Darwinists now raisetheir hopes by importingpagan priests from America

American import Douglas Futuyma
American import AndrewBerry Being defeated in Turkey, Darwinists now
bring in American imported Darwinist pagan priests. They preach the
Darwinist superstitions unilaterallyin closed halls giving no room to
the opposing accounts. Making these pagan priests tell ancient
Egyptian legends, they try to give the impression that "they are not
idle, but doing something."
However, they cannot hinder Darwinism's dreadful defeat because:
- More than 100 million fossils of 250 thousand different species have
been excavated. NOT EVEN ONE of them IS A TRANSITIONAL FORM.
- All of the 100 million excavated fossils belong to intact, perfect,
flawless living forms. Most of them are LIVING FOSSILS of living
things that are living today. All of these 100 million fossils PROVE
THE FACT OF CREATION.
- It is scientifically proven that it is impossible for a single
protein to come into existence by chance.
- It is scientifically proven that mutations have no evolutionary
power and they DEFINITELY DAMAGE the living organism –except for the
exceptions in which they remain ineffective.
- THE EXTRAORDINARY INFORMATION IN THE DNA puts forth with definite
and irrefutable proofs inthe living body, that there is no place to
chance.
- THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION, in which the living beings' diversity
appeared all of a suddenwith perfect forms 540 millions years ago
demolished Darwinism.
- The organs and forms in living organisms with IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY
leave Darwinists speechless.
- In the absence of even one transitional form, DARWINISTS RESORTED TO
FRAUDS and exhibited false fossils in the museums for years.
- It appeared that ALL THESKULLS that Darwinists put forth to prove
the imaginary human evolution ARE INVALID and thus all of them were
removed from the scientific literature.
- The fossils proving the fact of creation HAVE BEEN CONCEALED BY
DARWINISTS FOR YEARS.
- The fact that we are only exposed to THE IMAGE of the matter has
refuted the Darwinist philosophy.
While these facts are known to everyone, you vainly payto bring these
shaman priests. Slumbering in closed salons while listening to their
Sumerian and ancient Egyptian legends is nothing but vain expense and
loss of time.Bringing pagan priests isno solution. Ask these pagan
priests if "there is a single intermediate fossil?" If so, ask them to
bring and show it. Tell them that they will be rewarded with 10
trillion TL if they can. If they fail to bring, then this means they
are telling a lie, do not believe in them. Ask these people if the
"all of the 100 million fossils unearthed so far are intact, perfect
fossils". Ask them again if almost all of them are "living fossils" or
not. Ask them if the "evolution of horse" is true or not. Ask them if
they have "hidden the fossils for years or not." Ask them ifthe
"formation of a protein by chance is impossible" and "if they are
aware of it."
If they can answer none of these, then this means that they have come
here for "sleeping" sessions.
As will be remembered, in the faceof the question, "Is therea single
intermediate fossil?" Douglas Futuymaescaped from the speaker's
platform in Vatican. Here in closed salons they continue to give
trouble to people by telling their superstitions similar to pagan
ceremonies. The lectures given by Futuyma drowse people like fairy
tales. Indeed, Andrew Berry confessed in an interview he gave to a
newspaper that the environment they form is extremely boring.
How long will this POOR, PATHETIC RESISTANCE continue? In the face of
clear scientific truths, plain facts this bigoted resistance is the
shame of the century. Feigning ignorance to such plain, explicit and
substantive facts, deceiving people with fake claims they make from
the platforms, trying to make people believe in claims like, "Our
ancestors were earthworms", "Our forefather is a microbe", "The
missing link finally uncovered" is the most desperate hoax of the
century.
This is self-deception; they trulyresist rationalism. This is an
INGLORIOUS ACTION AGAINST rational human thinking. It is high time to
see the facts. This poor, primitive rationaleis a 150 years-old
disgrace. Trying to uphold ancient Mesopotamian superstitions too
distant to be scientific only for the sake of obstinacy is pure shame.
This action has to be ended in no time.
Ida, is one the extinct species of lemur. It is a perfect developed
lemur and it shows no sign of intermediary form. It is an evidence
ofcreation

