Ibn Khaldoon was born in Tunisiain 732 A.H. to a fairly well-to-do
family who had earlier migrated from Seville in Muslim Spain. His
lineage goes to Yemen which land our hero's family had left in the
company of the army that conquered Spain.
During his childhood in Tunis, IbnKhaldoon must have had his share in
his family's active participation in the intellectual life of the
city, and to a lesser degree, its political life, the household in
which Ibn Khaldoonwas raised was frequented by thepolitical and
intellectual leaders of Western Islam (i.e. North Africaand Spain),
many of whom took refuge there and were protected against angry
rulers.
Ibn Khaldoon led a very active political life before he decided to
write his well-known masterpiece on history. He worked for rulers in
Tunis and Fez (in Morocco), Granada (in Muslim Spain) and Baja (in
Tunisia) successively. At the age of forty-three, Ibn Khaldoon finally
succeeded in crossing over once more to Muslim Spain, not with
ambitious designs of his youth, but as a tired and embittered man with
no purposesave escaping the turmoil of North Africa." Unfortunately,
the ruler of Granada caused Ibn Khaldoon's friend, Ibn Al-Khateeb, to
flee to North Africa. When he learnt of Ibn Khaldoon's attempts to
help his friend, he was expelled from Granada. So he went back to
North Africa to spend four years in seclusion to do some thinking in
peace.
Intellectually, Ibn Khaldoon was well-educated, having studied (in
Tunis first and Fez later) the Quran, Prophet Muhammad's Ahadeeth and
other branches of Islamic studies such as dialecticaltheology,
Shari'ah (Islamic Law orJurisprudence, according to the Maliki
School). He also studied Arabic literature, philosophy, mathematics
and astronomy. Butwe can safely say that Ibn Khaldoon learnt very much
from the school of life in which he actively participated, moving from
place to place and from oneroyal court to another, sometimes at his
own will, but often forced to do so by plotting rivals or despotic
rulers.
Ibn Khaldoon learnt much from his meetings with all sorts of rulers,
ambassadors, politicians and scholars, he came in contact with in
North Africa, Muslim Spain, Egypt and other parts of the Muslim World.
All of these circumstances and experiences seem to have contributed to
the formation of his views on history,culture and society, neatly
expressed in his book on history and concisely summed up in his
well-known master-piece"Al-Muqaddimah ('Prologue')."
The revolutionary views of Ibn Khaldoon have always attracted not only
Arab scholars' attention but the attention of many a Western thinker
as well. In his study of history Ibn Khaldoon was a pioneer in
subjecting historical reports to the two basic criteria of (1) reason
and (2)social and physical laws. He considered the following four
points worthy of consideration instudying and analyzing historical
reports:
1. Relating events to each other through cause and effect.
2. Drawing analogy between the past and the present.
3. Taking into consideration the effect of the environment.
4. Taking into consideration the effect of inherited and economic conditions.
But Ibn Khaldoon's work was more than a critical study of history. It
was, in fact, a study of human civilization in general, its beginning,
factors contributing to its development, and the causes of its
decline. Thus, unwittingly, Ibn Khaldoon founded a new science: the
science of social development or sociology, as we call it today.
"I have written on history a book in which I discussed the causes and
effects of the development ofstates and civilizations, and I followed
in arranging the material of the book an unfamiliar method, and I
followed in writing it a strange and innovative way." These are the
words of Ibn Khaldoon indicating the new interesting method he
followed in the study of history, whereby he created, ineffect two new
sciences: Historiology and Sociology at the same time.
Due to his emphasis on reason and its necessity in judging history and
social events, it has been claimed that Ibn Khaldoon tried to refute
conventional religious knowledge and substitute it with reason and
rational philosophy. The claim is founded on a false premise or
assumption, i.e. that religion and reason are necessarily in conflict
with each other. Naturally, it is true that some religions do
teachthings which are irrational in nature. But this is certainly not
true of Islam which has always encouraged observation and thinking and
condemned the non-believers for not using their reason and thinking.
There are many verses in the Qur'an to this effect.
The close relationship between Ibn Khaldoon's views and Islam are
clearly seen in his remarks on the role of religion in unifying
theArabs and bringing progress and development to their society. We
also see that connection in his opinion on the close affinity between
religion and the state, pointing out that injustice and despotism are
clear signs of the downfall of the state. On philosophy, Ibn Khaldoon
points out that metaphysical philosophyhas one advantage only, which
is to sharpen one's wits. For knowledge of the metaphysical world,
especially in matters of belief, can only be derived from the divine
revelation, i.e. the Quran and the Sunnah.
In education, Ibn Khaldoon was apioneer when he remarked that
suppression and use of force are enemies to learning, and that they
lead to laziness, lying and hypocrisy. He also pointed out to the
necessity of good models andpractice for the command of good
linguistic habits.
Because the era of Ibn Khaldoon was an age of decline for Muslim
civilization, and most of the efforts of scholarship were directed to
collecting, summarizing and memorization of the body of knowledge left
by the ancestors, he severely attacked those unhealthy practices that
led to stagnation and to the stifling of creativity onthe part of
Muslim scholars.
But if Ibn Khaldoon made some interesting contribution to education,
he certainly made a major and pioneering contribution in the fields of
sociological and historical studies. For it was he who pointed to the
necessity of subjecting both social and historical phenomena to
scientific objective analysis. He noted that those phenomena were not
the outcome of chance, but were rather controlled by laws that had to
be discovered and applied in our study of society, civilization and
history. Historians, he remarked, committed errors in their study of
historical events, due to three major factors:
(1) Their ignorance of the naturesof civilization and peoples, (2)
their bias and prejudice and (3) their blind acceptance of reports
given by others.
Ibn Khaldoon pointed out that true progress and development comes
through correct understanding of history, and thelatter can only be
achieved by observing the following:
1) Absolute objectivity, which means that the historian should not be
in any way show prejudicefor or against anyone or any idea.
2) Confirmation and scrutiny of reported information. One shouldlearn
all one can about the historians whose reports one hears or reads. One
should check their morals and trustworthinessbefore accepting their
reports.
3) Not limiting history to the study of political and military news or
to news about rulers and states. For history should include the study
of all social, religious and economic conditions.
These were but a few of the many interesting views left by Ibn
Khaldoon in his famous Al-Muqaddimah ('Prologue') and his book on
history, two masterpieces that have left clear marks on human thought
and its development.
--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
"GENERAL ARTICLES"
- Tamil -- Urdu -- Kannada -- Telugu --*-
Share
"BISMILLA HIRRAHMAAN NIRRAHEEM"
WELCOME! - AS'SALAMU ALAIKUM!!
******** *****
*****
[All] praise is [due] to Allah, Lord of the worlds; -
Guide us to the straight path
*- -*
* * In this Blog; More Than Ten Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah} - Most Usefull Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And All Articles & Get Benifite!
* Visit :-
"INDIA "- Time in New Delhi -
*- WHAT ISLAM SAYS -*
-
Islam is a religion of Mercy, Peace and Blessing. Its teachings emphasize kind hear tedness, help, sympathy, forgiveness, sacrifice, love and care.Qur’an, the Shari’ah and the life of our beloved Prophet (SAW) mirrors this attribute, and it should be reflected in the conduct of a Momin.Islam appreciates those who are kind to their fellow being,and dislikes them who are hard hearted, curt, and hypocrite.Recall that historical moment, when Prophet (SAW) entered Makkah as a conqueror. There was before him a multitude of surrendered enemies, former oppressors and persecutors, who had evicted the Muslims from their homes, deprived them of their belongings, humiliated and intimidated Prophet (SAW) hatched schemes for his murder and tortured and killed his companions. But Prophet (SAW) displayed his usual magnanimity, generosity, and kind heartedness by forgiving all of them and declaring general amnesty...Subhanallah. May Allah help us tailor our life according to the teachings of Islam. (Aameen)./-
''HASBUNALLAHU WA NI'MAL WAKEEL''
-
''Allah is Sufficient for us'' + '' All praise is due to Allah. May peace and blessings beupon the Messenger, his household and companions '' (Aameen) | | |
| | |
|
Share
Follow Me | |
**
Share
-
-*- *: ::->
*
Monday, May 20, 2013
Ibn Khaldoon: the founding father of sociology
Sacrifices, - One sacrifice is sufficient on behalf of the members of a householdeven if they are one hundred strong.
Is one sacrifice sufficienton behalf of all the members of a
household, even if they are many?.
Praise be to Allaah.
One sacrifice is sufficienton behalf of all the members of a
household, no matter how many of them thereare.
Al-Tirmidhi (1505) narrated that 'Ata' ibn Yassaar said: I asked Abu
Ayyoob: How was the sacrifice done at the time of the Messenger
ofAllaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)? He said: A man
would offer a sheepon behalf of himself and the members of his family,
and they would eat some and feed others with some." Classed as saheeh
by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi.
It says in Tuhfat al-Ahwadhi:
This hadeeth clearly states that a single sheepis sufficient on behalf
of a man and the members of his household, even if they are many, and
that is correct.
Al-Haafiz ibn al-Qayyim said in Zaad al-Ma'aad: The teaching of the
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was that a sheep
is sufficient on behalf of a man and the members of his household,
even if they are many in number.
Al-Shawkaani said in Nayl al-Awtaar: In fact a single sheep is
sufficient on behalf of the members of a household, even if there are
one hundred or more, as is indicated by the Sunnah. End quote.
Shaykh Ibn 'Uthaymeen said in al-Sharh al-Mumti' (5/275):
There is no limit to how many people may share in the reward. The
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) offered a
sacrifice on behalf of his entire ummah, and a man may offer a single
sheep on behalf of himself and the members of his household, even if
they are one hundred strong. End quote.
The Standing Committee was asked: There are twenty-two people in this
family, and they have one income and one budget. On Eid al-Adha they
offer a single sacrifice, and I do not know whether that is sufficient
or whether they should offer two sacrifices?
They replied:
If the family is big but they live in one house, one sacrifice is
sufficientfor them, but if they offer more than one sacrifice, that is
better. End quote.
Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa'imah, 11/408. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
household, even if they are many?.
Praise be to Allaah.
One sacrifice is sufficienton behalf of all the members of a
household, no matter how many of them thereare.
Al-Tirmidhi (1505) narrated that 'Ata' ibn Yassaar said: I asked Abu
Ayyoob: How was the sacrifice done at the time of the Messenger
ofAllaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)? He said: A man
would offer a sheepon behalf of himself and the members of his family,
and they would eat some and feed others with some." Classed as saheeh
by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi.
It says in Tuhfat al-Ahwadhi:
This hadeeth clearly states that a single sheepis sufficient on behalf
of a man and the members of his household, even if they are many, and
that is correct.
Al-Haafiz ibn al-Qayyim said in Zaad al-Ma'aad: The teaching of the
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was that a sheep
is sufficient on behalf of a man and the members of his household,
even if they are many in number.
Al-Shawkaani said in Nayl al-Awtaar: In fact a single sheep is
sufficient on behalf of the members of a household, even if there are
one hundred or more, as is indicated by the Sunnah. End quote.
Shaykh Ibn 'Uthaymeen said in al-Sharh al-Mumti' (5/275):
There is no limit to how many people may share in the reward. The
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) offered a
sacrifice on behalf of his entire ummah, and a man may offer a single
sheep on behalf of himself and the members of his household, even if
they are one hundred strong. End quote.
The Standing Committee was asked: There are twenty-two people in this
family, and they have one income and one budget. On Eid al-Adha they
offer a single sacrifice, and I do not know whether that is sufficient
or whether they should offer two sacrifices?
They replied:
If the family is big but they live in one house, one sacrifice is
sufficientfor them, but if they offer more than one sacrifice, that is
better. End quote.
Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa'imah, 11/408. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Sacrifices, - Selling a sacrificial animal, and the acceptable age for an animal for ‘aqeeqah.
1. can anyone distribute money by selling a goat that was offered to
be slaughtered in the name of Allah for family welfare.
2. can a goat less than one year of age is acceptable for Aqeeka (for
new born baby two for boy, 0ne for girl).
these are needed please do reply these questions.
Praise be to Allaah.
It is not permissible to sell part of the sacrificial animal or
udhiyah, or to sell all of it, except in cases where it is done in
accordance with the purpose of the sacrifice, because what a person
has given to Allaah cannot be sold at all.
It says in al-Mughni: It is not permissible to sell any part of it –
i.e., the sacrificial animal – but if the butcher is poor and he gives
him something because he is poor, in addition to the wages that he
gives him, that is permissible, because he is entitled to take some of
it because of being poor, not as payment forhis work. End quote
(3/222)
Shaykh Ibn 'Uthaymeen said: It is haraam to sell any part of the
udhiyah, whether the meat or anything else, even the skin. The butcher
should not be given anything from it in partial payment for his work,
because that is like selling. (Risaalah Ahkaam al-Hadiy wa'l-Udhiyah)
And he (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: It is not permissible to
dispose of it – i.e., the udhiyah – in ways that would prevent going
ahead with the sacrifice,such as selling, giving away, giving as a
pledgeand so on, unless he replaces it with something that serves the
purpose pf sacrifice better, not for his own ends. If he selects a
sheep for sacrifice then he decides that he wantsto keep it for some
reason and replaces it with one that is better so that he can keep it,
that is not permissible, because he is taking back something that he
had set aside for Allaah for his own ends and notfor serving the
purpose of sacrifice in a better way.
