is His Slave and Messenger.
We have previously pointed out that Khul' is one irrevocable divorce;
so please refer to Fatwa 88502 . The irrevocably divorced woman
(unless she is pregnant) is not entitled to maintenance and her
husband cannot take her back except with a new marriage contract
because he has become a stranger to her. If the wife remembering her
husband after minor irrevocable divorce means her desire to return to
him and the like, then there is nothing wrong with that.However, if
what is meant is imagining sexual intercourse with him, then this is
not permissible. As for returning to him, you should not hasten to do
that as long as he used totreat you in that bad manner. If you want
that,then consult some wise people in that regard and offer prayer of
Istikhaarah (seeking guidance) to your Lord The Almighty and He will
choose for you what implies all good, Allaah Willing. For more
benefit,kindly refer to Fatwa 81434 about how to offerprayer of
Istikhaarah.
We would like to draw attention to some matters:
Firstly, if the wife helped her husband in building the house
voluntarily, then it is not permissible for her to ask him to
reimburse her for what she had spent. But if she spent on building the
house as a real partner, then she owns from the house a share in
accordance with what she had spent.
Secondly, if what the wife spent on her husband or on herself and her
children was a kind of donation and gift, then she has no right to ask
him to reimburse her for what she had spent. But if that was a loan,
then she can ask him to pay it back to her. It is her word that counts
in this regard and she has to take oath.
However, the cases of dispute can be settled through the Islamic
courts or the authorities that are specialized in looking into matters
of Muslims in the non-Muslim countries such as the Islamic Centers
because the matter needs investigation, more information and the like.
Thirdly, the husband should not prefer one of his children to the
others with a gift except with a sound reason. All childrenhave right
in the property he leaves after his death. It is not permissible to
deprive anyone of them from his share; be them males or females.
Allaah The Almighty says (what means): { Allaah instructs you
concerning your children: for the male, what is equal to the share of
two females. } [Quran 4:11]
Allaah Knows best. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -