Question
Hello To All, Please help me with this: What is the Hukem of doing Haj
or Umra for a 9th month pregnant woman? Best Regards, Rabab
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad,
is His Slave and Messenger.
It is permissible for the pregnant woman to offerHajj and 'Umrah
whether she is in the 9thmonth orany other month of pregnancy. Indeed,
it was proved thatAsmaa' bint 'Umayswent out for Hajj with the
Prophet, when she was pregnant and approaching full term, and she gave
birth at the Meeqaat as stated in the Hadeeth of Jaabirregarding the
description of the Hajj of the Prophet:"…Until he came to Thul
Hulayfah,and Asmaa' bint 'Umays gave birth to Muhammadibn Abi Bakr and
she senta message to the Messenger of Allaah, )asking what she should
do(. He, said: "PerformGhusl )ritual bath( and bandage your private
parts..."
We do not know any disagreement among scholars regarding the
permissibility of the Hajj of the pregnant woman; however, if she
fears harm for herself or if a trustworthy doctor tells her that going
for Hajj may cause harm or pose a risk to her or to her baby because
she is sick or weak or a similar reason, then she should not go for
Hajj that year for Allaah The Almighty says )what means(:
·}Allaah does not charge a soul except ]with that within[ its
capacity.{ ]Quran 2:286[
·}And do not kill yourselves ]or one another[. Indeed, Allaah is to
you ever Merciful.{ ]Quran 4:29[
This is also indicated by the words of the Prophet: "There should be
no harm nor reciprocal harm." ]Ibn Maajah, Ahmad and others[
Allaah Knows best.
"GENERAL ARTICLES"
- Tamil -- Urdu -- Kannada -- Telugu --*-
Share
"BISMILLA HIRRAHMAAN NIRRAHEEM"
WELCOME! - AS'SALAMU ALAIKUM!!
******** *****
*****
[All] praise is [due] to Allah, Lord of the worlds; -
Guide us to the straight path
*- -*
* * In this Blog; More Than Ten Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah} - Most Usefull Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And All Articles & Get Benifite!
* Visit :-
"INDIA "- Time in New Delhi -
*- WHAT ISLAM SAYS -*
-
Islam is a religion of Mercy, Peace and Blessing. Its teachings emphasize kind hear tedness, help, sympathy, forgiveness, sacrifice, love and care.Qur’an, the Shari’ah and the life of our beloved Prophet (SAW) mirrors this attribute, and it should be reflected in the conduct of a Momin.Islam appreciates those who are kind to their fellow being,and dislikes them who are hard hearted, curt, and hypocrite.Recall that historical moment, when Prophet (SAW) entered Makkah as a conqueror. There was before him a multitude of surrendered enemies, former oppressors and persecutors, who had evicted the Muslims from their homes, deprived them of their belongings, humiliated and intimidated Prophet (SAW) hatched schemes for his murder and tortured and killed his companions. But Prophet (SAW) displayed his usual magnanimity, generosity, and kind heartedness by forgiving all of them and declaring general amnesty...Subhanallah. May Allah help us tailor our life according to the teachings of Islam. (Aameen)./-
''HASBUNALLAHU WA NI'MAL WAKEEL''
-
''Allah is Sufficient for us'' + '' All praise is due to Allah. May peace and blessings beupon the Messenger, his household and companions '' (Aameen) | | |
| | |
|
Share
Follow Me | |
**
Share
-
-*- *: ::->
*
Thursday, June 20, 2013
Fathwa - A nine-month-pregnant woman may perform Hajjor 'Umrah
Fathwa - Having intention throughout the prayer
Question
Salamualaikum wr wb. Do you have to maintain an intention throughout
prayer? Sometimes wheni pray i forget what i am reciting )i.e if i am
reciting al fatiha or another surah(. Does thatmean I have to repeat
myprayer?
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad,
is His Slave and Messenger.
You should know that intention is to resolve to do something.
Intention in prayer is that the worshiper resolves to pray Thuhr or
'Asr for example. That intention should be made along with the
Takbeeratul-Ihraam )first Takbeerah( or a little time before it. It
was stated in Ar-RawdhAl-Murbi': "One can have intention while
reciting Takbeeratul-Ihraam so that the intention can be combined to
the act of worship. One can also have it )intention(
beforeTakbeeratul-Ihraam in a time that is considered by custom as a
little time." ]End quote[
If you come to know that,then intention is not done or renewed inside
the prayer. So, if you have intention and recited Takbeer, then
youhave maintained intention and that is enough.
As for what you have stated that you do not know whether you have
recited Al-Faatihah or theSoorah, then this does not make it necessary
for you to renew intention or to repeat the prayer from the beginning.
But if you have doubt whether or not you recited Al-Faatihah while you
are still in prayer, then recite it and consider that you have not
recited it before. Thatis because Al-Faatihah is a Rukn )pillar of
prayer( and whoever doubts leaving a Rukn of the prayer while he is
still in it, has to do it.Ibn Qudaamahsaid in Al-Mughni: "If one has
doubts about leaving a Rukn of the prayer while he is still in it,
whether he missed it or not? He will be like the one who did not
perform it whether he is leading people in prayer or praying alone
because the basic principle is that it was not performed." ]End quote[
Finally, reciting a Soorah after Al-Faatihah is something
recommendedand thus if one doubts whether or not he did it, then his
doubt has no effect and his prayer is valid.
Allaah Knows best.
Salamualaikum wr wb. Do you have to maintain an intention throughout
prayer? Sometimes wheni pray i forget what i am reciting )i.e if i am
reciting al fatiha or another surah(. Does thatmean I have to repeat
myprayer?
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad,
is His Slave and Messenger.
You should know that intention is to resolve to do something.
Intention in prayer is that the worshiper resolves to pray Thuhr or
'Asr for example. That intention should be made along with the
Takbeeratul-Ihraam )first Takbeerah( or a little time before it. It
was stated in Ar-RawdhAl-Murbi': "One can have intention while
reciting Takbeeratul-Ihraam so that the intention can be combined to
the act of worship. One can also have it )intention(
beforeTakbeeratul-Ihraam in a time that is considered by custom as a
little time." ]End quote[
If you come to know that,then intention is not done or renewed inside
the prayer. So, if you have intention and recited Takbeer, then
youhave maintained intention and that is enough.
As for what you have stated that you do not know whether you have
recited Al-Faatihah or theSoorah, then this does not make it necessary
for you to renew intention or to repeat the prayer from the beginning.
But if you have doubt whether or not you recited Al-Faatihah while you
are still in prayer, then recite it and consider that you have not
recited it before. Thatis because Al-Faatihah is a Rukn )pillar of
prayer( and whoever doubts leaving a Rukn of the prayer while he is
still in it, has to do it.Ibn Qudaamahsaid in Al-Mughni: "If one has
doubts about leaving a Rukn of the prayer while he is still in it,
whether he missed it or not? He will be like the one who did not
perform it whether he is leading people in prayer or praying alone
because the basic principle is that it was not performed." ]End quote[
Finally, reciting a Soorah after Al-Faatihah is something
recommendedand thus if one doubts whether or not he did it, then his
doubt has no effect and his prayer is valid.
Allaah Knows best.
Fathwa - In divorce, it is the husband's word that counts
Question
salam wallikum ..a divorce saman a person from court came but i was
not at home stating that your husband has sent it, but when i spoke to
my husband he said that he did not sent it and he dose not want to
divorce me, he said it could be his family, but after that I did not
hear from him now he is saying that his affair withbhabhi should
agreed by me or he will marry someone else...i dont want divorce nor
can i adjust this relation ship what shouls i do.
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad,
is His Slave and Messenger.
Sharee'ah )Islamic law( has made divorce in the husband's hand and
thus he is the one who has theright to divorce his wife. If he denies
divorce and there is no proof that he has actually divorced her,then
the husband's word is taken into account. It isnarrated in the
Masaa'il of ImaamAhmad ibn Hanbalfrom his sonSaalih: "I asked him
)ImaamAhmad( about a woman who claimed thather husband divorced her,
but she does not have evidence while her husband denies it. He said,
"The husband's word must be taken …" ]End quote[
We do not understand what you mean by your saying: "I did not hear
from him", if you mean that he has absented himself from you, then we
say it is not permissible for the husband to be away fromhis wife for
more than sixmonths except with her permission. For more benefit,
please refer to Fatwa 84073.
On the other hand, you did not explain to us the reality of his
relationship with the wife of his brother. If it is a prohibited
relationship, then it is incumbent upon you to rebuke him for that and
it is not permissible to keep silentand accept that he commits that
great sin. If he insists on that, then it is more appropriate for you
to ask for divorce even in return for a compensation. There is no good
for you to remain in marriage with a man who has a sinful relationship
with the wife of his brother.
However, if what is meant is that he respects and reveres her for she
isthe wife of his brother without doing with her anything of what
Allaah The Almighty has prohibited or what may lead to that, then
there isnothing wrong with that and you should not rebuke him for
that.
Allaah Knows best.
--
- - - - - - - - -
- - ▓███▓ TRANSLATOR 1:->
http://translate.google.com.my/m?sl=auto&tl=en&hl=en ▓███▓ - -
- TRANSLATOR 2 -
http://andrew-lviv.net/en/services/translator/?url=site.ua/ -
- - - -Tamil Translator
[http://translate.google.com.my/m?sl=auto&tl=ta&hl=en ] -
''''''''''"''"' '''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''"''"' +
'''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''"''"' '''''''''''''''''''' -
salam wallikum ..a divorce saman a person from court came but i was
not at home stating that your husband has sent it, but when i spoke to
my husband he said that he did not sent it and he dose not want to
divorce me, he said it could be his family, but after that I did not
hear from him now he is saying that his affair withbhabhi should
agreed by me or he will marry someone else...i dont want divorce nor
can i adjust this relation ship what shouls i do.
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad,
is His Slave and Messenger.
Sharee'ah )Islamic law( has made divorce in the husband's hand and
thus he is the one who has theright to divorce his wife. If he denies
divorce and there is no proof that he has actually divorced her,then
the husband's word is taken into account. It isnarrated in the
Masaa'il of ImaamAhmad ibn Hanbalfrom his sonSaalih: "I asked him
)ImaamAhmad( about a woman who claimed thather husband divorced her,
but she does not have evidence while her husband denies it. He said,
"The husband's word must be taken …" ]End quote[
We do not understand what you mean by your saying: "I did not hear
from him", if you mean that he has absented himself from you, then we
say it is not permissible for the husband to be away fromhis wife for
more than sixmonths except with her permission. For more benefit,
please refer to Fatwa 84073.
On the other hand, you did not explain to us the reality of his
relationship with the wife of his brother. If it is a prohibited
relationship, then it is incumbent upon you to rebuke him for that and
it is not permissible to keep silentand accept that he commits that
great sin. If he insists on that, then it is more appropriate for you
to ask for divorce even in return for a compensation. There is no good
for you to remain in marriage with a man who has a sinful relationship
with the wife of his brother.
However, if what is meant is that he respects and reveres her for she
isthe wife of his brother without doing with her anything of what
Allaah The Almighty has prohibited or what may lead to that, then
there isnothing wrong with that and you should not rebuke him for
that.
Allaah Knows best.
--
- - - - - - - - -
- - ▓███▓ TRANSLATOR 1:->
http://translate.google.com.my/m?sl=auto&tl=en&hl=en ▓███▓ - -
- TRANSLATOR 2 -
http://andrew-lviv.net/en/services/translator/?url=site.ua/ -
- - - -Tamil Translator
[http://translate.google.com.my/m?sl=auto&tl=ta&hl=en ] -
''''''''''"''"' '''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''"''"' +
'''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''"''"' '''''''''''''''''''' -
What would spark the next Fukushima?
The gung-ho nuclear industry is in deep shock. Just as it and its
cheerleader, the International Atomic Energy Agency, were preparing to
mark next month's 25th anniversary of the Chernobylaccident with a
series of self-congratulatory statements about the dawning of a safe
age of clean atomic power, a series ofcatastrophic but entirely
avoidable accidents take place in not one but three reactors in oneof
the richest countries of the world. Fukushima is not a rottingold
power plant in a failed state manned by half-trained kids, but
supposedly one of the safest stations in one of the most
safety-conscious countries with the best engineers and technologists
in the world.
Chernobyl blew up not because the reactor malfunctioned but because an
ill-judged experiment to see how long safety equipment would function
during shutdown went too far. So, too, in Japan, it was not the
nuclear bits of the station that went wrong but the
conventionaltechnology. The pumps did not work because the power
supply went down and the back-up support was not there because no one
had thought what happened was possible.
Even though Japan had been warned many times that possiblythe most
dangerous place in the world to site a nuclear power station was on
its coast, no one had taken into account the double-whammy effect of a
tsunami and an earthquake on conventional technology. It's easyto be
wise after the event, but the inquest will surely show that the
accident was not caused by an unpredictable natural disaster,but by a
series of highly predictable bad calls by human regulators.
The question now is whether the industry can be trusted anywhere. If
this industry were a company, its shareholders would have deserted it
years ago. In justone generation it has killed, wounded or blighted
the lives of many millions of people and laid waste to millions of
square miles of land. In that time it has been subsidized to the tune
of trillions of dollars and it will cost hundreds of billions more to
clean up and store the messes it has caused and the waste it has
created. It has had three catastrophic failures now in 25 years and
dozens more close shaves. Its workings have been marked around the
world by mendacity, cover-ups, secrecy and financial incompetence.
Sadly, the future looks worse. Theworld has a generation of reactors
coming to the end of their days and politicians putting intense
pressure on regulators toextend their use well beyond their design
lives. We are planning to double worldwide electricity supply from
nuclear power in the next 20 years, but we have nowhere near enough
experienced engineers to run the ever-bigger stations. We have private
companies peddling new designs that are said to be safer but which are
still not proven, and we have 10 new countries planning to move into
civil nuclear power in the next five years.
It gets worse. More than 100 of the world's reactors are already sited
in areas of high seismic activity and many of 350 new stations planned
for the highly volatile Pacific rim where earthquakes, tsunamis and
other natural hazards are certain to happen. We still have not
workedout how to store waste and, we now know that we cannot protect
stations from all eventualities.
Next time the disaster may have nothing to do with an earthquake or a
tsunami, but be because of climate change, terrorism, a fatal error in
an anonymous engineering works, proliferation of plutonium or a
deranged plant manager. If therewere no alternatives than employing
nuclear power to lightup a bulb or to reduce carbon emissions then the
industry and governments might be forgiven. But when the stakes are so
high, the scale is so big and there are 100 other safer ways, it seems
sheer folly to go on in this way.
PHOTO CAPTION
The No.3 nuclear reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant isseen
burning after a blast following an earthquake and tsunami in this
handout satellite image taken March 14, 2011.
Source: Guardian.co.uk
cheerleader, the International Atomic Energy Agency, were preparing to
mark next month's 25th anniversary of the Chernobylaccident with a
series of self-congratulatory statements about the dawning of a safe
age of clean atomic power, a series ofcatastrophic but entirely
avoidable accidents take place in not one but three reactors in oneof
the richest countries of the world. Fukushima is not a rottingold
power plant in a failed state manned by half-trained kids, but
supposedly one of the safest stations in one of the most
safety-conscious countries with the best engineers and technologists
in the world.
Chernobyl blew up not because the reactor malfunctioned but because an
ill-judged experiment to see how long safety equipment would function
during shutdown went too far. So, too, in Japan, it was not the
nuclear bits of the station that went wrong but the
conventionaltechnology. The pumps did not work because the power
supply went down and the back-up support was not there because no one
had thought what happened was possible.
Even though Japan had been warned many times that possiblythe most
dangerous place in the world to site a nuclear power station was on
its coast, no one had taken into account the double-whammy effect of a
tsunami and an earthquake on conventional technology. It's easyto be
wise after the event, but the inquest will surely show that the
accident was not caused by an unpredictable natural disaster,but by a
series of highly predictable bad calls by human regulators.
The question now is whether the industry can be trusted anywhere. If
this industry were a company, its shareholders would have deserted it
years ago. In justone generation it has killed, wounded or blighted
the lives of many millions of people and laid waste to millions of
square miles of land. In that time it has been subsidized to the tune
of trillions of dollars and it will cost hundreds of billions more to
clean up and store the messes it has caused and the waste it has
created. It has had three catastrophic failures now in 25 years and
dozens more close shaves. Its workings have been marked around the
world by mendacity, cover-ups, secrecy and financial incompetence.
Sadly, the future looks worse. Theworld has a generation of reactors
coming to the end of their days and politicians putting intense
pressure on regulators toextend their use well beyond their design
lives. We are planning to double worldwide electricity supply from
nuclear power in the next 20 years, but we have nowhere near enough
experienced engineers to run the ever-bigger stations. We have private
companies peddling new designs that are said to be safer but which are
still not proven, and we have 10 new countries planning to move into
civil nuclear power in the next five years.
It gets worse. More than 100 of the world's reactors are already sited
in areas of high seismic activity and many of 350 new stations planned
for the highly volatile Pacific rim where earthquakes, tsunamis and
other natural hazards are certain to happen. We still have not
workedout how to store waste and, we now know that we cannot protect
stations from all eventualities.
Next time the disaster may have nothing to do with an earthquake or a
tsunami, but be because of climate change, terrorism, a fatal error in
an anonymous engineering works, proliferation of plutonium or a
deranged plant manager. If therewere no alternatives than employing
nuclear power to lightup a bulb or to reduce carbon emissions then the
industry and governments might be forgiven. But when the stakes are so
high, the scale is so big and there are 100 other safer ways, it seems
sheer folly to go on in this way.
PHOTO CAPTION
The No.3 nuclear reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant isseen
burning after a blast following an earthquake and tsunami in this
handout satellite image taken March 14, 2011.
Source: Guardian.co.uk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)