The mindset that seeks to ascribe terrorism to Islam is the Darwinist mindset that represents the true source of terrorism

All the terrorist activities across the world that areattempted to be
equatedwith Islam, including therecent slaughter on a military base in
America, are the products of the Darwinist, Leninist, Stalinist and
Marxist mindset. Those who perpetrate such massacres have absolutely
nothing to dowith Islam. These peoplehave received a Darwinist and
Marxist education in Europe or America and are rooted in Leninism and
Stalinism. Since conflict represents the basis of the philosophy in
which someone with a Marxist, Leninist and Darwinist mindset believes,
since they regard the people killed as mere animals and also believe
that these need to be eliminated according to natural selection, it is
perfectly normal for those with such a mindset to carry out such
massacres.
Those who seek to ascribe such massacres to Islam are the
hereticalatheist masonic groupings that wish to cause divisions
between Muslims and Christians inparticular and seek to weaken the
truly devoutand give rise to oppression, conflict and war across the
globe. Atheist freemasons, representatives of the systems of the
antichrist (dajjal), seek to totally misrepresent Islam, a religion of
peace and love, and thus ensure that people hold prejudiced views of
it. The fact is, however, that unjustified killing is a sin in Islam.
Our Lord makes this absolutely clear in the Qur'an:
So We decreed for the tribe of Israel that if someone kills another
person – unless it is in retaliation for someone else or for causing
corruption in the Earth – it is as if he had murdered all mankind. And
if anyone gives life to another person, it is as if he had given life
to all mankind. Our messengers came to them with clear signs but even
after that manyof them committed outrages in the Earth. (Surat
Al-Ma'ida, 32)
Those who do not call onany other deity togetherwith Allah and do not
killanyone Allah has made inviolate, except with the right to do so,
and do not fornicate; anyonewho does that will receive an evil
punishment. (Surat al-Furqan, 68)
Allah reveals that it is as sinful to kill one person as to kill all
mankind. There is no question of someone who maintainsthe bounds set
by Allah of harming a single person, let alone slaughtering thousands
of innocent individuals.
In addition, under Islam nobody can arbitrarily distinguish between
those who do "right" or "wrong." Because this distinction is clearly
set out by way of the Qur'an. As revealed in the Qur'an, there can be
no aggression in Islam, only self-defense. A Muslim can only resist
aggression for purposes of defense, in the event of a threat to
himself or those around him. According to Islam, only under such
circumstances do peoplehave a "right to attack" the other side, and
then for purely defensive purposes. But if the other side ceases its
aggression, then they must also put a stop to their defensive actions.
Allah makes this a definitive pronouncement in the Qur'an:
"Fight in the Way of Allah against those who fight you, but do not go
beyond the limits. Allah does not love those who go beyond the limits.
… Do not fight them in the Masjid al-Haram untilthey fight you there.
But if they do fight you, thenkill them. That is how thekuffar should
be repaid. But if they cease, Allah is Ever-Forgiving, Most Merciful."
(Surat al-Baqara, 190-192)
Those who imagine theycan escape punishment by fleeing from justice
inthis world will never be able to avoid having to account for
themselves after death, in the presence of Allah, in the Hereafter.
Therefore, true Muslims who know that they will have to account for
their actions once they are dead are punctilious when it comes to
maintaining the bounds set by Allah. It is impossible for a genuine,
devout Muslim to harm people or perpetrate mass slaughter, things made
sinful by Allah, or to harm them in any way by turning his back on
such virtues as love, affection and forgiveness, which constitute the
very essence of Islam. The mindset that seeks to ascribe terrorist
attacks to Islam is the Darwinist, Marxist, materialist mindset that
wishes to lead the world to irreligion. Atheist freemasonry, the
system of the antichrist, has undertaken to defend this mindset. But,
by the leave of Allah, this cunning strategy of the antichrist has
been exposed and defeated inrecent times when the coming of the
Prophet Jesus (as) and Hazrat Mahdi (as) is imminent. Atheist f
reemasonry, the system of the antichrist, is no longer able to deceive
people as it usedto, and all this heretical mindset's vile plots
against Islam and true believer end in failure.
From Adnan Oktar's interview dated 6 November, 2009:
ADNAN OKTAR: There is no terror in Islam, just people of Muslim
originswho have been brought up as Darwinist materialists and
terrorists. For example, someone may have Turkish origins and his ID
card may describe himas Turkish, yet he may still be an enemy of
Turkishness. Like the alleged organization Ergenekon organization.But
his ID card says he is a Turk. It may say he is a Muslim, though that
does not necessarily make him one. In order to be a Muslim he must be
affectionate, compassionate, forgiving, tolerant and humane.
Compassion does not mean ignoring the offenses committed by someone,
by the way,but rather forgiving such offenses. Therefore,if you look
at all the people responsible for what is known as Islamicterror, all
the terrorist attacks in the world, youwill see that they have all
received a Darwinist education. They have all adopted a Darwinist,
materialist and Marxist line. They are all great admirers of Che or of
Ho Chi Minh. In other words,they are all people who have been raised
hand in glove with terrorism. As a result, Palestine and Syria have
only just beenfreed from communist thinking. Iraq has only just been
freed from it. They all used to hold Stalinist, terrorist ideas. The
old tools are therefore still being used today. Terrorists are people
produced by those old tools.
ADNAN OKTAR: Look, the leaders of the people who perpetrate actions of
this kind have all been brought up in Europe or America. Theyhave all
gone through an intensively Darwinist education. They have all adopted
Marxist, Leninistand Stalinist thinking and strive to ascribe these
things to Islam. They even called such people green communists at one
time, Muslims with a great admiration for communism. But Islam is a
pure faith. It is an unsullied faith, and nothing can subsequently be
added to it. Whatever exists in Islam already does so, and nothing can
be added on afterwards.
ADNAN OKTAR: The aim behind these Marxists' terror is to create a
division between Muslims and Christians and set them against one
another, and to install an atheist masonic, Marxist system to fill
that gap. Because the idea of thesis, antithesis and synthesis is one
espoused by both Marx and Darwin. Darwin espoused the dialectic of
living things. One lot espoused the dialectic of history. And others,
the dialectic of nature. Put the three together and you have Marxist
dialectics. The idea of conflict is inherent in that, the idea that
people can only attain perfection through conflict. Conflictis an
essential attribute of Marxists. They say thateven if you have
Marxism, its antithesis will still arise, and a newsynthesis, that it
will give rise to its own antithesis. They say that conflict is a
feature of the permanent world. Terror is essential for that to be
made a reality. This is a most devilish plan. A Marxist, atheist
masonic plan thatwould be very successfulwere it really put into
action. But I have thwarted all these plans. They are doing what
Darwinist, Marxist theoryrequires. But by demolishing Darwinism and
showing people that it is all a plot, I am thwarting the attempt toset
Muslims and Christians against one another.
ADNAN OKTAR: While being injected with Marxism, nobody will ever
become a Marxist if they come right out and say, "You will just go out
and kill people." Of course it will be given a humane appearance. The
mask must be one that has a very positive impact on the human soul and
character. In that event, people may then look favorably on it. But
there is also the theory of conflict in Marxism. What does the theory
of conflict mean? What does the constant operation of theses and
antithesis mean? It means there will be constant bloodshed. They talk
about the dictatorship of the proletariat, and that means blood, tears
and suffering. But they say there will always be counter-theses to
this. And the antithesis to that is fascism. They speak of fascism
conflicting with communism and of therebeing a new synthesis emerging
from this, and that a new antithesis to that will then emerge. Inother
words, they refer to endless disorder and anarchy. They say this a
global law and base it on Darwin's theory of evolution. The dialectic
of nature, of living things, of history. Someone who believes that has
no other option that to be a Marxist, and they are very insincere.
Someone who is a Darwinist has no option other than to be a Marxist.