Scientists are embarrassed by the Ida circus

Even Darwinist scientists had no qualms about admitting: "THE IDA SHOW
IS AN EMBARRASSMENT!"
The IDA FUROR, first acclaimed by the Darwinist Jorn Hurum, a
paleontologist at the Museum of Natural History in Oslo, and then
lauded to the skies by the Darwinist David Attenborough as the missing
link that had been sought for so manyyears and described in the press
under such headlines as "the ancestor of man" and "the eighth wonder
of the world" has even attracted intense criticism from Darwinist
scientists. In their eyes, this peculiar show IS LITERALLY A CLOWNING!
Many fossils have been made the subject of speculation during the
history of the Darwinist deception. Theses have been written about
many false fossils (there are 40 separate doctoral theses about
PILTDOWN Man, which was subsequently establishedas a hoax). Pictures
of these as the forerunner of human beings that never actually existed
have appeared in Darwinist publications (pictures of Nebraska Man,
based on the discovery of a single boar tooth, and his entire family
appeared in newspapers for months on end). And some of these fakes
havebeen taken from countryto country and placed ondisplay. All these
fossils were the subject of intense Darwinist propaganda, to be
replaced by a profound silence in Darwinist circles once they were
shown to be false or hoaxes.
On occasion the speculation continued, quite shamelessly, even once
fossils had been shown to be false. Haeckel's false illustrations, for
instance, continued to appear in text books even after Haeckel had
admitted they were fraudulent. Another well-known example is the
evolution of the horse series. Scientists have admitted that this
series is a fantasy devoidof the slightest foundation. Yet the series
is still exhibited and discussed in text books. That is the extent to
which Darwinist speculation can be carried.
The furor over Ida resembles these previous instances, but also
differs from them inone regard. This time, Darwinists have totally
lost control. Because Darwinism is in a historicstate of collapse.
Darwinist stratagems arebeing exposed one by one. That is why
Darwinists have made such a sudden fuss over a fossil lemur that had
been kept on the shelf for 26 years. Some Darwinist scientists
initially reacted with caution, issuing moderate statements along the
lines of, "it is still too early to refer to it as a missing link."
But the propaganda reachedsuch alarming dimensions and became so
blatant that even Darwinist scientists wereeventually forced in strong
reaction against it.
What have Darwinist scientists said about Ida?
The scandal of the Ida furor has even been criticized by Darwinist scientists.
In an article carried under the title "The Missing Link?" on the ABC
News Television website, the Johns Hopkins University Carnegie Museum
of Natural History paleontologist Chris Beard says:
"This fossil is not as closeto monkeys, apes, and humans as we are
being led to believe." 1
In another article in NewScientist magazine titled "Why Ida Fossil Is
Not The Missing Link?", Beard openly states that Ida bears no
similarity tohuman beings, for whichreason it cannot be described as a
missing link. No matter how much research may be put into it, Ida is
not, according to the Darwinist Beard, in that sense the eighth
wonderof the world. 2 Beard makes it clear that the fossil in question
is a fully formed and perfect one that can tell us muchabout biology.
The Duke University Richard Kay openly admits that there is no
scientific analysis to prove that Ida is a missing link, in other
words that THERE IS NO EVIDENCE AT ALL. 3 Elwyn Simons, a Duke
University paleoanthropologist, states that Ida tells us nothing we
did not already know. 4
Perhaps the most honestcriticism came from the Timesonline web site:
"Attenborough...was justone element of the media circus turning Ida
into humanity's newest and best link with its ancient past."
Timesonline made the following comments about the fossil:
"Such finds are usually unveiled to the world through the sober
pagesof an academic journal, but for Ida nothing less than a
glittering press conference at the American Museum of Natural History
in New York would do. Later thescientists who studied Ida outlined the
details of their research. Their pronouncements were just as
extravagant." 5
It will be useful to point out here in the context of Darwinists that
