The pitiful Darwinists who imagine the newly discovered fossil Anchiornis Huxleyi to be a transitional fossil

A fossil discovered in China the other day was quickly taken up as a
"four-winged bird" in the Darwinist media. Darwinists right away
claimed that this fossil might be "the ancestor of birds." As ever,
they immediately gave the animal a name. They baptized it Anchiornis
huxleyi, in memory of Thomas Huxley, an atheist, Darwinist and 32nd
degree freemason known as Darwin's bulldog.
The fossil belonged to a bird, with wings and also feathers on its
hind legs. The fossil, which Darwinists were unable to account for,
also conflicted with the claims of the theory of evolution. As we
know, despite being a perfect bird Archaeopteryx is regarded as a
transitional form by Darwinists making childish claims. (You can read
about the scientific evidence showing that Archaeopteryx is a perfect
bird here and here .) This new fossil, found in strata dating back
151-161 million years, was older than Archaeopteryx . But fromthe
Darwinist perspective it exhibited no imaginary transitional form
characteristics that it needed to go to Archaeopteryx. With its "four
wings," as Darwinists described it, this life form represent ahuge
puzzle in terms of Darwinist theory. As theystrive to account for the
supposed evolution of two wings, Darwinists now have to account for
third and fourth wings not observed in dinosaurs, nor flying squirrels
nor birds. This of course deals a profound and severe blow to the
Darwinist claim of evolution from bipedal dinosaurs. For that reason
Darwinists began talking about a transitional form "whoserear
wing-like structuresgradually became vestigial." Not even able to
account for the two wings possessed by birds, they now began defending
the idea "twopairs of wings that formed in some way andthen became
vestigial for some reason."But that account is nothing less than an
expression of despair.
Anchiornis Huxleyi Is Not a Transitional Fossil But a Species of Bird
Like Those Living Today
Despite all the Darwinist speculation, it appears from even a brief
examination of the Anchiornis Huxleyi fossil that it represents a
species of bird similar to those living today. The fossil in question
exhibits fully avian features in terms of skulland general anatomy. In
terms of its wings and feathers, it appears to resemble the today's
species of birds with muffed feet. In addition to wings, these animals
have feathers strongly reminiscent of wings on their back legs. The
feathers in question do not function as wings, but are important in
giving the animal an impressive appearance.
This approximately 160-million-year-old life form possesses the same
features as present-day birds with muffed feet. Itrepresents an
extinct member of the species that comprise this family. This is so
obvious that any scientist looking at pictures of it will easily see
this clear resemblance.
As we have already seen,in order to be able to suggest that this
fossil resembles a transitional form, Darwinists maintain that the
rear feathers that pose such adilemma for their theorygradually became
"vestigial." What this means, according to the theory of evolution is:
"Adinosaur gradually decided to fly, following which it developed a
pair of wings. It then thought another pair of wings would come in
handy and grew those, too. But as it grew this second pair it then
thought they were actually unnecessary. It finally decided these wings
should become vestigial and disappear and continued its imaginary
evolutionary process with just one pair of wings." That, in summary,
is the fairy talethat Darwinists are telling, dressed up in scientific
terminology, inworld-renowned journals. The points in this
extraordinarily illogical scenario, which not even a child would be
taken in by, that represent insoluble dilemmas for Darwinists are as
follows:
- There is no such thing as a transition from dinosaurs to birds. Such
a passage is physiologically impossible and, naturally, THERE EXISTS
NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL thatmight confirm this impossible
scenario.
- Birds did not emerge from some other life form gliding through the
air. Birds have always existed as birds, and appeared suddenly with
their magnificent appearances. As with all other life forms, THERE
EXISTS NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL to show that birds evolved.
- Bird feathers and wingsare some of the most complex structure
investigated by biology today. It is totally ridiculous to claim that
an unconscious life form decided these would be necessary, grew them
and later gave up and allowed them to becomevestigial. The proponents
of Darwinism ARE IN AN IMPOSSIBLE POSITION IN THE FACE OF A SINGLE
BIRDFEATHER.
- Four wings represent a considerable advantage for a living thing.
Four-winged life forms can maneuver relatively much better than
two-winged ones. For example, thanks to their four wings dragonflies
and honeybees are able to maneuver very much easier. Four wings should
therefore be an advantage for a life form. As we have seen, this
illogical claim is even incompatible with evolution's own claims.
- The animal HAS NOT A SINGLE STRUCTURE DEVELOPING FROM A
MOREPRIMITIVE FORM that would allow it to be regarded as a
transitional form. All of its structures are fully functional and
sublimelycomplex.
- All the fossils put forward by Darwinists inorder to supposedly
confirm their scenarios of a passage from land to air, and that they
still frequently attempt to bring up today, BELONG TO FULLY FORMED AND
PREFECT LIFE FORMS. Since Archaeopteryx and Microraptor gui , another
bird species with muffed feet, are nothing more than perfect bird
species that existed millions of years ago, they cause grave concern
to Darwinists, who have sought a way of escape from all the evidence
of Creation by depicting them as transitional forms.
Darwinists are following the same course with the newly discovered fossil.
In the same way that every fossil discovered BELONGS TO A PERFECT LIFE
FORM, so Anchiornis Huxleyi IS A PERFECT BIRD SPECIES that represents
the highly decorative species of birds with muffed feet alive today
and that has in all probability become extinct. And as a
representative of birds with muffed feet that dates back 160 million
years it constitutes significant evidence for Creation. A second
important point here is that none of its organs exhibit any
transitional form features.
Darwinists are engaging in the same offensive techniques with this new
fossil that once again reveal their own helplessness. THEY ARE TRYING
TO GATHER SUPPORT USING FALSE TECHNIQUES, by writing articles, holding
conferences and disseminating the false idea this is a transitional
form from the mouths ofthe most renowned Darwinist professors in the
world's best known journals. They have beendoing the same thing forthe
last 150 years. They always try to deceive people with the same soiled
propaganda and to impose the worst deception of the centuryon them
using the same cunning stratagems. But the media are no longer suited
to such things.
Darwinism HAS BEEN ENTIRELY ELIMINATED BY THE EXISTENCE OF 250 MILLION
FOSSILS THAT ALL PROVE CREATION.
IT HAS BEEN SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN that the handful of fossils
Darwinists claimed were SUPPOSEDLY TRANSITIONAL FORMS HAVE ALL BEEN
INVALIDATED.
The Atlas of Creation HAS DECLARED TO THE WORLD THE FACT THAT THERE IS
NO SUCH THING AS EVOLUTION, a fact which Darwinists have tried to
cover up for the last 150 years.
That is why nobody any longer listens or gives credence to these
methods of deception that have persisted for the last 150 years.
And Darwinists are well aware of this. And that isthe reason for their
feelings of despair, misery and defeat. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -