Distinguishing between atheist Zionism and Judaism

In the summer of 1982 there began a great savagery that caused
thewhole world to cry out in protest. The Israeli Army entered Lebanon
in a sudden attack, and moved forward destroying every target that
appeared before it. The Israelis surrounded the refugee camps, where
Palestinians lived who had fled the Israeli occupation years
before,and for two days used Lebanese Christian militias to slaughter
innocent civilians. Within a few days, thousands of innocent people
had been massacred.
This terrible Israeli terrorism outraged the whole world. The
interesting thing, however, is that some ofthe protests came from
Jews, even Israeli Jews. Professor Benjamin Cohen of Tel Aviv
University penned a statement on June 6, 1982, saying:
I am writing to you while listening to a transistor that has just
announced that 'we' are in the process of 'realizing our objectives'in
Lebanon: to insure 'peace' for the residents of Galilee. These lies
worthy of Goebbels make me mad. It is clear that this savage war, more
barbaric than any of those preceding it, has nothing to do with the
attempt in London or the security of Galilee... Jews, sons of
Abraham... Jews, victims themselves of so much cruelty, how can they
become so cruel? ... The greatest success of Zionism is the
'dejudaisation' of the Jews. 1
Benjamin Cohen was notthe only Israeli to oppose the Israeli
occupation of Lebanon. Many Jewish intellectualsliving in Israel
condemned the savagery carried out by their own state.
This attitude was not restricted to the occupation of Lebanon.
Israel's oppression of thePalestinians, its insistence on its policy
ofoccupation, and its links with the semi-fascist administrations in
the former racist regime in South Africa had been criticized for many
years by many prominent intellectuals in Israel. This Jewish criticism
wasaimed not just at the policies of Israel, but also at atheist
Zionism, its official ideology.
This situation is the expression of a very important truth: Israel's
policy of occupation andstate terrorism from 1967 up to the present
stems from the ideology of atheist Zionism, and many Jews in the world
are opposed to it.
For Muslims, therefore, the concepts that should be criticized are not
Judaism or the Jewish race, but Godless Zionism. In the same way that
an anti-Nazi can have no hatred for the German people, so he can have
none for theJewish race because he opposes atheist Zionism.
The Racist Roots of Atheist Zionism
After the Jews were expelled from Jerusalem in 70 AD, they began to
spread to different parts of the world. During this period of the
'diaspora,' which lasted up to the 19 th century, the vast majority of
Jews saw themselves as a religiousgroup. Over time, most Jews adopted
the religion of the countries they lived in. Jews in Germany, for
example, began to speak German, and those in Britain, English. Hebrew
was left as a sacred language used only in prayers and religious
texts. When certain social restrictionson Jews in European countries
were lifted in the 19th century, Jews began to assimilate withthe
societies they were living in. Most Jews saw themselves as a
'religious community,' not as a 'race' or 'nation.' They described
themselves as 'Jewish Germans,' 'Jewish Britons,' or 'Jewish
Americans.'
However, there was a huge rise in racism all over the world in the
19th century. Racist ideas, influenced in particular by Darwin's
theory of evolution, grew enormously and found many supporters
particularly in Western societies. Atheist Zionismwas the effect this
racist storm had among the Jews.
There are two varieties of Zionism today. The first of these is the
Zionist conception of thedevout Jewish people, who wish to live in
peace and security in Israel alongside Muslims,seeking peace and
wishing to worship in the lands of their forefathers and engage in
business. In that sense, Muslims support Zionism. We would fully back
the devout Jewish people living in peace and security in their own
lands, remembering God, worshipping in their synagogues and engaging
in science and trade in their own land.
The Zionist belief held bya devout Jew and based on the Torah does not
inany way conflict with the Qur'an. The Jews' living in that region is
indicated in the Qur'an, in which it is revealed that God has settled
the Children of Israel on it:
Remember when Moses said to his people, "My people! Remember
God'sblessing to you when He appointed prophets among you and
appointed kings for you,and gave you what He had not given to
anyoneelse in all the worlds! My people! Enter the Holy Land which God
has ordained for you. Do notturn back in your tracks and so become
transformed into losers."(Surat al-Ma'ida: 20-21)
It is the "irreligious, Godless Zionism" that weas Muslims condemn
andregard as a threat. TheseGodless Zionists, who do not defend the
existenceand oneness of God, but,on the contrary, encourage a
Darwinist, materialist perspective and thus engage in irreligious
propaganda, are also a threat to devout Jews. Godless Zionism is today
engaged in a struggle against peace, security and moral virtue, and
constantly produces strife and chaos and the shedding of blood.
Muslims and devout Jewsmust join forces to oppose this Godless Zionism
and encourage belief in God.
Judaism Is Not the Origin of Atheist Zionism
T he Jews who propagated the idea of Godless Zionism were people with
very weak religious beliefs, most of whom were atheists. They saw
Judaism as the name of a race, not as a community of belief. They
suggested that the Jews were a separate race from European nations,
that it was impossible for them to live together and that it was
essential they establish their own homeland. They did not rely on
religious thinking when deciding where that homeland should be.
Theodor Herzl, the founder of irreligious Zionism, oncethought of
Uganda, and this became known as the 'Uganda Plan.' The Zionists later
decided on Palestine. The reason forthis was Palestine was regarded as
'the Jews' historic homeland' rather than for any religious
significance it had for them.
The atheist Zionists made great efforts to get other Jews to accept
these non-religious ideas. In fact, the World Zionist Organization
thatwas set up for this purpose undertook vast propaganda work in all
countries with Jewish populations, and suggested that Jews could not
live peacefully with other nations and that they were a separate
'race,' for which reason they had to go and settle in Palestine. Most
Jewish communities ignored these calls.
In this way, atheist Zionism entered world politics as a racist
ideology which maintained that Jews should not live with other
nations. First of all,this mistaken idea created grave problems for
and pressure on Jewsliving in the diaspora. Then for the millions of
Muslims in the Middle East, it brought the Israeli policy of
occupation and annexation, together with bloodshed, death, poverty and
terror.
Many Jews today criticize this atheist and radical form of Zionist
ideology. Rabbi Hirsch, one of the foremost Jewish men of religion,
said, 'Zionism wants to define the Jewish peopleas a national entity
... which is a heresy.' 2
The famous French Muslim thinker Roger Garaudy wrote this on the subject:
The worst enemy of the prophetic Jewish faith is the nationalist,
racist and colonialist logic of tribal Zionism, born of the
nationalism, racism and colonialism of 19th century Europe. This logic
…inspired all the colonialisms of the West and all its wars of one
nationalism against another…There is no future or security for Israel
and no peace in the Middle East unless Israel becomes"dezionized" and
returns to the faith of Abraham, which is the spiritual, fraternal and
common heritage of the three revealed religions: Judaism, Christianity
andIslam. 3
For this reason, therefore, we must distinguish between devout Jews
and atheist Zionists. Not every Jew in the world holds such an
understanding of Zionism. In fact, atheist Zionists are a minority
inthe Jewish world. Moreover, there are a great many Jews who oppose
atheist Zionism's crimes against humanity,who want Israel to withdraw
at once from all the territory it has occupied, and say that instead
of being a racist 'Jewish state' Israel should be a free state where
all races and communities can live together in equality.
While Muslims rightfully oppose Israel and atheistZionism, they must
also bear these truths in mind, and remember that it is not the devout
Jews who are the problem, but atheist Zionism.
1 "Professor Leibowitz calls Israeli politics in Lebanon Judeo-Nazi"
Yediot Aharonoth , July 2, 1982
2 Washington Post , October 3, 1978
3 Roger Garaudy, "Right to Reply: Reply to the Media Lynching of Abbe
Pierre and Roger Garaudy", Samizdat , June 1996

--
- e-pln- - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com.my/m?sl=auto&tl=en&hl=en ▓███▓ - -

The sun's hydrogen and helium content

The Sun is made up of 70% hydrogen (H) and 28% helium (He) atoms. i
Other substances make up less than 2%. Six hundred million tons of
hydrogen are converted into 596 million tons of helium in the Sun
every second. The remaining 4 million tons is given off as heat and
light energy. ii In that sense, the first thing that comes to mind
when the Sun is mentioned is the letters H (hydrogen) and He (helium)
that stand for the Sun. All the 15 verses in Surat ash-Shams of the
Qur'an (Shams meaning 'Sun'), end in the letters H and E. The Arabic
equivalent of these letters are:
The Arabic form of the verses in Surat ash-Shams and the final letters
thereof can be seen below:
As can be seen, all the verses in Surat ash-Shams end in the letters
He and Elif. The letter H stands for hydrogen and He for helium. No
other Surah in the Qur'an ends in theletters HE in every verse from
beginning to end. It is therefore extremely striking how only this
Surah in the Qur'an endsin such a sequence of letters. Surat
ash-Shams's number, 91, is also highly significant. Apart from
hydrogen, there are 91 other elements in the Periodic Table, and these
are made up of hydrogen elements. To put it another way, all atoms.
From hydrogen, the lightest element, to the heaviest are intra-atomic
combinations of hydrogen atoms. For that reason, the H (hydrogen) atom
in the Sun makes up the other 91 elements in nature. iii
Almighty Allah has created all the details in nature, and is still
creating them. All our knowledge about such details is permitted to
usin order for us to comprehend the omniscience of our Lord.In one
verse, we are told:
Allah, there is no god but Him, the Living, the Self-Sustaining. He is
notsubject to drowsiness or sleep. Everything in the heavens and the
earth belongs to Him. Who canintercede with Him except by His
permission? He knows what is before them andwhat is behind them
butthey cannot grasp any ofHis knowledge save what He wills. His
Footstool encompasses the heavens and the earth and their preservation
does not tire Him. He is the Most High, the Magnificent. (Surat
al-Baqara, 255)
____________________________
i http://observe.arc.nasa.gov/nasa/exhibits/sun/sun_2.html;
http://www.nineplanets.org/sol.html
ii http://observe.arc.nasa.gov/nasa/exhibits/sun/sun_5.html
iii http://periodic.lanl.gov/elements/1.html;William D. Harkins, "The
Abundance of the Elements in Relation to the Hydrogen-Helium Structure
of the Atoms", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA
, April 1916, Vol. 4, pp. 216–224.

--
- e-pln- - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com.my/m?sl=auto&tl=en&hl=en ▓███▓ - -

Darwin's legacy confirmed on the 200th anniversary of his birth

In 1859, 150 years ago, Darwin said the following in his book the
Origin of Species :
WHY, if species have descended from other species by insensibly
finegradations, do we not everywhere see Innumerable
transItIonalforms? Why is not all nature In confusIon instead of the
species being, as we see them, well defIned?
Innumerable transItIonal forms must have exIsted, why do wenot fInd
them embeddedIn countless numbers In the crust of the earth?
Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of
such intermediate links?
Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic
chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection
which can be urged against mytheory. (Charles Darwin, The Origin of
Species, pp. 172, 280)
Darwin's words he uttered 150 years agohave now come true!
N ow, as Darwin saidin the 19th century, there is actually NO SUCH
THING AS A TRANSITIONAL FORM.
More than 100 million fossils have been unearthed in the Earth's
crust. Yet NOT ONE OF THEM IS A TRANSITIONAL FORM.
These 100 million fossils unearthed reveal that NATURE IS NOT IN A
STATE OF CONFUSION, as Darwin anticipated, BUT IS RATHER FULL OF
COMPLETE, PERFECT, FLAWLESS LIVING THINGS WITH ALL THEIR PARTS INTACT.
IN NO GEOLOGICAL FORMATION or STRATUM IS THERE ONE TRANSITIONAL FORM
FOSSIL that shows the alleged connection between living things.
Above all, new sciences have shown that CELLS , CHROMOSOMESand
PROTEINS ARE EXTRAORDINARILY COMPLEX.
It has been discovered that DNA possesses ENOUGH INFORMATION TO FILL
ONE MILLION ENCYCLOPEDIA PAGES and it is IMPOSSIBLE for such a
marvelous structure TO HAVE COME INTO EXISTENCE BY CHANCE.
It has been realized that atoms – the most basic building blocks of
everything – HAVE A PERFECT ORDER AND COMPLEXITY.
This glorious order and unique, flawless artistry on Earth has been
revealed as, again just as Darwin said, THE GRAVEST OBJECTION THAT
WOULD BE RAISED AGAINST HIS THEORY.
Contemporary Darwinists have confirmed the truth of this legacy:
Niles Eldredge (Paleontologist at Harvard University):
Indeed, the sudden appearance of a varied, well-preserved array of
fossils, which geologists have used to mark the beginnings of the
Cambrian Period (theoldest division of the Paleozoic Era ) does pose a
fascinating intellectual challenge . [1]
Derek W. Ager (Paleontologist at University College, Swansea):
The point emerges that if we examine the fossil record in detail,
whetherat the level of orders or of species, we find – over and over
again – not gradual evolution , but the sudden explosion of one group
at the expense of another . [2]
Mark Czarnecki (Evolutionist paleontologist):
A major problem in proving the theory [of evolution] hasbeen the
fossil record, the imprints of vanished species preserved in the
Earth's geological formations. This record has never revealed traces
of Darwin's hypothetical intermediate variants — instead, species
appear and disappear abruptly , and this anomaly has fueled the
creationist argument that each species was created by God . [3]
Carlton E. Brett (Professor of Geology at the University of Cincinnati):
Did life on Earth change steadily and gradually through time? The
fossil record emphatically says "no. " [4]
Dr. Colin Patterson (Evolutionist Paleontologist and Curator of
London's Natural History Museum):
You say that I should at least "show a photo of the fossil from which
each type of organism was derived." Iwill lay it on the line — there
is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertightargument .
[5]
David B. Kitts (Professor of the History of Science at Oklahoma University):
Evolution requires intermediate forms between species, and
paleontology does not provide them . [6]
Mark Ridley (Zoologist at Oxford University):
In any case, no real evolutionist . . . uses the fossil record as
evidence in favor of the theory of evolution as opposed to special
creation. . . [7]
Steven M. Stanley (Professor of Paleontology at the University of
Hawaii at Manoa):
The known fossil record fails to document a single example of phyletic
evolution [the evolution of a species' entire population into a new
species] accomplishing amajor morphologic [structural] transition and
hence offers no evidence that the gradualistic model [of evolution]
can be valid . [8]
Hoimar Von Ditfurth (A German Professor of Neurology and Psychiatry
and Evolutionist Science Writer):
When we look back, we see there is no need to have been surprised at
our failure to find those transitionalforms searched for almost
painfully. Because the great likelihood is that such transitional
stages neverexisted . [9]
Tom Kemp (Curator of The Zoological Collections at Oxford University:
In no single adequately documented case is it possible to tracea
transition, species by species, from one genus to another. [10]
Dr. Colin Patterson (Evolutionist Paleontologist and Curator of
London's Natural History Museum):
[Stephen Jay] Gould [of Harvard] and the American Museum people are
hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils .
[11]
We therefore congratulate Darwin!
From the scientific proofs of 21st century, it now appears that Darwin
was very foresighted indeed! 150 years ago, he said, "There is even
not one single transitional fossil." And now, millionsof fossil
specimens confirm that there is NOTONE SINGLE TRANSITIONALFORM FOSSIL
WHATSOEVER! Darwin's legacy has been proven right! On the 200th
anniversary of Darwin's birth, we congratulate Darwin on his prudence
and on this important prediction.
[1] Niles Eldredge The Monkey Business: A Scientist Looks at
Creationism, WashingtonSquare Press, New York, 1982, p.44
[2] Derek A. Ager, "The Nature of the Fossil Record," Proceedings of
the British Geological Association, Vol. 87, 1976, p. 133
[3] Mark Czarnecki, "The Revival of the Creationist Crusade,"
MacLean's, 19 January 1981, p. 56
[4] Carlton E. Brett, "Stasis: Life in the Balance." Geotimes, Vol.
40, Mar. 1995, p. 18
[5] From a letter dated 10 April, 1979, quoted in L. D. Sunderland's
Darwin's Enigma: Fossils and OtherProblems, 4th edition, Master Books,
1988
[6] David B]. Kitts, "Paleontology and Evolutionary Theory," Evolution
, Vol. 28, September 1974, p. 487
[7] Mark Ridley, "Who Doubts Evolution?," New Scientist, Vol. 90; June
25, 1981, p. 831
[8] Stanley, Stephen M., Macroevolution--Pattern and Process, San
Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co., 1979, p. 39
[9] Hoimar Von Ditfurth, Dinozorların Sessiz Gecesi 2, ["The Silent
Night of the Dinosaurs 2"] p. 22.
[10] T homas S. Kemp, Mammal-Like Reptiles and the Origin of Mammals,
New York: Academic Press, 1982, p. 319
[11] Colin Patterson, letter to Luther Sunderland dated April 10,
1979, quoted in L.D. Sunderland Darwin's Enigma, p. 89

--


--
e- - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com.my/m?sl=auto&tl=en&hl=en ▓███▓ - -

The Virtues of Hijab

1.An act of obedience.
The hijab is an act of obedience to Allah and tohis prophet (pbuh),
Allah says in the Qur'an: `It is not for a believer, man orwoman, when
Allah and His messenger have decreed a matter that they should have an
option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His
Messenger, has indeed strayed in a plain error.' (S33:36).
Allah also said: 'And tell the believing women to lower their gaze
(from looking at forbidden things) and protect their private parts
(from illegalsexual acts, etc) and not to show off their adornment
except what must (ordinarily) appear thereof, that they should draw
their veils over their Juyubihinna.'(S24:31).
Juyubihinna: The respected scholars from As-Salaf As-Saleh (righteous
predecessors) differed whether the veil cover of the body must include
the hands and face or not. Today, respected scholars say that the
hands and face must be covered. Other respected scholars say it is
preferable for women to cover their whole bodies.
2.The Hijab is IFFAH (Modesty).
Allah (subhana wa'atala) made the adherence to the hijab a
manifestationfor chastity and modesty. Allah says: 'O Prophet!
Tellyour wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to
draw their cloaks (veils) over their bodies (when outdoors). That is
most convenient that they should be known and not molested.' (S33:59).
In the above Ayaah there is an evidence that the recognition of the
apparent beauty of the woman is harmful to her.When the cause of
attraction ends, the restriction is removed. This is illustrated in
the case of elderly women who may have lost every aspect of
attraction. Allah(swt) made it permissible for them to lay aside their
outer garments andexpose their faces and hands reminding, however,
that is still better for them to keep their modesty.
3.The hijab is Tahara (Purity)
Allah (swt) had shown us the hikma (wisdom) behind the legislation of
the hijab: `And when youask them (the Prophet's wives) for anything
you want, ask them from behind a screen, that is purer for your hearts
andtheir hearts.' (S33:53).
The hijab makes for greater purity for the hearts of believing men and
women because it screens against the desire of the heart. Without the
hijab, the heart may or may not desire. That is why the heart is more
pure when the sight is blocked (by hijab) and thus the prevention of
fitna (evil actions is very much manifested. The hijab cuts off the
ill thoughts and the greed of the sick hearts:
`Be not soft in speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease (of
hypocrisy orevil desire for adultery, etc) should be moved with
desire, but speak in an honorable manner.' (S33:32)
4.The hijab is a Shield
The prophet (pbuh) said:"Allah, Most High, is Heaven, is Ha'yeii
(Bashful), Sit'teer (Shielder). He loves Haya' (Bashfulness) and Sitr
(Shielding; Covering)." The Prophet (pbuh) also said: "Any woman who
takes off her clothes in other than her husband'shouse (to show off
for unlawful purposes), has broken Allah's shield upon her. "The
hadith demonstrates that depending upon the kindof action committed
there will be either reward (if good) or punishment (if bad).
5. The hijab is Taqwah (Righteousness)
Allah (swt) says in the Qur'an: `O children of Adam! We have bestowed
raiment upon you to cover yourselves (screen your private parts, etc)
and as an adornment. But the raiment of righteousness,that is
better.'(S7:26). Thewidespread forms of dresses in the world today are
mostly for show off and hardly taken as a cover and shield of the
woman's body. To the believing women, however the purpose is to
safeguard their bodies and cover their private parts as a
manifestation of the order of Allah. It is an act of Taqwah
(righteousness).
6.The hijab is Eemaan (Belief or Faith)
Allah (swt) did not address His words about the hijab except to the
believing women, Al-Mo'minat. In many cases in the Qur'an Allah refers
to the "the believing women". Aisha (RA), the wife of the prophet
(pbuh), addressed some women from the tribe of Banu Tameem who came to
visit her and had light clothes on them, they were improperly
dressed:"If indeed you are believing women, then truly this is not the
dress of the believing women, and if you are not believing women, then
enjoy it."
7. The hijab is Haya' (Bashfulness)
There are two authentic hadith which state: "Eachreligion has a
morality and the morality of Islam is haya'" AND"Bashfulness is from
belief, and belief is in Al-Jannah (paradise)". The hijab fits the
natural bashfulness which is a part of the nature of women.
8.The hijab is Gheerah
The hijab fits the natural feeling of Gheerah, which is intrinsic in
the straight man who does not like people to look at his wife or
daughters. Gheerah is a driving emotion that drives the straight man
to safeguard women who are related to him from strangers. The straight
MUSLIM man has Gheerahfor ALL MUSLIM women Inresponse to lust and
desire, men look (with desire) at other women while they do not mind
that other men do the same to their wives or daughters. The mixing of
sexes and absence of hijab destroys the Gheerain men. Islam considers
Gheerah an integral part of faith. The dignity of the wife or daughter
or any other Muslim womanmust be highly respected and defended.

--
- e-pln- - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com.my/m?sl=auto&tl=en&hl=en ▓███▓ - -