General, - Darwinism, - Why is NTV so willing to embarrass itself with such nonsense as “We evolved while cooking meat”?

Share ::-

- -

- -

As we all know, the world has been held captive by atheist masons and atheist Zionists’ wide-ranging and organized plans and Darwinist propaganda for the last century and a half. Through this comprehensive propaganda, institutions of state had to defend the heretical theory of evolution, schools had to teach it and teachers had to instruct their students in it, despite not believing it themselves. So shamelessly has this propaganda been disseminated that despite the theory of evolution being an astonishingly false and irrational lie, some people have been put in the willing or unwilling position of vigorously espousing this primitive thesis.
Darwinists never anticipated certain developments in the 21st century. They never imagined this unintelligent theory, devoid of any scientific or logical basis, would be so easily defeated. In deciding to raise new generations with this theory, they never even dreamed THAT THE NEW GENERATION WOULD MAKE FUN OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION. They never even ADMITTED THE POSSIBILITY that when the whole world had submitted to this unbelievable theory SOMEONE WITH THE COURAGE TO ANNIHILATE THE THEORY WOULD EMERGE. But everything they never imagined has come true.
That is the origin of Darwinists’ current bafflement.
Darwinists cannot deceive a population 99% of whom do not believe in evolution
NTV’s broadcasts are a small accompaniment to the crowd in question who have so wasted their time and been so seriously defeated. NTV’s position is a bit different to that of the others, however, because the media group in question IS TRYING TO DECEIVE A SOCIETY 99% OF WHOSE POPULATION DO NOT BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION. However,
We have news for NTV:
*.Turkish society HAS BEEN READING THE MORE THAN 300 BOOKS, WATCHING DOCUMENTARIES AND PERUSING ARTICLES BY HARUN YAHYA, which demolish evolution with concrete evidence, ever since the 1980s.
*.EVERY MEMBER of this society IS WELL AWARE, even if he knows very little about the subject and has never received any education in biology, THAT NOT EVEN A SINGLE PROTEIN CAN COME INTO BEING BY CHANCE AND THAT 60 PROTEINS ARE NEEDED FOR ONE TO COME INTO BEING.
*.This society has learned that more than 300 million fossils prove the fact of Creation AND THAT NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL EXISTS.
*.Just about all Turkish people have studied theAtlas ofCreation, page by page, through which they can access free of charge over the internet and which uses fossil evidence to refute all the unscientific claims of evolution.
*.People in this society have seen with their own eyes at fossil exhibitions the evidence that refutes evolution AND HAVE TOUCHED THESE FOSSILS THAT PROVE CREATION WITH THEIR OWN HANDS.
*.The younger generation has attended some 2000 SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCES IN JUST ABOUT ALL OF TURKEY’S 81 PROVINCES that refute the theory of evolution in their own schools, universities and conference halls.
*.Students ARE REACTING AGAINST teachers who try to deceive their pupils by telling them about evolution and questions about evolution imposed on exam papers ARE BEING HURRIEDLY REMOVED.
*.If we ask any citizen on any street in any Turkish province, THEY WILL SAY THAT THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS A HUGE FRAUD AND A TERRIBLE DECEPTION.
It is terribly illogical to defend the fraud of evolution and to imagine that people will still believe in it in such a climate. Everyone in Turkey, from 7 to 70, knows perfectly well THAT NO MONKEY EVER TURNED INTO A HUMAN BEING BY COOKING MEAT. To imagine that the Turkish nation, whose superior virtues act as a model for all countries, will believe in this nonsense, to so underestimate that nation, means to think that they are completely gullible, and that is a grave and total error. This glorious nation is far more intelligent and foreseeing than Darwinists could ever imagine. The fact that 99% of people in Turkey do not believe in evolution is an explicit reflection of this.
Darwinists have suffered a huge and profound defeat all over the world
As a result of the works that emerged from Mr. Adnan Oktar’s 30-year intellectual struggle, Darwinists have suffered a stunning defeat they never expected. This is something they never calculated for. The more they strive to rescue their theory, they greater the effect of the reaction they attract. The fact that people are abandoning this theory in droves, despite the Darwinist conditioning all over the world, is the clearest sign that their awareness on the subject has been raised and that they now think in the light of the scientific evidence.
People have now seen the Sun. It is enough for them to have seen the Sun for just a second. It is now impossible to convince them that there is no such thing outside, as the Sun. That is why broadcasting organizations striving to spread Darwinist indoctrination under the direction of certain forces are aware they have been dealt a heavy blow and that there is now nothing else for them to do in order to defend the theory of evolution. The few examples we are witnessing these days are mere death throes. As a small media group trying to follow these Darwinists who have been so globally defeated, NTV is engaged in the same hopeless endeavors, but it is suffering an even worse disappointment, and the reports it issues to that end are a serious embarrassment to it. Our advice to NTV is, instead of imitating Darwinist broadcasts that have been profoundly defeated across the world and that nobody takes seriously, they should go out on the streets and see what people really think, see how intelligently and open mindedly people think and thus see how they do not believe in the nonsense that is Darwinism. In that even, NTV and media organizations that engage in similar Darwinist propaganda will see how they are being humiliated by tales such as “we evolved while cooking meat.” They will realize that they cannot deceive the Turkish people, and we hope that they will then cease espousing such nonsense.








:: Share ::

- PUBLISHERNajimudeeN M

General, - Darwinism, - The Archaeoraptor Dino-bird forgery exposed by Jerry Bergman, PhD

Share ::-

- -

- -

Fraud in Evol: Archaeorapter ref ck’ed 12/20/10 CL MAS
Abstract
The history of the brief life of the Archaeoraptor forgery was reviewed. The claim that the fossil was a dinosaur-bird transitional form consisting of a bird-like body and a dinosaur-like posterior turned out to be a fake. The forgery illustrates some of the difficulties of interpreting the history of life from teeth and bones. It also illustrates how easy it is to fool the authorities, although in this case the forgery was so poorly done that it was exposed within a matter of months.
Introduction
One of the most recent forgeries used to prove evolution is that of Archaeoraptor liaoningensis, commonly called Archaeoraptor. Dubbed the evolutionary find of the century, it purportedly proved that birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs. The find was first announced in October 1998 at a press conference at the National Geographic Society in Washington, D.C. The announcers included paleontologist Philip J. Currie of the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Paleontology in Drumheller’ Alberta; Stephen Czerkas of the Dinosaur Museum in Blanding, Utah; and Xing Xu of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology in Beijing.
The first documentation about the Archaeoraptor find was published in a full-color, well-illustrated feature article in the November 1999 issue of The National Geographic Magazine. The article touted it as “a missing link between terrestrial dinosaurs and birds that could fly” (Sloan, 1999, pp. 99). Rowe et al., wrote that the
Archaeoraptor fossil was announced as a “missing link” and [was] purported to be possibly the best evidence since Archaeopteryx that birds did, in fact, evolve from certain types of carnivorous dinosaur[s]. It reportedly came from Early Cretaceous beds of China that have produced other spectacular fossils transitional between birds and extinct non-avian dinosaurs (2001, p. 539).
The find, “once proclaimed as a key intermediate between carnivorous dinosaurs and birds,” turned out to be a Piltdown man forgery story all over again (Zhou, Clarke, and Zhang, 2002, p. 285; Bergman, 2003, 2006). It is part of what some now consider an epidemic of fraud in science, especially in the area of evolution (Feder, 2006: Chang, 2002; Rowe et al., 2001).
The fossil was discovered in the northeastern province of Liaoning, China, the location of many new putative feathered dinosaur species. The National Geographic Society “trumpeted the fossil’s discovery ... as providing a true missing link in the complex chain that connects dinosaurs to birds” (Simons, 2000, p. 128). The turkey sized Archaeoraptor was also used by certain prominent paleontologists to prove that birds evolved from dinosaurs and provided a “long-sought key to a mystery of evolution” (Simons, 2000, p. 128).
The “missing link between terrestrial dinosaurs and birds that could actually fly” which had the “arms of a primitive bird and the tail of a dinosaur” was touted as a “true missing link in the complex chain that connects dinosaurs to birds” (Sloan, 1999, p. 100). The “true missing link” soon “soared off in a burst of media fame” (Chin, 2000, p. 2221).
Suspicions Arise Early
The fossil caused no small sensation. Nature reported that as a result of the find the “palaeontology community has been rocked by a Chinese ‘bird’ fossil that may be a new species” (Dalton, 2000a, p. 689). The importance of the fossil was indicated by the 1.6 million dollar price set on it by the insurer because the experts judged it as “an important link in dinosaur and bird evolution” (Dalton, 2000a, p. 689). Nonetheless, suspicions about the fossil arose early. Monastersky wrote that
Red-faced and downhearted, paleontologists are growing convinced that they have been snookered by a bit of fossil fakery from China. The “feathered dinosaur” specimen that they recently unveiled to much fanfare apparently combines the tail of a dinosaur with the body of a bird (2000, p. 38).
The paleontologists had doubts because of “the concerns about the tail” due to the fact that the bones connecting it to the body are missing and the slab showed signs of reworking. The dinosaur-bird evolution supporters had convinced themselves, however, that the two parts belonged together as part of one animal until they could no longer deny the overwhelming evidence against this conclusion (Monastersky, 2000, p. 38).
Xu Xing evaluated the fossil and found a “strong resemblance” between the rear half of an unnamed dinosaur and the Archaeorapter (Grant, 2007, p. 78). High-resolution computed X-ray tomography evaluations confirmed Xing’s evaluation. He now had clear evidence that the fossil consisted of two “unmatched pieces, skillfully pasted over” (Simons, 2000, p. 130). The body has now been identified as that of the fossilized fish-eating bird called Yanornis martini and the tail as that of the small winged dromaeosaur Microraptor zhaoianus (Zhou, Clarke, and Zhang, 2002, p. 285). M. zhaoianus was a medium-to-large sized animal—all known specimens of M. zhaoianus are larger then Archaeopteryx except a recently discovered example (Xu, Zhou, and Wang, 2000, p. 705).
The forgery was not skillfully done but was “put together badly and deceptively” by, it appeared, amateurs (Simons, 2000, p. 130). When carefully examined by X-ray tomography “it took about five minutes” to determine that the fossil had been faked (Dalton, 2000b). In the end the whole story involved “zealots and cranks,” “rampant egos clashing,” “misplaced confidence,” and “wishful thinking” (Simons, 2000, p. 128). Simons adds that this is a story in which not one of those involved was entirely innocent (2000, p. 128).
Even the original article noted that the bird section was part of a bird more advanced than Archaeopteryx, the “earliest known bird,” but the tail was “strikingly similar to the stiff tails of a family of predatory dinosaurs called dromaeosaurs.” Before the forgery’s exposure the scientist supporters rationalized these major contradictions by claiming that this “mix of advanced and primitive features is exactly what scientists would expect to find in dinosaurs experimenting with flight” As Chin notes, “none of these problems sank in at the National Geographic” and so they printed their story (2000, p. 2221). This is one more example of evolution misleading research, resulting in incorrect conclusions, which is exactly what happened in the Piltdown fiasco.
Paleontologist Philip Currie, a leader of the dinosaur-to-bird evolution theory and a member of the National Geographic Scientific team that supported the validity of the find, said “this embarrassment will follow me the rest of my life” (Friend, 2000, p. 2A). The editor of the National Geographic Magazine claimed that the Archaeoraptor article was “reviewed by six leading paleontologists” and the staff worked on the story “for a full year” to insure accuracy and high standards of both facts and presentation (Allen, 2000, p. 541). None of these six experts detected the hoax.
Conclusions
In the end, the Archaeorapter fiasco was “a disaster for science” (Dalton, 2000a, p. 690). In a field based on little empirical evidence, many assumptions, and strong personalities, the Archaeoraptor affair was not surprising. It also illustrates the conflicts historically common among scientists in the paleontology field (Chang, 2002). The unprofessional, at times even fraudulent, behavior of the leading participants in this case is far from what one would expect from highly trained professionals. Holden concluded that a problem in paleontology is the fact that this field naturally excites much interest because of our curiosity about the origins of life, and
because conclusions of emotional significance to many must be drawn from extremely paltry evidence, it is often difficult to separate the personal from the scientific in disputes raging within the field. … The primary scientific evidence is a pitifully small array of bones ... One anthropologist has compared the task to that of reconstructing the plot of War and Peace with 13 randomly selected pages. Conflicts tend to last longer [than in other fields] because it is so difficult to find conclusive evidence to send a theory packing (1981, p. 737).
The fact is, paleontology is an “unexacting kind of science” (Medawar, quoted in Hill, 1986, p. 209). Tattersall and Schwartz have even questioned if paleoanthropology is a hard science. And, although the whole field of paleontology field is more sophisticated today, the fact remains that “modern as the undertaking has become, it continues to be riddled with controversies and dominated by personalities” (Holden, 1981, p. 737). The unmasking of forgeries and new research is forcing so many revisions in the evolution field that a Time magazine senior science editor wrote that, as a former science teacher, many facts he believed to be true in evolution have been found out to be false. He later reminisced that “just about everything” he taught his students in this area has turned out to be wrong (quoted in Headland, 1997, p. 605). This is not the first major forgery used to prove evolution, nor will it be the last (Chin, 2000). Nor is evolutionary biology the only scientific discipline where fraud is a problem. The related area of archaeology, which shares several features with that of paleontology, has had its share of fraud as well (Feder, 2006). Nonetheless, much progress has been made in these fields in the last century by many dedicated researchers.
References
Allen, William. 2000. “Fooled, but Not Foolish.” Nature, 404:541.
Austin, Steven A. 2000. “Archaeoraptor: Feathered Dinosaur from National Geographic Doesn’t Fly.” Impact, i-iv.
Bergman, Jerry. 2003. “A History of the Piltdown Hoax.” Rivista di Biologia/ Biology Forum. 96(3):457-484.
-. 2006. ‘The History of Hesperopithecus: The Human-Ape Link that Turned Out to be a Pig.” Rivista di Biologia/ Biology Forum. 99(2):205-224.
Chang, Kenneth. 2002. “On Scientific Fakery and the Systems to Catch It.” The New York Times Science Times, Tuesday, October 15, pp. 1, 4.
Chin, Gilbert. 2000. “Disappearing Discovery of the Year: Archaeoraptor.” Science 290:2221. December 22.
Dalton, Rex. 2000a. “Feathers fly over Chinese Fossil Bird’s Legality and Authenticity.” Nature. 403: 689-690.
-. 2000b. “Fake Bird Fossil Highlights the Problem of Illegal Trading.” Nature, 404:696.
Feder, Kenneth L. 2006. Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology. Fifth edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
Friend, Tim. 2000. “The ‘Missing Link’ That Wasn’t.” USA Today, 18(98):1A-2A.
Grant, John. 2007. Corrupted Science: Fraud, Ideology and Politics in Science. Surrey: Facts, Figures and Fun.
Headland, T.N. 1997. “Revisionism in Ecological Anthropology.” Current Anthropology 38: 605–630.
Hill, A. 1986. “The Gift of Taungs.” Nature, 323:209, September 18.
Holden, Constance. 1981. “The Politics of Paleoanthropology.” Science, 213:737-740.
Monastersky, R. 2000. “All Mixed Up Over Birds and Dinosaurs.” Science News, 157: 38.
Rowe, Timothy, Richard A. Ketcham, Cambria Denison, Matthew Colbert, Xing Xu, and Philip J. Currie. 2001. “The Archaeoraptor Forgery.” Nature, 410: 539-540.
Simons, Lewis M. 2000. “Archaeoraptor Fossil Trail.” National Geographic, 198(4):128-132.
Sloan, Christopher. 1999. “Feathers for T. Rex?” National Geographic, 196(5): 99-103. November.
Tattersall, Ian and Jeffrey H. Schwartz. 2002. Is Paleoanthropology Science? Naming new Fossils and Control of Access to Them. The Anatomical Record, 269:239–241.
Xu, Xing, Zhonghe Zhou and Xiaolin Wang. 2000. “The Smallest Known Non-Avian Theropod Dinosaur” Nature 408:705-708.
Zhou, Zhonghe, Julia A. Clarke and Fucheng Zhang. 2002. “Archaeoraptor’s Better Half.” Nature. 420:285.