If the dialectic ofliving things is true, thenaccording to their
belief the dialectic of nature and history is also true. And there is
also dialectical philosophy. People who believe in dialectical
philosophy must also sign up to conflict. In other words, they must
sign up to thesis and antithesis. They must therefore alsoaccept
terror and anarchy. That is why Lenin told people to "bomb banks, kill
the police, kill soldiers and rob banks." That is why he wanted it. He
was saying that people need to engage in such a struggle in order to
attain the thesis, antithesis and synthesis.
ADNAN OKTAR: This is a devilish ruse. There can be no terror in the
nameof Islam. Because killing is forbidden in Islam. There is no
compulsion in the religion. That is also forbidden. Compulsion is
forbidden.I am a mujahid, waging jihad. The word jihad comes from the
word 'jehd,' meaning to strive. What they are doing is slaughter. The
Qur'an does not talk of slaughter. The Qur'an refers to 'jehd,' the
jihad, spreading the religion and telling people about it. Our Prophet
(saas) describedthe religion by proving it with love, affection and
compassion. The religion is made available, and people either sign up
to it or not. If you impose it on people then the result is hypocrisy.
Do you know what hypocrisy means? You give rise to the mostvile people
in the world. Hypocrisy is many, many times worse than disbelief.
PRESENTER: Is killing on behalf of the religion legitimate?
ADNAN OKTAR: You can defend yourself for the sake of the religion. If
they come to your home and try to kill you and your children. That is
self-defense. Of course you will defend yourself in that case. But
Allah tells us to go no further. He tells us to respond
proportionately and then stop. He tells us to stop when they do. He
tells us to stop when they halt their attack. He tells us to go no
further. - - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/
▓███▓ - -

Britons want creation to be taught in schools

Great Britain, Darwin's own homeland, now rejects evolution. For years
the bastion of Darwinism, Britain has come to oppose evolution
extraordinarily quickly over the past few years. The country heads the
list of those in which thefact of creation is spreading the quickest,
and the public, as recent newspaper headlines show, now want students
to learn about the fact of creation in schools.
Richard Dawkins, who has recently stepped up his pro-Darwinist and
atheist activities in Britain, imagined that Darwinism, the worst
deception in the world, would be strengthened with atheist camps and
demagoguery. Dawkins has been engaged in wide-ranging activities to
that end for many years now, and has expressed his concern at the
spread of Creationist belief, and has set these fears out in his
latest book in such a clear manner that they cannotbe denied. Rather
than providing any scientific evidence to support his claims, Dawkins
makes far from scientific accusations, writes slogans on the sides of
public buses , seeks to attract interest by performing impersonations
on talk shows and most recentlysought shelter behind the idea of
aliens . He truly imagined that these false and demagogic methods
would work. His latest book, in which he claimsto "provide evidence
for evolution," actually contains not a single piece of scientific
evidence, only demagoguery, but he actually thinks that this outdated
method going back 150 years can still influence people today.
The fact is, however, that Dawkins' efforts in this direction have
been in vain and have enabled people to bettersee the true face of
evolution. According to the results of an opinion poll conducted last
year, only 25% of British people believe in evolution. Parents have
now objected to the state of affairs in which evolution alone has been
taught in schools and that has persisted for many years, and have now
said, "Creationshould also be taught in schools." The increasingly
rapid turning toward Allah in Britain in particular has fundamentally
undermined and demolished the bastion of Darwinism. Dawkins must have
been amazed to see the turning toward the fact of Creation among the
British people in whom he had placed so much faith, since he had no
hesitations over ignorantly describing hisown people as "ignorant."