With regard to rams, which are male sheep, the ram should have reached
the age of one year in order for it to be permissible as a sacrifice,
but the Sunnahshows that it is permissible to sacrifice ajadh'ah. The
majority of scholars say that this applies only to jadh'ah of sheep,
not of goats. A jadh'ah of sheep is one that is six months old, but
the older it is than six months the better, because some of the
madhhabs say that jadh'ah means one that is a year old.
The evidence that indicates that the desirable age according to
sharee'ah is one year is the marfoo' hadeeth of Jaabir (may Allaah be
pleased with him):
"Do not slaughter anything but a two-year-old animal, unless it is too
difficult for you, in which case slaughter a jadh'ah sheep."
Narrated by Muslim 1963.
The apparent meaning of the hadeeth is that a jadh'ah of sheep is only
acceptable if a two-year-old is not available. But the majority of
scholars interpreted that as referring to what is mustahabb, and they
quoted the following as evidence:
1 – It was narrated from one of the companions of the Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) that "a jadha'h is sufficient for
what a two-year-old is sufficient." Narrated by al-Nasaa'i (4383) and
Abu Dawood (2799); classed as saheeh by al-Albaani.
2 – It was narrated that 'Uqbah ibn 'Aamir (may Allaah be pleased with
him) said: We sacrificed a jadh'ah of sheep alongwith the Messenger
of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). Narrated by
al-Nasaa'i (4382). Its isnaad was classed as qawiy by al-Haafiz in
al-Fath, and as saheeh byal-Albaani. See the commentary on Zaad
al-Ma'aad (2/317).
It should be noted that the same conditions are stipulated for
'aqeeqah as for udhiyah: the animal should be free of faults and of
the proper age. The evidence for that is qiyaas (analogy), on the
basis that both are sacrifices.
Thus it may be known that it is acceptable for you to sacrifice a
sheep that has reached the ageof six months. And Allaahknows best. -
- ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
be slaughtered in the name of Allah for family welfare.
2. can a goat less than one year of age is acceptable for Aqeeka (for
new born baby two for boy, 0ne for girl).
these are needed please do reply these questions.
Praise be to Allaah.
It is not permissible to sell part of the sacrificial animal or
udhiyah, or to sell all of it, except in cases where it is done in
accordance with the purpose of the sacrifice, because what a person
has given to Allaah cannot be sold at all.
It says in al-Mughni: It is not permissible to sell any part of it –
i.e., the sacrificial animal – but if the butcher is poor and he gives
him something because he is poor, in addition to the wages that he
gives him, that is permissible, because he is entitled to take some of
it because of being poor, not as payment forhis work. End quote
(3/222)
Shaykh Ibn 'Uthaymeen said: It is haraam to sell any part of the
udhiyah, whether the meat or anything else, even the skin. The butcher
should not be given anything from it in partial payment for his work,
because that is like selling. (Risaalah Ahkaam al-Hadiy wa'l-Udhiyah)
And he (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: It is not permissible to
dispose of it – i.e., the udhiyah – in ways that would prevent going
ahead with the sacrifice,such as selling, giving away, giving as a
pledgeand so on, unless he replaces it with something that serves the
purpose pf sacrifice better, not for his own ends. If he selects a
sheep for sacrifice then he decides that he wantsto keep it for some
reason and replaces it with one that is better so that he can keep it,
that is not permissible, because he is taking back something that he
had set aside for Allaah for his own ends and notfor serving the
purpose of sacrifice in a better way.
With regard to rams, which are male sheep, the ram should have reached
the age of one year in order for it to be permissible as a sacrifice,
but the Sunnahshows that it is permissible to sacrifice ajadh'ah. The
majority of scholars say that this applies only to jadh'ah of sheep,
not of goats. A jadh'ah of sheep is one that is six months old, but
the older it is than six months the better, because some of the
madhhabs say that jadh'ah means one that is a year old.
The evidence that indicates that the desirable age according to
sharee'ah is one year is the marfoo' hadeeth of Jaabir (may Allaah be
pleased with him):
"Do not slaughter anything but a two-year-old animal, unless it is too
difficult for you, in which case slaughter a jadh'ah sheep."
Narrated by Muslim 1963.
The apparent meaning of the hadeeth is that a jadh'ah of sheep is only
acceptable if a two-year-old is not available. But the majority of
scholars interpreted that as referring to what is mustahabb, and they
quoted the following as evidence:
1 – It was narrated from one of the companions of the Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) that "a jadha'h is sufficient for
what a two-year-old is sufficient." Narrated by al-Nasaa'i (4383) and
Abu Dawood (2799); classed as saheeh by al-Albaani.
