Darwinism, - Responses to the claim that peptide bonds can be established in thelaboratory

Share

Darwinists have been going through troubled times in the face of the fact that protein cannot form spontaneously. They claim that one peptide bond, one of the hundreds of essential preconditions for protein, can be formed in the laboratory. The fact is, however, that even if such research has been carried out, the existence of one chemical bond produced in a conscious and controlled environment in existing living systems obviously comes nowhere near accounting for the existence of protein. Darwinists still have no explanation for how a completely functional protein could have emerged BY CHANCE and fully formed in the manner they claim.
The fact that a single peptide bond has been established, after decades of research, under specific conditions in the laboratory and under the supervision of conscious scientists, indicates that this mechanism cannot form by chance.
This fact shows the enormous complexity in even one single detail regarding protein.
In any case, the establishment of a single peptide bond does not produce even one of the hundreds of preconditions necessary for protein to come into being. By itself, it is completely meaningless.
The whole of the amino acid chain, in specific numbers, sequences and shapes, that will make protein functional has to be bound with peptide bonds. For that reason, that bond has to form individually hundreds or even thousands of time in amino acid for a single protein.
Darwinists who speculate over a single peptide bond have to account for the same complex process for each and every bond.
Darwinists have to be able to account for the formation of a single protein. Chemical reactions are not life. Even if there are hundreds of amino acids all bound by peptide bonds, they will never combine together to make protein. A great many conditions, all of which are individually impossible, would have to be met for protein to form. But the really critical thing, is that proteins have to be present in order for protein to form.

Share

Darwinism, - The invalidity of he claim that ''theprobability calculations regarding protein formation are wrong''

Share

Since the greatest and most fundamental dilemma facing Darwinism is that of the initial beginning of life, that is the subject that is most troubling to Darwinists. Darwinists are unable to account for the formation of a single protein even in the laboratory, let alone by chance, and as always they resort to demagoguery as the easiest way out.
Darwinists hide behind the idea that the probability calculations for the formation of a single protein are “wrong.” Even this just goes to show how terrified Darwinists are at their inability to account for a single protein .
It is true that the probability of an average, functional protein in the human body forming spontaneously has been calculated as 1 in 10 950 . But even if there is an error in that calculations, as Darwinists hypothesize, if the true probability were 1 in 10600or 10400or even just 10100or 1060instead of 10950it would still pose an insoluble dilemma for Darwinists. Because the probability in all cases would still be ZERO.
But the point that really needs to be emphasized is this: in terms of protein, it is impossible to speak of any mathematical probability at all. Because IN ORDER FOR PROTEIN TO FORM, OTHER PROTEINS MUST ALREADY BE PRESENT. In other words, it is incorrect to employ the logic of “it can only form with such and such a probability.” Because protein itself has to exist beforehand in order for protein to come into existence. And this is a huge vicious circle for Darwinists.
Even if all the materials needed for protein, and all the amino acids that represent the building blocks of protein, were all brought together, no protein would still form in any way. THE PRESENCE OF DNA AND PROTEINS TO PERFORM THE MANUFACTURE OF PROTEIN AND FULLY EQUIPPED CELLS to organize the process IS STILL ESSENTIAL.
In addition, 60 proteins are needed for a single protein to form, not just one or two. Since these all have different functions, they are all highly specialized.
It is unclear why Darwinists keep insisting on bringing up the fact that protein and DNA are essential for protein to exist “has been known to scientists for a very long time.” It is of course something that every scientist investigating the cell in the 21st century must know. The important thing is not who discovered it, but that it represents an insoluble dilemma for evolution.
It is therefore deceptive for Darwinists to try to gain time by saying “that calculation is wrong, but this one is right.” No matter what Darwinists claim, it is impossible for them to account for the emergence of a protein, in other words, for the origin of life.
The fact that Darwinists are unable to account for a single protein totally eliminates the theory of evolution. All false accounts regarding evolution will all be invalid right from the outset.

