For children, - Cheap Ticket to Paradise: Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be Upon him) in dream

A man from a respectable background came to Balkh which is situated in
the south of Iran, accompanied by his wife and daughters. Shortly
after their arrival the man fell ill and later died, leaving his wife
and daughters. Without his support they became poor and suffered. So
fearing the mockery of enemies, she fled Balkh with her daughters to
Samarkand.
On the day she arrived the weather was very cold, so she left her
daughters in a mosque and went out in search of food. She passed by
two groups of people. One was gathered around a Muslim who was the
Sheikh and the other group around a Zoroastrian (Majusi) who was the
security officer of the city.
She first went to the Muslim Sheikh and described her situation
saying, "I am a woman of a respectable family, with daughters whom I
have left in the local mosque and I have come in search of food." He
asked her, "Bring me proof that you are from a respectable family."
She replied, "I am a stranger in this town and therefore do not know
anyone to testify for me." She departed from him brokenhearted. She
then went to the Zoroastrian and explained her situation to him,
telling him about her noble background and her orphaned daughters who
were, waiting her return in the local mosque. She also mentioned to
him how the Muslim Sheikh had treated her. The Zoroastrian stood up
and sent some womenfolk to bring her daughters and took all of them to
his house. There he showered them with honour and generosity. He fed
them fine food and clothed them in rich garments.
That night the Muslim Sheikh saw in a dream the Day of Resurrectionand
the banners were unfurled around Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be
Upon him). Ahead of him, was a green palace made of emeralds, its
balconies of pearls and rubies and domes of pearls and corals. He
asked Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be Upon him), "Messenger of Allah,
for whom is this palace?" Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be Upon him)
replied, "For a Muslim." The Muslim Sheikh replied, "I am a Muslim!"
Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be Upon him) said, "Prove to me that you
are a Muslim?" At that, the Muslim Sheikh was dumbstruck. Holy Prophet
Muhammad (Peace be Upon him) then said, "You asked a woman to produce
proof of her respectability and therefore my question to you is, can
you produce proof that you are a Muslim?" At this point the Muslim
Sheikh felt remorse about his treatment towards the woman and her
orphaned daughters.
In the morning, he immediately set out to find the woman. He learnt
she was staying with the Zoroastrian and so called for him. When the
Zoroastrian arrived, the Muslim Sheikh requested that he sends the
woman and her daughters to him. The Zoroastrian replied, "Under no
circumstance! I have received great blessings from her." The Muslim
Sheikh said, "Take a thousand dinars from me and bring them to me."
Zoroastrian shouted, "Impossible! The one who showed you the palace in
your dream has made it (the palace) for me. Are you surprised because
I am not a Muslim? By Allah (SWT), I did not sleep last night, before
I and my family accepted Islam at that noble woman's hand and I dreamt
something similar to what you dreamt; Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be
Upon him) asked me, "Is that noble woman and her daughters with you?"
I replied: "Yes, Messenger of Allah." Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be
Upon him) said, "This palace is for you and your family. Allah (SWT)
created you a believer in eternity." At that the Muslim Sheikh
remained sorrowful and grieved for the missed opportunity of earning a
lofty position in Paradise, due to his neglect of the widowed woman
and her daughters.
Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be Upon him) has said, "The one who
strives on behalf of the widow and the needy is like a warrior in the
path of Allah". (Bukhari and Muslim) May Allah guide us to what is
right for indeed, He is Generous, the most Kind, and the most
Merciful!

The İnvalidity Of The Famous Darwinist Claim That ''Useful Mutations Do Exist.''

The false idea that useful mutations exist is a classic Darwinist
claim. Although the whole scientific world knows, with absolute
scientific evidence, that mutations have a destructive or fatal
effect, this claim is still persistently made, out of a fear of
humiliation. Because Darwinism is a theory that depends totally on
mutations. All Darwinists know that if the destructive effect were
to be mentioned just once, that would spell the end of Darwinism. It
is for that reason they try to give the impression, citing invalid
and utterly pitiful examples, that mutations can be beneficial. But
this is a complete deception.
· As we have set out many times before,
mutations have a net harmful effect, with only 1% being neutral,
though the latest scientific research has shown that even these can
produce long-term damage in the organism. [1] The net harmful effect
of mutations is not a psychological defense mechanism, but an
explicit truth revealed by science.
· If Darwinists object to this, then they are
directly flying in the face of science. Because this is not a matter
of opinion, but an absolute scientific fact.
· It is impossible for mutations to bestow any
useful characteristic. Under normal conditions, everything in a
living body exhibits complete regularity, order and symmetry. In
addition, these systems co-exist with the most delicate balances
and exhibit a glorious complexity right down to the finest detail.
Mutations are random interventions, such as with radiation, and
mean breakages, impairments and dislocations. They INEVITABLY
DAMAGE these extraordinarily complex systems, with their regularity,
symmetry and order. It is illogical and a violation of science to
maintain anything else.
· The results at Chernobyl, Nagasaki and
Hiroshima were all the results of mutations. Under the effect of
mutations, organisms with regular structures either died or suffered
severe damage, and this harmful effect even manifested itself in
subsequent generations.
· Darwinists generally cite various examples of
immunity in order to try to corroborate their claims that
"beneficial mutations do exist." But these examples all consist of
a variation or impairment in bacteria or immune cells.
· Sometimes, a dislocation in a single DNA
nucleotide, or base, can bestow immunity to an antibiotic on a
micro- organism. But although this may be useful to the
micro-organism, IT IS NOT A BENEFICIAL MUTATION. Because the
mutation in question has actually harmed the micro-organism. The
ribosome sequence belonging to the micro- organism has been
impaired, and it prevents the antibiotic binding to the organism by
damaging the lock and key harmony. In other words, rather than there
being any novelty in the micro-organism, we are looking at a loss
of information.
· Mutations are literally like firing at a
regular structure with a machine gun. Opening fire on a healthy
structure will entirely do away with that structure. The fact that
one bullet has no effect or destroys an existing infection in the
body changes nothing. The organism will already have been killed by
the other 99 bullets hitting it.
· The example that Darwinists cite with such
examples is like a bullet healing the body by destroying a single
infection. The organism is devastated by mutations, but Darwinists
concentrate on the one that heals this infection.
· Since the subject of mutations constitutes one
of the most damaging points for Darwinists they engage in
demagoguery by depicting minor instances of variation or the effects
examined above as major evidence. The fact is, however, that the
adherents of evolution, who maintain that all living things acquired
their present symmetrical and complex structures by way of
evolution, have to be able to cite examples of mutations that take
place one after the other and are all beneficial, and that also
bestow new information on the organism.
· What is more, Darwinists also have to provide
evidence for the scenario of one living thing's physiology turning
into that of another life form through mutation at the macro level.
BUT THEY CANNOT EVEN CONTEMPLATE PRODUCING SUCH EVIDENCE. Because
as they know full well, mutations destroy and ruin and occasionally
entirely destroy the organism concerned.
· It addition, we need to make the following
point very clear: mutations can never bestow any new data on an
organism that is not already in its genome. That is impossible. The
examples alleged to have "added new information" are all
misleading. No new genetic information is ever added. All that
happens is that information already existing in a living thing's
genes starts to be used by becoming more visible as a result of
variations.
· Breaks and dislocations in the bases that make
up DNA CAN NEVER PRODUCE NEW INFORMATION. They do not equate to
information that did not already exist being bestowed on a living
thing. Darwinists are without doubt well aware of this. But they
insist on depicting dislocations in genetic bases as new data. This
is an example of Darwinist demagoguery.

The Easiness Of Islam Is A Blessing From Allah

Believers constantly live their lives according to what the
All-Merciful and Most Merciful has revealed in the Qur'an. No matter
where they are, they display a moral character that pleases Allah
and avoid any behavior that displeases Him. In His mercy, Allah
gave Islam to humanity, a religion that is easy to follow and
results in a good and contented way of life. From the Qur'an, we
can see that Islam's requirements are extremely easy, because "Allah
desires ease for you; He does not desire difficulty for you" (Surat
al-Baqara, 185).
Due to His compassion and mercy, all true religions contain rules
that are very easy to obey. The various attempts made throughout
history to deviate from the essence of religion and to prevent
people from living according to it have added several enforced
practices and myths to it. When such distortions become firmly
established and self-generating traditions, people, either with or
without their knowledge, become far removed from the religious
morality. One of the most dangerous of these distorted beliefs is
that it is hard to live according to the religious morality.
However, both Allah and our Prophet (saas) state that it is very
easy for believers to follow this morality.
As with everything else that exists, Allah has created human beings
from nothing. With full knowledge of them, as well as being closer
to them than their jugular veins, He created religion in such a way
that it fully corresponds with each person's inherent human nature:
So set your face firmly toward the Religion, as a pure natural
believer, Allah's natural pattern on which He made humanity. There is
no changing Allah's creation. That is the true Religion – but most
people do not know it. (Surat ar-Rum, 30)
The Qur'an is a clear teaching that anyone, regardless of age and
culture, can understand. The oft-heard assertion that this is not
true is based mainly on people's ignorance of Islam's essence.
Today, many people are unaware of the truths revealed in the
Qur'an, the existence of the Afterlife, the pangs of Hell, the
incomparable blessings of Paradise, and of what He has revealed
concerning various matters. However, the Qur'an was sent down so
that people could read it, know its wisdom, and learn the purpose
of life.
A Muslim's greatest responsibility is to read the Qur'an and live
according to It. But only those whom Allah guides to the straight
path can apply Its morality to their lives. Allah promises to guide
everyone who turns to Him in complete sincerity. Those who assert
that the Qur'an is hard to understand seek to prevent others from
reading it, turning toward Allah, and living according to its moral
teachings. However, Allah says in many verses that the Qur'an is
clear and understandable:
We have sent down Clear Signs to you, and no one rejects them except
the deviators. (Surat al-Baqara, 99)
Allah has been pleased to choose the religion of Islam for humanity;
moreover, the rules and practice of the Qur'an are very simple. In
its verses, Allah says of the Qur'an:
We did not send down the Qur'an to you to make you miserable, but only
as a reminder for those who fear [and respect Allah]. (Surah Ta Ha,
2-3)
In His endless mercy and compassion, Allah has detailed in the
Qur'an the kind of life that will ensure our happiness and
contentment. Allah states this in the Qur'an as follows:
But as for him [or her] who believes and acts rightly, he [or she]
will receive the best of rewards, and We will issue a command, making
things easy for him [or her]. (Surat al-Kahf, 88)
It is important for every Muslim to show that religion, in its
essence, is easy in order to kindle the people's hearts with the
Qur'an and Islamic morality, teach them the Qur'an and our Prophet's
(saas) Sunnah as the only guides for their lives. Many people are
unaware of this truth and think that their lives will be more
comfortable if they disregard the Qur'an's morality out of concern
that it will restrict their enjoyment of life's pleasures. However,
such great errors and deceptions obscure the fact that such morality
is easy to follow, for Allah, Who created humanity, is fully aware
of what system of morality is best for His creation. Actually, what
is difficult is to live in a society composed of individuals who do
not know the boundaries that Allah has set.

The İnvalidity Of The Claim That ''Rna İs The Forebear Of Life''

The RNA world thesis is a supposed savior launched by Darwinists out
of a sense of despair at the failure of all experiments regarding
the beginning of life. But everyone who understands science and the
complexity of the cell will inevitably find it illogical for
Darwinists, who have never manufactured even a single protein, to
make such a claim. In the absence of a single protein of the first
imaginary cell they claim for the beginning of life, Darwinists claim
that RNA is responsible for the whole thing, in all its wondrous
complexity. But when it comes to how RNA itself first appeared,
they are again, as always, silent.
· According to the RNA world thesis, a
hypothetical RNA molecule that came into being by chance
manufactured proteins in some way, after which DNA appeared by
chance out of a need for a second molecule to store all this protein
information. Darwinists, with their powerful imaginations, are
still trying to produce a single peptide bond in the laboratory,
but seek to mislead people by shamelessly propagating this
impossible and unbelievable scenario.
· Extraordinary complexity is a huge and
insoluble dilemma for Darwinists who are unable to account for how
even a single RNA nucleotide might have come into being.
· Even if we assume that the impossible happened
and came about by chance, proteins are still essential in order for
this entire mechanism to function. In other words, RNA cannot perform
its function of producing a protein without proteins already being
in existence. Just like other proteins, in order for DNA and RNA to
exist and function, it is essential for the cell to exist
beforehand, fully equipped and with all its proteins and other
organelles.
· A second major deception on this subject is
the claims made regarding the function of RNA. RNA only contains
information about the structure of protein alone. RNA has no
mechanism to manufacture protein.
· A protein is manufactured in an organelle
called the ribosome with the assistance of many enzymes as the
result of highly complex processes. The ribosome is a complex cell
organelle again made up of proteins. This therefore leads to the
impossible assumption that the ribosome, the proteins serving within
it, DNA and RNA all came about spontaneously at exactly the same
time.
· The RNA world thesis, spoken of with
embarrassment by many scientists, is one of the most illogical
theories yet espoused by Darwinists, who are in a despairing state
when it comes to explaining the origin of life. Casually bringing
up such an illogical claim and depicting it as major scientific
evidence is another element of Darwinist demagoguery.
The eminent University of San Diego California evolutionist Dr.
Leslie Orgel, a colleague of Stanley Miller and Francis Crick,
refers to the possibility of "life beginning with the RNA world" as
a "scenario." Orgel sets out the characteristics that RNA would
have to possess and the impossibility of its doing so in an article
titled "The Origin of Life on the Earth" in the October 1994 issue
of American Scientist:
This scenario could have occurred, we noted, if prebiotic RNA had two
properties not evident today: A capacity to replicate without the help
of proteins and an ability to catalyze every step of protein
synthesis.(Leslie E. Orgel, "The Origin of Life on the Earth",
Scientific American, October 1994, Vol. 271, p. 78)
It is of course impossible for such a RNA to exist.