'' Our Lord ! grant us good in this world and good in the hereafter and save us from the torment of the Fire '' [Ameen]
-
{in Arab} :->
Rabbanaa aatinaa fid-dunyaa hasanatan wafil aakhirati hasanatan waqinaa 'athaaban-naar/-
(Surah Al-Baqarah ,verse 201)
Share 
magazine, Celal Sengor published a piece titled "The Difficulty with
Being Human." In the article, Sengor, maintained that "lies"
constitute the starting point for a great many discoveries and
inventions, and that important scientific findshad been made as a
result of them. On the basis of that, Sengor then reached the totally
illogical conclusion that "it is impossible to be human without
imagining something false to be true and giving expression to that."
At this point, Sengor, who has followed a falselogic this far and
reached the conclusion that "one cannot be human without lying," was
right about one thing: he pointed to Darwinism as evidence for the
claim in question.He said that Darwin had come out with a lie. He
admitted that Darwin's theory was a lie put forward in the climate
ofignorance of the 19th century, a kind of intellectual adventure. And
in that he was absolutely right.
Darwin said he had "found a scientific theory" at a time when nobody
even knew whatthe cell looked like and when the biro had not yet even
been invented. All he had actually done was to embark on an aimless
ship voyage, drink with the crew from morning till night and collect
insects for hisown amusement on the islands they stopped off at. As
Darwin openly states in his autobiography, he took no interest in
these specimens he collected, just setting them to one side and
getting on withhis youthful adventure. In his letters he frequently
said that he had made his claim under the spirit of that adventure,
that it was nonsensical and that he was about to commit suicide
because of it. He was unaware that the cell, which he imagined to be a
balloon full of water, was actually just as complex as a whole
galactic system. That waswhy he saw nothing wrong in maintaining that
the cell came into existence by chance. He was unaware of the lawsof
genetics. He thereforeimagined that acquired characteristics could be
passed on to later generations. On the basis of that error, he then
put forward the lie that living things turned into one another,
soughtto convince himself of that, and therefore spent the whole of
his life in a state of surprise at the total absence of transitional
fossils.
As Sengor says, Darwin made his name with a lie. But where Sengor is
mistaken is that no greatdiscovery was then made as the result of that
lie and, on the contrary, that lie continued to grow and spread.
Celal Sengor willbe perfectly well aware that the details of genetic
science were discovered after Darwin's time. Genetics and microbiology
have shown the existence in living things of such extraordinary
structures as the cell membrane, ribosomes, mitochondria, DNA,
chloroplasts and protein.They have also shown it is statistically
impossible for a single protein to form by chance. It has been
realized that not even the smallest and most basic components of the
cell can be manufactured in the laboratory environment.The second
greatest blow to Darwinism camefrom the science of paleontology. More
than250 million fossils have been unearthed since Darwin's time. And
Darwinists have seen been stunned and shocked by the revelation to the
whole world in the works of Harun Yahya that NOT ONE OF THESE IS A
TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL.
Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik rosaea are fossils that Darwinists
speculated about for a long time. But detailed examination of the
fossils revealed that they were complete and perfect life forms with
no transitional characteristics.
When this fact is brought out into the open, Darwinists develop their
own unique defense mechanism and point to Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik
Rosaea as saviors, even though these actually harbor no transitional
features whatsoever. (These are the only vehicles for speculation in
their possession.) Sengor sought shelter in the same technique, and as
soon as the lack of transitional fossils was raised he tried to depict
these two fossils as findings actually corroborating Darwin's false
theory. BUT THIS IS A DECEPTION.
Darwinist claims on the subject of Archaeopteryx have been discredited
with wide-ranging evidence. It has been established that this life
form was a perfect flyingbird and, more importantly, perfect birds
living contemporaneously with Archaeopteryx have totally eliminated
the claims regarding transition in question. You can access detailed
information about the invalidity of Darwinist claims regarding
Archaeopteryx here .
Tiktaalik Rosaea , on the other hand, is a perfect mosaic form. It
possessesnot a single intermediate characteristic, and all thefossil's
characteristics show that is a perfect, but extinct life form.
Detailed statements on the subject have been made many times before,
and all the speculation regarding Tiktaalik rosaea has been utterly
refuted. Youcan read detailed information about the invalidity of
Darwinist claims about Tiktaalik rosaea here .
Celal Sengor is without doubt well aware of the facts listed above,
that Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik rosaea are not transitional forms
and, furthermore, Darwinists HAVE NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FORM IN
THEIR POSSESSION. But because of his devotion to Darwinist ideology
hethinks he needs to defend these false claims. Sengor should bear
this fact in mind: DARWINISM BEGAN WITH A LIE AND BECAME AN
EVENGREATER LIE AS IT GREW AND THRIVED. And, most important of all,
THE WHOLE WORLD HAS NOW WORKED OUT, WITH DEFINITIVE AND
SCIENTIFICEVIDENCE, THAT DARWINISM IS A LIE. There is now nobody who
does not know thatDarwinism is a fraud. Darwinism is now the butt of
jokes. Not even children believe the theory or are taken in byits
speculation. And defending that lie merely degrades the followers of
Darwinism, and even makes them utterly ridiculous. Two hundred fifty
million fossils show that Allah created living things with their
present-day appearances, in a single moment and out of nothing. And
the demagoguery employed to defend Darwinism just looks utterly
helpless.
Celal Sengor is also mistaken on this point; the great discoveries he
refers to were not developed on the basis of a lie, but of false or
deficient information. The people who made the discoveries produced
hypotheses in an effort to understand something, and then intended to
arrive at an accurate conclusion by way of RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION.
For example, a scientific discovery was made at a time when the Earth
wasthought to be flat; it wasrealized that the Earth is spherical, and
nobody has to date objected to the evidence proving this. Therefore,
none of the discoverers in question have defended a lie devoid of any
scientific evidence in theway Darwin did, nor insisted on spreading a
lie that had been refutedby the scientific evidence. It is not
possible to be human by lying, as Sengor imagines, but rather by
acting honestly, espousing the truth and by never departing fromthe
truth, even if the prevailing conditions will place one in a difficult
position. It is fear of Allah that is needed for this. What makes
people human is to listen to the voice of their consciences, and not
to suppress their consciences when all theevidence points to a single
truth, in favor of falsity and superstition.
Do not mix up truth withfalsehood and knowingly hide the truth. (Surat
al-Baqara, 42)
--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
