ISLAMIC MORAL VALUES ENSHRINE FREEDOM OF BELIEF
When the religion of Islam that has been sent as a salvation from the
presence of Allah is explained to a person, he believes on his own
will and decides withoutbeing subjected to any kind of compulsion or
duress. People are free to choose truth or error. If they make the
wrong choice, they will face its consequence in the Hereafter.
In matters of belief, Islam offers people complete freedom with a very
open and clear language. This perception which was valid ever since
Islam was first revealed, forms the basis of the Islamic morality. The
verses on the subject are perfectly clear:
There is no compulsion where deen is concerned. Right guidance has
become clearly distinct from error. Anyone who rejects false deities
and believes in Allah has grasped the Firmest Handhold, which will
never give way. Allah is All-Hearing, All-Knowing. (Surat al-Baqara,
256)
According to the Islamic morality, people are freeto choose whatever
beliefs they wish, and nobody can oblige anyone else in subjects of
belief. When a Muslim meets someone whom he wants to have faith, he
only has the liability to communicate Islam and to explain the
existence of Allah, to state that the Qur'an is the book of His
revelation, that the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is His messenger, to
explain the existence of the Hereafter and the Day of Judgment and
thebeauties of the Islamic morality. However, such liability is only
restricted to communicating the religion. In one verse (Surat
an-Nahl), Allah informs us that our Prophet (pbuh) also is only a
messenger:
Call to the way of your Lord with wisdom and fair admonition, and
argue with them in the kindest way. Your Lord knows best who is
misguided from His way.And He knows best who are guided. (Surat
an-Nahl, 125)
Another verse states, "... It is the truth from your Lord; so let
whoever wishes believe and whoever wishes do not believe..." (Surat
al-Kahf,29)
and our Lord addresses our Prophet (pbuh) as, "Perhaps you will
destroy yourself with grief because they will not become believers."
(Surat ash-Shu'ara',3). In the Surah Qaf Allah issues our Prophet
(pbuh) this reminder:
We know best what theysay. You are not a dictator over them. So
remind, with the Qur'an, whoever fears My Threat. (Surah Qaf, 45)
When the religion of Islam that has been sent as a salvation from the
presence of Allah is explained to a person, he believes on his own
will and decides withoutbeing subjected to any kind of compulsion or
duress. People are free to choose truth or error. If they make the
wrong choice, they will face its consequence in the Hereafter.
People are free to choose correctly or wrongly. When Islam--the true
path that Allah has revealed--is explained, they come to believe of
their own freewill, reaching this decision with no pressure being put
on them. If they make wrong choices, they will face its consequences
in the Hereafter. On this subject, one verse of the Qur'an contains
the clearest command and reminder:
"If your Lord had willed, all the people on the earth would have
believed. Do you think you can force people to be believers?" (Surah
Yunus, 99)
For example, one personmay immediately come to believe in the face of
a believer's preaching, while another mocks and attacks it. One person
may use his conscience and decide to live in the way that is pleasing
to Allah, while the other may join the deniers and respond to fine
words with ugly ones. But that denial willnever inspire despair or
sorrow in the person issuing the call. In Surah Yusuf Allah says:
"But most people, for all your eagerness, are not muminun. You do not
ask them for any wage for it. It is only a reminder to all beings."
(Surah Yusuf, 103-104)
What's important is that no matter what reaction he meets with, the
person who abides by the Qur'an keeps on displaying the kind of
morality that is pleasing to Allah, refuses to make any concessions on
it, and puts his trust in Allah. Allah has told us that His religion
is to be explained "in the kindest way" as revealedin the Qur'an:
"Argue with the People of the Book only in the kindest way--except in
the case of those of them who do wrong--saying, "We believe in what
has been sent down to us and what was sent down to you. Our God and
your God are One and we submit to Him." (Surat al-'Ankabut, 46)
We must not forget that all events, great or small,happen in the
framework of the destiny created by Allah. And it is Allah who bestows
salvation on someone who is invited to believe. For that reason,
believers are never troubled by deniers' behavior. There are many
instances of this in the Qur'an. In the verse "Perhaps you may destroy
yourself with grief, chasing after them, if they do not have iman in
these words"(Surat al-Kahf, 6), Allah tells the Prophet (saas) not to
be troubledif the people he calls on to believe in the Qur'an fail to
do so. In another verse we are told "You cannot guide those you would
like to but Allah guides those He wills. He has best knowledge of the
guided."(Surat al-Qasas, 56) Therefore, one's invitation, fine words
and all the details one set out will only have any effect in the event
that Allah so wills it. (Harun Yahya, Only Love Can Defeat Terrorism)
The only responsibility of a believer is to call people to the Qur'an.
