Dought & clear, - Why death is the punishment for Apostasy.

Share ::-

:: Share ::

Alslamualik
This question has bees asked several time from non-Muslims and I want to find an answer: Why When the Muslim convert to another religion(Murtad) he/she should be killed?
Praise be to Allaah.
Your question may be answered by the following points:
(1) This is the ruling of Allaah and His Messenger, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Whoever changes his religion, kill him." (reported by al-Bukhaari, al-Fath, no. 3017).
(2) The one who has known the religion which Allaah revealed, entered it and practised it, then rejected it, despised it and left it, is a person who does not deserve to live on the earth of Allaah and eat from the provision of Allaah.
(3) By leaving Islaam, the apostate opens the way for everyone who wants to leave the faith, thus spreading apostasy and encouraging it.
(4) The apostate is not to be killed without warning. Even though his crime is so great, he is given a last chance, a respite of three days in which to repent. If he repents, he will be left alone; if he does not repent, then he will be killed.
(5) If the punishment for murder and espionage (also known as high treason) is death, then what should be the punishment for the one who disbelieves in the Lord of mankind and despises and rejects His religion? Is espionage or shedding blood worse than leaving the religion of the Lord of mankind and rejecting it?
(6) None of those who bleat about personal freedom and freedom of belief would put up with a neighbour’s child hitting their child or justify this as "personal freedom," so how can they justify leaving the true religion and rejecting the sharee’ah which Allaah revealed to teach mankind about His unity and bring justice and fairness to all?
We ask Allaah for safety and health. May Allaah bless our Prophet Muhammad .

- PUBLISHERNajimudeeN M

For children, - Muslim Society: Allah's command to destroy City(Amar Bil Maroof, Nahi Anil Munkar)

Share ::-

Anyone who seeks to enjoin the good and forbid the evil in an Islamic Society must himself be aware of what is lawful and unlawful, and should not act contrary to what he preaches.
His aim should be to guide the people in an Islamic Society. He should talk nicely and be aware of the difference in the level of understanding of the people. If he is opposed, he should exhibit patience and if supported and favoured, he should thank Allah (SWT).
Imam Ali (as) said: One, who refrains from prohibiting the evil by means of his heart, hand and tongue, is (like) a dead amongst the living. Also Imam Ali (as) said: The silent on one's oppression is like supporting and joining hands to oppressors.
One who remains silent to oppression is considered amongst the oppressors and is cursed by Islam. As we regularly recite in Ziyarat Al-Warith, "Curse be upon those who heard the call to deliver their duties (against oppressors) but remained silent."
Allah (SWT) ordered two angels to destroy a city. On reaching there, the angels noticed one of the inhabitants beseeching and supplicating to Allah.
One of the angels said to the other: "Don't you see this person supplicating?"
"Yes I do, but Allah's order has to be executed," replied the other one.
"Wait. Let me ask Allah (SWT) as to what should be done."
Praying to Allah (SWT), the first angel inquired: "In this city there is a person, who entreats and beseeches you. Do we still impose the chastisement upon the city?"
The answer came from Allah (SWT): "Execute the commandment which has been given to you, for that person has never been perturbed and distressed for My sake, nor did he show anger over the evil deeds committed by the other people."

:: Share ::

- PUBLISHERNajimudeeN M

Fathwa, - She asked her husband for Khul' and he said to her 'You could have it'

Share::- :right:


I am currently serving my iddat in'sha Allah in either a khula or a talaq. I think I am in an irrevocable iddat as my husband divorced me twice before years ago. Last week my husband informed me that If I desire a khula I may take it and he will grant it. I htought hard about it and prayed istakhara. I do not regret my decision to take it and it is as if I have been released from a cruel slavery. I am so relieved to not be his wife any longer Sub'han Allaah! Anyways, when I ask my husband for the khula he said I could have it but there was no transferring of anything between us physically or in discussion. His intention was definitely to allow me to terminate the marriage and agree with it. I just assumed because its a khula he will keep my dowry which was the Tafisr Ibn Kathir collection. Is this a divorce or a khula? And my iddat is three periods )because I am in my twenties( no matter which it is right?
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammadis His slave and Messenger.
The statement of your husband ‘you could have it’ in response to you asking him for Khul’ is not a clear acceptance of Khul’ on his part, rather this depends on what your husband intended by this statement. If he meant that he gives you Khul’ without compensation, then the juristsdiffered in opinion in regard to Khul’ without compensation. Indeed,Ibn Qudaamahreported their difference of opinion and said after quoting a narration fromImaam Ahmad:“It appears that this means that Khul’ without compensation is valid, and this is the view of Maalikbecause it is a termination of the marriage, so it is valid without compensation, like divorce. That is because Khul’ is basically legislated in case a wife hates her husband and wishes to separate from him, and so she asks him to release her, and if he accepts, then what is meant by Khul’ is achieved, so it is valid, in the same way as if it was with compensation…”Then he )Ibn Qudaamah( mentioned the other narration fromImaam Ahmadand said:“According to this narration, Khul’ is not valid except with compensation, and if he )the husband( utters it without compensation and he intended divorce, then it is a revocable divorce as it can be considered as a metaphor of divorce. However, if he did not intend divorce with it, then it is nothing. This is the view of Abu Haneefah and Ash-Shaafi’i.”
However, it appears that the first opinion is closer to the truth because of its strong evidence. Based on this, if your husband had intended by his statement ‘you could have it’ to initiate Khul’ with this wording, and he did not intend just a promise to do it, then this Khul’ is valid and it is one revocable divorce as we have already clarified in Fatwa 88502.
The waiting period of a woman in Khul’ is like the waiting period of a divorced woman according to the preponderant opinion of the scholars.









:: Share ::

PUBLISHER
Najimudeen M

free software, wallpaper, mp4, news, search box, google yahoo mail and many more downloads - OPEN & USE