Hadees, - seat in Hell-fire, -

Share ::-

:-> Found In: Sahih Bukhari Chapter No: 3, Knowledge Hadithno: 109 Narrated: Salama I heard the Prophet saying, "Whoever (intentionally) ascribes to me what I have not said then (surely) let him occupy hisseatinHell-fire." Relevance: 24.574 Found In: Sahih Bukhari Chapter No: 3, Knowledge Hadithno: 108 Narrated: Anas The fact which stops me from narrating a great number of Hadiths to you is that the Prophet said: "Whoever tells a lie against meintentionally, then (surely) let him occupy hisseatinHell-fire." Relevance: 23.3569 Found In: Sahih Bukhari Chapter No: 3, Knowledge Hadithno: 110 Narrated: Abu Huraira The Prophet said, "Name yourselves with my name (use my name) but do not name yourselves with my Kunya name (i.e. Abu-l Qasim). And whoever sees meina dream then surely he has seen me for Satan cannot impersonate me. And whoever tells a lie against me (intentionally), then (surely) let him occupy hisseatinHell-fire." Relevance: 22.2551 Found In: Sahih Bukhari Chapter No: 3, Knowledge Hadithno: 107 Narrated: Abdullah bin Az-Zubair I said to my father, 'I do not hear from you any narration (Hadith) of Allah s Apostle as I hear (his narrations) from so and so?" Az-Zubair replied. l was always with him (the Prophet) and I heard him saying "Whoever tells a lie against me (intentionally) then (surely) let him occupy, hisseatinHell-fire. Relevance: 21.6337 Found In: Sahih Muslim Chapter No: 1, Faith (Kitab Al Iman) Hadithno: 199 Narrated: Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) observed: He who killed himself with steel (weapon) would be the eternal denizen of the Fire of Hell and he would have that weaponinhis hand and would be thrusting thatinhis stomach for ever and ever, he who drank poison and killed himself would sip thatinthe Fire of Hell where he is doomed for ever and ever; and he who killed himself by falling from (the top of) a mountainwould constantly fallinthe Fire of Hell and would live there for ever and ever. Relevance: 20.5375 Found In: 40 Hadith Qudsi Chapter No: 1, 40 Hadith Qudsi Hadithno: 39 Narrated: Abu Said Al-Khudri who said that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: "Paradise andHell-firedisputed together, andHell-firesaid: 'inme are the mighty and the haughty.' Paradise said: 'inme are the weak and the poor.' So Allah judged between them, [saying]: 'You are Paradise, My mercy; through you I show mercy to those I wish. And you areHell-fire, My punishment; through you I punish those I wish, and it isincumbent upon Me that each of you shall have its fill.'" It was related by Muslim (also by al-Bukhari and at-Tirmidhi). Relevance: 19.6861 Found In: Sunan Ibn Majah Chapter No: 1, The Book of the Sunnah Hadithno: 254 Narrated: Jabir bin Abdullah that the Prophet (saw) said: “Do not seek knowledgeinorder to show offinfront of the scholars, or to argue with the foolish, and do not choose the backseatina gathering, due to it (i.e. the knowledge which you have learned) for whoever does that, the Fire, the Fire (awaits him).” (Daif) Relevance: 18.944 Found In: Sahih Bukhari Chapter No: 23, Funerals (Al-Janaaiz) Hadithno: 378 Narrated: Al-Mughira I heard the Prophet saying, "Ascribing false things to me is not like ascribing false things to anyone else. Whosoever tells a lie against meintentionally then surely let him occupy hisseatinHell-fire." I heard the Prophet saying, "The deceased who is wailed over is tortured for that wailing." Relevance: 18.8417 Found In: Sahih Bukhari Chapter No: 3, Knowledge Hadithno: 101 Narrated: Abu Said Al-Khudri Some women requested the Prophet to fix a day for them as the men were taking all his time. On that he promised them one day for religious lessons and commandments. Once during such a lesson the Prophet said, "A woman whose three children die will be shielded by them from the Hell fire." On that a woman asked, "If only two die?" He replied, "Even two (will shield her from theHell-fire)." Relevance: 17.6077 Found In: 40 Hadith Qudsi Chapter No: 1, 40 Hadith Qudsi Hadithno: 13 Narrated: Adi bin Hatim who said: I was with the Messenger of Allah (may the blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and there came to him two men: one of them was complaining of penury (being very poor), while the other was complaining of brigandry (robbery). The Messenger of Allah (may the blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: "As for brigandry, it will be but a short time before a caravan will [be able to] go out of Mecca without a guard. As for penury, the Hour (Day of Judgement) will not arrive before one of you takes his charity around without finding anyone to accept it from him. Then (1) one of you will surely stand before Allah, there being no screen between Him and him, nor aninterpreter to translate for him. Then He will say to him: 'Did I not bring you wealth?' And he will say: Yes.' Then He will say: 'Did I not send to you a messenger?' And he will say: 'Yes.' And he will look to his right and will see nothing butHell-fire, then he will look to his left and will see nothing butHell-fire, so let each of you protect himself againstHell-fire, be it with even half a date - and if he finds it not, then with a kind word." (1) i.e. at the time of the Hour. It was related by al-Bukhari. Relevance: 16.7384

- PUBLISHERNajimudeeN M

Welcome to Islam, - A figment of Darwin’s imagination

Share ::-

:-> If Darwin himself realized the "difficulties" in proving his theory, why are evolution scientists adamant on propagating his hypothesis as natural law? The person, who put forward the theory of evolution in the form that is propagated and defended today, was an amateur English naturalist, Charles Robert Darwin. Darwinhad never undergone a formal education in biology. He took only an amateur interest in the subject of nature and living things. His interest spurred him to voluntarily join an expedition on board a ship named H.M.S. Beagle that set out fromEnglandin 1832 CE and traveled around different regions of the world for five years. Young Darwin was greatly impressed by various living species, especially by certain finches that he saw in theGalapagos Islands. He thought that the variations in their beaks were caused by their adaptation to their habitat. With this idea in mind, he supposed that the origin of life and species lay in the concept of “adaptation to the environment”. According toDarwin, different living species were not created separately by Allaah, but rather came from a common ancestor and became differentiated from each other as a result of natural conditions. Darwin’s hypothesis was not based on any scientific discovery or experiment; in time however he turned it into a pretentious theory with the support and encouragement he received from the famous materialist biologists of his time. The idea was that the individuals that adapted to the habitat in the best way transferred their qualities to subsequent generations; these advantageous qualities accumulated in time and transformed the individual into a species totally different from its ancestors. )The origin of these “advantageous qualities” was unknown at the time(. According toDarwin, man was the most developed outcome of this mechanism. Darwincalled this process “evolution by natural selection”. He thought he had found the “origin of species”: the origin of one species was another species. He published these views in his book titledThe Origin of Species, By Means of Natural Selectionin 1859 CE. Darwinwas well aware that his theory faced lots of problems. He confessed these in his book in the chapter “Difficulties of the Theory”. These difficulties primarily consisted of the fossil record, complex organs of living things that could not possibly be explained by coincidence )e.g. the eye(, and instincts of living beings.Darwinhoped that these difficulties would be overcome by new discoveries; yet this did not stop him from coming up with a number of very inadequate explanations for some. The American physicist Lipson made the following comment on the “difficulties” ofDarwin: "On readingThe Origin of Species, I found thatDarwinwas much less sure himself than he is often represented to be; the chapter entitled “Difficulties of the Theory” for example, shows considerable self-doubt. As a physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the eye would have arisen." While developing his theory,Darwinwas impressed by many evolutionist biologists preceding him, and primarily by the French biologist, Lamarck. According to Lamarck, living creatures passed the traits they acquired during their lifetime from one generation to the next and thus evolved. For instance, giraffes evolved from antelope-like animals by extending their necks further and further from generation to generation as they tried to reach higher and higher branches for food.Darwinthus employed the thesis of “passing the acquired traits” proposed by Lamarck as the factor that made living beings evolve. But both Darwin and Lamarck were mistaken, because in their time life could only be studied with very primitive technology and at a very inadequate level. Scientific fields such as genetics and biochemistry did not exist even in name. Their theories therefore had to depend entirely on their powers of imagination. While the echoes ofDarwin’s book reverberated, an Austrian botanist by the name of Gregor Mendel discovered the laws of inheritance in 1865 CE. Not much heard of until the end of the century, Mendel’s discovery gained great importance in the early 1900s. This was the birth of the science of the genes and the chromosomes were discovered.Thediscovery of the DNA molecule that incorporates genetic information in the 1950s threw the theory of evolution into a great crisis. The reason was the incredible complexity of life and the invalidity of the evolutionary mechanisms proposed byDarwin. These developments ought to have resulted inDarwin’s theory being banished to the dustbin of history. However, this was not to be, because certain circles insisted on revising, renewing and elevating the theory to a scientific platform. These efforts gain meaning only if we realise that behind the theory lay ideological intentions rather than scientific concerns. Darwinwas a human being, fallible in his judgment and prone to error. It is worth pondering over, why do evolutionists insist upon elevating his theory to the level of gospel truth and the person who proposed it to the status of demi-god? Are they interested in serving Science, by insisting on following an obviously flawed theory? Or are they interested in serving their own interests and sinister agendas, by propagating a theory that denies that Allaah is the Creator of all things?

- PUBLISHERNajimudeeN M

──────────██─────────█▒▒█─────────█▒▒█─────────█▒▒█ ──────██▒█▒▒█ ────██▒▒██▒▒█ ──██▒▒█▒█████ ─█▒▒█▒▒█▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒█▒▒█▒▒███▒▒▒█ ─█▒█▒▒█▒▒█▒█▒▒█ ─█▒█▒▒███▒▒▒▒█ ──█▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒█ ───█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█ ────█▒▒▒▒▒▒█

Welcome to Islam, - Scientific pride and prejudice

Share ::-

:-> Evolution scientists pass off personal prejudices as scientific truth Most people accept everything they hear from scientists as strictly true. It does not even occur to them that scientists may also have various philosophical or ideological prejudices. The fact of the matter is that evolutionist scientists impose their own prejudices and philosophical views on the public under the guise of Science. For instance, although they are aware that random events do not cause anything other than irregularity and confusion, they still claim that the marvelous order, plan and design manifested in the Universe and in living organisms arose by chance. For instance, such a biologist easily grasps that there is an incomprehensible harmony in a protein molecule -- the building block of life -- and that there is no probability that this might have come about by chance. Nevertheless, he alleges that this protein came into existence under primitive earth conditions simply by chance, billions of years ago. He does not stop there; he also unhesitatingly claims that not only one, but millions of proteins were formed by chance and then incredibly came together to create the first living cell. Moreover, he defends his view with a blind stubbornness. This person is an “evolutionist” scientist. If the same scientist were to find three bricks resting on top of one another while walking along a flat road, he would never suppose that these bricks had come together by chance and then climbed up on top of each other, again by chance. Indeed, anyone who did make such an assertion would be considered insane. How is it possible that people who are perfectly capable of assessing ordinary events rationally, adopt such an irrational attitude when it comes to thinking about their own existence? It is impossible to claim that this attitude is adopted in the name of science: Science requires taking both alternatives into consideration wherever there are two alternatives equally possible concerning a certain case. If the likelihood of one of the two alternatives is much lower, for example if it is only one percent, then the rational and scientific thing to do is to consider the other alternative, whose likelihood is 99 percent, to be the valid one. Let us continue, keeping this scientific basis in mind. There are two views that can be set forth regarding how living beings came into existence on earth. The first is that all living beings were created by Allaah in their present complex structure. The second is that life was formed by unconscious, random coincidences. The latter is the claim of the theory of evolution. When we look at scientific data, that of molecular biology for instance, we can see that there is no chance whatsoever that a single living cell -- or even one of the millions of proteins present in this cell, could have come into existence by chance, as evolutionists claim. As we will illustrate in the following chapters, probabilistic calculations also confirm this many times over. Hence, the evolutionist view on the emergence of living beings has zero probability of being true. This means that the first view has a “one hundred percent” probability of being true. That is, life has been consciously brought into being. To put it in another way, it was “created”. All living beings have come into existence by the design of a Creator exalted in superior Power, Wisdom, and Knowledge. This reality is not simply a matter of conviction; it is the normal conclusion that wisdom, logic and science take one to. Under these circumstances, our “evolutionist” scientist ought to withdraw his claim and adhere to a fact that is both obvious and proven. To do otherwise is to demonstrate that he is actually someone who is sacrificing the spirit of scientific inquiry to further his own particular philosophy, ideology and dogma rather than being a true scientist. The anger, stubbornness and prejudices of our “scientist” increase more and more every time he confronts reality. His attitude can be explained with a single word: faith.Yet it is a blind superstitious faith, since there can be no other explanation for such blatant disregard of all facts that leads to a lifelong, fanatic allegiance to the preposterous scenario constructed wholly in his imagination. The Quran appeals to "men of knowledge" to exercise their faculties and appreciate the wonder of Allaah's creation in the world around them and within themselves. It is a sad reflection on the manifest unbelief of modern times, that evolution scientists are using the intellect and senses that Allaah has granted them to do just the opposite : negate the wonder of His creation. By disguising their delusions of grandeur as scientific theories, evolution scientists are doing a great disservice to the true spirit of scientific inquiry.

- PUBLISHERNajimudeeN M