He bears no responsibility for deniers persisting in their denial and
therefore earning punishment in the Hereafter. Our Lord reveals this
to the Prophet (pbuh) in the verse "We have sent you with the Truth,
bringing good news and giving warning. Do not ask about the
inhabitants of the Blazing Fire."(Surat al-Baqara, 119).
Allah has given mankind both reason and a conscience. His messengers
and the Divine books revealed tothem have shown the true path, and
people are responsible for their own choices. Islamic morality can be
lived only by a sincere decision to do so--by surrendering oneself to
Allah and listening to one's conscience, which always commands one to
do what is right. It is atotal violation of Islamic morality to force
anyoneto believe, because whatmatters is an individual'ssurrendering
himself to Allah with all his heart and believing sincerely. If a
system were to force people into a religion and worship, people would
appear to be religious because of their fear of the system.
From a religious perspective only religiosity lived for Allah and
based on free and conscious choice is acceptable. Allah says the
following to our Prophet (pbuh) in the Surat al-Ghashiyya:
"So remind them! You are only a reminder. Youare not in control of
them. But as for anyone who turns away and is unbeliever, Allah will
punish him with the Greatest Punishment. Certainly it is to Us they
will return. Then their Reckoning is Our concern. "(Surat
al-Ghashiyya: 21-26)
It also needs to be emphasized that Islam leaves people free to make
their own choices regarding religion and commands them to respect
other religions. Even if someone believesin a superstitious faith, as
the Qur'an describes it, still he can live in peace and security in
Muslim lands and freely perform his own religious obligations. In
verses Allah commanded our Prophet (pbuh) to tell those who denied
Him:
"I do not worship what you worship, and you donot worship what I
worship. Nor will I worship what you worship, nor will you worship
what I worship. You have your religion, and I have my religion."
(Surah Qaf, 2-6)
Under the morality of Islam, everyone is free tocarry out his
religious obligations in accord with his own particular belief. Nobody
can prevent any others from performing their particular religious
duties, nor can he obligethem to worship in the manner he desires.
That violates the morality of Islam, and is unacceptable to Allah. In
the Islamic history a model of society emerges in which everyone is
free to worship and perform the obligations attendant upon his
particular chosen beliefs.In the Qur'an Allah describes monasteries,
churches, synagogues, and the places of worship of the Peoples of the
Book as all under Allah's protection:
"... If Allah had not driven some people backby means of others,
[then] monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques, where Allah's
name is mentioned much, would have been pulled down and destroyed.
Allah will certainly help those whohelp Him--Allah is All-Strong,
Almighty." (Surat al-Hajj, 40)
Our Prophet's (pbuh) lifeis full of such examples. When Christians
came to see him, he left his own mosque for them to use and pray in
it. That kind of tolerance was maintained during the times of the Four
Rightly Guided Caliphs who succeeded the Prophet (pbuh). After
Damascus was captured, a church that had been turned into a mosque was
divided into two, so thatChristians might worshipin one half and
Muslims in the other.
The Design of the Woodpecker
As we all know, woodpeckers build theirnests by boring holes in tree
trunks with their beaks. This may sound familiar to most people. But
the point many people fail to examine is why woodpeckers sufferno
brain hemorrhage when they beat a tattoo so vigorously with their
heads. What the woodpecker does is in a way similar to a human being
driving a nail into the wall with his head. Ifa man ventured to do
something like that, he would probably undergo a brain shock followed
by a brain hemorrhage. However, awoodpecker can peck a hard tree trunk
38-43 times in just two or three seconds and nothing happens to it.
Nothing happens because t he head structure of woodpeckers is ideally
created for such a task. The skull of the woodpecker has a remarkable
suspension system that absorbs the force of the blows. Its forehead
and some skull muscles adjoined to its beak and the jaw joint are so
robust that they help lessen the effect of the forceful strokes during
pecking.
Design and planning do not end here. Preferring primarily pine trees,
woodpeckers check the age of the trees before boring a hole in them
and pick those older than 100 years, because pine trees older than 100
years suffer an illness that causes the hard and thick bark to soften.
This was only recently discovered by science and perhaps youmay be
reading of it here for the first time in your life; woodpeckers have
known it for centuries.
This is not the only reason why woodpeckers prefer pine trees.
Woodpeckersdig cavities around theirnests, the function of which was
not originallyunderstood. These cavities were later understood to
protect them from a great danger. Over time, the sticky resin that
leaks from the pine trees fills up the cavities and the outpost of the
woodpecker's nest is thus filled with a pool whereby woodpeckers can
be protected from snakes, their greatest enemies.
Another interesting feature of woodpeckers is that their tongues are
thin enough to penetrate even ants' nests in the trees. Their tongues
are also sticky, which allows them to collect the ants that live
there. The perfection in their creation is further revealed by the
fact that their tongues have a structure which preventsthem from being
harmed by the acid in the bodies of the ants.
Woodpeckers, each of whose characteristics is discussed in a different
paragraph above, prove with all their detailed features that they are
'created'. If woodpeckers had evolved coincidentally asthe theory of
evolution claims, they would have died before they acquired such
extraordinarily consistent traits and they would be extinct. However,
as they were created by God with a special "design" adaptedto their
life, they started their lives by bearing all the vital
characteristics.
DARWINISM: THE WORST SO-CALLED SCIENTIFIC DECEPTION - 2
Since Darwinism is an ideology based on deceiving the world and
turning people away from belief in Allah (God), the supporters of the
Dajjal have to try to keep it alive, no matter what the cost. For that
reason, the various people who have entered the Dajjal's protection
have resortedto all possible methods to keep the ideology on its feet.
They heralded the theory of evolution as a proven fact, despite the
fact there is not a single piece of evidence to support it. They have
given the impression that non-existent evidence does in fact exist and
have tried to adapt fossils to their own theory. They have produced
fictitious intermediate forms, despite the fact that not a single
genuine one exists, and have taught this as scientific fact in school
books. They have ignored the countless pieces of evidence against
evolution that have emerged, and havedeliberately hidden them away
from the public gaze. In the absence of any evidence for their theory,
they have manufactured falsefossils and exhibited these for decades in
the world's most famous museums. Instead of being ashamed when their
frauds have been exposed, they have continued with their deceptive
methods and have had no qualms about producing and defending new
frauds. Although it has been scientifically proved thatnot one single
protein can form by chance they have still insisted on maintaining
that life first emerged by chance in muddy water. (The probability of
a function protein forming by chance is 1 in 10950, in other words,
zero.) They have had no compunctions about publishing their false
evidence in newspapers and scientific journals and on the television,
and have not hesitated to teach these to students in schools for
years. Darwinism is a belief system based on fraud, deception and
falsehood. Darwinism is not scientific. Ever since it was first
launched, Darwin's theory has assumed the task assumed by the ancient
pagans; it has sought to disseminate paganism and to turn people
awayfrom belief in Allah. It deceived people for 150 years. For 150
years, it sought to familiarize people with a lie. Darwinism is a
heretical religion that needs fraudto survive, that tells lies to
attract supporters, and that excommunicates those who tell the truth.
Allah says in one verse:
Say: "Shall I tell you of a reward with Allah far worse than that:
that of those whom Allah has cursed and with whom He is angry –
turning some of them into monkeys and into pigs – and who worshipped
false deities? Such people are in a worse situation and further from
the right way." (Surat al-Ma'ida, 60)
Under normal conditions, there would be no logic at all in people
continuing to follow such a perverted ideology. But some people have
fallen into asnare laid by the Dajjal. All unawares, they have been
deceived by this deception, not knowing what they were doing orhow
they had been led astray. Because the Dajjal has employed a very
cunning method. AsDarwinism deceived the world it made contact, by
fraudulent and perverted means, with people who had undertaken this
cunningand ugly work of the Dajjal. However, it is alsocertain that,
as with all superstitious religions, the cunning snares laid in this
religion will also come to nothing:
They are hatching a plot.I too am hatching a plot. So bear with the
unbelievers – bear with them for a while. (Surat at-Tariq, 15-17) -
- ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
"GENERAL ARTICLES"
- Tamil -- Urdu -- Kannada -- Telugu --*-
Share
"BISMILLA HIRRAHMAAN NIRRAHEEM"
WELCOME! - AS'SALAMU ALAIKUM!!
******** *****
*****
[All] praise is [due] to Allah, Lord of the worlds; -
Guide us to the straight path
*- -*
* * In this Blog; More Than Ten Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah} - Most Usefull Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And All Articles & Get Benifite!
* Visit :-
"INDIA "- Time in New Delhi -
*- WHAT ISLAM SAYS -*
-
Islam is a religion of Mercy, Peace and Blessing. Its teachings emphasize kind hear tedness, help, sympathy, forgiveness, sacrifice, love and care.Qur’an, the Shari’ah and the life of our beloved Prophet (SAW) mirrors this attribute, and it should be reflected in the conduct of a Momin.Islam appreciates those who are kind to their fellow being,and dislikes them who are hard hearted, curt, and hypocrite.Recall that historical moment, when Prophet (SAW) entered Makkah as a conqueror. There was before him a multitude of surrendered enemies, former oppressors and persecutors, who had evicted the Muslims from their homes, deprived them of their belongings, humiliated and intimidated Prophet (SAW) hatched schemes for his murder and tortured and killed his companions. But Prophet (SAW) displayed his usual magnanimity, generosity, and kind heartedness by forgiving all of them and declaring general amnesty...Subhanallah. May Allah help us tailor our life according to the teachings of Islam. (Aameen)./-
''HASBUNALLAHU WA NI'MAL WAKEEL''
-
''Allah is Sufficient for us'' + '' All praise is due to Allah. May peace and blessings beupon the Messenger, his household and companions '' (Aameen) | | |
| | |
|
Share
Follow Me | |
**
Share
-
-*- *: ::->
*
Saturday, May 11, 2013
What will Dawkins have to say to this? Londoners say 'we support creation'
The 1 July, 2009, issue of the Birmingham Post daily newspaper carried
the results of a recent opinion poll, according to which the number of
believers in London has risen considerably. Thesepeople who voted
against evolution believed that Allah had created all of life, just
the way it looks now and in a single moment.
This must have come as aconsiderable shock to Richard Dawkins, who
engages in wide-ranging activities intended to spread atheism and
Darwinism in Britain and worldwide! Perhaps themost important shock
for Dawkins will have been such a powerful rejection of Darwin, the
founder of the fraud of evolution, in his home country and even in his
home town. The British public must have become aware of the lies told
on behalf of evolution in their own country, since they have
increasingly begun loudly ridding themselves of this deception.
This is of course the expected conclusion. There is an important fact
we have told all Darwinists – and Dawkins – many time over. We have
told them,"if you put people into a darkened room but let them glimpse
the Sun for just a very brief moment, you will never afterwards be
able to convince them there is no Sun outside. We havetold them that
all the scientific evidence points to Creation, and that it is
impossible to convince people who know that not a single transitional
fossil exists of anything else. We toldthem that now that the fraud of
Darwinism has been so noisily revealed,the old techniques of
demagoguery and false publications will no longer be enough to keep
evolution alive. Wesaid that people have now learned what Darwinist
demagoguery really is, that Darwinist deceptions have been exposed and
that they have now begun looking on Darwin and Darwinism as
fraudulent.But Dawkins and some other Darwinists like himstill thought
that propaganda, demagogicstatements and false fossils could still
have an effect on people and that the Darwinist dictatorship would
remain strong, no matter what. Dawkins placed his trust in that alone
and imagined he could effectively indoctrinate people withatheist
propaganda in the form of posters on the sides of buses.
But the position in London, where those bus posters were most
intensively employed is that PEOPLE IN LONDON NOW BELIEVE IN ALLAH.
It is of course natural foran increasing number ofpeople in various
countries to be turning to Allah. Any logical person will draw only
one conclusion from the evidence he sees aroundhim, and the glorious
artistry on Earth and perfect Creation; the existence of a Sublime and
Almighty Creator. Any rational person can see from the evidence
provided that evolution is the worst deception inrecent centuries. It
is of course very easy for people to see, from countless pieces of
evidence, that they have been deceived and to realize the existence of
Almighty Allah. That is why, no matter how much they may try, neither
Dawkins nor anyother Darwinist can change the facts of which people
have beenconvinced in their minds. Neither Darwinistpropaganda nor the
Darwinist dictatorship have the power to do that any more. - -
▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
the results of a recent opinion poll, according to which the number of
believers in London has risen considerably. Thesepeople who voted
against evolution believed that Allah had created all of life, just
the way it looks now and in a single moment.
This must have come as aconsiderable shock to Richard Dawkins, who
engages in wide-ranging activities intended to spread atheism and
Darwinism in Britain and worldwide! Perhaps themost important shock
for Dawkins will have been such a powerful rejection of Darwin, the
founder of the fraud of evolution, in his home country and even in his
home town. The British public must have become aware of the lies told
on behalf of evolution in their own country, since they have
increasingly begun loudly ridding themselves of this deception.
This is of course the expected conclusion. There is an important fact
we have told all Darwinists – and Dawkins – many time over. We have
told them,"if you put people into a darkened room but let them glimpse
the Sun for just a very brief moment, you will never afterwards be
able to convince them there is no Sun outside. We havetold them that
all the scientific evidence points to Creation, and that it is
impossible to convince people who know that not a single transitional
fossil exists of anything else. We toldthem that now that the fraud of
Darwinism has been so noisily revealed,the old techniques of
demagoguery and false publications will no longer be enough to keep
evolution alive. Wesaid that people have now learned what Darwinist
demagoguery really is, that Darwinist deceptions have been exposed and
that they have now begun looking on Darwin and Darwinism as
fraudulent.But Dawkins and some other Darwinists like himstill thought
that propaganda, demagogicstatements and false fossils could still
have an effect on people and that the Darwinist dictatorship would
remain strong, no matter what. Dawkins placed his trust in that alone
and imagined he could effectively indoctrinate people withatheist
propaganda in the form of posters on the sides of buses.
But the position in London, where those bus posters were most
intensively employed is that PEOPLE IN LONDON NOW BELIEVE IN ALLAH.
It is of course natural foran increasing number ofpeople in various
countries to be turning to Allah. Any logical person will draw only
one conclusion from the evidence he sees aroundhim, and the glorious
artistry on Earth and perfect Creation; the existence of a Sublime and
Almighty Creator. Any rational person can see from the evidence
provided that evolution is the worst deception inrecent centuries. It
is of course very easy for people to see, from countless pieces of
evidence, that they have been deceived and to realize the existence of
Almighty Allah. That is why, no matter how much they may try, neither
Dawkins nor anyother Darwinist can change the facts of which people
have beenconvinced in their minds. Neither Darwinistpropaganda nor the
Darwinist dictatorship have the power to do that any more. - -
▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Celal Sengor is right!Darwinism was founded on a momentous lie
In his column in the 26 June, 2009 issue of Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik
magazine, Celal Sengor published a piece titled "The Difficulty with
Being Human." In the article, Sengor, maintained that "lies"
constitute the starting point for a great many discoveries and
inventions, and that important scientific findshad been made as a
result of them. On the basis of that, Sengor then reached the totally
illogical conclusion that "it is impossible to be human without
imagining something false to be true and giving expression to that."
At this point, Sengor, who has followed a falselogic this far and
reached the conclusion that "one cannot be human without lying," was
right about one thing: he pointed to Darwinism as evidence for the
claim in question.He said that Darwin had come out with a lie. He
admitted that Darwin's theory was a lie put forward in the climate
ofignorance of the 19th century, a kind of intellectual adventure. And
in that he was absolutely right.
Darwin said he had "found a scientific theory" at a time when nobody
even knew whatthe cell looked like and when the biro had not yet even
been invented. All he had actually done was to embark on an aimless
ship voyage, drink with the crew from morning till night and collect
insects for hisown amusement on the islands they stopped off at. As
Darwin openly states in his autobiography, he took no interest in
these specimens he collected, just setting them to one side and
getting on withhis youthful adventure. In his letters he frequently
said that he had made his claim under the spirit of that adventure,
that it was nonsensical and that he was about to commit suicide
because of it. He was unaware that the cell, which he imagined to be a
balloon full of water, was actually just as complex as a whole
galactic system. That waswhy he saw nothing wrong in maintaining that
the cell came into existence by chance. He was unaware of the lawsof
genetics. He thereforeimagined that acquired characteristics could be
passed on to later generations. On the basis of that error, he then
put forward the lie that living things turned into one another,
soughtto convince himself of that, and therefore spent the whole of
his life in a state of surprise at the total absence of transitional
fossils.
As Sengor says, Darwin made his name with a lie. But where Sengor is
mistaken is that no greatdiscovery was then made as the result of that
lie and, on the contrary, that lie continued to grow and spread.
Celal Sengor willbe perfectly well aware that the details of genetic
science were discovered after Darwin's time. Genetics and microbiology
have shown the existence in living things of such extraordinary
structures as the cell membrane, ribosomes, mitochondria, DNA,
chloroplasts and protein.They have also shown it is statistically
impossible for a single protein to form by chance. It has been
realized that not even the smallest and most basic components of the
cell can be manufactured in the laboratory environment.The second
greatest blow to Darwinism camefrom the science of paleontology. More
than250 million fossils have been unearthed since Darwin's time. And
Darwinists have seen been stunned and shocked by the revelation to the
whole world in the works of Harun Yahya that NOT ONE OF THESE IS A
TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL.
Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik rosaea are fossils that Darwinists
speculated about for a long time. But detailed examination of the
fossils revealed that they were complete and perfect life forms with
no transitional characteristics.
When this fact is brought out into the open, Darwinists develop their
own unique defense mechanism and point to Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik
Rosaea as saviors, even though these actually harbor no transitional
features whatsoever. (These are the only vehicles for speculation in
their possession.) Sengor sought shelter in the same technique, and as
soon as the lack of transitional fossils was raised he tried to depict
these two fossils as findings actually corroborating Darwin's false
theory. BUT THIS IS A DECEPTION.
Darwinist claims on the subject of Archaeopteryx have been discredited
with wide-ranging evidence. It has been established that this life
form was a perfect flyingbird and, more importantly, perfect birds
living contemporaneously with Archaeopteryx have totally eliminated
the claims regarding transition in question. You can access detailed
information about the invalidity of Darwinist claims regarding
Archaeopteryx here .
Tiktaalik Rosaea , on the other hand, is a perfect mosaic form. It
possessesnot a single intermediate characteristic, and all thefossil's
characteristics show that is a perfect, but extinct life form.
Detailed statements on the subject have been made many times before,
and all the speculation regarding Tiktaalik rosaea has been utterly
refuted. Youcan read detailed information about the invalidity of
Darwinist claims about Tiktaalik rosaea here .
Celal Sengor is without doubt well aware of the facts listed above,
that Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik rosaea are not transitional forms
and, furthermore, Darwinists HAVE NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FORM IN
THEIR POSSESSION. But because of his devotion to Darwinist ideology
hethinks he needs to defend these false claims. Sengor should bear
this fact in mind: DARWINISM BEGAN WITH A LIE AND BECAME AN
EVENGREATER LIE AS IT GREW AND THRIVED. And, most important of all,
THE WHOLE WORLD HAS NOW WORKED OUT, WITH DEFINITIVE AND
SCIENTIFICEVIDENCE, THAT DARWINISM IS A LIE. There is now nobody who
does not know thatDarwinism is a fraud. Darwinism is now the butt of
jokes. Not even children believe the theory or are taken in byits
speculation. And defending that lie merely degrades the followers of
Darwinism, and even makes them utterly ridiculous. Two hundred fifty
million fossils show that Allah created living things with their
present-day appearances, in a single moment and out of nothing. And
the demagoguery employed to defend Darwinism just looks utterly
helpless.
Celal Sengor is also mistaken on this point; the great discoveries he
refers to were not developed on the basis of a lie, but of false or
deficient information. The people who made the discoveries produced
hypotheses in an effort to understand something, and then intended to
arrive at an accurate conclusion by way of RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION.
For example, a scientific discovery was made at a time when the Earth
wasthought to be flat; it wasrealized that the Earth is spherical, and
nobody has to date objected to the evidence proving this. Therefore,
none of the discoverers in question have defended a lie devoid of any
scientific evidence in theway Darwin did, nor insisted on spreading a
lie that had been refutedby the scientific evidence. It is not
possible to be human by lying, as Sengor imagines, but rather by
acting honestly, espousing the truth and by never departing fromthe
truth, even if the prevailing conditions will place one in a difficult
position. It is fear of Allah that is needed for this. What makes
people human is to listen to the voice of their consciences, and not
to suppress their consciences when all theevidence points to a single
truth, in favor of falsity and superstition.
