The deception that 'there are tons of transitional fossils and that dinosaur species represent transitional fossils'

Asked "Are there any transitional fossils?" CelalŞengör gave the
astonishing reply that there are "tons" of transitional fossils and
that ALL dinosaurs represent transitional fossils. This unexpected
reply IS A BLATANT DECEIT.
As we have explained and demonstrated many times before, fully 100
million fossils have been extracted from the layersof the earth, BUT
NOT ONE IS A TRANSITIONAL FORM FOSSIL . All the 100 million fossils
discoveredhave remained the samefor millions of years and are
IDENTICAL to living things today THAT HAVE NEVER CHANGED AT ALL. These
100 million fossils, hidden away for years by Darwinists because they
proved this evident truth, have been revealed to the whole world and
the whole world has been convinced by them. By means of Atlas of
Creation , the whole world has now seen thatNOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL
FORM FOSSIL EXISTS AND THAT LIVING THINGS HAVE REMAINED UNCHANGED
FORMILLIONS OF YEARS.
It is of course impossible for Celal Şengör to be unaware of all this.
He knows there are no transitional form fossils and that this has
been made clear to the whole world. Indeed, the extravagant claim he
makes that there exist "tons" of intermediate form is due to the
severenature of this great defeat.
There is no doubt that Celal Şengör is also aware of Mr. Adnan Oktar's
challenge that "a 10 trillion New Turkish Lira prize" will be given to
anyone coming up with transitional fossil. Yet for some reason he
isreluctant to produce even one of the transitional fossils he
maintains exist in their "tons." That is because THERE ARE NO SUCH
TRANSITIONAL FORM FOSSILS . The sole reason,of course, for his
fantastical claim is that this is a demagogic Darwinist technique, a
way of influencing young people with groundless claims rather than
scientific evidence. But the fact of which Celal Şengör is as yet
unaware is that Turkish society is no longer influenced by
demagoguery. Young people in particular have seen and examinedthe
scientific facts for themselves and are aware that these all prove the
fact of Creation.
In regard to this claim about these fictitious "tons" of intermediate
form fossils, Celal Şengörsurprisingly seeks to depict "the whole
dinosaur super class," as evidence. Şengör, who declares that all
dinosaur species with their perfect structures are "transitional
forms," openly maintains that these animals, which areobviously
reptiles and have reptilian features "are not reptiles and are not
birds, either." The aim here is to mislead his audience about
theseextinct life forms. This is a general Darwinist tactic. In their
claims about non-existent transitional form fossils, Darwinists always
use extinct life forms they can speculate about. Celal Şengör must
have thought that extinct dinosaurs were an excellent candidate on
this subject since he defines the whole class as transitional fossils.
The fact is that these magnificent and perfect life forms from the
Jurassic Period have left behind perfect fossil specimens and are
extraordinary marvels ofCreation EXHIBITING NO TRANSITIONAL
CHARACTERISTICS WHATSOEVER. Şengör thought he could deceive the young
people opposite him with this claim; but he was mistaken.
Şengör's first piece of speculation regarding dinosaurs was an
impossible though most amusing claim, that dinosaurs turned into
birds. This is a deceptionbecause;
- Darwinists' greatest dilemma in trying to explain the supposed
evolution of birds, is the existence of the 150-million-year-old
Archaeopteryx , a perfectflying bird from a time when dinosaurs lived.
- Darwinists only claim that some dinosaurs are intermediate forms
by saying that feather-like structures exist. The fact is, however,
that all the animals they make theseclaims about were perfectly formed
dinosaurs. In addition, it has emerged that the structures they claim
"resemble feathers" are completely bogus. Fossilized membranous
structures have constantly been made the subject of Darwinist
speculation. It is impossible for Darwinists to point to another
supposed transitional form characteristic "belonging to a bird" in
perfect reptile dinosaur fossils. Since the claim that "feathers are
present" is one that is very much open to interpretation and
conjecture, they claim tohave found a few feather-like remains in
agiant reptile and then raise this as if it were scientific evidence
in all the scientific journals under the monopoly of the Darwinist
dictatorship. And indeed, people were taken in by the " feathered
dinosaur " deceit for decades.
- All the fossils brought to the fore on this subject have been
proved with clear and irrefutable scientific evidence to have no
feather structures . An article called "Plucking the Feathered
Dinosaur" that appeared in Science magazine made it clear that the
structures Darwinists depicted as feathers in the best known of these
claims actually had nothing to do with feathers at all.
- The best known fossil that has been attemptedto be passed of as a
transitional form, T. rex ,
Was a 12-meter-tall,
stocky,
cold blooded,
terrestrial life form that was covered in scales.
It is impossible for this life form to turn into a bird, the largest
of which is no bigger than the albatross'
has light bones, is covered in feathers, is warm-blooded, has a lung
structure that permits air to flow in only one direction and possesses
aerodynamic features, all through random mutations.
- The latest attempt on the subject was that made to launch
Epidexipteryx as a feathered dinosaur. Darwinists interpreted a long,
two-paired structure on its back as feather stalks in the process of
evolution. Thefact though that this structure, as described ina BBC
report, is a soft sheath with a membranous structure. It has nothing
in the least to do with feathers.
The Darwinist Professor Alan Feduccia, the most highly regarded
ornithologist in the world, says this about the myth of dinosaurs
evolving into birds:
" Well, I've studied bird skulls for 25 years and I don't see any
similaritieswhatsoever. I just don't see it . . . . The [theory of]
theropod origins of birds, in my opinion, willbe THE GREATEST
EMBARRASSMENT of paleontology of THE 20 TH CENTURY." 1
"There are insurmountable problems with that theory. . . Beyond what
we have just reported, there is the time problem in that superficially
bird-like dinosaurs occurred some25 million to 80 million years after
the earliest known bird, which is 150 million years old. 2
" IT'S BIOPHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to evolve flight from such large
bipeds with foreshortened forelimbs and heavy, balancing tails. " 3
___________________________
1 New Scientist, 1 February 1997,p. 28
2 David Williamson, "Scientist says ostrich study confirms bird
'hands' unlike those of dinosaurs", UNC News, no. 425, 14 August 2002
3 Ann Gibbons, "New Feathered Fossil Brings Dinosaurs and
BirdsCloser", Science, no. 274, 1996, pp. 720-721. - - ▓███▓
Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -