Darwinists' latest desperate efforts to keep the Dino-bird deception alive

Darwinists have once again begun raising claims that have already been
answered in order to deny the enormous rout suffered by their
dino-bird claims. They have been in a terrible panic, especially in
recent days when evolution is going through its death throes,and have
set about looking for a series of new methods of deception for the
sake of propping Darwinism up. The latest instance ofthese concern a
dinosaur fossil discovered in China and that has recently been
reported in certain sections of the press. Darwinists are repeatingthe
same hollow myths and reiterating the errorthat the fossil in question
supposedly represents evidence for evolution.
Statements regarding the invalidity of the claim in question are as follows:
The fossil, known as Limusaurus inextricabilis , has short arms and
three-toed claws. Darwinist paleontologists, who maintain that the
fossil also has a small finger protrusion, are trying to herald this
as a fourth finger and, as always, to use this characteristic as a
tool of Darwinist propaganda. They claim that although "for some
reason" this life form HAD NO FEATHERS (which could not possibly have
existed anyway), because of this 1 cm bone in question it constitutes
a potential transition from 5-toed dinosaurs to 3-toed birds.
But this is a classic Darwinist deception.
As we have already made clear in many other instances, Darwinists are
experts when it comes to inventing speculation about different
structures in a fossil. They use an anatomical imperfection, a broken
bone or even a perfect organ in a fossilized life form as propaganda
tools for Darwinist accounts. It will be useful to recall the
Darwinist speculation about the Coelacanth as perhaps the most
striking example of this. All the conjecture about the fossil was
totally demolished as a result ofthe capture of a great many living
Coelacanths .Darwinists chose to retreat into a profound silence in
the face of thishumiliation, as with all Darwinist deceptions that are
proved to be frauds. (You can access detailed information about the
Coelacanth here .)
Darwinists are now provocatively attempting to use a single bone
protrusion in a dinosaur fossil of which we can never examine living
specimens as a vehicle for Darwinist propaganda. The fact is, however,
that Limusaurus inextricabilis is a flawless terrestrial life form
with a perfect anatomy. It exhibits no transitional form
characteristics. All its limbs and structures are flawless. As we have
many times made clear, if Darwinists want to produce intermediate
fossil evidence, then the life forms they produce must be similar to
these:
As living things turned, according to Darwinism, into ever more
imaginary forms, anatomical abnormalities must havearisen. There must
have been billions of such monstrous life forms, and we should keep
digging up their fossil remains everywhere. Butsince these do not
exist, Darwinists despairingly take a bone in a fossil, reshape it and
call it transitional fossil. Yet the fossils they propose all belong
to perfect, immaculate and flawless life forms.
As we have also clarified before, there is no question of a transition
between terrestrial life forms and birds. The anatomic structures of
terrestrial life forms and birds are completely different and any
change in this perfect anatomical harmony canonly prove fatal. The
claim regarding the origin of birds that Darwinists have been making
for so many years has had new frauds added onto it in the example of
Limusaurus inextricabilis . Darwinists have fantastically attempted to
equate the fossil with a bird, decided that the dinosaur should have
feathers and then resorted to new tactics when no such thing was
encountered in the fossilin question. When no feathers were found,
they had no compunction about using such expressions as "the
dinosaur's body MAY HAVE BEEN covered in feathers." The aim here is to
launch a dinosaur that lived millions of years in the past as a
transitional fossil using speculation and sophistry. (It also needs to
be made clear at this point that the idea of the " feathered dinosaur
" that Darwinists have broughtup so many times beforeis totally
fantastical. It has been shown that thestructures described as
feathers are completely different and that the fossils so heralded are
false .)
The recent discovery of other findings that totally demolish all
claims regarding the passage from dinosaurs to birds, the realization
that dinosaurs had a totally different pelvic bone structure to that
ofbirds, the bone being totally unsuited to flight,and that their
totally different femur bones in particular made any such transition
completely impossible utterly repudiate the Darwinist claim on the
subject. In addition, this has been openly admitted by Darwinist
scientists. This perfectly preserved fossil has been deliberately
brought up in an attempt to neutralize this huge Darwinist collapse
admitted even by Darwinists themselvesand with the aim of making
people to forget this defeat. The fact is, however, that Darwinist
frauds just make Darwinists more ridiculous with every passing day.
But Darwinists have a problem with admitting this fact.
The Limusaurus inextricabilis fraud has taken its place as yet another
embarrassment in the history of Darwinism. Similar Darwinist
falsehoods arestill published in various popular publications by the
Darwinist dictatorship that is unwilling to accept defeat. But through
the works of Harun Yahya the global rout of Darwinism has been made
plain for all to see.Allah created the universe and all the living
things in it within a perfect harmony and brings each one into being
separately. Allah shows, with His glorious works and evidence, that
chance can play no role in the creation of life. Our advice to
Darwinists is that they accept the fact of Creation, which is well
known to everyone else, and stop making claims that have already been
rebutted. - - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/
▓███▓ - -