Do not mix up truth withfalsehood and knowingly hide the truth. (Surat
al-Baqara, 42)
--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
magazine, Celal Sengor published a piece titled "The Difficulty with
Being Human." In the article, Sengor, maintained that "lies"
constitute the starting point for a great many discoveries and
inventions, and that important scientific findshad been made as a
result of them. On the basis of that, Sengor then reached the totally
illogical conclusion that "it is impossible to be human without
imagining something false to be true and giving expression to that."
At this point, Sengor, who has followed a falselogic this far and
reached the conclusion that "one cannot be human without lying," was
right about one thing: he pointed to Darwinism as evidence for the
claim in question.He said that Darwin had come out with a lie. He
admitted that Darwin's theory was a lie put forward in the climate
ofignorance of the 19th century, a kind of intellectual adventure. And
in that he was absolutely right.
Darwin said he had "found a scientific theory" at a time when nobody
even knew whatthe cell looked like and when the biro had not yet even
been invented. All he had actually done was to embark on an aimless
ship voyage, drink with the crew from morning till night and collect
insects for hisown amusement on the islands they stopped off at. As
Darwin openly states in his autobiography, he took no interest in
these specimens he collected, just setting them to one side and
getting on withhis youthful adventure. In his letters he frequently
said that he had made his claim under the spirit of that adventure,
that it was nonsensical and that he was about to commit suicide
because of it. He was unaware that the cell, which he imagined to be a
balloon full of water, was actually just as complex as a whole
galactic system. That waswhy he saw nothing wrong in maintaining that
the cell came into existence by chance. He was unaware of the lawsof
genetics. He thereforeimagined that acquired characteristics could be
passed on to later generations. On the basis of that error, he then
put forward the lie that living things turned into one another,
soughtto convince himself of that, and therefore spent the whole of
his life in a state of surprise at the total absence of transitional
fossils.
As Sengor says, Darwin made his name with a lie. But where Sengor is
mistaken is that no greatdiscovery was then made as the result of that
lie and, on the contrary, that lie continued to grow and spread.
Celal Sengor willbe perfectly well aware that the details of genetic
science were discovered after Darwin's time. Genetics and microbiology
have shown the existence in living things of such extraordinary
structures as the cell membrane, ribosomes, mitochondria, DNA,
chloroplasts and protein.They have also shown it is statistically
impossible for a single protein to form by chance. It has been
realized that not even the smallest and most basic components of the
cell can be manufactured in the laboratory environment.The second
greatest blow to Darwinism camefrom the science of paleontology. More
than250 million fossils have been unearthed since Darwin's time. And
Darwinists have seen been stunned and shocked by the revelation to the
whole world in the works of Harun Yahya that NOT ONE OF THESE IS A
TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL.
Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik rosaea are fossils that Darwinists
speculated about for a long time. But detailed examination of the
fossils revealed that they were complete and perfect life forms with
no transitional characteristics.
When this fact is brought out into the open, Darwinists develop their
own unique defense mechanism and point to Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik
Rosaea as saviors, even though these actually harbor no transitional
features whatsoever. (These are the only vehicles for speculation in
their possession.) Sengor sought shelter in the same technique, and as
soon as the lack of transitional fossils was raised he tried to depict
these two fossils as findings actually corroborating Darwin's false
theory. BUT THIS IS A DECEPTION.
Darwinist claims on the subject of Archaeopteryx have been discredited
with wide-ranging evidence. It has been established that this life
form was a perfect flyingbird and, more importantly, perfect birds
living contemporaneously with Archaeopteryx have totally eliminated
the claims regarding transition in question. You can access detailed
information about the invalidity of Darwinist claims regarding
Archaeopteryx here .
Tiktaalik Rosaea , on the other hand, is a perfect mosaic form. It
possessesnot a single intermediate characteristic, and all thefossil's
characteristics show that is a perfect, but extinct life form.