2 – It was narrated that 'Uqbah ibn 'Aamir (may Allaah be pleased with
him) said: We sacrificed a jadh'ah of sheep alongwith the Messenger
of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). Narrated by
al-Nasaa'i (4382). Its isnaad was classed as qawiy by al-Haafiz in
al-Fath, and as saheeh byal-Albaani. See the commentary on Zaad
al-Ma'aad (2/317).
It should be noted that the same conditions are stipulated for
'aqeeqah as for udhiyah: the animal should be free of faults and of
the proper age. The evidence for that is qiyaas (analogy), on the
basis that both are sacrifices.
Thus it may be known that it is acceptable for you to sacrifice a
sheep that has reached the ageof six months. And Allaahknows best. -
- ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Sacrifices, - It is essential that the sacrificial animal be slaughtered by a Muslim with the intention of offering a sacrifice (udhiyah).
In this part of the country (Vanc. ,Canada) and maybe other ares also,
the farmers deal with us in the following manner. When you go tobuy an
animal, they quote you a per pound rate. This means that after
slaughtering the animal, they weigh it and charge you a certainamount
per pound. This includes the cost of the animal and the fees for using
his premises (for slaughter) and the cutting and wrapping fee. For the
udhiyah is this permissible?
Or is it that the animal must first be purchased and then afterwards
only the fees can be paid. The farmers are not willing to do this as
they are afraid they may lose on the deal if they do it. I do believe
that if people try hard enough they may find those whomaight agree.
However, I am not certain. Nonetheless, the question is, can the
udhiyah be considered correct if the method of purchase mentioned
above is followed?.
Praise be to Allaah.
It is a necessary condition of the sacrificethat the animal be
slaughtered by a Muslim with the intention of offering a sacrifice
(udhiyah); it is not sufficient to slaughter it for the meat.
Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Majmoo' (8/380):
The intention is a condition of the sacrificebeing valid.
There is nothing wrong with buying the animal in the manner described
in the question, so long as the worker slaughtersit with the intention
of offering a sacrifice. That is if the worker is a Muslim; otherwise
one of you should slaughter it, then the worker can cut it up.
Shaykh Ibn 'Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Sharh
al-Mumti' (7/494):
It is not correct to delegate the slaughter of the udhiyah
(sacrifice)to a kitaabi (i.e., a Jew or a Christian), even though meat
slaughtered by the People of the Book is halaal. Because slaughtering
the sacrifice is an act of worship, it is not correct to delegate it
to a kitaabi, as a kitaabi cannot be involved in acts of worship that
draw the Muslim closer to Allaah, because he is akaafir (disbeliever)
whose worship is not accepted. If his acts of worship are not valid
when done on his own behalf, they cannot be valid when done on behalf
of another. But if a kitaabi is delegated to slaughter regular meat
for eating, there is nothing wrong with that.
And Allaah knows best.
--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
the farmers deal with us in the following manner. When you go tobuy an
animal, they quote you a per pound rate. This means that after
slaughtering the animal, they weigh it and charge you a certainamount
per pound. This includes the cost of the animal and the fees for using
his premises (for slaughter) and the cutting and wrapping fee. For the
udhiyah is this permissible?
Or is it that the animal must first be purchased and then afterwards
only the fees can be paid. The farmers are not willing to do this as
they are afraid they may lose on the deal if they do it. I do believe
that if people try hard enough they may find those whomaight agree.
However, I am not certain. Nonetheless, the question is, can the
udhiyah be considered correct if the method of purchase mentioned
above is followed?.
Praise be to Allaah.
It is a necessary condition of the sacrificethat the animal be
slaughtered by a Muslim with the intention of offering a sacrifice
(udhiyah); it is not sufficient to slaughter it for the meat.
Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Majmoo' (8/380):
The intention is a condition of the sacrificebeing valid.
There is nothing wrong with buying the animal in the manner described
in the question, so long as the worker slaughtersit with the intention
of offering a sacrifice. That is if the worker is a Muslim; otherwise
one of you should slaughter it, then the worker can cut it up.
Shaykh Ibn 'Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Sharh
al-Mumti' (7/494):
It is not correct to delegate the slaughter of the udhiyah
(sacrifice)to a kitaabi (i.e., a Jew or a Christian), even though meat
slaughtered by the People of the Book is halaal. Because slaughtering
the sacrifice is an act of worship, it is not correct to delegate it
to a kitaabi, as a kitaabi cannot be involved in acts of worship that
draw the Muslim closer to Allaah, because he is akaafir (disbeliever)
whose worship is not accepted. If his acts of worship are not valid
when done on his own behalf, they cannot be valid when done on behalf
of another. But if a kitaabi is delegated to slaughter regular meat
for eating, there is nothing wrong with that.
And Allaah knows best.
--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)