2. The “miracles of nature”that are widely spoken of nowadays

2.
Recently on websites and in chat rooms it has become common to see
topics and posts that contain pictures and audioor video clips that
show miracles, such as a fountain coming out of the sand in the
desert, or the name of Allah on the skin of a goat, or clouds forming
the name of Allah,or a girl who was transformed into an animal. Most
of these things are not true and arefabricated but these thingsare
very widespread.
What is the ruling on such things?.
Praise be to Allaah.
The signs of Allah in this universe are many; every atom in it
testifies to His greatness and majesty, and affirms His Oneness.
Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
"HaMeem. (These letters are one of the miracles of the Quran and none
but Allah (Alone) knows their meanings).
The revelation of the Book(this Quran) is from Allah, the All-Mighty,
the All-Wise.
Verily, in the heavens and the earth are signs for the believers.
And in your creation, and what He scattered (through the earth) of
moving (living) creatures are signs for people who have Faith with
certainty.
And in the alternation of night and day, and the provision (rain) that
Allah sends down from the sky, and revives therewith the earth after
its death, and in the turning about of thewinds (i.e. sometimes
towards the east or north, and sometimes towards the south or west
etc., sometimes bringing glad tidings of rain etc., and sometimes
bringing the torment), are signs for a people who understand.
These are the Ayat (proofs,evidences, verses, lessons, revelations,
etc.) of Allah, which We recite to you (O Muhammad SAW) with truth.
Then in which speech after Allah and His Ayat will they believe?"
[al-Jaathiyah 45:1-6] .
This is a call to ponder andthink about dozens of verses in the Holy
Qur'an that encourage us to look at the visible signs and to think
about them so as to increase in faith and certainty about the Creator
and believe in His Oneness, may He be glorified.
What these signs have in common is that they are visible to all
people. The earth, the sky, the sun, themoon, the animals, rain, one's
own self and so on are all signs that may be seen and known by all
humans. Each and every individual can understand their greatness and
realisethat they point to the Lordand Creator. Even though the
scientist may know things that ordinary people do not know aboutthese
things, they are visible to all and each person may learn from them
according to his ownlevel of understanding.
But with regard to what has become widespread nowadays of talking
about"miracles of nature", including those mentionedby the questioner,
as far asAllah's power is concerned,Allah, may He be exalted, has
power over all things, such as causing His name to appear on the skin
of a goat or on an egg, or transforming some peopleinto animals.
In fact we believe that such transformations will happen, as the
Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) told us.At-Tirmidhi
(2212) narrated that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of
Allah be upon him) said: "Among this ummah, people will be swallowed
up in the earth, transformed into monkeysand pigs, and pelted with
stones." A man among theMuslims said, "O Messenger of Allaah, whenwill
that be?" He said: "When singing-girls and musical instruments become
widespread and wine is drunk."
Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh at-Tirmidhi.
This is as far as the might and power of Allah, may He be exalted, are
concerned. But as for whether these "miracles" happened or not, most
of what is in circulation nowadays of such things cannot be verified
or proven. Most of what people are passing aroundto one another of
these things is no more than chit-chat in their gatherings and images
on discussion boards and in chat rooms, the source or author of which
is not known. Does the Muslim need such stories to prove the soundness
of his religion and belief?!
Is there a shortage of evidence based on common sense and certainty,
so that one has to resort to these rumours?!
The correct attitude towards these reports is torefrain from
judgement. So we do not believe them, because of the possibility that
they may be false, and we do not disbelieve them, because of the
possibility that theymay be true, so long as wehave no clear evidence
to prove whether they are true or false. If such evidence comes along
then we may be certain in that case.
:->
--

- - -
Translate:
http://translate.google.com/m?hl=en&twu=1/
- - - -

Hell - Fire of Hell - Dua When Seeing a Fire

Hell - If only you knew the torments of hell
It is the worst of places where anyone could dwell
It is in existence even as we speak
And for its inhabitants the outlook is bleak
On the day of rising, hell will be in view
A terrible sight, if only you knew
It will be brought forward by 70,000 reigns
And 70,000 angels will be on each of those chains
After burning for a thousand years , it�s flamesturned white
A thousand more years, now it�s as black as the night
You think the flames are bearable, you�re totally wrong
The flames are of hell are sixty nine times as strong
In a flash it will disintegrate all of your bones
The hellfire will be fuelled by man and stones
The thickness of your skin will greatly increase
Causing your threshold for pain to greatly decrease
The people in hell are thereto stay
They will melt to nothing, 70,000 times in a day
70 years it will take, for a stone that is thrown
to hit the bottom of hell and it won�t be alone
The food of hell resembles a devil�s head
and to drink, boiling water and blood bright red
which cuts up the bowels, everything will fall out
the inhabitants of hell will scream and shout
some will be taken out by Almighty Allah �s command
but the polytheists will stay eternally damned
Take up islam , the only way to succeed
and if you don�t, you�re unfortunate indeed
Brothers and sisters, help determine your fate
Once you see hellfire, it�ll be far too late./
-
Fire of Hell - It is related that Zainul Abideen would pray one
thousand rakahs every night, even if he were travelling. When he
performed ablution he would turn yellow and during prayer he would
tremble. When asked why this happened to him, he responded, "Do you
not know who I stand before?"If the wind blew he would fall down
unconscious out of the fear of Allah .
Once there was a fire in his house while he was prostrating in prayer.
The people began to warn him,"Oh son of the messenger of Allah, FIRE!
FIRE!" He did not raise his head untill thefire had extinguished
itself.He was later asked why he did not respond to the criesof the
people. He replied "The fire of hell had diverted my attention".
-
Dua When Seeing a Fire - اللَّهُ أَكْبَرُ
Allah is the Greatest./

--

- - -
Translate:
http://translate.google.com/m?hl=en&twu=1/
- - - -

The vestigial organ deception has once again been refuted by scientists

According to research findings published in the journal Evolutionary
Biology, it has now been announced that the appendix, described by
Darwin as an organ that had become vestigial during the evolutionary
process, in fact performs important functions and Darwin made that
suggestion based on ignorance and a lack of scientific knowledge.
Darwin imagined that the appendix had no function in the body. He
therefore claimed that it was an evolutionary remnant since the organ
had not been used in the process of evolution. Yet contemporary
scientists have now refuted this claim of Darwin's.
A team made up of researchers from Duke, Arizona and Arizona state
universities discovered that the appendix safely harbors good
bacteria, andthat these do not leave it until required.
Dr. William Parker, a Duke University professor of surgical sciences
and the research head, stated that "It is now time to correct the
information in the textbooks. The appendix is stillreferred to as a
'vestigial organ' in many biology books."
The fact that the appendixwas a functional organ had already appeared
in various scientific studies inprevious years. But Darwin's followers
were unwilling to abandon the vestigial organ deception, which they
had made the greatest supposed basis for their theory. New findings
that gradually emerged once again revealed that Darwinists had been
using false propaganda on the subjectand deceiving people. Likeall the
other organs alleged to be vestigial, theappendix is in fact a
completely functional organ.
William Parker's statements on the subject:
Darwin suggested that the appendix was a remnant from the cecum, a
larger organ in humans and other primates, that ithad no function and
that only a few species possessed one. Even today, Darwin's followers
insist on maintaining that deception. In addition to the significant
discovery outlined above, William Parker has also revealed that Darwin
was wrong in the following regard:
"First, several living species, including certain lemurs, several
rodents and a type of flying squirrel, still have an appendix attached
to a large cecum which is used in digestion. Second, Parker says the
appendix is actually quite widespread in nature. "Forexample, when
species aredivided into groups called 'families', we find that more
than 70 percent of all primate and rodent groups contain species with
an appendix."
Parker says that Darwin made these claims out of alack of scientific knowledge:
"Darwin simply didn't have access to the information we have,"
explains Parker. "If Darwinhad been aware of the species that have an
appendix attached to a large cecum, and if he had known about the
widespread nature of the appendix, he probably would not have thought
of the appendix as a vestige of evolution."
Another point of which the scientists in question repudiate Darwin is
the fact that appendix infection, or appendicitis, is not due to an
incorrect appendix, as Darwin thought, but to cultural change slinked
to industrialization and health conditions.
The theory of evolution is being repudiated over andover again with
every passing day. The theory of evolution is an outdated 19th century
claim. It is based, not on scientific data, but on Charles Darwin's
imagination and ancient Sumerian legends.

--

- - -
Translate:
http://translate.google.com/m?hl=en&twu=1/
- - - -

The vestigial organ deception has once again been refuted by scientists

According to research findings published in the journal Evolutionary
Biology, it has now been announced that the appendix, described by
Darwin as an organ that had become vestigial during the evolutionary
process, in fact performs important functions and Darwin made that
suggestion based on ignorance and a lack of scientific knowledge.
Darwin imagined that the appendix had no function in the body. He
therefore claimed that it was an evolutionary remnant since the organ
had not been used in the process of evolution. Yet contemporary
scientists have now refuted this claim of Darwin's.
A team made up of researchers from Duke, Arizona and Arizona state
universities discovered that the appendix safely harbors good
bacteria, andthat these do not leave it until required.
Dr. William Parker, a Duke University professor of surgical sciences
and the research head, stated that "It is now time to correct the
information in the textbooks. The appendix is stillreferred to as a
'vestigial organ' in many biology books."
The fact that the appendixwas a functional organ had already appeared
in various scientific studies inprevious years. But Darwin's followers
were unwilling to abandon the vestigial organ deception, which they
had made the greatest supposed basis for their theory. New findings
that gradually emerged once again revealed that Darwinists had been
using false propaganda on the subjectand deceiving people. Likeall the
other organs alleged to be vestigial, theappendix is in fact a
completely functional organ.
William Parker's statements on the subject:
Darwin suggested that the appendix was a remnant from the cecum, a
larger organ in humans and other primates, that ithad no function and
that only a few species possessed one. Even today, Darwin's followers
insist on maintaining that deception. In addition to the significant
discovery outlined above, William Parker has also revealed that Darwin
was wrong in the following regard:
"First, several living species, including certain lemurs, several
rodents and a type of flying squirrel, still have an appendix attached
to a large cecum which is used in digestion. Second, Parker says the
appendix is actually quite widespread in nature. "Forexample, when
species aredivided into groups called 'families', we find that more
than 70 percent of all primate and rodent groups contain species with
an appendix."
Parker says that Darwin made these claims out of alack of scientific knowledge:
"Darwin simply didn't have access to the information we have,"
explains Parker. "If Darwinhad been aware of the species that have an
appendix attached to a large cecum, and if he had known about the
widespread nature of the appendix, he probably would not have thought
of the appendix as a vestige of evolution."
Another point of which the scientists in question repudiate Darwin is
the fact that appendix infection, or appendicitis, is not due to an
incorrect appendix, as Darwin thought, but to cultural change slinked
to industrialization and health conditions.
The theory of evolution is being repudiated over andover again with
every passing day. The theory of evolution is an outdated 19th century
claim. It is based, not on scientific data, but on Charles Darwin's
imagination and ancient Sumerian legends.

--

- - -
Translate:
http://translate.google.com/m?hl=en&twu=1/
- - - -