Hadees

gb

Share ::-

- -

-















அனஸ் (ரலி) அவர்கள் கூறியதாவது:நபி (ஸல்) அவர்களின் தோழர்களில் சிலர் நபியவர்களின் துணைவியரிடம் (சென்று)- நபியவர்கள்தனிமையில் செய்யும் வழிபாடுகள் குறித்துவினவினர். (அவர்கள் கூறிய மறுமொழியைக் கேட்ட பின் நபியவர்கள் செய்யும்வழிபாடுகளைக் குறைவாக எண்ணிக்கொண்டு) அவர்களில் ஒருவர்-"நான் பெண்களை மணமுடிக்கமாட்டேன்" என்று சொன்னார். மற்றொருவர் "நான் புலால் உண்ண மாட்டேன்" என்றார். இன்னொருவர்- "நான் படுக்கையில் உறங்கமாட்டேன்" என்றார். (இதை அறிந்த) நபி (ஸல்) அவர்கள் இறைவனை வாழ்த்திப் போற்றிவிட்டு-"சிலருக்கு என்ன நேர்ந்தது? அவர்கள் இப்படியெல்லாம் கூறுகின்றனர். ஆனால்- நான் (இரவில்) தொழுகிறேன்; உறங்கவும் செய்கிறேன். நோன்பும் நோற்கிறேன்; நோன்பை விட்டு விடவும் செய்கிறேன். பெண்களை மணந்தும் கொள்கிறேன். என் வழிமுறையை எவர் புறக்கணிக்கிறாரோ அவர் என்னைச் சார்ந்தவர் அல்லர்" என்றார்கள்.[ ஹதீஸ் -











-
-
:: Share ::

- - - -

-

Names and Attributes of Allaah, Dought & clear, - * The unseen belongs entirely to Allah, then Allah discloses to whomever He wills of His slaves whatever He wills of His unseen

gb

Share ::-

- -

-


In surah Luqman is said:
[Verily Allah, with Him (Alone) is the knowledge of the Hour, He sends down the rain, and knows that which is in the wombs. No person knows what he will earn tomorrow, and no person knows in what land he will die. Verily, Allah is All-Knower, All-Aware (of things).] [31: 34].
Does this ayah means that this five things knows only Allah and that He did not reveal some of these five things even to prophets ?
For example do we say that even prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, was not informed in which land he will die, or we do not ask about it ? I hope so you understand my question, I want to ask are these five things excluded from ayah:
["(He Alone) the All-Knower of the Ghâib (unseen), and He reveals to none His Ghâ'ib (unseen)." Except to a Messenger (from mankind) whom He has chosen (He informs him of unseen as much as He likes), …] [72: 26-27]. ?
-
Praise be to Allah
Firstly:
Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Say: ‘None in the heavens and the earth knows the Ghaib (unseen) except Allah, nor can they perceive when they shall be resurrected’”
[an-Naml 27:65].
This indicates that knowledge of the unseen, in general terms, is something that belongs only to the Knower of the unseen, the Lord of the Worlds. However Allah, may He be exalted, may disclose to whomever He wills of His creation whatever He wills of His unseen. He, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“(He Alone) the All-Knower of the Ghaib (unseen), and He reveals to none His Ghaib (unseen).
Except to a Messenger (from mankind) whom He has chosen (He informs him of unseen as much as He likes), and then He makes a band of watching guards (angels) to march before him and behind him”
[al-Jinn 72:26, 27].
Al-Qurtubi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
The scholars (may Allah have mercy on them) said: The fact that He, may He be glorified, praised Himself for having knowledge of the unseen, which He has kept to Himself, to the exclusion of His creation, indicates that no one knows the unseen except Him. Then He made an exception in the case of those with whom He is pleased of His Messengers, so He grants them knowledge of whatever He wills of His unseen, by means of revelation to them, which He makes a miracle for them and evidence of the truthfulness of their Prophethood. End quote.
Tafseer al-Qurtubi(19/28)
The scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas said:
Knowledge of unseen matters is something that belongs exclusively to Allah, may He be exalted, and none of His creation – jinn or otherwise – knows it except what Allah has revealed concerning it to whomever He wills of His angels or His Messengers. End quote.
Fataawa al-Lajnah ad-Daa’imah(1/346)
See the answer to question no. 101968
Secondly:
Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Verily, Allah! With Him (Alone) is the knowledge of the Hour, He sends down the rain, and knows that which is in the wombs. No person knows what he will earn tomorrow, and no person knows in what land he will die. Verily, Allah is All-Knower, All-Aware (of things)”
[Luqmaan 31:34].
Al-Bukhaari (1039) narrated that Ibn ‘Umar said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “The keys of the unseen are five, which no one knows except Allah: no one knows what will happen tomorrow, no one knows what is in the wombs, no soul knows what it will earn tomorrow, no soul knows in which land it will die, and no one knows when rain will come.”
No one has complete knowledge of these five matters, in terms of all their details, circumstances and timings, except Allah, but some information about them may be known to some people, and at some times but not others either through knowledge from Allah by way of revelation, which can only be granted to the Prophets, or through knowledge by way of inspiration, which only happens to the siddeeqs (the strong and true in faith) and the righteous, or through empirical evidence and the like, by way of worldly science and knowledge, or on the basis probability and observation.
As for perfect knowledge of these five things and others, they are matters of the unseen which no one knows except Allah.
Ibn Rajab (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
These five are only mentioned because people need to know that only Allah has knowledge of them, and comprehensive knowledge of them is something that belongs only to Allah, and that definitive knowledge of each one of them belongs only to Him.
As for finding out about some minor aspect of them in a non-definitive manner, which may be right or wrong, this is not ruled out, because it does not come under the heading of that knowledge which belongs only to Allah and not to anyone else.
We noted above that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was given knowledge of all things, except these five. As for Allah, may He be glorified, giving him knowledge of one of these things, that is not ruled out either. That is included in the verse in which He, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“(He Alone) is the All-Knower of the Ghaib (unseen), and He reveals to none His Ghaib (unseen).
Except to a Messenger (from mankind) whom He has chosen (He informs him of unseen as much as He likes), and then He makes a band of watching guards (angels) to march before him and behind him”
[al-Jinn 72:26, 27].
But knowledge of the Hour is something that belongs exclusively to Allah, and He has not told anyone else about it, as we have seen above in the hadith about Jibreel questioning the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). The same applies to comprehensive knowledge of what will happen tomorrow.
With regard to knowledge of what is in the wombs, Allah, may He be exalted, alone has knowledge of it, before He instructs the angel of the wombs to shape it and write its destiny, then after that Allah may inform whomever He wills of His creation about it, as He informs the angel of the wombs about it.
If he is one of the Messengers, then he may come to know about it with certainty.
If he is someone else, one of the siddeeqs or the righteous, then Allah, may He be exalted, inform him of it indirectly, as az-Zuhri narrated from ‘Urwah, from ‘Aa’ishah, that when Abu Bakr was dying, he said to her, among other things: You have two brothers and two sisters. I said: I know about my two brothers, but who are my two sisters? He said: What is in the womb of the daughter of Khaarijah; I think it is a girl.
According to another report, he said: It has occurred to me that it is a girl, so take good care of her. And Umm Kulthoom was born.
With regard to anyone knowing what he will earn tomorrow, in what land he will die, or when rain will come, in general terms no one knows this except Allah. As for knowing some details thereof, if Allah discloses that to some of His Messengers, this is an exemption from this general meaning, as the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was told of many matters of the future unseen, of which he spoke.
In Tabook he said: “Tonight a strong wind will blow, so no one will be standing up”, and that is indeed what happened.
Learning about the blowing of the wind is akin to learning about the falling of rain at a particular time.
Similarly, the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) told his daughter Faatimah, when he was ill, that he would die of this illness.
It was narrated from him (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that he said: “The area between my grave and my minbar is one of the gardens of Paradise.” Narrated by Imam Ahmad from the hadith of Abu Sa‘eed al-Khudri, and by an-Nasaa’i from the hadith of Umm Salamah, from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
This indicates that he knew of the place of his death and burial.
And it was narrated from him that he said: “No Prophet dies but he is buried in the place where he dies.”
Narrated by Ibn Maajah and others.
With regard to the fact that some people other than the Prophets may come to know some information about the unseen, there is no need – as stated above – to exclude that (and say that they cannot know such things), because their knowledge is not based on certainty; rather it is based on what they think is most likely to be the case, and some of it is mere illusion, conjecture and speculation and none of that constitutes knowledge. So there is no need to exclude it from that which that only Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, knows, as stated above. And Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, knows best. End quote.
Fath al-Baari(9/269-27 2)
The scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas said:
What the verse means is that Allah, may He be exalted, has kept knowledge of the Hour to Himself, so no one knows its time except Him. So no angel who is close to Him and no Prophet who was sent knows its appointed time, although Allah has told them of its signs and portents.
No one knows when rain will fall or in what place it will fall except Allah, although people of experience may know the signs of that and when the causes thereof will come together, but that is not exact knowledge; rather it is based on probability with some element of speculation, and it may not even happen as they think. Allah, may He be glorified, has also kept to Himself knowledge of what is in the wombs, in detail, in terms of whether it will be formed or unformed, its growth, whether it will survive to full term or be miscarried before that, alive or dead, whether it will be sound or suffer defects, and what it may face of problems, without Him acquiring that knowledge from somewhere else or basing His knowledge on some measures and experiments. Rather He knows how it will be and how it will develop before it comes into existence and before the means of its existence come into being, for He is the One Who decrees and creates all means and measures and has precise knowledge that will materialise, and what happens will never be different from what He knows, for He is Allah, may He be glorified.
Allah may allow man to know some of what is in the wombs, whether it is male or female, sound or defective, how soon birth will occur or whether there will be a miscarriage before the pregnancy reaches full term, but all of that is by the help of Allah whereby He enables humans to develop means of knowing such things, such as diagnostic imaging. It does not come from something that humans possess in and of themselves without taking external measures, and that knowledge comes after Allah commands the angel to give shape to the foetus, and it does not include everything in the womb; rather it is general in nature, with the possibility of error on occasion.
No soul knows what it will earn tomorrow in either spiritual or worldly terms. That is also a matter concerning which Allah has kept knowledge of the details to Himself. People may expect to make gains or incur losses in general terms, which may give them hope or an incentive to strive, or it may create fear and make them refrain, based on the signs and circumstances around them. But none of that can be called certain knowledge (because it is more akin to speculation).
Similarly, no soul knows in what land it will die, on land or sea, in his own land or elsewhere. Only Allah knows the details of that, for He, may He be glorified, has perfect knowledge and encompasses all things, seen and unseen, visible and hidden.
In conclusion, the knowledge of Allah comes from His own Self; it is not acquired from elsewhere and it is not dependent on measures or experimentation. He knows what has happened and what will happen, and His knowledge is not mixed with any doubt or any possibility that it will not materialise. His knowledge encompasses all beings in detail, great and small, unlike the knowledge of others. May He be glorified. End quote.
Fataawa al-Lajnah ad-Daa’imah(2/174-176)
Thirdly:
The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was aware during his final illness that he would die of it.
At-Tirmidhi (3872) narrated that ‘Aa’ishah, the Mother of the Believers, said: When the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was sick, Faatimah bent down and embraced him and kissed him, then she lifted her head and wept. Then she embraced him again, then she lifted her head and smiled. When the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) died, I said to her: Do you remember when you bent down and embraced the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), then you raise your head and wept, then you bent down and embraced him, then you raised your head and smiled? What made you do that? She said: He told me that he was going to die of that sickness, so I wept. Then he told me that I would be the first of his family to join him, and that was when I smiled.
Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani inSaheeh at-Tirmidhi.
It also seems that he (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) knew where he would die, as mentioned above in the quotation from Ibn Rajab (may Allah have mercy on him).
And Allah knows best.






















-
-
:: Share ::

- - - -

-

Names and Attributes of Allaah, Dought & clear, - * Refutation of those who falsely claim that Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (mayAllah have mercy on him) was one of those who say that Allah is a physical entity

gb

Share ::-

- -

-


















Is it true that Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah said that Allah is a filled body that does not have cavity (hole) inside, in 'Majmul Fatawa'', vol.17, pg.214/215 and Bayyan Talbis Jahmiyyah, vol.1, pg.511 etc like deviant aasharis and maturidis claim?
-
Praise be to Allah
Firstly:
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) was subjected, by the promoters of innovation, to campaigns aimed at distorting his image, and that was only because he stood up to the promoters of innovation, debated with them, proved them wrong and highlighted the extent of their deviation from the path of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and his Companions, and he told them to adhere to the Qur’an and Sunnah. So these people and their followers got angry with him and started to fabricate lies against him, attributing to him words and ideas that he never said; in fact it is proven that he rejected and refuted such ideas!
One of the gravest sins that a person may commit is slander, which means fabricating lies and attributing to a Muslim something that is not true. The sin is even worse if that Muslim against whom lies are fabricated is a respected scholar and one of the imams of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah, such as Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him), because these people want to cast aspersions on him with regard to the methodology of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah, and give precedence to their own deviant methodologies.
Secondly:
The methodology of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah with regard to the names and attributes of Allah, may He be exalted, is well known; it is to affirm what Allah affirmed for Himself and deny what He denied for Himself, without likening His attributes to any of His creation, without discussing the nature of those attributes, without distorting the meanings thereof and without denying what is meant. This has been explained previously in a number of fatwas; see fatwa no. 122675.
With regard to novel terminology introduced byahl al-kalaam(Islamic philosophers), such as “physical entity” and “direction”, Ahl as-Sunnah neither confirm nor deny this terminology; rather they think that using these terms or denying them comes under the heading of reprehensible innovations.
As for what these words may mean, the one who uses these words is to be questioned as to what he means by that; then if the meaning he intends is correct, we affirm it, but if he intends a false meaning, we reject it. But we do not express these meanings except in the shar‘i terminology that is mentioned in the Qur’an and Sunnah; we do not use this novel terminology.
The views of Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) with regard to this issue are well known, which is that it is not permissible to affirm the word “physical entity” with regard to Allah, may He be exalted, or to deny it either, because the Qur’an and Sunnah never used such a word, and because this is a very general word that could be used to refer to something true or it could be used to refer to something false. He stated that this is the view of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah, including the Sahaabah, Taabi‘een and leading scholars of the Muslims, such as the four imams and others.
There follow some quotations from his books which highlight the lies of this fabricator with regard to what he attributed to Shaykh al-Islam.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote.
Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa(5/434)
Thirdly:
We checked the two places in the books of Shaykh al-Islam that are mentioned in the question, and we did not find that he affirmed that Allah, may He be exalted, is a physical entity.
With regard toMajmoo‘ al-Fataawa(17/214-215), there is nothing of that nature mentioned there; rather there is a discussion of the meaning of the soorah “Qul Huwa Allahu Ahad”. He mentioned the meaning of the name of Allahas-Samad, and the difference of opinion among the commentators of the early generations (17/214-216).
Then he mentioned a lengthy discussion refuting various groups of innovators, and stated that the view of the leading scholars of Ahl as-Sunnah is the correct view. Then he said (17/303):
Imam Ahmad followed the way of his predecessors, the leading scholars of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah, who adhered to the Qur’an and Sunnah and followed that which Allah revealed to them, which is to look and see:
Whatever we find that the Lord affirmed for Himself (of attributes) in His Book, we affirm it, and whatever we find that He denied for Himself, we deny it.
Every word that is found in the Qur’an and Sunnah by way of affirmation, the meaning of that word is to be affirmed.
Every word that is found by way of denial, the meaning of that word is to be denied.
As for words that are not found in the Qur’an and Sunnah, or even in the words of the Sahaabah and those who followed them in truth, and all the leading imams of the Muslims, either by way of affirmation or denial, and people disputed concerning them:
These words are not to be affirmed or denied, except after finding out about their meanings. Then if their meanings are found to refer to something that the Lord affirmed for Himself, they are to be affirmed.
If their meanings are found to refer to something that the Lord denied for Himself, then they are to be denied.
If we find that the wording may be used to affirm something true or false, or to deny something true or false, or it is so ambiguous that it may refer to something true or false, and the one who used it intended some of that, but when he uses it, it may give the impression to people, or make them understand, what he intends or what he does not intend:
Then in this case these words are not to be used in the context of either affirming or denying, such as the words “substance”, “physical entity”, occupying space”, “direction” and similar words. It is rare that anyone uses these words either to affirm or deny, but there will be some false notion inserted into it, even if he intended to say something sound.
The early generations and leading scholars disapproved of these novel terms because they contained falsehood and lies, and speaking about Allah without knowledge. [End quote]
This quotation is not sufficient; rather one should check what Shaykh al-Islam said at length concerning this issue, because there is great benefit in doing so, and it contains proofs of the lies of those who accused him of saying that Allah is a physical entity – Allah forbid. May Allah have mercy on him and forgive him.
What he discussed in his other important major work,Bayaan Talbees al-Jahamiyyah, and in his great book,Minhaaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah, or any of his other writings, does not go beyond what we have already quoted and explained here.
The other quotation referred to [in the question] is to be found inBayaan Talbees al-Jahamiyyah(1/511). The attribution here is to the first edition, which was published by Muhammad ibn ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn Qaasim, as the questioner stated, and not the complete annotated version of the book. It has the same approach to the issue, but it should be noted that this text is quoted from the book of Shaykh al-IslamMinhaaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah, as was pointed out by the commentator in his footnote, so as to complete and make up for the shortcoming of the copy of the book that he had. Therefore we will quote the text from its original source, so as to see it in context, then we will refer the reader to the place where the quotation may be found in both books.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
As for the words “physical entity”, “substance”, “occupying space”, “direction” and so on, neither the Qur’an nor the Sunnah use these words when referring to Allah, either by way of denial or affirmation. Similarly, none of the Sahaabah or those who followed them in truth, or any of the leading scholars from among Ahl al-Bayt [the Prophet’s family] or otherwise, not one of them used such words when referring to Allah, either by way of denial or affirmation.
The first ones who were known to speak of such matters, by way of denial or affirmation, were ahl al-kalaam (Islamic philosophers), both those who denied the divine attributes, such as the Jahamis and Mu‘talizah, and those who affirmed the divine attributes, such as those among the Raafidis and others who believed that Allah is a physical entity.
Those who denied the divine attributes denied these words, and included in their denial attributes that Allah and His Messenger affirmed, such as the fact that Allah has knowledge, might, will, love, pleasure, and anger, and is exalted. They said: He does not see and He does not speak the Qur’an or anything else; rather what is meant by His speaking is that He creates words in some physical entity other than Himself, and so on.
Those who affirmed the divine attributes included in that attributes that Allah and His Messenger denied, to the extent that they said that He sees in this world by means of physical eyes, His hand could be shaken and He could be embraced… Allah, may He be glorified, is far above being described with any attributes that are exclusively for created beings, for anything that is exclusively for created beings is an attribute of imperfection, whereas Allah, may He be exalted, is far above all imperfection and deserves the utmost perfection. There is no equal to Him in any of the attributes of perfection, for He is far above shortcomings in any way; in His utmost perfection He is far above there being anything like unto Him, as He, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Say (O Muhammad (Peace be upon him)): ‘He is Allah, (the) One.
‘Allah-us-Samad (The Self-Sufficient Master, Whom all creatures need, He neither eats nor drinks).
‘He begets not, nor was He begotten;
‘And there is none co-equal or comparable unto Him’”
[al-Ikhlaas 112:1-4]. [end quote]
See:Minhaaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah(2/527-533).
Then Shaykh al-Islam (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
We should study the issues in this field, and whatever Allah and His Messenger affirm (with regard to divine attributes) we should affirm.
And whatever Allah and His Messenger deny, we should deny.
Whatever words are mentioned in the texts are to be adhered to when affirming and denying, so we affirm what the texts affirm of words and meanings, and we deny what the texts deny of words and meanings.
As for the words concerning which there is a dispute among those scholars of the later generations who invented them– such as the terms “physical entity”, “substance”, “occupying space”, “direction” and the like – they should not be denied or affirmed until we see what was meant by the one who uttered them.
If what he meant when denying and affirming was a correct meaning that is in accordance with what the Messenger said, then the meaning that he intended by that word should be approved, but it should be expressed using the words that are used in the texts (of the Qur’an and Sunnah), and not in these invented, ambiguous words, except in the case of necessity, and with some comments to explain the intended meaning.
Necessity refers to cases such as when one is discussing the issue with someone and cannot convey what he wants to convey to him except by using these words.
But if the one who uttered it intended some false meaning, then that meaning should be rejected.
If he combines both true and false meanings, then what is true should be affirmed and what is false should be rejected.
If two people agree on the meaning, and dispute as to whether this wording refers to it or not, it should be expressed in a way on which they both agree on the meaning thereof, and the one who is closest to being correct is the one who is in harmony with the regular usage of language. End quote.
Minhaaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah(2/554-555)
What we must do is read the words of the scholar, and indeed the words of any writer, in the context in which the author mentioned it. As for taking only part of what he said, and quoting it in isolation of what comes before and after it, so as to prove one’s claims or lies, this is the way of the promoters of innovation and deviation.
What words could be clearer, and what way of discussing this issue could be better, than the way in which Shaykh al-Islam discussed this matter? What a great imam he was!
We hope that what we have mentioned above is sufficient.
We ask Allah, may He be exalted, to show us the truth as truth and help us to follow it, and to show us falsehood as false and help us to avoid it.
And Allah knows best.






-
-
:: Share ::

- - - -

-