Those who went along with superstition and failed to comprehend the
sublime might and power of Allah have always fallen into the error
into which Dawkins and other Darwinists have fallen. They have
believed that a claim put forward in opposition to Allah, a mass
deception, could muster support and grow using corrupt and false
methods. They imagined that the more propaganda was made, the more
effective it would be. They imagined they could make good their lack
of scientific evidence by indulging in impersonations on chat shows,
putting posters up on the sides of buses and entering into debates
with middle school students. The fact is, however, that by doing so
they have made the great mistake committed by everyone who has ever
striven against Allah. Allah has always thwarted the plans of those
who strove against the truth with superstition and led them to
failure. Under the law of our Almighty Lord, those who do this in the
futurewill also be condemned to failure. Almighty Allah tells us in
His verses:
... Allah is our Lord and your Lord. We have our actions and you have
your actions. There is no debate between us and you. Allah will gather
us all together. He is our final destination.' The argument of those
who argue about Allah, once He has been acknowledged, has no basis
whatsoever with their Lord… (Surat ash-Shura, 15-16) - - ▓███▓
Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

A new name for Darwinist despair modular evolution and aperfect flying bird: Darwinopterus

The enormous scale of the Darwinist defeat andhow Darwinists have no
means of saving their theory has been set out with various forms of
supporting evidence for a long time now. But theevidence that perhaps
made this defeat clearesthas come from Darwinists themselves.
Darwinists, with no scientific evidence for their theories, confronted
by disappointment time and time again and whohave suffered their worst
rout in the manifest proofs of Creation presented in recent years,
have now set reason. Leaving reason, logic and scienceto one side,
Darwinists come up with a new claim. They said, "all the organs in the
life form we have just discovered somehow came into existence
momentarily." They then had no qualms about giving thisthe name of
modular evolution. "We do not know how it happened, but it is a form
of evolution," they said. They have quite shamelessly put this
falseand ludicrous claim out in scientific journals, as if it were
that easy to deceive people. This stage to which Darwinists have now
come is one of the greatest manifestations of the Darwinist defeat.
This new deception that Darwinists refer to as "modular evolution" is
the idea that one or more organs appears suddenly in a life form. Not
a word is of course said about how these organs emerge, what kind of
biological, physical and anatomical stages might be involvedor about
any scientific evidence for it. All we have is an evolutionist claim,
according to which an animal can suddenly grow wings or develop claws
and suddenly turn into a birdor a land-dwelling life form. DEVOID OF
ANY EVIDENCE AS TO HOW LIVING THINGS EVOLVE AND WITH NO CHANCE OF
FINDING ANY IN THE FUTURE, EITHER, DARWINISTS NOW IMAGINE THEY CAN
DECEIVEPEOPLE BY SAYING, "EVERYTHING HAPPENED IN A SINGLE MOMENT."
It is of course scientifically IMPOSSIBLE for a living thing to
suddenly develop a new characteristic, to suddenly grow a new limb or
to suddenly come into possession of a new system. ALL BRANCHES OF
SCIENCE REFUTE this claim. It must not be forgotten that the mutations
necessary for such a change to take place will inevitablykill the life
form involved. NINETY NINE PERCENT OF MUTATIONS ARE DELETERIOUS, AND
THEOTHER 1% HAS NO EFFECT. SEVERAL MUTATIONS TAKING PLACE AT THE SAME
TIME LEAD TO THE SWIFT DEATH OF THE LIVING THING CONCERNED. There is
only one reason for the production of such an amazingly ignorant idea
as modular evolution, and that is the despairing evolutionist idea of
"WHAT KIND OF EVOLUTIONARY MODEL MIGHT DO AWAY WITH THENEED TO LOOK
FOR EVIDENCE IN THE FOSSIL RECORD?"
Because THE FOSSIL RECORD DEFINITIVELY REFUTES THE THEORY OF
EVOLUTION. ALMOST 300 MILLION FOSSILS HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED TO DATE,AND
EVERY NEW FOSSIL UNEARTHED ONCE AGAIN PROVES THE COLLAPSE OF
DARWINISM.
Darwinopterus Is Also a Fossil That Confirms Creation, and That
Explains the Darwinist Panic
Seeking to support their hollow theory, Darwinists pointed to
160-million-year-old bird fossils found in the north-east of China as
anexample, at least in theirown eyes, of this false modular evolution.
This new fossil, the subject ofspeculation in many publications,
especially National Geographic, was given the name of " Darwinopterus
." Darwinopterus was a perfect flying bird with ahead and neck looking
just like those of birds alive today and whose rear legs and tail
resemble extinct forms of bird known as pterosaurs. This life formis a
perfect example of the mosaic life form group of which there are many
specimens living today. Contrary to what Darwinists maintain, this
life form isa perfect work that manifestly and powerfully refutes
Darwinism and in fact verifies Creation.
As biology advanced, living things were divided into various groups on
the basis of specific characteristics. These were scientifically
examined in the form of species, phyla, families and breeds. It was of
course impossible to divide all life forms on the basis of features
set up by human beings. Because some life forms possess features from
several groups established by human beings. These are knownas "mosaic
life forms." These may possess characteristics from several groups,
species or families. Darwinists try to use this state of affairs as a
vehicle for speculation and to depict characteristics belonging to
different species as intermediate form characteristics. But the fact
is that all these features are complete and perfect characteristics.
These lifeforms have not a single structure or organ indicating
developing and thus intermediate form characteristics. Features
belonging to various different species in one single life form are a
manifestation of the matchless works andsublime creation of Allah.
It needs to be made clear here that a pterosaur fossil has
beendiscovered before and also used as a vehicle forvarious forms of
Darwinist speculation. Darwinists failed to fully understand the
structureof the 150-million-year pterosaur and produced completely
biased and unrealistic interpretations of it. However, investigations
of the fossil by a team of scientists from three universities
described the life form's physical structure as a "masterpiece."
Thanks toits perfect and flawless mosaic structure, this animal was
able to walk comfortably on dry land,fly to perfection and alsoswim
comfortably in the seas. Because it was a marvel of creation equipped
with all these features by Allah.
The life form they are presently trying to portray as the greatest
evidence for evolution isa specimen of the pterosaur, which scientists
have previously described as a"masterpiece." The fact is, however,
that since they harbor perfect characteristics belonging to different
species, mosaic life forms represent an even more insoluble dilemma
for evolution. But since Darwinists are unable to swallow that fact
they try to go on the counter-offensive and depict them as evidence
for their own theory. In the same way, since they areunable to account
for the perfect and very different characteristics possessed by
Darwinopterus they haveno qualms about comingup with the idea of
modular evolution, an even more wretched and humiliating one for
Darwinists. Yet they are very well aware that every structure in this
life form is totally flawless and points to a sublime creation.
Darwinopterus was a perfect bird, flawlessly created, that possesses
features of various flyingbird species at one and the same time.
The real reason why Darwinists are hiding behind such a shameful
account as "modular evolution" is this; while Darwinists are trying to
invent a new mask for the fact that not a single intermediate form has
ever been discovered in the fossil record, the factof creation is
spreading very rapidly right across the world. Through the works of
Harun Yahya people are no longer being taken in by the Darwinist
dictatorship. The number of people who believe in the Darwinist
deception is falling increasingly in opinion polls across the world.
The period before us will be a bright one in which people become aware
ofthe scientific facts and learn the real truth. Darwinist writhing
will have no effect. Allah has created all living things, human beings
included, and the universe we live in, in a perfect manner, and the
nonsense that is evolution will soon be consigned to the history
books.
Say: "Allah's is the conclusive argument. If He had willed He could
have guided every one of you." (Surat al-An'am, 149)

--
/-
-
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - - -
●▬►
-
I welcome, My Blog Readers Openions. So write your comments and
Suggetions any time, below each Posts or Write to my Email -
aydnajimudeen@gmail.com/-
Thanks my Readers.
-
*.*.*.*.*.
-
¤ Assalamualaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa barakatuh ¤
●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●
-

Institution of marriage and social duties of Muslims

The foremost and fundamental institution of human society is the
family unit. A family is established by the coming together of a man
and a woman, and their contact brings into existence a new generation.
It then produces ties of kinship and community, which gradually
develop into a large society. The family is the institution through
which a generation prepares the succeeding generation for the service
of human civilization and for the discharge of its social obligations
with devotion, sincerity and enthusiasm.
This institution does not merely recruit cadets for the maintenance
and development of human culture but its guardians. They earnestly
desire thatthose who have to replace them in the future should be
better than themselves. In this respect the family can be truly
called the fountain-head of progress, development, prosperity and
strength of human civilization on Earth.
Hence, besides the social problems, Islam devotes much attention to
those relating to the family andstrives to establish this important
social unit on the healthiest and strongest foundations. According to
Islam, the correct form of relationship between a man and woman is
marriage, that is, the onein which full social responsibilities are
undertaken by them and which results in the emergence of a family.
Irresponsible behaviour are not condoned by Islam as innocent past
times or ordinary transgressions. Rather, they are acts that strike at
the very roots of human society.
Hence, Islam aims at purifying and purging the society of all
activitiesthat encourage such irresponsible action or provide
opportunities forthem. Regulations of Hijaab (an out fit women must
adhere to in Islam) , ban on free mixing of men and women,
restrictions on music and films and discouragement of the spread and
propagation of obscenities and aberrations, are all intended to guard
against this.
Their sole object is to protect and strengthen the institution of the
family. Islam does not merely regard the desirable form of social
contact as just permissible but holds andaffirms it as a good and
virtuous act. Indeed, it is seen as an act of worship. It does not
simply look upon celibacyof an adult person with disfavor, but calls
upon every young man and woman to take, in his turn, the social
responsibilities of married life just as his or her parents did in
their time.
Islam also strongly disapproves those rites, ceremonies or
restrictions that make marriage a difficult and tedious affair. The
intention of Islam is that marriage may become easy and fornication
(andadultery) the most difficult thing in society, and not vice versa
as it is in most of the societies today.
Hence, besides debarringa few specified relatives from entering into
matrimony with one another, it has legalized marital relations with
all other near and distant kith and kin. It has removed all
distinctions of caste and community and permitted matrimony of any
Muslimwith any other Muslim, although being equivalent in status is a
matter that is recognized when considering marriage. It has
enjoinedthat the amount of Mahr (dower) should be fixed at a low and
easy figure, the burden of which can be easily borne by the husband
and has dispensed with the necessity of clerics and offices of
compulsory registration.
In an Islamic society, marriage is such a plain and simple ceremony as
can be performed anywhere before two witnesses, and a Wali (woman's
guardian or one whom he authorizes), though it is essential that the
proceedings should know that the couple is now going to live a
matrimonial life.
Within the family itself, Islam has assigned to the man a position of
authority so that he may maintain order and discipline as the chief of
the household. Islam expects the wife to obey and look after the
comforts and well-being of her husband and expects the children to
behave accordingly with their parents. Islam doestnot favor a loose
and disjointed family system, which is devoid of any authority,
control and discipline and in which someone is not
pointedlyresponsible for the proper conduct and behaviour of its
members.
Discipline can only be maintained through a central authority and in
the view of Islam the position of father in the family is such that it
makes him the fittest person to take over this responsibility. But
this does not mean that the man has been made a tyrant and an
oppressor in the household and the woman has been handedover to him as
a helpless chattel. According to Islam, the real spirit of marital
life is love, understanding and mutual respect. If the woman has been
asked to obey the husband, the latter has been called upon to exercise
his privileges towards the welfare of the family andtreat his wife
with love, affection and sweetness.
Islam makes the marital bond strong but not unbreakable. It aims at
keeping the bond intact only so long as it is founded on sweetness of
love or for as long as at least the possibility of lasting
companionship exists. When this possibility of lasting companionship
exists. When this possibility diesout, it gives the man the right of
divorce and the woman the right of separation. Under
certainconditions, when married life has become a source of misery and
nuisance, it also gives theIslamic courts of justice the authority to
annul the marriage.

--
/-
-
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - - -
●▬►
-
I welcome, My Blog Readers Openions. So write your comments and
Suggetions any time, below each Posts or Write to my Email -
aydnajimudeen@gmail.com/-
Thanks my Readers.
-
*.*.*.*.*.
-
¤ Assalamualaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa barakatuh ¤
●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●
-