There Is No Such Thing as the “FirstSelf-reproducing Molecule That Gave Rise to Life”

The scenario regarding life that Darwinists have been rehearsing
ever since Darwin's time begins with a mythical "first cell" that
supposedly came into being spontaneously. This mythical first cell;
Was described in Darwin's day as "a small balloon filled with
water," because under the primitive conditions of the time, nobody
even knew what the cell really looked like.
It was irrationally suggested that this alleged first cell came
into being spontaneously in water.
It was claimed that all the varieties of life developed from this
first cell that came into being by chance.
Enormous scientific progress was subsequently made in the 20th
Century and the structure of the cell was fully revealed. It was
realized that;
A single cell has a more complex structure than the city of New York.
That it was impossible for even a single protein inside the cell,
let alone a cell itself, to come about spontaneously.
The idea that the cell came into being in muddy water is therefore
scientifically illogical and impossible.
These facts caused a terrible panic among Darwinists. The fact that
the theory of evolution had collapsed RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING OF LIFE
totally demoralized them. They wanted to conceal this fact. They
set about using the press and universities. "We can probably
manufacture protein in laboratories and are conducting
experiments," they said. "There are hypotheses that life began from
a single cell," they said. "We will prove our claims eventually,"
they said. But nothing changed over the next 150 years and no
evolutionary claim was ever proved. On the contrary, every new
scientific advance has proven that no protein can ever come into
being by chance.
Why Do Evolutionists in Turkey Still Espouse Claims That Darwinists
Elsewhere Have Abandoned?
Stunned by a succession of scientific defeats, Darwinists recently,
under the leadership of Richard Dawkins, began speaking of a
supposed "self-reproducing molecule." But even this did not rescue
the position, and even Dawkins had to publicly admit the illogical
nature of the claim, and thus that such a creation could only be
brought into being by a sublime intelligence.
Yes despite all these facts and scientific advances, evolutionists in
Turkey insist on repeating the idea. They reiterate such illogical
and unscientific ideas as, "We cannot speak of an advanced life
form, but we speak of an organization progressing toward life,"
"...the first self-replicating molecule created life," or "....life
emerging from inanimate matter is the result of the laws of nature,
and there is nothing to discuss about it." The reason for this is
that these people are unable to divorce themselves from the old,
fraudulent evolutionist conception of science.
There Is No Such Thing as a First Self-reproducing Molecule
Since Darwinists are unable to account for how a protein might have
formed spontaneously, they claim that the beginning of life was "a
first molecule capable of self-reproducing." First of all, there is
no such thing as a "self- reproducing molecule." If this molecule
was a protein, the smallest units inside the living cell, then it
must be borne in mind that proteins themselves have no "self-
reproductive" property. In order for a protein to be able to
self-replicate, IT NEEDS
Other proteins
DNA
Ribosomes
Endoplasmic reticulum
Cytoplasm
Energy manufacturing mitochondria
And the cell membrane.
IN SHORT,
A FULLY EQUIPPED CELL.
Therefore, the idea of a "self-reproducing molecule" is totally
fraudulent. It is impossible for a molecule not inside a living
cell to be able to take in energy from the outside and use it to
replicate itself . To refer to this as "an organization progressing
toward life" is demagoguery and a deliberate distraction.
"Organization progressing toward life" is a totally illogical term.
The smallest living thing is "a CELL." Only a cell and the
structures inside it can self-reproduce. Only a cell can take in
energy from the outside and use it. Only a cell can maintain its own
existence through its own organelles and the energy it takes in from
the outside.
To put it another way, there can be no supposed stages progressing
from the inanimate toward life . LIFE CAN NEVER COME FROM SOMETHING
INANIMATE. THAT IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. IT IS SCIENCE THAT SAYS
THIS, PROVEN, CONCLUSIVE, SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS. When Darwinists
say, "....there is scientific evidence that life formed from
inanimate matter," they are not speaking the truth. All research at
the molecular level has proved in the 20th Century that life cannot
come from what is inanimate; and this has been confirmed by
science in the 21st Century. Not even the presence of a protein is
enough for a living thing to form. In order to be able to explain
life, Darwinists have to account for the formation of a SINGLE
CELL. BUT THEY ARE STILL UNABLE TO ACCOUNT FOR HOW A SINGLE PROTEIN
MIGHT HAVE EMERGED SPONTANEOUSLY. A tiny protein inside the cell
totally demolishes Darwinism.