Share

Darwinism, - The invalidity of the claim that ''RNA is the forebear of life''

Share

The RNA world thesis is a supposed savior launched by Darwinists out of a sense of despair at the failure of all experiments regarding the beginning of life. But everyone who understands science and the complexity of the cell will inevitably find it illogical for Darwinists, who have never manufactured even a single protein, to make such a claim. In the absence of a single protein of the first imaginary cell they claim for the beginning of life, Darwinists claim that RNA is responsible for the whole thing, in all its wondrous complexity. But when it comes to how RNA itself first appeared, they are again, as always, silent.
According to the RNA world thesis, a hypothetical RNA molecule that came into being by chance manufactured proteins in some way, after which DNA appeared by chance out of a need for a second molecule to store all this protein information. Darwinists, with their powerful imaginations, are still trying to produce a single peptide bond in the laboratory, but seek to mislead people by shamelessly propagating this impossible and unbelievable scenario.
Extraordinary complexity is a huge and insoluble dilemma for Darwinists who are unable to account for how even a single RNA nucleotide might have come into being.
Even if we assume that the impossible happened and came about by chance, proteins are still essential in order for this entire mechanism to function. In other words, RNA cannot perform its function of producing a protein without proteins already being in existence. Just like other proteins, in order for DNA and RNA to exist and function, it is essential for the cell to exist beforehand, fully equipped and with all its proteins and other organelles.
A second major deception on this subject is the claims made regarding the function of RNA. RNA only contains information about the structure of protein alone. RNA has no mechanism to manufacture protein.
A protein is manufactured in an organelle called the ribosome with the assistance of many enzymes as the result of highly complex processes. The ribosome is a complex cell organelle again made up of proteins. This therefore leads to the impossible assumption that the ribosome, the proteins serving within it, DNA and RNA all came about spontaneously at exactly the same time.
The RNA world thesis, spoken of with embarrassment by many scientists, is one of the most illogical theories yet espoused by Darwinists, who are in a despairing state when it comes to explaining the origin of life. Casually bringing up such an illogical claim and depicting it as major scientific evidence is another element of Darwinist demagoguery.
The eminent University of San Diego California evolutionist Dr. Leslie Orgel, a colleague of Stanley Miller and Francis Crick, refers to the possibility of “life beginning with the RNA world” as a “scenario.” Orgel sets out the characteristics that RNA would have to possess and the impossibility of its doing so in an article titled "The Origin of Life on the Earth" in the October 1994 issue of American Scientist :
This scenario could have occurred, we noted, if prebiotic RNA had two properties not evident today: A capacity to replicate without the help of proteins and an ability to catalyze every step of protein synthesis. (Leslie E. Orgel, "The Origin of Life on the Earth", Scientific American, October 1994, Vol. 271, p. 78)
It is of course impossible for such a RNA to exist.