the information contained in the sober pages of academic journals is
not always of any scientific value. Historic scientific frauds such as
Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man and Archaeoraptor were all announced over
many pages and for many daysin the serious academic journals in
question. In order a find is to be of any scientific value, there
needs to be scientific evidence of that. But since finds always
conflict with their claims (fossils represent perfect life forms, but
Darwinists arealways on the look out for imaginary, semi-developed
transitional forms), Darwinists are never able to produce any
scientific evidence. Consequently, no matter how sober the academic
journal is, the information given to defend Darwinism, is always only
a deception.
Cambridge University Professor of Human Evolution Robert Foley says it
is "meaningless" to describe this creature as a missing link.
Two well-known Darwinist paleontologists who share different views
about the supposed evolution of man and who are therefore neverable to
agree, Elwyn Simons from Duke University and Christopher Beard from
the Carnegie Museum in Pittsburgh, have made these comments about Ida:
6
"Dr. Simons phoned me for the first time in 10 years to share his
outrage about this MALARKEY and, for the first time in a decade, I
agree with him," said Beard last week. "...The roll-out was
extraordinary and it is now clear that the scientists were under
pressure to meet the showbusiness deadlines."
Simons said, "It's absurd and dangerous." "This is all bad science...
Darwinius is a wonderfulfossil, but IT IS NOT A MISSING LINK OF ANY
KIND. IT REPRESENTS A DEAD END IN EVOLUTION."
In addition to the words of all these scientists setting out the scale
of the Ida fraud, Jorn Hurum himself, introduced at the beginning of
this article,also admits he performed a circus around Ida and
attemptsto justify this by saying: "Any pop band is doing the same
thing. Any athlete is doing the same thing. We have to start thinking
the same way in science."
It will be appropriate at this point to recall that Hurum is someone
who has made sensational use of fossils in the past. The fact that he
has signed a contract with the Atlantic film company about the
fossilIda that he has made such a sensation out of issignificant
evidence of how far he has taken this circus and how the matter has
nothing to dowith science at all.
Conclusion:
The fossil Ida, which has even been criticized by Darwinist
scientists, is a crystal clear example of the dimension the Darwinist
propaganda techniques we have been describing for so long can actually
assume. Darwinist propaganda has been carried out by way of these
techniques for the last 150 years. The reason why the Ida circus is
now coming in for criticism from Darwinist scientists stems from an
attempt to carry on with the circus even though the techniques of
Darwinist propaganda have been exposed and that fossil in question has
been proved to belong to a perfect life form and is in no way any kind
of missing link. By being persisted in so shamelessly when the true
facts are so obvious the circus has damaged Darwinists' esteem and
forced Darwinist scientists to react.
All Darwinists are of course well aware that Ida is not a transitional
form but the fossil of a perfect life form. Contrary to all the
speculation, Ida is a flawless life form that lived a perfect life
some 47 million years ago. This fossil, which is 95% preserved and
whose every detail can therefore be examined, CONTAINS NOT A SINGLE
STRUCTURE SUGGESTIVE OFA TRANSITIONAL FORM CHARACTERISTIC. This
extraordinary find IS PROOF OF THE FACT OF CREATION.
____________________________
1 The Missing Link? Nightline, ABC News television, May 20, 2009. The
Missing Link? Nightline, ABC News television, May 20, 2009
2 Chris Beard, "Why Ida fossil is not the missing link", New
Scientist, May 21, 2009,
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17173-why-ida-fossil-is-not-the-missing-link.html
3 Gibbons, A. "Revolutionary" Fossil Fails to Dazzle Paleontologists.
ScienceNOW Daily News. Posted on sciencenow.sciencemag.orgMay 19,
2009, accessed May 20, 2009
4 Dayton, L. Scientists divided on Ida as the missing link. The
Australian. Posted on theaustralian.news.com.au May 21, 2009, accessed
May 21, 2009
5 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6350095.ece
6 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6350095.ece

