Ibne Umar (RA) used to buy sugar (made from dates) and distribute it
among the poor. His servant once submitted that it would be better if
bread were given to the poor instead of sugar, as they would benefit
more from it. He agreed with the suggestion but said that Allah Ta'ala
has said: You will never attain piety unless you spend of that which
you love.(Al-Imran:92). Since, he himself loved sugar most, he gave
the same to the poor. Source: "Fadhail-E-Sadaqaa Part I", translated
by Prof. Abdul Karim.
Subhan-Allah! How beautifully they would give away what they lovethe
most, so that they may fulfill one of the commandments of Allah. May
Allah also give us these great qualities. Ameen.
--
- - - - - - -
"GENERAL ARTICLES"
- Tamil -- Urdu -- Kannada -- Telugu --*-
Share
"BISMILLA HIRRAHMAAN NIRRAHEEM"
WELCOME! - AS'SALAMU ALAIKUM!!
******** *****
*****
[All] praise is [due] to Allah, Lord of the worlds; -
Guide us to the straight path
*- -*
* * In this Blog; More Than Ten Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah} - Most Usefull Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And All Articles & Get Benifite!
* Visit :-
"INDIA "- Time in New Delhi -
*- WHAT ISLAM SAYS -*
-
Islam is a religion of Mercy, Peace and Blessing. Its teachings emphasize kind hear tedness, help, sympathy, forgiveness, sacrifice, love and care.Qur’an, the Shari’ah and the life of our beloved Prophet (SAW) mirrors this attribute, and it should be reflected in the conduct of a Momin.Islam appreciates those who are kind to their fellow being,and dislikes them who are hard hearted, curt, and hypocrite.Recall that historical moment, when Prophet (SAW) entered Makkah as a conqueror. There was before him a multitude of surrendered enemies, former oppressors and persecutors, who had evicted the Muslims from their homes, deprived them of their belongings, humiliated and intimidated Prophet (SAW) hatched schemes for his murder and tortured and killed his companions. But Prophet (SAW) displayed his usual magnanimity, generosity, and kind heartedness by forgiving all of them and declaring general amnesty...Subhanallah. May Allah help us tailor our life according to the teachings of Islam. (Aameen)./-
''HASBUNALLAHU WA NI'MAL WAKEEL''
-
''Allah is Sufficient for us'' + '' All praise is due to Allah. May peace and blessings beupon the Messenger, his household and companions '' (Aameen) | | |
| | |
|
Share
Follow Me | |
**
Share
-
-*- *: ::->
*
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
What do you love the most?
The brand new sky
Once we attended a speech given by a brotherwho came from France. The
speech was very heart warming and good to our imaan. I will share a
little bit of what he was saying. He said that our heart is filled so
much with what we see. Nice houses, cars, dollars, cclothes, etc.
These are just little little creations ofmankind and get used up very
soon. He told us not to fill our hearts with these small creations of
men but to fill our hearts with the Greatness of Allah by looking at
His uncomparable creations. He told us to look at the sky. It's
billions of years old but everyday it looks brand new. He told us to
look at the birds, they only have one dress and they don't even do
laundry. But even after 20years, you look at their feathers and they
still shine. Allahu Akbar! Let usempty our hearts of all the
materials, and bring only Allah into it.
"Everyone shall taste death. And only on the Day of Resurrection shall
you be paid your wages in full. And whoever is removed away from the
Fire and admitted to Paradise, he indeed is successful. The life of
this world is only the enjoyment of deception (adeceiving thing)." Al
Qur'an 3:185
--
- - - - - - -
speech was very heart warming and good to our imaan. I will share a
little bit of what he was saying. He said that our heart is filled so
much with what we see. Nice houses, cars, dollars, cclothes, etc.
These are just little little creations ofmankind and get used up very
soon. He told us not to fill our hearts with these small creations of
men but to fill our hearts with the Greatness of Allah by looking at
His uncomparable creations. He told us to look at the sky. It's
billions of years old but everyday it looks brand new. He told us to
look at the birds, they only have one dress and they don't even do
laundry. But even after 20years, you look at their feathers and they
still shine. Allahu Akbar! Let usempty our hearts of all the
materials, and bring only Allah into it.
"Everyone shall taste death. And only on the Day of Resurrection shall
you be paid your wages in full. And whoever is removed away from the
Fire and admitted to Paradise, he indeed is successful. The life of
this world is only the enjoyment of deception (adeceiving thing)." Al
Qur'an 3:185
--
- - - - - - -
1b] When taking the wife back (following a revocable divorce), it is not essential that the wife know
1b]
Ibn Qudaamah (may Allahhave mercy on him) said: If the husband of the
revocably divorced woman takes her back without her knowledge, that
taking back is valid, because it does not require her consent and
therefore it does not require her knowledge either, as in the case of
talaaq. If he took her backand she did not know, then her 'iddah ended
andshe married someone else, then he comes and claims that he took her
back before her 'iddah ended, and he has proof of that, it is proven
that she is his wife and the second marriage is invalid, because he
(the second husband) married the wife of another man. So she is to be
returned tothe first husband, whether the second husband consummated
the marriage with her or not. This is the correct opinion and it is
the view of most of the fuqaha', including ath-Thawri, ash-Shaafa'i,
Abu 'Ubayd, and ashaab ar-ra'y. It was also narrated from 'Ali (may
Allah be pleased with him).
A second report was narrated from Abu 'Abdillah (may Allah have mercy
on him): if the second husband has consummated the marriage with her,
then she is his wife and the first marriage becomes invalid. This was
narrated from 'Umar ibn al-Khattaab (may Allah be pleased with him),
and it is also the view of Maalik. Something similar was narrated from
Sa'eed ibn al-Musayyab, 'Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn al-Qaasim and Naafi'. End
quote from al-Mughni, 7/411
Based on that, perhaps you can consult a lawyer to see whether it is
possible to reopen the case of khula' easily after it was closed, or
whether it is possible to leave it without closing it. Or you can try
to find out your husband's attitude by anymeans, so that you can find
out whether he took him back before the end of your 'iddah or not, so
as to know exactly where you stand.
We ask Allah to make things easy for you and todecree good for you
wherever it may be.
And Allah knows best.
--
- - - - - - -
Ibn Qudaamah (may Allahhave mercy on him) said: If the husband of the
revocably divorced woman takes her back without her knowledge, that
taking back is valid, because it does not require her consent and
therefore it does not require her knowledge either, as in the case of
talaaq. If he took her backand she did not know, then her 'iddah ended
andshe married someone else, then he comes and claims that he took her
back before her 'iddah ended, and he has proof of that, it is proven
that she is his wife and the second marriage is invalid, because he
(the second husband) married the wife of another man. So she is to be
returned tothe first husband, whether the second husband consummated
the marriage with her or not. This is the correct opinion and it is
the view of most of the fuqaha', including ath-Thawri, ash-Shaafa'i,
Abu 'Ubayd, and ashaab ar-ra'y. It was also narrated from 'Ali (may
Allah be pleased with him).
A second report was narrated from Abu 'Abdillah (may Allah have mercy
on him): if the second husband has consummated the marriage with her,
then she is his wife and the first marriage becomes invalid. This was
narrated from 'Umar ibn al-Khattaab (may Allah be pleased with him),
and it is also the view of Maalik. Something similar was narrated from
Sa'eed ibn al-Musayyab, 'Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn al-Qaasim and Naafi'. End
quote from al-Mughni, 7/411
Based on that, perhaps you can consult a lawyer to see whether it is
possible to reopen the case of khula' easily after it was closed, or
whether it is possible to leave it without closing it. Or you can try
to find out your husband's attitude by anymeans, so that you can find
out whether he took him back before the end of your 'iddah or not, so
as to know exactly where you stand.
We ask Allah to make things easy for you and todecree good for you
wherever it may be.
And Allah knows best.
--
- - - - - - -
1a] When taking the wife back (following a revocable divorce), it is not essential that the wife know
1a]
I have been given a first, revocable, talaaq, and my 'iddah ended
after I became pure following the third of three menstrual cycles
since thedivorce occurred two months ago. During the 'iddah period, my
husband did not take me back, but he is a master atplaying games and
there are a number of issues between us. I am afraid that he may have
taken me back without telling me, because there was a court case as I
had taken him to court for khula' (a kind of divorce), but whenthe
talaaq occurred, there was no longer any need for it so the case was
closed. I am afraid that after the case was closed Iwill find out that
he took me back without my knowledge. Please note that he divorced me
in front of a notary and nowI have a document of thatrevocable
divorce. I hope that you can advise me asto what I should do? In order
for him to take me back, does he have to do so in front of the same
notary in front of whom he divorced me, and in the same record, or
not?.
Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
The husband may take back his wife whom he divorced revocably
duringthe 'iddah, and it is not stipulated that she shouldbe present
or know of it, or that the taking back bedone in the presence of a
notary, whether the divorce was issued in the presence of a notary or
not.
But it is mustahabb for the taking back to be witnessed by two
witnesses, and it was said that it is obligatory for it to be
witnessed.
Ibn Qudaamah (may Allahhave mercy on him) said: Taking back is done by
saying to two Muslim men: Bear witness that I have taken aback my
wife, without any guardian being present and without any mahr being
added. Another report was narrated from Abu 'Abdullah (may Allah have
mercy on him), which says that it is permissible to take the wife back
without it beingwitnessed, the reason being that taking back does not
require any guardian or mahr, or the consent or knowledge of the wife,
according to scholarly consensus, because of what we have mentioned
about the woman who us revocably divorced coming under the heading of
rulings on wives, and taking her back means keeping her and continuing
marriage to her. Hence Allah, may He be glorified and exalted,
described taking back as "retaining" and leaving them as "releasing"
them, as He says (interpretation of themeaning): "…and they have
reached their term, then retain them in kindness or release them in
kindness" [al-Baqarah 2:231] and, in another verse, "and then (a
woman) must be retainedin honour or released in kindness" [al-Baqarah
2:229]. Marriage is brokenby divorce and is restored when the divorce
is rendered null and void; taking back the wife removes the reason for
the break and stops it going all the way to irrevocable divorce;
therefore it does not require what is required to initiate a new
marriagecontract.
With regard to witnessing, there are two reports, one of which
saysthat it is obligatory. This isone of the two views of
ash-Shaafa'i, because Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation
of themeaning): "Then when they are about to fulfil their term
appointed, either take them back in agood manner or part withthem in a
good manner. And take for witness two just persons from among you
(Muslims)" [at-Talaaq 65:2]. The apparent meaning of the commandis
that it is obligatory, andbecause this is for the purpose of making
intimacy permissible, having it witnessed is required as in the case
of the marriage contract.
The second report says that having witnesses is not required. This is
the view favoured by Abu Bakr, and was the opinionof Maalik and Abu
Haneefah, because there is no need for acceptance, so there is no need
for witnesses, as is the case with all the husband's rights, and that
is becausewith regard to that in which the guardian's consent is not
required, it is not necessary to have witnesses. In this case the
command is understood as meaning that it is mustahabb. However there
is no difference of opinion among the scholars that it is Sunnah to
have witnesses.
End quote from al-Mughni, 7/403
Thus you know that your husband may have taken back during the 'iddah
and that his taking back isvalid, whether he took you back in the
presence of a notary or not. But if he comes after the end of your
'iddah and claims that he took you back, he will be to provide proof,
which is the testimony of two witnesses, unless youbelieve his claim,
in whichcase you may go back to him.
If the woman gets married after the end of her 'iddah, then her first
husband claims that he took her back without herknowledge and provides
proof of that, then she is to be returned to him.
--
- - - - - - -
I have been given a first, revocable, talaaq, and my 'iddah ended
after I became pure following the third of three menstrual cycles
since thedivorce occurred two months ago. During the 'iddah period, my
husband did not take me back, but he is a master atplaying games and
there are a number of issues between us. I am afraid that he may have
taken me back without telling me, because there was a court case as I
had taken him to court for khula' (a kind of divorce), but whenthe
talaaq occurred, there was no longer any need for it so the case was
closed. I am afraid that after the case was closed Iwill find out that
he took me back without my knowledge. Please note that he divorced me
in front of a notary and nowI have a document of thatrevocable
divorce. I hope that you can advise me asto what I should do? In order
for him to take me back, does he have to do so in front of the same
notary in front of whom he divorced me, and in the same record, or
not?.
Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
The husband may take back his wife whom he divorced revocably
duringthe 'iddah, and it is not stipulated that she shouldbe present
or know of it, or that the taking back bedone in the presence of a
notary, whether the divorce was issued in the presence of a notary or
not.
But it is mustahabb for the taking back to be witnessed by two
witnesses, and it was said that it is obligatory for it to be
witnessed.
Ibn Qudaamah (may Allahhave mercy on him) said: Taking back is done by
saying to two Muslim men: Bear witness that I have taken aback my
wife, without any guardian being present and without any mahr being
added. Another report was narrated from Abu 'Abdullah (may Allah have
mercy on him), which says that it is permissible to take the wife back
without it beingwitnessed, the reason being that taking back does not
require any guardian or mahr, or the consent or knowledge of the wife,
according to scholarly consensus, because of what we have mentioned
about the woman who us revocably divorced coming under the heading of
rulings on wives, and taking her back means keeping her and continuing
marriage to her. Hence Allah, may He be glorified and exalted,
described taking back as "retaining" and leaving them as "releasing"
them, as He says (interpretation of themeaning): "…and they have
reached their term, then retain them in kindness or release them in
kindness" [al-Baqarah 2:231] and, in another verse, "and then (a
woman) must be retainedin honour or released in kindness" [al-Baqarah
2:229]. Marriage is brokenby divorce and is restored when the divorce
is rendered null and void; taking back the wife removes the reason for
the break and stops it going all the way to irrevocable divorce;
therefore it does not require what is required to initiate a new
marriagecontract.
With regard to witnessing, there are two reports, one of which
saysthat it is obligatory. This isone of the two views of
ash-Shaafa'i, because Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation
of themeaning): "Then when they are about to fulfil their term
appointed, either take them back in agood manner or part withthem in a
good manner. And take for witness two just persons from among you
(Muslims)" [at-Talaaq 65:2]. The apparent meaning of the commandis
that it is obligatory, andbecause this is for the purpose of making
intimacy permissible, having it witnessed is required as in the case
of the marriage contract.
The second report says that having witnesses is not required. This is
the view favoured by Abu Bakr, and was the opinionof Maalik and Abu
Haneefah, because there is no need for acceptance, so there is no need
for witnesses, as is the case with all the husband's rights, and that
is becausewith regard to that in which the guardian's consent is not
required, it is not necessary to have witnesses. In this case the
command is understood as meaning that it is mustahabb. However there
is no difference of opinion among the scholars that it is Sunnah to
have witnesses.
End quote from al-Mughni, 7/403
Thus you know that your husband may have taken back during the 'iddah
and that his taking back isvalid, whether he took you back in the
presence of a notary or not. But if he comes after the end of your
'iddah and claims that he took you back, he will be to provide proof,
which is the testimony of two witnesses, unless youbelieve his claim,
in whichcase you may go back to him.
If the woman gets married after the end of her 'iddah, then her first
husband claims that he took her back without herknowledge and provides
proof of that, then she is to be returned to him.
--
- - - - - - -
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)