Scientific responses to Celal Sengor's demagogic claims

Celal Sengor, a guest on the TV program "Siyaset Meydani" (Political
Arena), broadcast on 19 March, 2009, provided various explanations in
order to defend Darwinism, which has now been totally defeated. Sengor
used Darwinist demagogic techniques to attempt tore-introduce matters
that had been repeated for many years but completely disproved and he
totally denied the subjects at points he was unable to answer before a
group of youngpeople he could not manage to convince. Since the
accounts in question have been raised once again by means of this
program, it is essential to issue some reminders of the subject. You
can read Celal Sengor's claims andthe definitive scientific responses
of them below:
1. The Deception that "There Are Tons of Transitional Fossils and That
Dinosaur Species Represent Transitional Fossils"
2. The Deception That Therapsids Are Transitional Forms
3. The Deception that "There Was No Oxygen inthe Primeval Atmosphere"
4. The Transition to Bipedalism Deception
5. The Invalidity of the Claim That the Idea Whales Evolved from Bears
Did Not Originate with Darwin
6. The Invalidity of the Claim That Mutations Miraculously Give Rise
to Evolution
7. The Invalidity of the Claims That the Eye Is Notan Irreducibly
Complex Structure and That the Eye Evolved
8. The Invalidity of the Claim That There Is Chaosin the Universe and the World
9. The Invalidity of the Claim That Bacterial Resistance to
Antibiotics Is Evidence of Evolution.
10. The Deceit that Photosynthetic Bacteria Emerged with "a Small
Evolution" and ProducedOxygen
11. The Invalidity of the Claim that Man's Ancestors Lived in Caves
12. The Deceit That The Human Ability to Think Isthe Same as That of
Other Living Things
13. The Error of Seeking to Depict the Harmony on Earth as Disorder
14. The Invalidity of the Claim That New Species Evolve Every Year
15. What Was Never Mentioned on the Program "Siyaset Meydani" (Political Arena)
SUMMARY STATEMENTS:
THE MUTATIONCLAIM
1. Mutations are either neutral or else harmful to living things.
There are no useful mutations. (Hiroshima, Chernobyl, dwarfism,
cancer).
2. Mutation adds no new information to DNA. But this is essential in
the formation of a new species or a new characteristic. (No wing can
appear in a species without wings; only three legs may emerge instead
of two).
3. Not one single cell can form by chance. The people who make this
claim have to date been unable to manufacture asingle living thing or
cellunder laboratory conditions.
(Click for details)
THE CLAIM OF THE TRANSITION FROM QUADRIPEDALISM TO BIPEDALISM
1. Standing on two legs rather than four is of no advantage.
Quadripedalism is faster and more effective in terms of concealment
and hunting. In addition, animals are capable of standing on two legs
for fixation.
2. According to what evolutionists claim, a living thing would have to
pass through many transitional postures in moving from four legs
totwo. But that is impossible even according to evolutionists' own
claims.
(Click for details)
THE CLAIM THAT DINOSAURS EVOLVED INTO BIRDS
According to evolutionists, first there were herbivorous dinosaurs.
These then turned into small, carnivorous dinosaurs, and then into
birds. But this is nonsense because:
1. Carnivorous and herbivorous dinosaurs lived at the same time. There
was also a perfect bird, Archaeopteryx , living 150 million years ago
at the same time as dinosaurs.
2. Birds' lungs, feet, jaw, palate, tooth and bone structures are
entirely different to those of land-dwelling life forms.
3. The Darwinist Alan Feduccia, the world's most eminent
ornithologist, says this about the myth of dinosaurs evolving into
birds:
"Well, I've studied bird skulls for 25 years and I don't see any
similaritieswhatsoever. I just don't see it... The theropod origins of
birds, in my opinion, will be the greatest embarrassment of
paleontology of the 20th century."( New Scientist , 1 February, 1997,
p. 28)
(Click for details)
THE INVALIDITY OF THE IDEA OF A TRANSITION FROM REPTILES TO MAMMALS
Darwinists attempt to portray therapsids with their two jaw bones as
an intermediate form between reptiles and mammals. But this claim is
invalid because:
1. There are animals with 1, 2 or 3 fingers. All life forms have
different skull bones. Therefore, having a different number of jaw
bones is no proof that this life form is a transitional one.