:: Share ::

- PUBLISHERNajimudeeN M

General, - Darwinism, - Why these constant efforts to use Denisovan fossils as a vehicle for evolutionary propaganda?

Share ::-

- -

- -

What is it that induced Darwinists, whose lies have been constantly exposed for years now and who have thus been totally belittled and humiliated, to keep telling the same lies? The reason, of course, is their despair, defeatism and lack of any other way out.
Another important indication of Darwinists’ despair is the way that they keep bringing up frauds they already propagandized months before, as if nothing had happened and these had never been refuted. This is absolute proof of how Darwinism has collapsed. Because Darwinists have nothing more to speculate about and no more instruments with which to deceive people.
NTV, the most fanatical defender of Darwinist deceptions and the reports in question in Turkey, and other media organizations like Darwinist Science Daily website, are all trying to deceive people by again bringing up the issue of a fossil they refer to asDenisovanand herald as a third species in the fictitious evolution of man. They are waiting for time to pass and trying to make people forget the replies we have already issued on this subject. The fact is, however, that we produced several comprehensive exposures of the invalidity of this claim when they brought it up before and revealed the deception going on here in a very detailed manner. You can read our previous rebuttal here.
To summarize;
*.
A fossil finger and tooth dating back 30,000 years were discovered in the Altay mountains in Siberia.
*.
The tooth and bone fragment belonged to two different people living at the same time.
*.
Darwinists said that the bone fragment and tooth bore similarities to Neanderthals, and even toHomo erectus.
*.
DNA analysis of the finger showed that these life forms had the same genetic characteristics as today’s Polynesians (people living in New Guinea and other nearby countries).
*.
On the basis of these findings, and of the fact the fossil was discovered in Siberia, and since it was thus incompatible with the mythical migration out of Africa scenarios that evolutionists espoused, Darwinists then claimed that this life form was a “third species” that had evolved in a fictitious way.
*.
The fact is, however, that both Homo erectusand Neanderthalsare both normal human races. There are many people today who possess many characteristics of the races in question. It is therefore perfectly normal for the fossil discovered to also possess characteristics of these races.
*.
Migration out of Africa is a scenario fabricated by evolutionists themselves. (Darwinists claim that monkeys first began evolving into humans in Africa, from where they migrated to Europe having completed that evolution.) Darwinists maintain that this life form discovered in Siberia must have lost all characteristics belonging to Neanderthals and earlier human races. For that reason, the fossil in question does not fit into this false Darwinist scenario.Out of a state of despair, and because the fossil completely refutes their claims, Darwinists refer to it as “the cousin of the Neanderthals,” a “third species” that evolved in different places. Yet genetic research shows there is no difference between the fossil and human beings alive today. This fossil openly refutes evolution, despite these efforts to depict it is evidence for it.
As we have stated many times before, Darwinists employ many propaganda techniques. Since they are unable to directly employ science and scientific evidence, they use science for their propaganda and tell blatant lies. It appears that Darwinists’ new technique consists of constantly repeating propaganda tools that have already been discredited before. They hope that with the passage of time, people will forget the rebuttal that has already been issued. There is nothing surprising about this, bearing in mind that Darwinists have been relying on this fraud for their survival for the last 150 years.
What Darwinists fail, or pretend not to understand is this; if you tell someone in a sealed room that it is dark outside, they may perhaps believe it. But if you lift the curtains for just a second so they can see the Sun outside, they will never again believe that it is dark out there. There is no point trying to convince them otherwise. Because verbal suggestion is invalidated by concrete evidence. That is how people stand now. Everyone in the world has woken up to the fact that Darwinism is a deception. Whenever they see reports about evolution, they know they are being lied to. The one method of deception that Darwinists relied on for years, “suggestion with no supporting evidence,” no longer works. Because people have seen the Sun.
Darwinists must realize how demeaning this is and put an end to these hollow endeavors. They will always be confronted by the sublime and immaculate creation of Almighty Allah, Lord of the Worlds. Darwinism has been routed. Any efforts to resuscitate it will just humiliate Darwinists still further.







:: Share ::

- PUBLISHERNajimudeeN M