Question:
I wanted to know whether it was permissible in Islam for a male and a
female to text each other. Both want to get married to each other, but
have some issues to tackle e.g. parental consent, cultural barriers...
Answer:
In the Name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
Dear Sister,
I pray this message finds you in good health and iman.
It is permissible for a male and female to speak to each other with
the intention of getting married. What is impermissible is for the
male and female to be alone with each other, to have suggestive
conversation, and to have physical contact.
Text chat is not without its problems. I assume you mean instant
messaging via computer or cell phone. This is not the ideal method to
communicate. First, it's way too impersonal to effectively discuss
serious issues. Second, it is akin to a form of khalwa, or seclusion,
considering that there is no third party chaperoning the discussion.
While it may be adviseable to to find some common ground before
approaching your families, exercise caution. A lot of well-intentioned
text messaging starts off innocently enough and then degenerates into
flirtation or worse.
You want to make sure that Islamic adab (decorum) is observed at all times.
As a suggestion, if you've got some issues to tackle before
approaching your families, why not meet the brother in the presense of
the local imam, or a knowledgeable member of the community? That way,
you can talk face to face without fear of impropriety, plus you may
get valuable advice for how to approach your families.
"GENERAL ARTICLES"
- Tamil -- Urdu -- Kannada -- Telugu --*-
Share
"BISMILLA HIRRAHMAAN NIRRAHEEM"
WELCOME! - AS'SALAMU ALAIKUM!!
******** *****
*****
[All] praise is [due] to Allah, Lord of the worlds; -
Guide us to the straight path
*- -*
* * In this Blog; More Than Ten Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah} - Most Usefull Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And All Articles & Get Benifite!
* Visit :-
"INDIA "- Time in New Delhi -
*- WHAT ISLAM SAYS -*
-
Islam is a religion of Mercy, Peace and Blessing. Its teachings emphasize kind hear tedness, help, sympathy, forgiveness, sacrifice, love and care.Qur’an, the Shari’ah and the life of our beloved Prophet (SAW) mirrors this attribute, and it should be reflected in the conduct of a Momin.Islam appreciates those who are kind to their fellow being,and dislikes them who are hard hearted, curt, and hypocrite.Recall that historical moment, when Prophet (SAW) entered Makkah as a conqueror. There was before him a multitude of surrendered enemies, former oppressors and persecutors, who had evicted the Muslims from their homes, deprived them of their belongings, humiliated and intimidated Prophet (SAW) hatched schemes for his murder and tortured and killed his companions. But Prophet (SAW) displayed his usual magnanimity, generosity, and kind heartedness by forgiving all of them and declaring general amnesty...Subhanallah. May Allah help us tailor our life according to the teachings of Islam. (Aameen)./-
''HASBUNALLAHU WA NI'MAL WAKEEL''
-
''Allah is Sufficient for us'' + '' All praise is due to Allah. May peace and blessings beupon the Messenger, his household and companions '' (Aameen) | | |
| | |
|
Share
Follow Me | |
**
Share
-
-*- *: ::->
*
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Fathwa, - Male and female texting each other
Fathwa, - The Islamic Social system and implications on gender interaction.
Question:
Aslamalaikum
I am struggling to understand the social system of Islam that governs
the relationship between the two sexes. To my understanding there are
certain shariah factors that define the permissibility of interaction.
1. Purpose of interaction (e.g. Trade, education, employment, dawah,
celebrations etc)
2. Where the interaction takes place (Shariah definitions of Public or Private)
Please could you provide information/opinions (Hanafi) on the following?
Question 1
Is it true that there is no Khalwa in a public place? If one was to
meet a work colleague of the opposite in a shopping mall would you be
able to greet them and have a conversation within the limits of Islam.
Question 2
What are the implications of a Private and Public defined place to the
ruling on social interaction between the sexes?
In a recent charity event the environment was "mixed". I was told this
was permissible on the following basis.
The event was public and open to anybody
The purpose of the event/interaction was for charity and not for social purposes
Seating arrangements were based on family tables.
The actual environment seems similar to certain cultural marriage
ceremonies (free mixing) which are prohibited due to the private
nature of the event.
Does the observation of Hijab by all females have any consequences to
the permissibility of the events, i.e. If all women are covered
appropriately then can there be interaction between the sexes.
Question 3
How does the event's purpose affect the ruling? The Interactions that
occur during trade and transactions, or interaction that takes place
during Islamic/dawah events are they different to those that take
place for purely social purposes?
Answer:
In the Name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
Dear Brother,
I pray that you are in good health and spirits.
I believe that there is a certain amount of confusion about what
constitutes free mixing and what is simply required in the way of
social graces.
Yes, free mixing of the genders is prohibited. However, and I pray one
of our scholars can elaborate further, in today's contemporary Western
societies, it is unrealistic to try to avoid any and all interaction
with members of the opposite sex.
Even when there's a purpose to the interaction, such as business or
work for example, it is inevitable that there will be a social aspect
to this contact.
Question 1
Is it true that there is no Khalwa in a public place? If one was to
meet a work colleague of the opposite sex in a shopping mall would you
be able to greet them and have a conversation within the limits of
Islam?
Khalwa takes place when one man, or more than one man, and one woman
are alone in a place that no one else can enter. Seeing someone in a
shopping mall is not khalwa. If you see a co-worker in a public place,
why would you ignore them? From the Muslim perspective, not talking to
the person may be interpreted as modesty and politeness. However, from
the non-Muslim's perspective, such behavior may be interpreted as
coldness or rudeness. It is important to look at the consequences of
our actions. Certainly a courteous greeting and an polite inquiry
after the person's health goes a long way in giving a good impression
of Islam. Remember that our actions are often interpreted as
representing the religion itself.
Question 2
What are the implications of a Private and Public defined place to the
ruling on social interaction between the sexes?
Certainly, the limits on gender interaction have to be more
scrupulously observed in private. By private, I assume you mean a
private function, such as a wedding. In that type of setting, which is
more conducive to free mixing, it is definitely better to be cautious.
However, I can't comment unless it's on a case-by-case basis. Every
wedding is different. Some weddings are strictly separated. Some are
mixed. Some wedding parties are very observant of hijab and gender
rules and others aren't. If you're in a situation where you're invited
to a wedding and you simply can't get out of it, then you can minimize
your contact with members of the opposite sex or simply not stay long.
As far as public functions are concerned, once again, that depends on
the community and their dynamics. Some public events are strictly
separated with the women sitting behind screens. Other events allow
guests to sit where they want. However, I have noticed that families
usually sit together, while other tables are reserved for single
brothers. This arrangement can work if people keep their interaction
modest and respectful.
However, if you are truly uncomfortable being in a mixed setting, even
if the women are covered, then you can choose not to attend. If it's a
fundraiser, why not drop off your check and keep on going?
Keep in mind that at some point in time you will have to interact with
Muslim sisters who do not observe hijab. As long as you guard your
gaze and observe the same decorum you would with any Muslim sister,
then insha'Allah, things should work out just fine.
Question 3
How does the event's purpose affect the ruling? The Interactions that
occur during trade and transactions, or interaction that takes place
during Islamic/dawah events are they different to those that take
place for purely social purposes?
I'm not sure what you mean by purely social purposes. When there is a
need, there is no problem with brothers and sisters interacting. The
important thing is to strike a balance. For example, you might be
working with sisters in organizing a dawah program. Obviously, you
will have to talk to them. However, you might see the sisters in a
different setting, like someone's house for example. From what I've
observed, people can maintain a good working relationship, but in more
private settings they observe a pleasant and modest distance. So if
you were to see the sisters at a dinner party, for example, you might
just give salaams and give them their space.
I hope this has been helpful.
And Allah knows best.
Aslamalaikum
I am struggling to understand the social system of Islam that governs
the relationship between the two sexes. To my understanding there are
certain shariah factors that define the permissibility of interaction.
1. Purpose of interaction (e.g. Trade, education, employment, dawah,
celebrations etc)
2. Where the interaction takes place (Shariah definitions of Public or Private)
Please could you provide information/opinions (Hanafi) on the following?
Question 1
Is it true that there is no Khalwa in a public place? If one was to
meet a work colleague of the opposite in a shopping mall would you be
able to greet them and have a conversation within the limits of Islam.
Question 2
What are the implications of a Private and Public defined place to the
ruling on social interaction between the sexes?
In a recent charity event the environment was "mixed". I was told this
was permissible on the following basis.
The event was public and open to anybody
The purpose of the event/interaction was for charity and not for social purposes
Seating arrangements were based on family tables.
The actual environment seems similar to certain cultural marriage
ceremonies (free mixing) which are prohibited due to the private
nature of the event.
Does the observation of Hijab by all females have any consequences to
the permissibility of the events, i.e. If all women are covered
appropriately then can there be interaction between the sexes.
Question 3
How does the event's purpose affect the ruling? The Interactions that
occur during trade and transactions, or interaction that takes place
during Islamic/dawah events are they different to those that take
place for purely social purposes?
Answer:
In the Name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
Dear Brother,
I pray that you are in good health and spirits.
I believe that there is a certain amount of confusion about what
constitutes free mixing and what is simply required in the way of
social graces.
Yes, free mixing of the genders is prohibited. However, and I pray one
of our scholars can elaborate further, in today's contemporary Western
societies, it is unrealistic to try to avoid any and all interaction
with members of the opposite sex.
Even when there's a purpose to the interaction, such as business or
work for example, it is inevitable that there will be a social aspect
to this contact.
Question 1
Is it true that there is no Khalwa in a public place? If one was to
meet a work colleague of the opposite sex in a shopping mall would you
be able to greet them and have a conversation within the limits of
Islam?
Khalwa takes place when one man, or more than one man, and one woman
are alone in a place that no one else can enter. Seeing someone in a
shopping mall is not khalwa. If you see a co-worker in a public place,
why would you ignore them? From the Muslim perspective, not talking to
the person may be interpreted as modesty and politeness. However, from
the non-Muslim's perspective, such behavior may be interpreted as
coldness or rudeness. It is important to look at the consequences of
our actions. Certainly a courteous greeting and an polite inquiry
after the person's health goes a long way in giving a good impression
of Islam. Remember that our actions are often interpreted as
representing the religion itself.
Question 2
What are the implications of a Private and Public defined place to the
ruling on social interaction between the sexes?
Certainly, the limits on gender interaction have to be more
scrupulously observed in private. By private, I assume you mean a
private function, such as a wedding. In that type of setting, which is
more conducive to free mixing, it is definitely better to be cautious.
However, I can't comment unless it's on a case-by-case basis. Every
wedding is different. Some weddings are strictly separated. Some are
mixed. Some wedding parties are very observant of hijab and gender
rules and others aren't. If you're in a situation where you're invited
to a wedding and you simply can't get out of it, then you can minimize
your contact with members of the opposite sex or simply not stay long.
As far as public functions are concerned, once again, that depends on
the community and their dynamics. Some public events are strictly
separated with the women sitting behind screens. Other events allow
guests to sit where they want. However, I have noticed that families
usually sit together, while other tables are reserved for single
brothers. This arrangement can work if people keep their interaction
modest and respectful.
However, if you are truly uncomfortable being in a mixed setting, even
if the women are covered, then you can choose not to attend. If it's a
fundraiser, why not drop off your check and keep on going?
Keep in mind that at some point in time you will have to interact with
Muslim sisters who do not observe hijab. As long as you guard your
gaze and observe the same decorum you would with any Muslim sister,
then insha'Allah, things should work out just fine.
Question 3
How does the event's purpose affect the ruling? The Interactions that
occur during trade and transactions, or interaction that takes place
during Islamic/dawah events are they different to those that take
place for purely social purposes?
I'm not sure what you mean by purely social purposes. When there is a
need, there is no problem with brothers and sisters interacting. The
important thing is to strike a balance. For example, you might be
working with sisters in organizing a dawah program. Obviously, you
will have to talk to them. However, you might see the sisters in a
different setting, like someone's house for example. From what I've
observed, people can maintain a good working relationship, but in more
private settings they observe a pleasant and modest distance. So if
you were to see the sisters at a dinner party, for example, you might
just give salaams and give them their space.
I hope this has been helpful.
And Allah knows best.
Fathwa, - Is it obligatory to cover the area under the chin?
Question:
I read that some scholars say that covering the chin and under it is
fardh, but some say because of its difficulty it is not. I have
difficulty wearing my hijab so that it covers my chin, also my cheeks
are really full and when I wear it in that manner I feel very insecure
as it draws more attention to them (I am in the time of meeting
potential husbands!) so can I wear hijab and just pin it under my
chin? I would be covering everything except for the part right under
my chin.
Answer:
Walaikum assalam,
I asked Mufti Mahmoud Ashraf Usmani about this last year: He said that the
scholars do not emphasize that the area under the chin is necessarily
from the awrah that must be covered, because of the difficulty of
covering it (and the wide hardship in insisting on such a ruling).
Others, however, emphasize it strongly.
I had asked Shaykh Adib al-Kallas about this a few years ago. He said
that the area should be covered, but because it is small in area, and
only little of it is generally visible from the sides, it would not
invalidate the prayer if left uncovered.
And Allah knows best, and He alone gives success.
Wassalam,
I read that some scholars say that covering the chin and under it is
fardh, but some say because of its difficulty it is not. I have
difficulty wearing my hijab so that it covers my chin, also my cheeks
are really full and when I wear it in that manner I feel very insecure
as it draws more attention to them (I am in the time of meeting
potential husbands!) so can I wear hijab and just pin it under my
chin? I would be covering everything except for the part right under
my chin.
Answer:
Walaikum assalam,
I asked Mufti Mahmoud Ashraf Usmani about this last year: He said that the
scholars do not emphasize that the area under the chin is necessarily
from the awrah that must be covered, because of the difficulty of
covering it (and the wide hardship in insisting on such a ruling).
Others, however, emphasize it strongly.
I had asked Shaykh Adib al-Kallas about this a few years ago. He said
that the area should be covered, but because it is small in area, and
only little of it is generally visible from the sides, it would not
invalidate the prayer if left uncovered.
And Allah knows best, and He alone gives success.
Wassalam,
The collection and compilation of the Quran
Part 1: During the Lifetime of the Prophet.
A study of the compilation of text must begin with the character of
the book itself as it was handed down by Muhammadto his
Companionsduring his lifetime. It was not delivered or revealed all at
once.
The Noble Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammadpiecemeal over a
period of twenty-three years from the time when hebegan to preach the
Message of Islam in Makkah in 610 CE until his death at Madeenah in
632 CE. The Quran itself declares that Allaah addressed Prophet
Muhammadwith what means:"…And We have spaced it distinctly."]Quran
25:32[
Furthermore, no chronological record of the sequence of passages was
kept by Muhammadhimself or his Companions so that, as each of these
began to be collected into an actual Soorah )chapter(, no thought was
given as to theme, order of deliverance or chronological sequence. It
is acknowledged by all Muslim writers that most of the chapters,
especially the longer ones, are composite texts containing various
passages not necessarily linked to each other in the sequence in which
they were given. As time went on Muhammadwould say words to the effect
of: "Put this passage in the chapter in which so-and-so is mentioned",
or: "Put it in such and such a place." ]As-Suyooti, Al-Itqaan fee
'Uloom Al-Quran, p.141[ Thus, passages were added to compilations of
other passages already collected together until each of these became a
distinct chapter. The evidence that a number of these chapters already
had their recognised titles during the lifetime of Muhammad. is the
following two Prophetic narrations: "Anyone who recites the last two
verses of Soorah Al-Baqarah )The Cow, chapter 2( at night, they will
suffice him." ]Al-Bukhaari[ And:"If anyone learns by heart the first
ten verses of the Soorah Al-Kahf )the Cave, No. 18(, he will be
protected from the Dajjaal )Antichrist(."]Muslim[
At the same time, there is also reason to believe that there were
other chapters to which titles were not necessarily given by Prophet
Muhammad. An example of this is Soorah Al-Ikhlaas ]Chapter 112[, for
although the Prophetspoke at some length about it and said it was
equal to one-third of the whole Quran, he did not mention it by name.
]Muslim[
As the Quran developed, the Prophet's Companionstook portions of it
down in writing and also committed its passages to memory. It appears
that the memorisation of the text was the foremost method of recording
its contents as the very word Quran means 'recitation'. From the very
first word delivered to Muhammadby the angel Jibreel )Gabriel( on
Mount Hiraa', namely Iqra' – 'Recite!' ]Chapter 96:1[, we can see that
the verbal recitation of its passages was very highly esteemed and
consistently practiced. Nevertheless, it is to actual written records
of its text that the Quran itself bears witness in the following verse
)which means(:"]It is recorded[ in honoured sheets. Exalted and
purified. ]Carried[ by the hands of messenger-angels. Noble and
dutiful."]Quran: 80:13-16[
Furthermore, there is evidence that even during the early days of
Prophet Muhammadin Makkah, portions of the Quran as then delivered
were being written down. When 'Umarwas still a pagan, he one day
struck his sister when he heard her reading a portion of the Quran.
Upon seeing blood on her cheek, however, he relented and said:"Give me
this sheet which I heard youreading just now so that I may see what
Muhammad has brought."]Ibn Is-Haaq, Seerat Rasoolullaah, p.156[. On
reading the portion of the twentieth chapter )of the Quran( which she
had been reading, he became a Muslim.
Nonetheless, it appears that right up to the end of the life of
Muhammadthe practice of memorisation predominated over the writing
down of the Quran and was regarded as more important.
In the Hadeeth )narrations( records, we read that the angel Jibreel is
said to have checked the recitation of the Quran every Ramadan with
Prophet Muhammadand, in his )the Prophet( final year, he )Jibreel(
checked it with him twice. Faatimahsaid:"The Prophet, sallallaahu
alayhi wa sallam, told me, 'Jibreel used to recite the Quran to me and
I to him once a year, but this year he recited the whole Quran with me
twice. I think that my death is approaching.'"]Al-Bukhaari[
Some of the closest Companions of the Prophetdevoted themselves to
learning the text of the Quran by heart. These included Ubayy Ibn
Ka'b, Mu'aath Ibn Jabal, Zayd Ibn Thaabit, Abu Zayd and Abu
Ad-Dardaa'. Abdullaah Ibn Mas'oodcollected more than ninety of the one
hundred and fourteen chapters by himself, learning the remaining
chapters from other Companions.
Regarding the written materials, there are no records as to exactly
how much of the Quran was written down during the lifetime of Prophet
Muhammad. There is no evidence to suggest that anyone actually
compiled the whole text of the Quran into a single manuscript, whether
directly under the authority of Prophet Muhammador otherwise.
With the death of Prophet Muhammadin 632 CE, the revelation stopped,
as the Quran had become complete. There could be no further revelation
once its chosen recipient had passed away. While he lived, however,
there was always the possibility that new passages could be added and
it hardly seemed appropriate, therefore, to contemplate codifying the
text into one harmonious whole. Thus, it is not surprising to find
that the book was widely scattered in the memories of men and in
writing on various different materials at the time of the death of the
Prophet.
There were only a few disputes among the Companions about the text of
the Quran while the Prophetwas alive, unlike those which arose soon
after his death. All these factors explain the absence of an official
codified text at the time of his death. Imaam As-Suyootistated that
the Quran, as sent down from Allaah in separate stages, had been
completely written down and carefully preserved, but that it had not
been assembled into one single location during the lifetime of Prophet
Muhammad, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, ]Ibn Is-haaq, Seerat
Rasoolullaah, p.96[
All of it was said to have been available in principle, for the
Companionshad absorbed it in their memories and it had been written
down on separate materials. The final order of the various verses and
chapters is also presumed to have been defined by the Prophetwhile he
was still alive.
A study of the compilation of text must begin with the character of
the book itself as it was handed down by Muhammadto his
Companionsduring his lifetime. It was not delivered or revealed all at
once.
The Noble Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammadpiecemeal over a
period of twenty-three years from the time when hebegan to preach the
Message of Islam in Makkah in 610 CE until his death at Madeenah in
632 CE. The Quran itself declares that Allaah addressed Prophet
Muhammadwith what means:"…And We have spaced it distinctly."]Quran
25:32[
Furthermore, no chronological record of the sequence of passages was
kept by Muhammadhimself or his Companions so that, as each of these
began to be collected into an actual Soorah )chapter(, no thought was
given as to theme, order of deliverance or chronological sequence. It
is acknowledged by all Muslim writers that most of the chapters,
especially the longer ones, are composite texts containing various
passages not necessarily linked to each other in the sequence in which
they were given. As time went on Muhammadwould say words to the effect
of: "Put this passage in the chapter in which so-and-so is mentioned",
or: "Put it in such and such a place." ]As-Suyooti, Al-Itqaan fee
'Uloom Al-Quran, p.141[ Thus, passages were added to compilations of
other passages already collected together until each of these became a
distinct chapter. The evidence that a number of these chapters already
had their recognised titles during the lifetime of Muhammad. is the
following two Prophetic narrations: "Anyone who recites the last two
verses of Soorah Al-Baqarah )The Cow, chapter 2( at night, they will
suffice him." ]Al-Bukhaari[ And:"If anyone learns by heart the first
ten verses of the Soorah Al-Kahf )the Cave, No. 18(, he will be
protected from the Dajjaal )Antichrist(."]Muslim[
At the same time, there is also reason to believe that there were
other chapters to which titles were not necessarily given by Prophet
Muhammad. An example of this is Soorah Al-Ikhlaas ]Chapter 112[, for
although the Prophetspoke at some length about it and said it was
equal to one-third of the whole Quran, he did not mention it by name.
]Muslim[
As the Quran developed, the Prophet's Companionstook portions of it
down in writing and also committed its passages to memory. It appears
that the memorisation of the text was the foremost method of recording
its contents as the very word Quran means 'recitation'. From the very
first word delivered to Muhammadby the angel Jibreel )Gabriel( on
Mount Hiraa', namely Iqra' – 'Recite!' ]Chapter 96:1[, we can see that
the verbal recitation of its passages was very highly esteemed and
consistently practiced. Nevertheless, it is to actual written records
of its text that the Quran itself bears witness in the following verse
)which means(:"]It is recorded[ in honoured sheets. Exalted and
purified. ]Carried[ by the hands of messenger-angels. Noble and
dutiful."]Quran: 80:13-16[
Furthermore, there is evidence that even during the early days of
Prophet Muhammadin Makkah, portions of the Quran as then delivered
were being written down. When 'Umarwas still a pagan, he one day
struck his sister when he heard her reading a portion of the Quran.
Upon seeing blood on her cheek, however, he relented and said:"Give me
this sheet which I heard youreading just now so that I may see what
Muhammad has brought."]Ibn Is-Haaq, Seerat Rasoolullaah, p.156[. On
reading the portion of the twentieth chapter )of the Quran( which she
had been reading, he became a Muslim.
Nonetheless, it appears that right up to the end of the life of
Muhammadthe practice of memorisation predominated over the writing
down of the Quran and was regarded as more important.
In the Hadeeth )narrations( records, we read that the angel Jibreel is
said to have checked the recitation of the Quran every Ramadan with
Prophet Muhammadand, in his )the Prophet( final year, he )Jibreel(
checked it with him twice. Faatimahsaid:"The Prophet, sallallaahu
alayhi wa sallam, told me, 'Jibreel used to recite the Quran to me and
I to him once a year, but this year he recited the whole Quran with me
twice. I think that my death is approaching.'"]Al-Bukhaari[
Some of the closest Companions of the Prophetdevoted themselves to
learning the text of the Quran by heart. These included Ubayy Ibn
Ka'b, Mu'aath Ibn Jabal, Zayd Ibn Thaabit, Abu Zayd and Abu
Ad-Dardaa'. Abdullaah Ibn Mas'oodcollected more than ninety of the one
hundred and fourteen chapters by himself, learning the remaining
chapters from other Companions.
Regarding the written materials, there are no records as to exactly
how much of the Quran was written down during the lifetime of Prophet
Muhammad. There is no evidence to suggest that anyone actually
compiled the whole text of the Quran into a single manuscript, whether
directly under the authority of Prophet Muhammador otherwise.
With the death of Prophet Muhammadin 632 CE, the revelation stopped,
as the Quran had become complete. There could be no further revelation
once its chosen recipient had passed away. While he lived, however,
there was always the possibility that new passages could be added and
it hardly seemed appropriate, therefore, to contemplate codifying the
text into one harmonious whole. Thus, it is not surprising to find
that the book was widely scattered in the memories of men and in
writing on various different materials at the time of the death of the
Prophet.
There were only a few disputes among the Companions about the text of
the Quran while the Prophetwas alive, unlike those which arose soon
after his death. All these factors explain the absence of an official
codified text at the time of his death. Imaam As-Suyootistated that
the Quran, as sent down from Allaah in separate stages, had been
completely written down and carefully preserved, but that it had not
been assembled into one single location during the lifetime of Prophet
Muhammad, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, ]Ibn Is-haaq, Seerat
Rasoolullaah, p.96[
All of it was said to have been available in principle, for the
Companionshad absorbed it in their memories and it had been written
down on separate materials. The final order of the various verses and
chapters is also presumed to have been defined by the Prophetwhile he
was still alive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)