Share

Personal, - Duties of Muslim Women During Times of Fitnah - II

Share

Allaah The Almighty Says )what means(:}And We have already sent Messengers before you to their peoples, and they came to them with clear evidences; then We took retribution from those who committed crimes, and incumbent upon Us was support of the believers.{]Quran 30:47[
The Companions, may Allaah be pleased with them, were keen on knowing the temptations in order to learn the way of salvation and they did so from the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam. The great Companion Huthayfah, may Allaah be pleased with him, would frequently ask the Prophet, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, about evil so that he would avoid it.
In a Hadeeth )narration( on his authority he said,
“People used to ask the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, about good and I used to ask him about evil for fear that it would befall me. Hence, I said, ‘O Messenger of Allaah, we were in a state of ignorance and evil, then Allaah brought us this good. Will there be any evil after this good?’ The Prophet, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, said:‘Yes’.Huthayfah, may Allaah be pleased with him, asked, ‘Will there be any good after that evil?’ He said:‘Yes, but it would be tainted with Dakhan )i.e., intermixed with evil(.’
I asked, ‘What will its Dakhan be?’ He said:‘There will be some people who will guide )people( according to something other than my guidance and will lead them according to something other than my Sunnah )tradition(. You will see their actions and disapprove of them.’Huthayfah, may Allaah be pleased with him, said, ‘Will there be any evil after that good?’ He said:‘Yes, there will be some people who will invite others to the doors of Hell, and whoever accepts their invitation will be thrown in it )by them(.’
Huthayfah, may Allaah be pleased with him, said, ‘O Messenger of Allaah, describe those people to us.’ He said:‘They will be from among us and speak our language )i.e., from among the Arabs(.’Huthayfah, may Allaah be pleased with him, asked, ‘What do you command me to do if I witness that?’ He said:‘Adhere to the community of Muslims and their leader.’Huthayfah asked, ‘What if they have neither a community nor a leader?’ He said:‘Keep away from all those different sects, even if you have to bite on )i.e. eat( the root of a tree, until you die while you are still in that state.’”]Al-Bukhaari and Muslim[
c- Loving desires and the dominance of desires, including the desire for eating, sex, offspring, money, position and the subsequent attitudes of flattering, ostentation, bribing, loving to show off and staying silent about the truth.
All these desires are temptations unless one fears Allaah The Almighty. This is because the true believer will not speak, move or look unduly, because he is certain that he will be questioned about his hearing, sight and heart.
Allaah The Almighty Says )what means(:}And of the people is he who worships Allaah on an edge. If he is touched by good, he is reassured by it; but if he is struck by trial, he turns on his face ]to the other direction[. He has lost ]this[ world and the Hereafter. That is what is the manifest loss.{]Quran 22:11[
So, sister, beware lest you should like for yourself and for your family to live on the margin, pursuing desires, or be satisfied with the minor transient pleasures of the world, and decline what Allaah The Almighty has prepared for His righteous slaves in the world and the Hereafter. That is because Allaah The Almighty likes what is sublime and hates what is trivial.
Allaah The Almighty Says )what means(:}O you who have believed, indeed, among your wives and your children are enemies to you, so beware of them. But if you pardon and overlook and forgive - then indeed, Allaah is Forgiving and Merciful. Your wealth and your children are but a trial, and Allaah has with Him a great reward. So fear Allaah as much as you are able and listen and obey and spend ]in the way of Allaah[; it is better for your selves. And whoever is protected from the stinginess of his soul - it is those who will be the successful.{]Quran 64:14-16[
d- Committing sins and misdeeds and violating sanctities. This leads to widespread loss of life, murder, loss of integrity and trust, withholding rights, consuming Riba )interest(, consuming the wealth of orphans, consuming the wealth of others illegally, not paying Zakaah )purifying alms(, drinking alcohol, neglecting Hijaab )Islamic covering(, committing adultery and sodomy, in addition to other forms of immorality. Allaah The Almighty Says )what means(:
•}So let those beware who dissent from the Prophet's order, lest Fitnah strike them or a painful punishment.{]Quran 24:63[
•}Corruption has appeared throughout the land and sea by ]reason of[ what the hands of people have earned so He may let them taste part of ]the consequence of[ what they have done that perhaps they will return ]to righteousness[. Say, ]O Muhammad[, “Travel through the land and observe how was the end of those before. Most of them were associators ]of others with Allaah[.{]Quran 30:41-42[
In a Hadeeth )narration( on the authority of Abu Hurayrah, may Allaah be pleased with him, he said that the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, said:“Woe unto the Arabs because of an impending evil! Successful is the one who restrains his hand )i.e. from being involved in fighting at the times of Fitnah(.”]Saheeh[
Allaah The Almighty Is merciful to us and we supplicate Him not to punish us for the actions committed by the foolish people who live among us.
e- Loving the world and having a strong inclination to it. Allaah The Almighty Says )what means(:}And do not extend your eyes toward that by which We have given enjoyment to ]some[ categories of them, ]its being but[ the splendor of worldly life by which We test them. And the provision of your Lord is better and more enduring. And enjoin prayer upon your family ]and people[ and be steadfast therein. We ask you not for provision; We provide for you, and the ]best[ outcome is for ]those of[ righteousness.{]Quran 20:131-132[
In a Hadeeth )narration( on the authority of Thawbaan, may Allaah be pleased with him, he said that the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, said:“People will soon summon one another to attack you as people, when eating, invite others to share their dish"Someone said, ‘O Messenger of Allaah! Will that be because of our small number at that time?' He said:‘No, you will be numerous at that time, but you will be like the scum left behind after a flood. Weakness will be put in your hearts, and terror will be removed from the hearts of your enemies, because you love the world and hate death.’]Saheeh[

Share