Darwinists' claims that Darwinism's saying 'we come from apes' is an oversimplification

Darwinists maintain that the peoplearound them are simplifying
Darwinism and Darwin, by provocatively saying, "A fool called Darwin"
or "Look, we resemble monkeys, so we must be descended from them."
But this is a deception. There is no provocation going on. People have
merely been told about the information of which they are unaware in
recent years. It has been proved that they were misled and deceived
for years. They have been told how Darwinism is a lie, that it is only
kept alive by propaganda, that Darwinists have produced false evidence
to rescue their position, and that they try to mislead people with the
lies that "we have found a transitional fossil" or "this is the
missing link," even though not a singletransitional form fossil
exists. People have seen the 100 million fossils that were concealed
from them for years. They have touched thesefossils with their own
hands at exhibitions andhave seen that living things HAVE REMAINED
UNCHANGED for millions of years. There is no longer any chance of
deceiving them.
What Darwinistsare in fact complaining about is this: Darwinists have
seen that people's awareness has risen. They realize that people have
discovered that Darwinism is nonsense. In complaining about the
over-simplification of Darwinism they are actually expressing their
unhappiness with this state of affairs. The fact is that Darwinism has
not been oversimplified at all, though its facile and false face has
finally been exposed.
Darwinism is a theory that claims that "the first cell formed by
chance in muddy water."It maintains that the whole variety of life
came into being throughchance, unconscious andrandom events. It
ascribes the existence of such extraordinary structures as wings,
fins, feathers and tails to blind coincidence alone. And no matter how
much Darwinists may deny it, Darwinism claims that "humans are
descended from monkeys because they resemble monkeys." Darwinism is no
more complex than that.
Darwinists are shocked and alarmed by the exposure of this facile
logic and have therefore recently been sheltering behind the claim
that "monkeys are not really our ancestors, but our cousins." But
thisis part of the same deception. When Darwinism asserts, "Man comes
from a primate", does this incur a different meaning? A monkey or a
primate, what difference does it make? Is it not the same old outdated
lie and perverted claim? Does this false theory suddenly become
scientific if one says "man's ancestor is a primate" or "humans and
primates have the same ancestor"? Of course, not. This is nothing else
than maintaining the deception by way of sophistry. It merely treats
people with contempt.
Darwinists' worries very probably stem from Darwinism's sudden and
recent collapse. Their attempts to portray Darwinism as a scientific
theory, to claim that it has been proved "apart from a few minor
points" and the way they complain about people ridiculing this
outdated theory are all indications of this. Because Darwinists are
facing a situation they never expected. Paleontology, the only science
that might have produced any evidence for Darwinism, HAS PRODUCED NOT
A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FORM FOSSIL. 100 million fossilshave been
unearthed, BUT THESE ALL PROVE CREATION. All fossils belong to perfect
life forms. Nothing is deficient, missing, semi-developed or peculiar
in them. Moreover, a significant part of these fossils are identical
to life forms around today. LIVING THINGS HAVE NOT CHANGED OVER
MILLIONS OF YEARS. In other words,THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS EVOLUTION.
Darwinists sought the answer to all this powerful evidence by HIDING
fossils away. (Darwinists have done this before. They kept Cambrian
Period fossils dating back 540 million years that dealt a seriousblow
to Darwinism HIDDEN AWAY FOR 70 YEARS.) But the unearthing of these
fossils from where they had been concealed has come as a huge shock. A
great awakening against the Darwinist deception has begun in all
countries of the world. Instead of believing in Darwinism, people now
laugh at it as a false and outdated theory. That is why Darwinists
complain about university instructors, teachers andeven their own
families laughing at Darwinism. Darwinists are no longerable to
prevent people coming to full awarenessin the face of the true
scientific facts.

--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

Fathwa, - Performing the ‘Asr prayer while thinking that one is performing the Thuhr prayer

Question
Sometimes when I perform the 'Asr prayer, it occurs to me that I am
performing the Thuhr prayer, if I get distracted or absent minded.
However, I rectify my intention and remind myself that I am performing
the 'Asr prayer. Is my prayer in such a case invalid, given that my
intention has changed?
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
isHis slave and Messenger.
Being distracted and forgetting one's intention during the prayer does
not invalidate it. What invalidates the prayer is deliberately
changing the intention or intending to change it. It is difficult to
maintain one's intention vivid in the mind throughout the entire
prayer.
Abu Hurayrah reported that the Prophet , said: " When the call for
prayer is pronounced, Satan takes to his heels, passing windwith
noise. When the call is finished, he comes back. When the Iqaamah is
pronounced, he again takes to his heels and, after its completion, he
returns again to interferebetween the (praying) person and his heart,
saying to him: 'Remember this or that thing' (things that the person
could not remember before (the prayer) till he forgets whether he has
offered three or four Rak'ahs. So if one forgets whether hehas prayed
three or four Rak'ahs, he should perform two prostrationsof Sahw (i.e.
forgetfulness). " [Al-Bukhaari and Muslim]
Hence, if the change in the worshipper's intention – the way it was
mentioned by the questioner – was becausehe was distracted or (he
temporarily) forgot his intention, this does not invalidate the
prayer, as stated earlier.
However, if you mean that the worshipper revoked his intention and
intended to perform another prayer, then it surely invalidates the
prayer as in such a case the intention totally changed.
If the questioner means that, during the prayer, he questioned his
intention (and doubted whether he had intendedto perform 'Asr or
Thuhr) and then counted on his doubt (without verifying it), this also
invalidates the prayer as such a prayer lacks the condition of having
an affirmed and assertive intention. However, if he did not act on his
doubt until he realized the truth(about his specific intention), there
is no harm in that.
Allaah Knows best. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -