Question
Assalamu Alaikum Sheikh.. I have some doubts to clear. You have helped
me clarify my doubts so far. May Allah reward you for that. Nowmy
question is regarding business. 1- I have starteda logistics company.
So i am recruiting two of my friends, one is a christian and one is a
hindu. Both belongs to poor family, both of them having debtof around
Qatar riyal 85000. Both are hardworking and well educated at the same
time. Am I doing wrong by recruiting non muslims? 2-In this business,
what we do is that we transport goods from Dubai to Doha. We collect
products from many companies and when we reach the customs we show it
as a single company. This is is the usual way this business takes
place. When we show it as a single company only Qr 500 or so must be
paid in the customs. But we take separate money from all the different
companies like Qr200 from each company. Is this haraam and these
companies know that we charge it this way.
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
In your question you mentioned three points and their answers are as follows:
1- Hiring non-Muslims is not prohibited in principle as Abu Bakr hired
a non-Muslim guidein the Migration journey, who was 'Abdullaah ibn
Urayqit , and the Prophet did not object him for doing that. However,
it is more appropriate for theemployer to be keen thathis employees be
Muslims.
2- Taking money from companies as a fee for permissible work while
these companies know this; is permissible.
3- What you mentioned regarding considering the goods of different
companies as goods for one single company with regard to the customs
duty costs; is permissible provided it does not involve cheating with
regards to the applied laws which regulate the entry of goods.
Allaah Knows best. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
"GENERAL ARTICLES"
- Tamil -- Urdu -- Kannada -- Telugu --*-
Share
"BISMILLA HIRRAHMAAN NIRRAHEEM"
WELCOME! - AS'SALAMU ALAIKUM!!
******** *****
*****
[All] praise is [due] to Allah, Lord of the worlds; -
Guide us to the straight path
*- -*
* * In this Blog; More Than Ten Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah} - Most Usefull Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And All Articles & Get Benifite!
* Visit :-
"INDIA "- Time in New Delhi -
*- WHAT ISLAM SAYS -*
-
Islam is a religion of Mercy, Peace and Blessing. Its teachings emphasize kind hear tedness, help, sympathy, forgiveness, sacrifice, love and care.Qur’an, the Shari’ah and the life of our beloved Prophet (SAW) mirrors this attribute, and it should be reflected in the conduct of a Momin.Islam appreciates those who are kind to their fellow being,and dislikes them who are hard hearted, curt, and hypocrite.Recall that historical moment, when Prophet (SAW) entered Makkah as a conqueror. There was before him a multitude of surrendered enemies, former oppressors and persecutors, who had evicted the Muslims from their homes, deprived them of their belongings, humiliated and intimidated Prophet (SAW) hatched schemes for his murder and tortured and killed his companions. But Prophet (SAW) displayed his usual magnanimity, generosity, and kind heartedness by forgiving all of them and declaring general amnesty...Subhanallah. May Allah help us tailor our life according to the teachings of Islam. (Aameen)./-
''HASBUNALLAHU WA NI'MAL WAKEEL''
-
''Allah is Sufficient for us'' + '' All praise is due to Allah. May peace and blessings beupon the Messenger, his household and companions '' (Aameen) | | |
| | |
|
Share
Follow Me | |
**
Share
-
-*- *: ::->
*
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Fathwa - His company makes a trick to reduce customs duty costs
Fathwa - Engagement does not require the presence of the woman's guardian
Question
Salam Alaikom, My daughter and I are traveling to Egypt soon where she
will be engaged. Her father will not be present as we are divorced and
he also is not Muslim and cannot leave the U.S. I am
muslimalhamdulilah and my daughter is also muslim alhamdulilah. Is it
permissable for me to accept this engagement without her father being
present since he is a non Muslim and cannot travel out of the country.
My daughter is 19 years old and she has never been married and she has
not had sexual intercourse with anyone. Having saidall these facts
could you please give me clarification on this matter. Thank you
Jazakallah Kheir
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
Accepting the person who proposes for marriage is the right of the
woman/girl whom the man had proposed to; it is for this reason that
the Prophet put the matter in her hands as per the Hadeeth of Ibn
'Abbaas in which the Prophet said: " A woman who has been previously
married is more entitled to her person than her guardian [i.e. she
should not be given in marriage except after consulting her]; and a
virgin womanshould not be given in marriage except after
herpermission, and her permission is her silence. " [Muslim]
Therefore, in proposing for marriage, the consentor presence of the
guardian is not a condition, but his consent and presence area
condition only when concluding marriage. Moreover, the guardian must
be a male; and a woman is not permitted to give herself in marriage,
nor is it permissible for a woman to give another woman in marriage.
For more benefit on the order of the guardians of a woman, please
refer to Fataawa 83338 and 86555 .
Also, it is a condition that the guardian be a Muslim, and it is not
permissible for a non-Muslim man to give a Muslim woman in marriage
even if she is his daughter. Therefore, if a woman has no Muslim
guardian, then it is the Islamic judge who marries her off, and if
again there is no Islamic judge, then she should entrust a just and
trustworthy Muslim man to marry her off as clarified in Fatwa 88488 .
Allaah Knows best. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Salam Alaikom, My daughter and I are traveling to Egypt soon where she
will be engaged. Her father will not be present as we are divorced and
he also is not Muslim and cannot leave the U.S. I am
muslimalhamdulilah and my daughter is also muslim alhamdulilah. Is it
permissable for me to accept this engagement without her father being
present since he is a non Muslim and cannot travel out of the country.
My daughter is 19 years old and she has never been married and she has
not had sexual intercourse with anyone. Having saidall these facts
could you please give me clarification on this matter. Thank you
Jazakallah Kheir
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
Accepting the person who proposes for marriage is the right of the
woman/girl whom the man had proposed to; it is for this reason that
the Prophet put the matter in her hands as per the Hadeeth of Ibn
'Abbaas in which the Prophet said: " A woman who has been previously
married is more entitled to her person than her guardian [i.e. she
should not be given in marriage except after consulting her]; and a
virgin womanshould not be given in marriage except after
herpermission, and her permission is her silence. " [Muslim]
Therefore, in proposing for marriage, the consentor presence of the
guardian is not a condition, but his consent and presence area
condition only when concluding marriage. Moreover, the guardian must
be a male; and a woman is not permitted to give herself in marriage,
nor is it permissible for a woman to give another woman in marriage.
For more benefit on the order of the guardians of a woman, please
refer to Fataawa 83338 and 86555 .
Also, it is a condition that the guardian be a Muslim, and it is not
permissible for a non-Muslim man to give a Muslim woman in marriage
even if she is his daughter. Therefore, if a woman has no Muslim
guardian, then it is the Islamic judge who marries her off, and if
again there is no Islamic judge, then she should entrust a just and
trustworthy Muslim man to marry her off as clarified in Fatwa 88488 .
Allaah Knows best. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Fathwa - The Imaam stands by the chest of the dead man in funeral prayer
Question
Is there any proof from the authentic ahadith from the books of hadith
supporting: 1) Imam standing by the chest (swadr) of the mayyit in
janazah salaah and not (wast).
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
We have not found any explicit Hadeeth stating that the Imaam should
stand in the funeral prayer by the chest of thedead, but what is
reported is that the Imaam stands by the head of a man [deceased male]
and by the waist ofa woman [deceased female]. Samurah ibn Jundub
narrated that a woman died in labor and the Prophet performed the
funeral prayer over her and he stood by her waist. [Al-Bukhaari,
Muslim and others]
Furthermore, it was reported that the coffin of a man was brought to
Anas and he stood by the head of the coffin, and then the coffin of a
woman was brought andhe stood further down the coffin than that, and
when he finished the funeral prayer, Al-'Alaa' ibn Ziyaad asked him: "
O Abu Hamzah, did the Prophet stand where you stood when it was the
funeral of a man and when it was the funeral of a woman like what
wesaw you doing?" He replied: "Yes." He (the narrator) said: "Then,
Al-'Alaa' ibn Ziyaad came to us and said: "Memorizethis. " [Ahmad and
others]
The scholars of the Hanbali School of jurisprudence who adoptthe
opinion that the Imaam should stand by the chest of the man, mentioned
this Hadeeth where it says that he stands by his head, and they said
that the two areas (of the body) are near to each other, so theone
standing by the headis considered to be standing by the chest;
IbnQudaamah said: " There is no difference of opinion in our School
that the Sunnah is that the Imaam stands in the funeral prayer by the
waist of the corpse of a woman and by the chest of the corpse of a man
or at the level of his shoulders….. " T hen he mentioned the Hadeeth
of Anas and the Shaafi'i School giving it as evidence for standing by
the head and then he said: "As regards the statement of those who say:
the Imaam should stand by the head of a man, then this statement is
not contradictory to the statement of those who say he should stand at
the level of his chest because they (the two parts of the body) are
near to each other; so theone who stands at one ofthem is considered
to be standing at the other. "
Allaah Knows best.
--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Is there any proof from the authentic ahadith from the books of hadith
supporting: 1) Imam standing by the chest (swadr) of the mayyit in
janazah salaah and not (wast).
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
We have not found any explicit Hadeeth stating that the Imaam should
stand in the funeral prayer by the chest of thedead, but what is
reported is that the Imaam stands by the head of a man [deceased male]
and by the waist ofa woman [deceased female]. Samurah ibn Jundub
narrated that a woman died in labor and the Prophet performed the
funeral prayer over her and he stood by her waist. [Al-Bukhaari,
Muslim and others]
Furthermore, it was reported that the coffin of a man was brought to
Anas and he stood by the head of the coffin, and then the coffin of a
woman was brought andhe stood further down the coffin than that, and
when he finished the funeral prayer, Al-'Alaa' ibn Ziyaad asked him: "
O Abu Hamzah, did the Prophet stand where you stood when it was the
funeral of a man and when it was the funeral of a woman like what
wesaw you doing?" He replied: "Yes." He (the narrator) said: "Then,
Al-'Alaa' ibn Ziyaad came to us and said: "Memorizethis. " [Ahmad and
others]
The scholars of the Hanbali School of jurisprudence who adoptthe
opinion that the Imaam should stand by the chest of the man, mentioned
this Hadeeth where it says that he stands by his head, and they said
that the two areas (of the body) are near to each other, so theone
standing by the headis considered to be standing by the chest;
IbnQudaamah said: " There is no difference of opinion in our School
that the Sunnah is that the Imaam stands in the funeral prayer by the
waist of the corpse of a woman and by the chest of the corpse of a man
or at the level of his shoulders….. " T hen he mentioned the Hadeeth
of Anas and the Shaafi'i School giving it as evidence for standing by
the head and then he said: "As regards the statement of those who say:
the Imaam should stand by the head of a man, then this statement is
not contradictory to the statement of those who say he should stand at
the level of his chest because they (the two parts of the body) are
near to each other; so theone who stands at one ofthem is considered
to be standing at the other. "
Allaah Knows best.
--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
The Islamic ruling on Al-Luqatah (lost and found)
Definition
Linguistically, 'Al-Luqatah' refers to anything that is found and
picked up from the ground. Technically, as Imaam Ibn Qudaamah a Muslim
scholar, definedit as: 'Property that the owner loses and a
personfinds and takes away (to preserve it in trust).'
Legal Validity
Muslim scholars vary about the ruling. The Hanafi and Shaafi'i
juristsmaintain that it is better to pick up a lost property because a
Muslim is duty-bound to preserve his Muslim brother's property, as
evidenced by the saying of the Prophet when he was asked about
Al-Luqatah: "Remember the description of its container and the string
with which it is tied. Make a public announcement of it for one year.
If nobody comes and claims it, then utilise the money but keep it as a
trust with you. And if its owner comes back one day seeking it, then
return it to him." [Al-Bukhaari and Muslim]
According to the Maaliki and Hanbali jurists, it is a Makrooh
(disliked) act to take away such property.This is also the opinion
ofIbn 'Umar and Ibn 'Abbaas . They argued that by taking away such
lost items, one is bound to use something that is deemed unlawful.
They also argued that one maynot be able to undertake his duty
efficiently regarding it, in terms of advertising it, returning it to
its lawful owner andpreserving it.
Its Ruling in Terms of Liability
Al-Luqatah remains a trust with the person who finds it and keeps
it,and he is deemed liable for it only if he abuses it. He is also
deemed liable for it if he gives it to somebody else without the
permission of a judge. If it is damaged while still in the finder's
possession, after publicly announcing that he has found it and asking
people to refer its rightful owner to him, then he is not deemed
liable for such damage because he volunteered to preserve it in trust.
TheAhaadeeth (prophetic statements) on this issue are very clear. The
Prophet said in the above-quoted Hadeeth:"... But keep it as a trust
with you ".
Types of Al-Luqatah
1. If it is an animal, the finder should see if it is able to protect
itself or not. If it is able to, then he is not allowed to take it
away. When the Prophet was asked about the Islamic ruling concerning a
lost camel, he replied: "It is none of your concern. Leave it, for it
has its feet and a water-container (reservoir), and it will reach
water and eat fromthe trees until its owner finds it." [Al-Bukhaari]
However, if the lost animal is not able to protect itself, such as a
sheep, a sick camel or a horse with a broken leg, the finder is
allowed to take it away. When the Prophet was asked about the ruling
concerning a lost sheep, he replied: "Take it, for it is either for
you, or for your brother (i.e., its owner), or for the wolf."
[Al-Bukhaari]
2. As for lost property that is not an animal, such as money of an
unknown owner, one should consider the following rulings:
The Ruling Concerning Trivial Fallen Items
For trivial items such as a loaf of bread, a whip, a date or anything
that people generally do not claim when they lose, according to the
predominant custom, theperson who finds such anitem is allowed to
claim itas his own without publicly announcing it. He is also allowed
to utilise it. Jaabir bin 'Abdullaah who was one of the Prophet's
companions, said : "The Messenger of Allaah allowed us to utilise
(such trivial objects as) a rod, a whip and a rope if we found it."
[Al-Bukhaari and Muslim]
Announcing Lost Property Publicly
a) If someone finds an object, he should acquaint himself with
thefeatures that distinguish it from all similar objects. This will
allow him to identify the right owner if he comes to claim it and asks
him about its distinguishing features.
b) If he knows its distinguishing features, he should advertise it in
public places, markets and outside Mosques, butnot inside the Mosques,
as this is deemed a Makrooh act. He should then wait for a year.
How should the finder becompensated for announcing, publicising or
maintenance expenditure?
Hanafi and Hanbali juristsmaintain that the finder should incur such
expenses. Imaam Maalik maintained: "The owner is to be given two
options: either to reclaimit from the person who has found it, by
paying him back for what he hasspent on it, or to give it to him in
return for the expenses incurred." Shaafi'i jurists say that the judge
takes the money from the public treasury of the Muslim state and gives
it to the finder of the lost property to use it for advertising
purposes, or the finder may borrow this money and would consider it as
a loan to the owner.
Returning Lost Property to the Person Who Claims It
If someone comes and claims that the lost property is his, its finder
should ask him about its distinguishing characteristics. If the
claimant adequately describes it and distinguishes it from similar
items, or if he proves to him with clear evidence that it belongs to
him - by describing its container or the string with which it is tied,
for instance - then the findershould return it to him, as the Prophet
said by way of example: "If its owner shows up and satisfactorily
describes itscontainer, the string withwhich it is tied and the amount
of money in it, then return it to him." [Muslim]
A question arises here: After the claimant provides a satisfactory
description of the lost property, should the finder return the
property to him or should he take him to a judge to establish the
evidence and act upon the judge's decision? According to the Hanafi
and Shaafi'i schools of Fiqh (jurisprudence), the finder of the lost
property is not obliged toreturn it. The followers ofthe Maaliki and
Hanbali schools of Fiqh have stated that he is obliged to return it to
its owner ifthe latter gives a satisfactory description of it, in
accordance with the dictates of the prophetic tradition mentioned
above.
Claiming Lost Property as One's Own
The finder of the lost property can claim such property as his own if
he still has it, or he can claimits price as his own in case he sold
it after advertising it for the required period of time. In such a
case, he should give it or give its value tothe owner should the
latter come forward to claim it, as the Prophet said in this
regard:"Advertise it for a year. If nobody claims it, then utilise it,
and keep it withyou as a trust." One is notallowed to claim it as his
own without advertising it for a full year.
Some scholars argue that it is not permissible to consider lost
property as one's own, and whoever finds it should, after advertising,
give it in charity to the poor because it is considered other people's
property, and it is not permissible to use it without its owner's
consent, in accordance with prophetic textual evidence: the Prophet
said: "A Muslim's propertyis not lawful (for another Muslim) without
the former's own free will." He also said: "Lost property is not
lawful. Whoever finds it should advertise it for a year. If its owner
shows up and claims it, he (the finder) must return it to him; if he
does not show up, he should give it in charity." [Al-Bazzaar and
Ad-Daaraqutni]
Linguistically, 'Al-Luqatah' refers to anything that is found and
picked up from the ground. Technically, as Imaam Ibn Qudaamah a Muslim
scholar, definedit as: 'Property that the owner loses and a
personfinds and takes away (to preserve it in trust).'
Legal Validity
Muslim scholars vary about the ruling. The Hanafi and Shaafi'i
juristsmaintain that it is better to pick up a lost property because a
Muslim is duty-bound to preserve his Muslim brother's property, as
evidenced by the saying of the Prophet when he was asked about
Al-Luqatah: "Remember the description of its container and the string
with which it is tied. Make a public announcement of it for one year.
If nobody comes and claims it, then utilise the money but keep it as a
trust with you. And if its owner comes back one day seeking it, then
return it to him." [Al-Bukhaari and Muslim]
According to the Maaliki and Hanbali jurists, it is a Makrooh
(disliked) act to take away such property.This is also the opinion
ofIbn 'Umar and Ibn 'Abbaas . They argued that by taking away such
lost items, one is bound to use something that is deemed unlawful.
They also argued that one maynot be able to undertake his duty
efficiently regarding it, in terms of advertising it, returning it to
its lawful owner andpreserving it.
Its Ruling in Terms of Liability
Al-Luqatah remains a trust with the person who finds it and keeps
it,and he is deemed liable for it only if he abuses it. He is also
deemed liable for it if he gives it to somebody else without the
permission of a judge. If it is damaged while still in the finder's
possession, after publicly announcing that he has found it and asking
people to refer its rightful owner to him, then he is not deemed
liable for such damage because he volunteered to preserve it in trust.
TheAhaadeeth (prophetic statements) on this issue are very clear. The
Prophet said in the above-quoted Hadeeth:"... But keep it as a trust
with you ".
Types of Al-Luqatah
1. If it is an animal, the finder should see if it is able to protect
itself or not. If it is able to, then he is not allowed to take it
away. When the Prophet was asked about the Islamic ruling concerning a
lost camel, he replied: "It is none of your concern. Leave it, for it
has its feet and a water-container (reservoir), and it will reach
water and eat fromthe trees until its owner finds it." [Al-Bukhaari]
However, if the lost animal is not able to protect itself, such as a
sheep, a sick camel or a horse with a broken leg, the finder is
allowed to take it away. When the Prophet was asked about the ruling
concerning a lost sheep, he replied: "Take it, for it is either for
you, or for your brother (i.e., its owner), or for the wolf."
[Al-Bukhaari]
2. As for lost property that is not an animal, such as money of an
unknown owner, one should consider the following rulings:
The Ruling Concerning Trivial Fallen Items
For trivial items such as a loaf of bread, a whip, a date or anything
that people generally do not claim when they lose, according to the
predominant custom, theperson who finds such anitem is allowed to
claim itas his own without publicly announcing it. He is also allowed
to utilise it. Jaabir bin 'Abdullaah who was one of the Prophet's
companions, said : "The Messenger of Allaah allowed us to utilise
(such trivial objects as) a rod, a whip and a rope if we found it."
[Al-Bukhaari and Muslim]
Announcing Lost Property Publicly
a) If someone finds an object, he should acquaint himself with
thefeatures that distinguish it from all similar objects. This will
allow him to identify the right owner if he comes to claim it and asks
him about its distinguishing features.
b) If he knows its distinguishing features, he should advertise it in
public places, markets and outside Mosques, butnot inside the Mosques,
as this is deemed a Makrooh act. He should then wait for a year.
How should the finder becompensated for announcing, publicising or
maintenance expenditure?
Hanafi and Hanbali juristsmaintain that the finder should incur such
expenses. Imaam Maalik maintained: "The owner is to be given two
options: either to reclaimit from the person who has found it, by
paying him back for what he hasspent on it, or to give it to him in
return for the expenses incurred." Shaafi'i jurists say that the judge
takes the money from the public treasury of the Muslim state and gives
it to the finder of the lost property to use it for advertising
purposes, or the finder may borrow this money and would consider it as
a loan to the owner.
Returning Lost Property to the Person Who Claims It
If someone comes and claims that the lost property is his, its finder
should ask him about its distinguishing characteristics. If the
claimant adequately describes it and distinguishes it from similar
items, or if he proves to him with clear evidence that it belongs to
him - by describing its container or the string with which it is tied,
for instance - then the findershould return it to him, as the Prophet
said by way of example: "If its owner shows up and satisfactorily
describes itscontainer, the string withwhich it is tied and the amount
of money in it, then return it to him." [Muslim]
A question arises here: After the claimant provides a satisfactory
description of the lost property, should the finder return the
property to him or should he take him to a judge to establish the
evidence and act upon the judge's decision? According to the Hanafi
and Shaafi'i schools of Fiqh (jurisprudence), the finder of the lost
property is not obliged toreturn it. The followers ofthe Maaliki and
Hanbali schools of Fiqh have stated that he is obliged to return it to
its owner ifthe latter gives a satisfactory description of it, in
accordance with the dictates of the prophetic tradition mentioned
above.
Claiming Lost Property as One's Own
The finder of the lost property can claim such property as his own if
he still has it, or he can claimits price as his own in case he sold
it after advertising it for the required period of time. In such a
case, he should give it or give its value tothe owner should the
latter come forward to claim it, as the Prophet said in this
regard:"Advertise it for a year. If nobody claims it, then utilise it,
and keep it withyou as a trust." One is notallowed to claim it as his
own without advertising it for a full year.
Some scholars argue that it is not permissible to consider lost
property as one's own, and whoever finds it should, after advertising,
give it in charity to the poor because it is considered other people's
property, and it is not permissible to use it without its owner's
consent, in accordance with prophetic textual evidence: the Prophet
said: "A Muslim's propertyis not lawful (for another Muslim) without
the former's own free will." He also said: "Lost property is not
lawful. Whoever finds it should advertise it for a year. If its owner
shows up and claims it, he (the finder) must return it to him; if he
does not show up, he should give it in charity." [Al-Bazzaar and
Ad-Daaraqutni]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)