Darwinists' claims that Darwinism's saying 'we come from apes' is an oversimplification

Darwinists maintain that the peoplearound them are simplifying
Darwinism and Darwin, by provocatively saying, "A fool called Darwin"
or "Look, we resemble monkeys, so we must be descended from them."
But this is a deception. There is no provocation going on. People have
merely been told about the information of which they are unaware in
recent years. It has been proved that they were misled and deceived
for years. They have been told how Darwinism is a lie, that it is only
kept alive by propaganda, that Darwinists have produced false evidence
to rescue their position, and that they try to mislead people with the
lies that "we have found a transitional fossil" or "this is the
missing link," even though not a singletransitional form fossil
exists. People have seen the 100 million fossils that were concealed
from them for years. They have touched thesefossils with their own
hands at exhibitions andhave seen that living things HAVE REMAINED
UNCHANGED for millions of years. There is no longer any chance of
deceiving them.
What Darwinistsare in fact complaining about is this: Darwinists have
seen that people's awareness has risen. They realize that people have
discovered that Darwinism is nonsense. In complaining about the
over-simplification of Darwinism they are actually expressing their
unhappiness with this state of affairs. The fact is that Darwinism has
not been oversimplified at all, though its facile and false face has
finally been exposed.
Darwinism is a theory that claims that "the first cell formed by
chance in muddy water."It maintains that the whole variety of life
came into being throughchance, unconscious andrandom events. It
ascribes the existence of such extraordinary structures as wings,
fins, feathers and tails to blind coincidence alone. And no matter how
much Darwinists may deny it, Darwinism claims that "humans are
descended from monkeys because they resemble monkeys." Darwinism is no
more complex than that.
Darwinists are shocked and alarmed by the exposure of this facile
logic and have therefore recently been sheltering behind the claim
that "monkeys are not really our ancestors, but our cousins." But
thisis part of the same deception. When Darwinism asserts, "Man comes
from a primate", does this incur a different meaning? A monkey or a
primate, what difference does it make? Is it not the same old outdated
lie and perverted claim? Does this false theory suddenly become
scientific if one says "man's ancestor is a primate" or "humans and
primates have the same ancestor"? Of course, not. This is nothing else
than maintaining the deception by way of sophistry. It merely treats
people with contempt.
Darwinists' worries very probably stem from Darwinism's sudden and
recent collapse. Their attempts to portray Darwinism as a scientific
theory, to claim that it has been proved "apart from a few minor
points" and the way they complain about people ridiculing this
outdated theory are all indications of this. Because Darwinists are
facing a situation they never expected. Paleontology, the only science
that might have produced any evidence for Darwinism, HAS PRODUCED NOT
A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FORM FOSSIL. 100 million fossilshave been
unearthed, BUT THESE ALL PROVE CREATION. All fossils belong to perfect
life forms. Nothing is deficient, missing, semi-developed or peculiar
in them. Moreover, a significant part of these fossils are identical
to life forms around today. LIVING THINGS HAVE NOT CHANGED OVER
MILLIONS OF YEARS. In other words,THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS EVOLUTION.
Darwinists sought the answer to all this powerful evidence by HIDING
fossils away. (Darwinists have done this before. They kept Cambrian
Period fossils dating back 540 million years that dealt a seriousblow
to Darwinism HIDDEN AWAY FOR 70 YEARS.) But the unearthing of these
fossils from where they had been concealed has come as a huge shock. A
great awakening against the Darwinist deception has begun in all
countries of the world. Instead of believing in Darwinism, people now
laugh at it as a false and outdated theory. That is why Darwinists
complain about university instructors, teachers andeven their own
families laughing at Darwinism. Darwinists are no longerable to
prevent people coming to full awarenessin the face of the true
scientific facts.

--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

Fathwa, - Performing the ‘Asr prayer while thinking that one is performing the Thuhr prayer

Question
Sometimes when I perform the 'Asr prayer, it occurs to me that I am
performing the Thuhr prayer, if I get distracted or absent minded.
However, I rectify my intention and remind myself that I am performing
the 'Asr prayer. Is my prayer in such a case invalid, given that my
intention has changed?
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
Being distracted and forgetting one's intention during the prayer does
not invalidate it. What invalidates the prayer is deliberately
changing the intention or intending to change it. It is difficult to
maintain one's intention vivid in the mind throughout the entire
prayer.
Abu Hurayrah reported that the Prophet , said: " When the call for
prayer is pronounced, Satan takes to his heels, passing windwith
noise. When the call is finished, he comes back. When the Iqaamah is
pronounced, he again takes to his heels and, after its completion, he
returns again to interferebetween the (praying) person and his heart,
saying to him: 'Remember this or that thing' (things that the person
could not remember before (the prayer) till he forgets whether he has
offered three or four Rak'ahs. So if one forgets whether hehas prayed
three or four Rak'ahs, he should perform two prostrationsof Sahw (i.e.
forgetfulness). " [Al-Bukhaari and Muslim]
Hence, if the change in the worshipper's intention – the way it was
mentioned by the questioner – was becausehe was distracted or (he
temporarily) forgot his intention, this does not invalidate the
prayer, as stated earlier.
However, if you mean that the worshipper revoked his intention and
intended to perform another prayer, then it surely invalidates the
prayer as in such a case the intention totally changed.
If the questioner means that, during the prayer, he questioned his
intention (and doubted whether he had intendedto perform 'Asr or
Thuhr) and then counted on his doubt (without verifying it), this also
invalidates the prayer as such a prayer lacks the condition of having
an affirmed and assertive intention. However, if he did not act on his
doubt until he realized the truth(about his specific intention), there
is no harm in that.
Allaah Knows best. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

Fathwa, - Not all mosque rulings apply to a Musalla

Question
We have a Musalla (area allocated for prayer) at our workplace where
weperform the 'Asr and Thuhr prayers but we do not proclaim the Athaan
for these prayers in the Musalla; is this correct or should we
proclaim the Athaan?
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
The preponderant opinion among Muslim scholars is that proclaiming the
Athaan in mosques is a collective obligation on the Muslim community.
A collective and not an individual one which, when it can be properly
carried out by a limited number of individuals, is canceled for the
remaining Muslims. Otherwise they all share the sin for not performing
it.
Since the rulings of the mosque (in cities and villages) in Islam does
notall apply to the Musalla, the Athaan is not obligatory for those
who perform the congregational prayer in the Musalla, yet it is
permissible and recommended. The Athaan is prescribed for Muslims when
prayers are due anywhere, whether in a city or outside it, due to the
general words of the Prophet , directed to Maalik ibn Al-Huwayrith and
his companions: " Whenever prayer time is due, you should pronounce
the Athaan and the Iqaamah and theolder of you should lead the prayer.
" [Al-Bukhaari]
Thus, the Sunnah of the Prophet , is that, whenever an obligatory
prayer is due, someone should proclaim the Athaan. However, the Athaan
does not affect the validity of the prayer,whether it is considered
obligatory or recommended.
Allaah Knows best.


--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

Fathwa, - Deliberately leaving recitation of a Surah after Al-Faatihah in prayer

Question
The Imaam in the second Rak'ah of Maghrib prayerdid not recite a Surah
after Al-Faatihah and then he bowed and prostrated normally. After
the third Rak'ah, the Imaam ended his prayer with Tasleem without
performing Sujood as-Sahw. We asked the Imaam to perform Sujood
as-Sahw but he told us that there was no need for it. He informed us
that he deliberately abstained from reciting a Surah after Al-Faatihah
and thatwhat he did was permissible. What is the religious ruling on
not reciting a Surah after Al-Faatihah intentionally in the second
Rak'ah of Maghrib prayer? May Allaah The Exalted Reward you
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
It is disliked for a worshipper to deliberately not recite a Surah
after Al-Faatihah inthe first and second Rak'ah of a prayer. Whoever
does so will be abandoning a Sunnah according to the majorityof Muslim
scholars. The Imaam in such a case should not perform Sujood as-Sahw
since it isprescribed to compensate for a worshipper's forgetfulness
in the prayer.
However, if the worshipper deliberately neglected an obligation or a
pillar of the prayer, his prayer is considered invalid and performing
Sujood as-Sahw does not compensate for such a mistake.
If a worshipper neglects a Sunnah, his prayer is valid despite his
mistake. However, even then, Sujood as-Sahw is not prescribed in such
a case to compensate for such error.
Allaah Knows best.

--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -