STORY - ~ There Is No Such Thing as the “First Self-reproducing Molecule That Gave Rise to Life”

The scenario regarding lifethat Darwinists have been rehearsing ever
since Darwin's time begins with a mythical "first cell" that
supposedly came into being spontaneously. This mythical first cell;
Was described in Darwin's day as "a small balloon filled with water,"
because under the primitive conditions of thetime, nobody even knew
what the cell really lookedlike.
It was irrationally suggested that this alleged first cell came into
being spontaneously in water.
It was claimed that all the varieties of life developed from this
first cell that came into being by chance.
Enormous scientific progress was subsequently made in the 20th Century
and the structure of the cell was fully revealed. It was realized
that;
A single cell has a more complex structure than the city of New York.
That it was impossible foreven a single protein inside the cell, let
alone a cell itself, to come about spontaneously.
The idea that the cell came into being in muddy water is therefore
scientifically illogical and impossible.
These facts caused a terrible panic among Darwinists. The fact that
the theory of evolution had collapsed RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING OF LIFE
totally demoralized them. They wanted to conceal this fact. They set
about using the press and universities. "We can probably manufacture
protein in laboratories andare conducting experiments," they said.
"There are hypotheses that life began from a single cell," they said.
"We will prove our claims eventually," they said. But nothing changed
over the next 150 years and no evolutionary claim was ever proved. On
the contrary, every new scientific advance has proven that no protein
canever come into being by chance.
Why Do Evolutionists in Turkey Still Espouse Claims That Darwinists
Elsewhere Have Abandoned?
Stunned by a succession ofscientific defeats, Darwinists recently,
under the leadership of Richard Dawkins, began speaking of a supposed
"self-reproducing molecule." But even this did not rescue the
position, and even Dawkins had to publicly admit the illogicalnature
of the claim, and thus that such a creation could only be brought
intobeing by a sublime intelligence.
Yes despite all these facts and scientific advances, evolutionists in
Turkey insist on repeating the idea. They reiterate such illogical and
unscientific ideas as, "We cannot speak of an advanced life form, but
we speak of an organization progressing toward life," "...the first
self-replicating molecule created life," or "....life emerging from
inanimate matter is the result of the laws of nature, and there is
nothing to discuss aboutit." The reason for this is that these people
are unable to divorce themselves from the old, fraudulent evolutionist
conception of science.
There Is No Such Thing as a First Self-reproducing Molecule
Since Darwinists are unable to account for howa protein might have
formed spontaneously, they claim that the beginning of life was "a
first molecule capable of self-reproducing." First of all, there is no
such thing as a "self-reproducing molecule." If this moleculewas a
protein, the smallestunits inside the living cell, then it must be
borne in mind that proteins themselves have no "self-reproductive"
property. In order for a protein to be able to self-replicate, IT
NEEDS
Other proteins
DNA
Ribosomes
Endoplasmic reticulum
Cytoplasm
Energy manufacturing mitochondria
And the cell membrane.
IN SHORT,
A FULLY EQUIPPED CELL.
Therefore, the idea of a "self-reproducing molecule" is totally
fraudulent. It is impossiblefor a molecule not inside aliving cell to
be able to take in energy from the outside and use it to replicate
itself . To refer to this as "an organization progressing toward life"
isdemagoguery and a deliberate distraction. "Organization progressing
toward life" is a totally illogical term. The smallestliving thing is
"a CELL." Only a cell and the structures inside it can self-reproduce.
Only a cell can take in energy from the outside and use it. Only a
cell can maintain itsown existence through its own organelles and the
energy it takes in from theoutside.
To put it another way, there can be no supposed stages progressing
from the inanimate toward life .LIFE CAN NEVER COME FROMSOMETHING
INANIMATE. THAT IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. IT IS SCIENCE THAT SAYS
THIS, PROVEN, CONCLUSIVE, SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS. When Darwinists say,
"....there is scientific evidence that lifeformed from inanimate
matter," they are not speaking the truth.

--
:-> :->