Detailed statements on the subject have been made many times before,
and all the speculation regarding Tiktaalik rosaea has been utterly
refuted. Youcan read detailed information about the invalidity of
Darwinist claims about Tiktaalik rosaea here .
Celal Sengor is without doubt well aware of the facts listed above,
that Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik rosaea are not transitional forms
and, furthermore, Darwinists HAVE NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FORM IN
THEIR POSSESSION. But because of his devotion to Darwinist ideology
hethinks he needs to defend these false claims. Sengor should bear
this fact in mind: DARWINISM BEGAN WITH A LIE AND BECAME AN
EVENGREATER LIE AS IT GREW AND THRIVED. And, most important of all,
THE WHOLE WORLD HAS NOW WORKED OUT, WITH DEFINITIVE AND
SCIENTIFICEVIDENCE, THAT DARWINISM IS A LIE. There is now nobody who
does not know thatDarwinism is a fraud. Darwinism is now the butt of
jokes. Not even children believe the theory or are taken in byits
speculation. And defending that lie merely degrades the followers of
Darwinism, and even makes them utterly ridiculous. Two hundred fifty
million fossils show that Allah created living things with their
present-day appearances, in a single moment and out of nothing. And
the demagoguery employed to defend Darwinism just looks utterly
helpless.
Celal Sengor is also mistaken on this point; the great discoveries he
refers to were not developed on the basis of a lie, but of false or
deficient information. The people who made the discoveries produced
hypotheses in an effort to understand something, and then intended to
arrive at an accurate conclusion by way of RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION.
For example, a scientific discovery was made at a time when the Earth
wasthought to be flat; it wasrealized that the Earth is spherical, and
nobody has to date objected to the evidence proving this. Therefore,
none of the discoverers in question have defended a lie devoid of any
scientific evidence in theway Darwin did, nor insisted on spreading a
lie that had been refutedby the scientific evidence. It is not
possible to be human by lying, as Sengor imagines, but rather by
acting honestly, espousing the truth and by never departing fromthe
truth, even if the prevailing conditions will place one in a difficult
position. It is fear of Allah that is needed for this. What makes
people human is to listen to the voice of their consciences, and not
to suppress their consciences when all theevidence points to a single
truth, in favor of falsity and superstition.
Do not mix up truth withfalsehood and knowingly hide the truth. (Surat
al-Baqara, 42)
--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Fathwa, - Determining the reward of the woman’s prayer inside her home is boundto Sharee‘ah texts
Question
Would a woman attain the twenty-seven fold reward if she offered the
prayer inside her home like the case of men who offer prayers in the
mosque?
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
There is no doubt that offering prayer in a congregation is better
than offering it alone. However, the prayer of a woman in her home is
superior to offering it in the mosque. Hence, the less virtuous deed
takes precedence over the most virtuous deed if it isdone in its
optimum timeand place. For example, reciting the Quran is more
virtuous than reciting the mere remembrance of Allaah The Exalted.
However, reciting the regular remembrance after the prayer in its due
time takes precedence over reciting the Quran as it occurred in the
proper place and time. The superiority of a woman's prayer inside her
home does not necessarily mean that it is equal to the prayer of men
in congregation. Hence, thismatter is not based on human opinions but
requires authentic proofsfrom the Quran or the Sunnah. The Prophet ,
mentioned that the prayer of a woman in herhome is better for her but
he did not determinea specific reward.
Allaah Knows best. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Would a woman attain the twenty-seven fold reward if she offered the
prayer inside her home like the case of men who offer prayers in the
mosque?
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
There is no doubt that offering prayer in a congregation is better
than offering it alone. However, the prayer of a woman in her home is
superior to offering it in the mosque. Hence, the less virtuous deed
takes precedence over the most virtuous deed if it isdone in its
optimum timeand place. For example, reciting the Quran is more
virtuous than reciting the mere remembrance of Allaah The Exalted.
However, reciting the regular remembrance after the prayer in its due
time takes precedence over reciting the Quran as it occurred in the
proper place and time. The superiority of a woman's prayer inside her
home does not necessarily mean that it is equal to the prayer of men
in congregation. Hence, thismatter is not based on human opinions but
requires authentic proofsfrom the Quran or the Sunnah. The Prophet ,
mentioned that the prayer of a woman in herhome is better for her but
he did not determinea specific reward.
Allaah Knows best. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)