* Dought & clear, - [ Prayers] - The green dome in Madeenah: its history and the ruling on its construction and on leaving it as it is.

* The green dome in Madeenah: its history and the ruling on its
construction and on leaving it as it is.
Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
The history of the green dome
The dome over the grave of the Prophet(peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) dates back to the seventh century AH. It was built during
the reign of Sultan Qalawoon, and at first it was the colour of wood,
then it became white, then blue, then green, and it has remained green
until the present.
Professor 'Ali Haafiz (may Allaah preserve him) said:
There was no dome over the sacred chamber. There was in the roof of
the mosque above the chamber a waist-high enclosure of brick to
distinguish the location of the chamber from the rest of the mosque's
roof.
Sultaan Qalawoon al-Saalihi was the first one to build a dome over the
chamber. He did that in 678 AH. It was square at the bottom and
octagonal at the top, made of wood, and built on top of the pillars
that surrounded the chamber. Planks of wood were nailed to it, over
which plates of lead were placed, and the brick enclosure was replaced
with one made of wood.
The dome was refurbished at the time of al-Naasir Hasan ibn Muhammad
Qalawoon, then the leaden plates slipped, but they were fixed and
refurbished at the time of al-Ashraf Sha'baan ibn Husayn ibn Muhammad
in 765 AH. It fell into disrepair and was renovated at the time of
Sultaan Qayit Bey in 881 AH.
The chamber and dome were burned in the fire that swept through the
Prophet's mosque in 886 AH. During the reign of Sultaan Qayit Bey the
dome was rebuilt, in 887 AH, and strong pillars to support it were
built in the floor of the mosque, and they were built of bricks to the
correct height. After the dome had been built in the manner described
above, cracks appeared in its upper part. When it proved impossible
to refurbish it, the Sultaan Qayit Bey ordered that the upper part be
demolished and rebuilt strongly using white plaster. So it was built
solidly in 892 AH.
In 1253 AH, an order was issued by the Ottoman Sultan 'Abd al-Hameed
to paint the dome green. He was the first one to colour it green, and
the colour has been renewed whenever necessary until the present.
It became known as the green dome after it was painted green. It was
previously known as the white dome or the fragrant dome or the blue
dome. End quote.
Fusool min Tareekh al-Madeenah al-Munawwarahby 'Ali Haafiz (p. 127, 128).
Secondly:
Rulings thereon
The scholars, both in the past and in modern times, criticized the
building of this dome and its being given a colour. All of that is
because of what they know of sharee'ah closing many doors for fear of
falling into shirk.
These scholars include the following:
1 – al-San'aani (may Allaah have mercy on him) said inTa-theer al-I'tiqaad:
If you say: A great dome has been built over the grave of the
Messenger(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), costing a great
deal of money, I say: This is in fact great ignorance of the
situation, because this dome was not built by him(peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) or by his Sahaabah or by those who followed
them, or by those who followed the Taabi'een, or by the scholars and
imams of the ummah. Rather this dome was built over his grave(peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) on the orders of one of the later
kings of Egypt, namely the Sultan Qalawoon al-Saalihi who is known as
King Mansoor, in 678 AH, and was mentioned inTahqeeq al-Nasrah bi
Talkhees Ma'aalim Dar al-Hijrah. These are things that were done on
the orders of the state and not on the basis of shar'i evidence. End
quote.
2 – The scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas were asked:
There are those who take the building of the green dome over the
Prophet's grave in the Prophet's Mosque as evidence that it is
permissible to build domes over other graves, such as those of the
righteous and others. Is this argument correct or what should our
response to them be?
They replied:
It is not correct to quote the fact that people built a dome over the
grave of the Prophet(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) as
evidence that it is permissible to build domes over the graves of the
righteous dead and others, because those people's building a dome over
his grave(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was haraam and
those who did it sinned thereby, because they went against what is
proven in a report from Abu'l-Hayaaj al-Asadi who said: 'Ali ibn Abi
Taalib (may Allaah be pleased with him) said to me: Shall I not send
you on the same mission as the Messenger of Allaah(peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) sent me? Do not leave any image without erasing
it or any high grave without levelling it.
And it was narrated that Jaabir (may Allaah be pleased with him) said:
The Prophet(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) forbade
plastering over graves, or sitting on them or building over them. Both
reports were narrated by Muslim in hisSaheeh. So it is not correct for
anyone to quote the haraam action of some people as evidence that it
is permissible to do similar haraam actions, because it is not
permissible to go against the words of the Prophet(peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) by citing the words or actions of anyone else.
And because he is the one who conveyed the command from Allaah, and he
is the one who is to be obeyed, and we must beware of going against
his commands, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):"And
whatsoever the Messenger (Muhammadصلى الله عليه وسلم( gives you, take
it; and whatsoever he forbids you, abstain )from it(" ]al-Hashr 59:7[.
And there are other verses which enjoin obedience to Allaah and to His
Messenger. And because building up graves and erecting domes over them
are means that lead to associating their occupants with Allaah, and
the means that lead to shirk must be blocked. End quote.
Shaykh 'Abd al-'Azeez ibn Baaz, Shaykh 'Abd al-Razzaaq 'Afeefi, Shaykh
'Abd-Allaah ibn Qa'ood.
Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa'imah(9/83, 84)
3 – The scholars of the Standing Committee also said:
There is no proof in the fact that a dome was set up over the
Prophet's grave for those who take it as an excuse for building domes
of the graves of the awliya' ("saints") and righteous people, because
the building of a dome over his grave was not done on his instructions
and was not done by any of his companions (may Allaah be pleased with
them), or by the Taabi'een, or by any of the imams of guidance in the
early generations whom the Prophet(peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) testified were good. Rather it was done by people of bid'ah
(innovation). It was proven that the Prophet(peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said: "Whoever introduces anything into this
matter of ours that is not part of it will have it rejected." And it
was proven that 'Ali (may Allaah be pleased with him) said to
Abu'l-Hayaaj: Shall I not send you on the same mission as the
Messenger of Allaah(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) sent
me? Do not leave any image without erasing it or any high grave
without levelling it.Narrated by Muslim. As it is not proven that
he(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) built a dome over his
grave, and it is not proven from any of the leading imams; rather what
is proven shows that to be an invalid action, and no Muslim should
feel any attachment to the action of innovators who built a dome over
the grave of the Prophet(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
End quote.
Shaykh 'Abd al-'Azzez ibn Baaz, Shaykh 'Abd al-Razzaaq 'Afeefi, Shaykh
'Abd-Allaah ibn Ghadyaan, Shaykh 'Abd-Allaah ibn Qa'ood
Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa'imah(2/264, 265).
4 – Shaykh Shams al-Deen al-Afghaani (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
al-'Allaamah al-Khajandi (1379 AH) said, discussing the history of the
green dome that was built over the grave of the Prophet(peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him), and explaining that it is an
innovation that was done by some sultans and ignorant persons who
erred and made a mistake, and that it is contrary to the clear saheeh
ahaadeeth and reflects ignorance of the Sunnah, and that they went to
extremes and imitated the Christians who are confused and misguided:
It should be noted that until the year 678 AH, there was no dome over
the chamber which contains the grave of the Prophet(peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him), rather it was built by the king
al-Zaahir al-Mansoor Qalawoon al-Saalihi in that year (678 AH), when
this dome was built.
I say: He did that because he had seen in Egypt and Syria the adorned
churches of the Christians, so he imitated them out of ignorance of
the command and Sunnah of the Prophet(peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him), as al-Waleed imitated them by adorning the mosque, as was
mentioned in Wafa' al-Wafa'.
It should be noted that undoubtedly this action of Qalawoon was
contrary to the saheeh ahaadeeth of the Messenger of Allaah(peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him), but ignorance is a great calamity
and exaggeration in love and veneration is a real disaster, and
imitation of foreigners is a fatal disease. We seek refuge with Allaah
from ignorance and exaggeration and imitation of foreigners. End
quote.
Juhood 'Ulama' al-Hanafiyyah fi Ibtaal 'Aqaa'id al-Qubooriyyah(3/1660-1662).
Thirdly:
The reason why it has not been demolished:
The scholars have explained the shar'i rulings concerning the building
of this dome and its obvious effects on the followers of bid'ah' who
have developed an attachment to this structure and its colour, and
they praise and venerate it a great deal in their poetry and writings.
Now it is up to the authorities to implement these fatwas, and this is
nothing to do with the scholars.
The reason why it is not demolished is so as to ward off fitnah and
for fear that it may lead to chaos among the ordinary people and the
ignorant. Unfortunately the ordinary people have only reached this
level of veneration towards this dome because of the leadership of
misguided scholars and imams of innovation. They are the ones who
incite the ordinary people against the land of the Two Holy
Sanctuaries and its 'aqeedah and its manhaj. They are very upset about
many actions that are in accordance with sharee'ah in our view and
contrary to innovation in their view.
Whatever the case, the shar'i ruling is quite clear, and the fact that
this dome has not been demolished does not mean that it is permissible
to build it or any dome over any grave, no matter what grave it is.
Shaykh Saalih al-'Usaymi (may Allaah preserve him) said:
The fact that this dome has remained for eight centuries does not mean
that it has become permissible, and being silent about it does not
indicate approval of it or that it is permissible. Rather the Muslim
authorities should remove it and put it back as it was at the time of
the Prophet(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). They should
remove the dome and the adornments and engravings that are found in
the mosques, above all the Prophet's Mosque, so long as that will not
lead to an even greater fitnah. If it would lead to an even greater
fitnah, then the ruler should postpone the matter until he finds an
opportunity for that. End quote.
Bida' al-Quboor, Anwaa'uha wa ahkaamuha(p. 253).
And Allaah knows best.

Be Patient: Key to happiness and success

This is another story which happened in the States. A man came out of
his home to admire his new truck. To his puzzlement, his
three-year-old son was happily picked stone and scratched lines on the
side of the truck. In his anger, the man ran to his son, knocked him
away. And took the little boy's hands and hit it many times as
punishment, not realizing he was using a wrench. When the father
calmed down, he rushed his son to the hospital.
Although the doctor tried desperately to save the crushed bones, he
finally had to amputate the fingers from both the little boy's hands.
When the boy woke up from the surgery and saw his bandaged stubs, he
innocently said, "Daddy, I'm sorry about your truck." Then he asked,
"But when are my fingers going to grow back?" The father was so hurt.
He went back to truck and kicked it a lot of times. Sitting back he
looked at the scratches, little boy wrote "I LOVE YOU DAD." Later then
committed suicide.
Think about this story the next time someone steps on your feet or you
wish to take revenge. Think first before you lose your patience with
someone you love. Trucks can be repaired. Broken bones and hurt
feelings often can't. Too often we fail to recognize the difference
between the person and the performance. We forget that forgiveness is
greater than revenge.
People make mistakes. We are allowed to make mistakes, because we
human beings are not perfect. But the actions we take while in a rage
will haunt us forever.
It takes 72 muscles to frown - only 14 to smile! So keep smiling,
After all, we only live once.
In the word SMILE:
*.S stands for Sets you free
*.M stands for Makes you special
*.I stands for Increases your face value
*.L stands for Lifts up your spirits
*.E stands for Erases all your tensions
A Smile makes us look younger, while Prayers make us feel stronger.
Think about how special a smile is. It costs nothing, but has the
power to enrich all, who receive it.
A smile is the light in your window that tells others that there is a
caring, sharing person inside.
Even a smile or a kind word is considered charity.
Good Life starts only when you stop wanting a better One. So, Live
like a Candle, which burns itself but give lights to others.

Personal Perception: Key to happiness and success

Different people have different perception. One man's meat could be
another man's poison.
Once Luqman (as), The Wise said to his son, "Oh son! Do not tie your
heart in seeking the pleasure of people. You are not likely to
succeed. Do not pay attention to what people say. Instead tell
yourself always to seek the pleasure of Allah (SWT)."
Luqman (as), The Wise wanted this lesson to be always remembered and
never to be forgotten. He thought of a way. So, he then told his son
to ride a donkey and the son obeyed. The father followed behind on
foot. They traveled in this way for some distance.
After some distance they came across a group of people. Seeing the son
on the donkey, one of them said, "What an impolite and bad boy. The
old father is walking on foot. The young son is comfortably riding on
the donkey. This is no manner to show respect to one's father."
Father and son heard this. The son came down from the donkey. Luqman
(as), The Wise rode on the donkey.
After some distance they came across another group of people. On
seeing the father riding the donkey, the elder of the group said, "Oh
you old man! This is not the way to bring up a son. You make him walk
in the hot sun, while you sit comfortably on the donkey."
Luqman (as), The Wise paid attention to what the people said. He came
down from the donkey. Both father and son walked on foot. The donkey
walked in front. They went a little further.
People seeing them, said, "How foolish you are? You walk behind a
donkey. Why don't you ride it?"
Luqman (as), The Wise and his son once again accepted what the people
said. They both rode the donkey and went further. They came across a
river. There was a bridge to be crossed. Some people were sitting
there. They saw Luqman (as), The Wise and his son riding the donkey.
One of them said, "It is very unkind and cruel of you two to ride on
the poor donkey. The little animal can hardly take all your burden."
So taking this advice Luqman (as), The Wise and his son dismounted
from the donkey. They traveled a little distance further. Looking very
lovingly Luqman (as), The Wise said to his son, "You have heard and
seen what the people said. It must have assured you, by now, that
whatever you do or whichever way you move, one is not able to please
the people of the world." You can never have everyone praise you, nor
will everyone condemn you. Never in the past, not at present, and
never will be in the future.
Luqman (as), The Wise pointed at the flowing river and added, "A
person can build a wall across the river. It will stop the flow of the
water. But it is not possible to shut the mouth of the people from
criticism."
Very clearly, similar is the case in our world today. The tongue has
no bone. It can speak even without thought. There are as many opinions
as there are people in the world. It is very bad to find fault with
the other person, especially when he is doing something good. A person
can feel very hurt when he listens to all the tongues that talk loose.
To avoid getting hurt by loose talk, a person can train himself. He
can discipline himself to think. By thinking he can know what is wrong
and void. When a person is sure that what he is doing will please his
Master, Allah (SWT) the Almighty, then he must never worry what others
speak. Thus, do not be too bothered by others words if your conscience
is clear.
"We must do what we conceive to be the right thing and not bother our
heads or burden our souls with whether we will be successful. Because
if we don't do the right thing, we will be doing the wrong thing and
we will just be a part of the disease and not a part of the cure."

The Myth of the Evolution of Fish with Lungs

Evolutionists resort to evolutionist tales regarding fish with
lungs and maintain that these fish were the first vertebrates to
move from water to dry land. However, the idea of the passage from
water to dry land and the role assumed to have been played in this
scenario by fish with lungs stem solely from blind devotion to the
theory of evolution. Evolutionists are unable to produce any
concrete evidence to support their claims. This can clearly be seen
from Darwinist writings. One sees tales about how fish supposedly
developed lungs in order to be able to make use of the oxygen in the
air and how their fins turned into feet to enable them to walk on
land. But these people are unable to produce any fossil evidence
for their claims. The reason for this is clear: such a passage is
entirely imaginary and there is no scientific evidence to support
it.
On the contrary, the scientific evidence refutes these Darwinist
tales. The weakness of the evolutionary myths about fish with lungs
is a fact explicitly and frequently brought up even in evolutionist
literature.
Fish with lungs are able to breathe air and to survive in dry
periods thanks to an astonishing metabolic arrangement and system.
These fish, which have to rise to the surface approximately every 20
minutes, bury themselves inside a cocoon made of mud in dry seasons
when the waters retract and enter into a kind of summer sleep,
known as aestivation. This time, when their metabolisms slow down
enormously, will last for months, or sometimes even for years,
until the rains begin again.
Some evolutionists claim that these creatures are left over from this
so called period, living transitional forms. According to this
entirely imaginary evolutionist fantasy, the fish in question were
imprisoned in very small bodies of water caused by a drought in the
Devonian Period, some 300 million years ago, and learned how to
walk from one pool to another. Some evolutionists regard these fish
as the supposed ancestors of amphibians (and quadrupeds).
There are enormous difference, in terms of skeletons and organs,
between amphibians and the fish with lungs alleged to be their
ancestors. In a paper published in the Journal of Molecular
Evolution the researchers C. Marshall and H. P. Schultz wrote
that,"Morphological analysis of the "living fossils," the coelacanth
and lungfish, has only lead to confusion regarding possible evolution
of tetrapods." (Marshall C. and Schultze HP. Journal of Molecular
Evolution 35 (2): 93-101, 1992.)
A paper in the Proceedings of the Linnean Society admitted the
dilemma facing the supposed evolutionary origins of fish with lungs
– portrayed as resting on very sure foundations:
"… the lungfishes, like every other major group of fishes that I know,
have their origins firmly based innothing." (Quoted in W. R. Bird, The
Origin of Species Revisited [Nashville: Regency, 1991; originally
published by Philosophical Library, 1987],
1:62-63)
In his book "Evolution: A Theory in Crisis,"the molecular biologist
Michael Denton wrote thatevolutionists described fish with lungs as a
transitional form between fish and amphibians, but said that the
individual characteristics of fish with lungs"in no way represent a
realistic passage between the two." ("Evolution: A Theory in Crisis",
Michael Denton, Adler and Adler: Bethesda, Maryland, 3rd ed. 1986,
p. 109)
The fossil record also deals a heavy blow to evolutionist scenarios
regarding fish with lungs. These have remained unchanged for
hundreds of millions of years and fossils belonging to these
creatures are identical to specimens living today. Not a single
fossil exists to justify the claim that the lungs in this fish
developed gradually. This shows that fish with lungs are rather
evidence against evolution, not for it . It is clear in the light of
the above facts that the idea that fish with lungs represent an
evolutionary phase is simply a fantasy.
What evolutionists are doing is to try to spread a scenario about
fish with lungs as if they were the scientific truth and to ignore
the objections to that scenario that can easily be found in the
scientific literature. This is a blind endeavor to spread Darwinist
propaganda with unscientific myths.
Like all living things, fish with lungs exhibited sublime
complexities far beyond the reach of even the most advanced
technologies. And like all living things they are proof of a flawless
Creation. The idea that fish one day moved from the water to dry
land and developed lungs and feet with the help of blind chance is a
myth. The truth is that Almighty Allah has perfectly created these
animals.