'' Our Lord ! grant us good in this world and good in the hereafter and save us from the torment of the Fire '' [Ameen]
-
{in Arab} :->
Rabbanaa aatinaa fid-dunyaa hasanatan wafil aakhirati hasanatan waqinaa 'athaaban-naar/-
(Surah Al-Baqarah ,verse 201)
Share 
all over" is the fact he had no explanation to offer in the face of
the eye's extraordinary complexity. But the fact is that Darwin knew
verylittle about the eye. Genetics had not been discovered in his day,
there were no electron microscopes and nobodyeven dreamed what
microbiology was to reveal. Subsequent scientific advances revealed
the extraordinary structure of the eye in all its glory. Since even
the level of knowledge of the 19th century was sufficient toalarm
Darwin, who knows what he would have done had he known what we know
today.
Modern-day Darwinists are silent in the face of this extraordinarily
complex structure. Underthe burden of this defeat, the atheist Richard
Dawkins is trying to supposedly offer an explanation for the
complexity of the eye. He maintains that an organ such as the eye,
which possesses irreducible complexity and can only function when 40
components are all present and fully formed, can actually function if
not fully formed, despite this being scientifically impossible.
The fact is that the eye ceases to function entirely even in the
absence of ocular fluid alone. It is deprived of all function if there
are no eyelashes, no oil producing glands inside the eye or if the
optical focusing function ceases.If the eye is to function as an eye
it is essential that it have its perfect structure together with all
its component parts.
However, the really essential matter, and that which inflicts the
greatest defeat on Darwinists when it comes to the eye, is that IT IS
NOT IN FACT THE EYE THAT SEES AT ALL. Dawkins and other Darwinists
appear quite certain that it is the eye that sees and seek to bring a
materialist explanation to bear. But they are mistaken.
It is the photon that strikes the eye, and an electric signal that
travels from the eye to the brain. Departing from the eye, the
electricsignal reaches an area the size of a lentil known as the
visual cortex. And an image forms in this lentil-sized area. THERE IS
AN EYE thatsees the image that forms here. AND THAT "EYE" IS THE
ACTUAL PERFECT EYE. That eye sees the electricity reaching it. And it
perceives it with a perfect sense of depth, vividly, in motion and in
three dimensions, in bright colors and flawlessly. Yet that area is
totally dark. The place the signal is transmitted to, the visual
cortex and the interior of the brain are all in pitch darkness. But
the eye there sees a vivid image, clearer and more perfect than any
produced by even the most advanced technology. And it interprets these
images, feels sadness, joy, love and liking, performs analyses,
remembers things and draws conclusions. How is Dawkins supposed to
account for this eye?
It is impossible for Dawkins to account for itat all.
That is because the eye that perceives this moving, colored and
three-dimensional worldin our brains is OUR SOUL . The soul is
completely metaphysical and cannotbe explained in terms of any
material concept. That is why materialists, atheists and Darwinists,
who seek to account for the existence of the soul and everything in
material terms are in a state of panic. The soul bestowed on human
beings by Allah (God) totally demolishes Darwinism and all
intellectual systems espoused by Darwinists. That is why all atheists,
such as Dawkins, avoid all face-to-face discussion of the subject.It
is understandable for them to seek a solution by avoiding the issue
because they will alwaysbe defeated in the face of the perfection of
the seeing eye in our brains and the soul created by Allah.
--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
No comments:
Post a Comment