2. There exists not a single transitional form fossil to support this claim.
3. Mammals are warm-blooded and reptiles are cold-blooded. Mammals
give birth to and suckle their young, and their bodies are covered in
fur. Reptiles lay eggs, do not suckle their young and their bodies are
covered in scales.
(Click for details)
THE INVALIDITY OF THE CLAIM THAT BACTERIALRESISTANCE TO ANTIBIOTICS IS
EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION
1. There are countless kinds of bacteria. Some were created with the
genetic information thatprovides resistance to antibiotics "before
antibiotics had ever been produced." When bacteria are exposed to any
kind of antibiotic, those without resistanceto the antibiotic in
question die, while those with resistance survive and are able to
multiply.
2. Shortly afterwards, thesame bacterium species consists entirely of
individuals resistant to the antibiotic in question, and the
antibiotic is now ineffective against the bacterium.
3. But the bacterium is still the same bacterium, not a new species.
No evolution has taken place. Bacteria have been around on Earth for
3.5 billion years and are still the same bacteria.
(Click for details)
THE CLAIM THAT THE LIGHT-SENSITIVE CELLS IN PARAMECIA IS A "PRIMITIVE EYE"
1. The eye of the trilobite that lived in the Cambrian Period 530
million years ago has thesame perfect faceted structure as that of the
modern-day dragonfly.
2. The perfect human eyeis too complex for its constituent components
to have evolved separately. It is essential for the 40 components of
the eye to be present together for sight to take place. Even the
absence of ocular fluid isalone for the eye not to function.
3. In a letter to his friend Asa Gray written on 3 April, 1860, Darwin
says, "The thought of the eye made me cold all over."
(Click for details)
THE CLAIM THAT "40,000 SPECIES DISAPPEAR EVERY YEAR AND 1,000 NEW SPECIES FORM"
1. The newly found species may already be living on Earth but not
discovered yet.
2. Or Allah creates a new species and people then discover it. Allah
creates from nothing, far from human eyes, in places where it cannot
be seen. Allah knows the truth. Allah creates as a miracle. But this
does not take place before people's eyes, in a zoo, for instance.
Unless Allah otherwise.
THE CLAIM THAT THERE WAS NO OXYGEN WHEN LIFE BEGAN AND THAT OXYGEN
APPEARED SUBSEQUENTLY
Darwinists never use oxygen in the experiments they conduct into the
origin of life. Because if an amino acid forms, oxygen will
immediately burn and destroy it. The Miller experiment was also
conducted without oxygen. They therefore deny the existence of oxygen
in the primordialatmosphere. But this is wrong because:
1. Rocks have been found dating back 3.5 million years and containing
oxidized ironand traces of uranium.
2. It is has been realized that 10,000 times more ultraviolet light
reached the Earth in this period than Darwinists estimated. Therefore,
it must have separated thewater vapor and carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere and released oxygen.
3. If, as Darwinists maintain, there was no oxygen in the
primordialatmosphere, then there would have been no ozone layer
protecting the Earth against ultraviolet light. In that case, it is
clear that no organic molecule would be able to survive on Earth
exposed to intenselevels of ultraviolet.
(Click for details)
THE PERFECT EQUILIBRIUM IN THE ATOM
The nucleus of the atom consists of protons and neutrons. Protons and
neutrons are composed of quarks. And quarks have their own various
sub-particles.
1. The volume of the nucleus is just 1 part in 10 billion of that of
the atom. But the mass of the nucleus comprises 99.95% of that of the
atom. While representing almost all the mass, it takes up no space.
This is equivalent to squeezing all the objects in a 10 billion square
meter house into a 1 square meter room.
2. If the spaces between the atoms in the human body were eliminated,
then a human being would be a tiny speck a few thousandths of a
millimeter in size. A planet would be the size of a chick pea.
3. The only thing distinguishing the 109 fundamental elements is the
number of protons in their nuclei. Gold has 79 protons, an oxygen atom
8 and iron 26 protons.
4. If we magnified an atom to the size of the Earth, an electron would
be no bigger than an apple.
5. An electron orbits the nucleus at the extraordinary speed of 1,000
km a second. There is a huge amount of traffic but perfect order
within the atom. There is never any confusion and no collisions ever
take place. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -