The call to the eclipse prayer should be made by saying “Al-Salaatu jaami’ah”

It is narrated that the call to the eclipse prayer should be made by saying“Al-Salaatu jaami’ah”. Should this be said once, or is it prescribed that it should be repeated? How often should it be repeated? Please advise us, may Allaah reward you.
Praise be to Allaah.
It was reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) gave orders that the call to the eclipse prayer should be made bysaying “Al-Salaatu jaami’ah”. This was narrated by al-Bukhaari and Muslim. The Sunnah is for the caller to repeat that until he thinks that the people have heard; there is no set limit for that as far as we know. And Allaah is the Source ofstrength.
Kitaab Majmoo’ Fataawawa Maqaalaat Mutanawwi’ah li Samaahat al-Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz ,/ - - - :-> Transtors: 1.http://free-translation.imtranslator.net/lowres.asp 2.http://translate.google.com/m?twu=1&hl=en&vi=m&sl=auto&tl=en

catch up with the eclipse prayer in the second rukoo’ of the first rak’ah

If I catch up with the eclipse prayer in the second rukoo’ of the first rak’ah, what should I do?
Praise be to Allaah.
The rak’ah will count in Salaat al-Kusoof if you catch up with the first rukoo’. Based on what you say in your question, you caught up with the second rak’ah only, so after the imaam says the salaam, you have to do a whole rak’ah with its two recitations, two rak’ahs and two sujoods./ - - - :-> Transtors: 1.http://free-translation.imtranslator.net/lowres.asp 2.http://translate.google.com/m?twu=1&hl=en&vi=m&sl=auto&tl=en

1a] The false feathered Dinosaur Concavenator corcovatus and the endless deceptive speculation from Darwinists

1a]
Speculation Is Useless. What Matters Is the eradication of the idea of evolution
Darwinist demagoguery may continue and the Darwinist press may persist
in portraying this false demagoguery as major discoveries. But WHAT
MATTERS IS THE FUNDAMENTAL ERADICATION OF THE IDEA OF EVOLUTION. What
matters IS THAT PEOPLE CAN NO LONGER BE DECEIVED BY THE LIE OF
EVOLUTION. Those days are over. DARWINISTS THEMSELVES ARE WELL AWARE
OF THAT. The lie ofDarwinists that science has annihilated has been
exposed now in the 21st century. Nothing that Darwinists do, no
speculation, can bring back the old glory days that evolutionists
enjoyedwith their mass deceptions. By Allah's leave, the 21st century
will be when superstitiousviews and ideologies vanish, never to return
and flourish again.

1] The false feathered Dinosaur Concavenator corcovatus and the endless deceptive speculation from Darwinists

1]
Darwinists lost no time in illustrating the false feathered dinosaur
they called Concavenator corcovatus. Using false pictures, one of the
most effective conditioning techniques, they sought to give the
impression that the animal really did have feathers on its forearms.
These feathers, that do not exist on the fossil itself, were added
tothe drawings as tools for speculation in order to deceive the
public.
N on-existent feathered dinosaurs, non-existent half-man and half-ape
creatures, life forms that supposedly emerged fromwater onto dry land
and the missing links that have never ever been found are some of the
evolutionist frauds that have been imposed on the public for many,
manyyears. Whenever Darwinists panic, whenever they realize that the
theory of evolution is heading for total collapse and whenever they
grasp the fact they have been defeated, they come up with a new
transitional form myth. They impose the idea of a fin growing a 1.5-mm
bump, for instance, a feather in the process of development or a
finger supposedly becoming vestigial... The proponents of the theory
of evolution, that for years has only managed to survive with
demagoguery and fraud instead of science, are stilltrying to persist
with the same techniques. All they need is a little speculationand a
little help from the press.
Now, however, Darwinistsare experiencing the shock of seeing that
theseoutdated methods no longer work. Darwinists;
-Never guessed that science would be used to respond to Darwinist demagoguery.
-Never imagined they would be humiliated in the eyes of the world.
-Never expected that theirmaneuvering and frauds would be exposed.
The way that Darwinists are again claiming to have "discovered a new
feathered dinosaur" is in fact an indication of their difficult
predicament. Obviously, the only way of defending Darwinism isthrough
speculation and demagoguery. The way they still resort to demagoguery
even though all their trickery has been exposed and insist on using
the same old methods and imposing outdated nonsense are a clear
expression of this huge despair.
How was Concavenator corcovatus made a tool for so-called evolution?
A 130-million-year dinosaur fossil represents another despairing
Darwinist initiative. An effort is being made to bring up the
fraudulent idea of the feathered dinosaur, that everyone issick of
hearing, in this fossil. Darwinists, once again, carried their frauds
to the pages of Darwinist publications, in the full knowledge they
will just be humiliated.
What Darwinists claimed is that the dinosaur fossil in question
belongs to a so-called feathered dinosaur. The supposed evidence was
the 'mini bumps' on the fossil's forearms. Darwinist speculation
immediately raised its head and these were claimed to be "possible
connection points for feathers." Closeexamination of their
claimreveals that there was no actual feather or any remains of
anything remotely resembling one. The interpretation of a miniature
bump as a "connecting point for feathers" could only be the product of
Darwinist demagoguery.
It will be of use here to remind our readers that the mini bumps in
question were not visible on the fossil itself, but were very apparent
in drawings and reconstructions based on it.
These statements are expressions of terrible weakness for Darwinists.
Darwinists are experts at depicting any bump they like as a feather,
or an arm as a wing. When it suits them, these bumps are portrayed as
completely unimportant fossil components. But when they believe that
any fossil detail can be used as a good tool for evolutionary
speculation, they immediately start building speculation around it.
The best knownexample of this is protoavis , which was rejected by
Darwinists because it refuted their claims, even though it was
scientifically proved to be the oldest known flying bird. It proved
impossible to convince Darwinists about the evident feather
protrusions on protoavis. Yet they had no such hesitations about
describing irrelevant structures on a 130-million-year-old dinosaur as
evidence for evolution. But there is onevery important piece of
evidence that demolishes their claims, one that Darwinists always
strive to forget but that we always remind them of:
The point needing to be emphasized is the existence of Archaeopteryx ,
a flying bird with perfect feathers that lived 20 million yearsbefore
the Concavenator corcovatus fossil. Archaeopteryx, a flawless bird
dating back 150 million years, totally refutes all the Darwinist
claims concerned. But Darwinists always have tofall back on
demagogueryin order to survive. That iswhy they never stop talking
about the frauds in question.
Speculation Is Useless.
-
What Matters Is the eradication of the idea of evolution :->