ALLAH's Zikr

Abu Darda narrated that Rasool Allah said,"Should I not tell you of
such a thinga which are the best and purest deeds in the court of your
Lord, high in ranks (darajat), better for you then spending gold and
silver (in Allah's path), and better than slaying the neck of the
enemy during war? The Sahaba said, "Yes, Oh Rasool Allah! ." He said,
"Itis Zikr of Allah." (Tirmizi)
Abu Huraira narratedthat Rasool Allah said,"Any gathering in which
people sit and do not do Zikr of Allah and do not send Durood upon
their Prophet is of loss for them. If Allah wills, give them azab
(punishment) and if wills, forgive them." (Tirmizi)
Abu Huraira narratedthat Rasool Allah said,"Allah Tabaraka wa Ta'ala
says when a person moves his lips forZikr of Allah, I am with him. "
(Bukhari)
Abu Huraira narratedthat Rasool Allah said,"Allah Tabaraka wa Ta'ala
says I am closer to my slave than his supposition of which he keeps of
me. And when he/her does Zikr of Allah,I am with him/her. If he does
Zikr in his heart, I do his Zikr near MY proximity (closeness) and if
he does Zikr in a gathering, I mention him in a gathering Afdhal
(better) than it. (Bukhari)
Abu Musa Ash'ari narrated that Rasool Allah said, "He/She who does
Zikr of Allah and he/she who doesn't,their example is of like an alive
and a dead. (Bukhari)
Abu Huraira said thatRasool Allah said, "The angels look for those who
do Zikr of Allah on the paths. Whenthey find those who are doing Zikr
of Allah then they call each other, "Come, your desired has been
found." Then thoseangels cover those are doing Zikr of Allah up to the
skies of this world with their wings. And Allah Rabbul Izzat says
about them to those angels "What are my slave doing?" Though Allah
knows more than those angels. The angels say, "Those people are doing
your Tasbeeh, Tahmeed, and Tamjeed."Rab Ta'ala says, "Have they seen
me?" The angels say, "We swear byyour pure Entity, they have not seen
you." Rab Ta'ala says to them, "If they had seen me then what would be
their state?" The angels say, "If they could've seen you then they
would do your Tamjeed and your Tasbeeh even more."
Rab Ta'ala says, "What slaves are asking from me?" The angels say,
"They are asking for Jannat from you." Rab Ta'ala says, "Have they
seen Jannat?" The angelssay, "We swear by Your Pure Entity, they have
not seen Jannat." Rab Ta'ala says, "If they had seen Jannat then what
would be their state?" The angels say, "If these people had seen
jannat then their greed, desire, and inclination for it would
increase. Rab Ta'ala says, "What else are they doing?" The angels say,
"They are seeking refuge." Rab Ta'ala says, "From what are they
seeking refuge?" The angels say, "They are seeking refuge from Hell."
Rab Ta'ala says, "Have they seen Hell?" The angels say, "Oh Rab, we
swear by Your Pure Entity, they have not seen it." Rab Ta'ala, "If
they had seen it then what would be their state?" The angels say, "If
they had seen it then they would run even further away from it and
fear it even more.
Rab Ta'ala says, "angels, Be witnesses that I have forgiven them." An
angelsays, "There is one person amongst them who is not part of those
who do Zikr, he is there for some necessity of his/her." Rab Ta'ala
says, "These are such people that even those sitting among them are
not deprived." (Bukhari)
Anas narrated that Rasool Allah said, "When you pass by gardens of
paradise, eat fruits of them. The Sahaba said, "What are the gardens
of Paradise?" He said, "The gatherings of Zikr." (Tirmizi)
Abu Huraira narratedAbu Saeed Khudri said that Rasool Allah said,
"Whenever a Jama'at (a group of people) sits for Zikr of Allah, the
angels surround it. Blessing covers that Jama'at. And peace and calm
descends on them. And Allah mentions them to the angels present in
HIScourt. (Muslim)
Ameer Muaviah narratedthat the Rasool Allah passed by a Jama'at and
asked them, "Why have you gathered here?" Some people of the Jammat
replied, "We have gathered here for the Zikr and Hamd of Allah because
by guidingus towards Islam He did favor on us. Rasool Allah said, "By
Allah, have you gathered only for this (purpose)?" They said, "By
Allah, we have gathered here only for such purpose. Rasool Allah said,
"I did not give you oath because ofany imputation (doubt) rather it is
because Jibraeel came to me and told me that Allah Azzawajal boasts of
you in the gathering of the angels. (Muslim)
Abdullah Bin Abbas narrated that Rasool Allah said, "The Shaitan
sticks to the heart of the child of Adam. When he does Zikr of Allah,
he (the Shaitan) runs away fromhim. And when the child of Adam becomes
careless from the Zikr of Allah, the Shaitan beginsto put was-wasah
(evil suggestions) into his heart. (Bukhari)
Abdullah Bin Umar narrated that Rasool Allah said, "Don't have a
conversation [without] Zikr of Allah. Because talking too much without
Zikr of Allah is the reason for the heart's hardness andwretchedness.
And that person becomes distant from Allah in whose heart there is
wretchedness. (Tirmizi)
Abudullah Bin Bisr narrated that one person asked, "Ya RasoolAllah!
There are manycommands on me of Islam. Tell me of such a thing which I
may hold on to steadfast. Rasool Allah replied, "Always keep your
tongue wet from Zikr of Allah." (Tirmizi)
Abdullah Bin Bisr narrated that a villager came to the Holy Court
ofRasool Allah and asked, "Which man is thebest?" Rasool Allah said,
"It is the luck and good-fortune of that person whose life is longand
his deeds are good."He asked, "Ya Rasool Allah! Which deed is the
best?" Rasool Allah said, "Your tongue bewet from Zikr of Allah when
you part from this world. (Tirmizi)
Muaaz bin Jabal narrated that Rasool Allah said, "The people of Jannat
will only regret that momentwhich had been empty of Zikr of Allah."
(Beheqi)

--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

1,5 million year old footprints is a brand new, shocking, severe blow to the imaginary evolution

The 21st century is the century when the collapse of Darwinism is
declared. Following the unveiling of 100 million fossils declaring the
collapse of Darwinism, the greatest blow to the theory is a newly
found human foot print fossil. Contrary to all the Darwinist claims,
this fossil indicates that CONTEMPORARY MAN WAS LIVING 1,5 MILLION
YEARS AGO
Darwinist scientists who uncovered the fossil agree that the fossil
theydiscovered in Kenya is THE SAME WITH THE CONTEMPORARY MAN. Among
the foot prints discovered, there is also one belonging to a child.The
measurements madeaccording to the size of the foot print, gaps between
fingers and thedepth of the earth revealthat the particular feet
print, which was discussed in Science magazine and then in news
channels such as Reuters and BBC News , belongs to a human being of
1.79-1.80 (5 feet 9 inches). The very same measurements alsomake it
possible to understand the weight, stride length and the gait. ALL
THESE MEASUREMENTS MADE ON THE FOOTPRINT REVEALED THOSE OF THE
CONTEMPORARY MAN. 1
As is also understood from the footprint, the thumb of this person, AS
IS THE CASE WITH CONTEMPORARY MAN, is parallel to other fingers. These
prints had an arch in the foot THE WAY CONTEMPORARY MAN HAS and short
fingers DEFINITELY CERTIFY UPRIGHT POSITION. 2
David Braun, a researcher of the South Africa Cape Town University,
states the following about the fossil:
"It was kind of creepy excavating these things to see all of a sudden
something that looks so dramatically like something that you yourself
could have made 20 minutes earlier in some kind of wet sediment just
next to thesite,"
Braun added:
"These could quite easilyhave been made on the beach today."
This fact, which is openlyconfessed by Darwinist scientists and
Darwinists publications, is not likelyto be rejected. Claiming until
presence that contemporary man appeared on Earth 200,000 years ago,
Darwinists made up an imaginary scenario of evolution and made
speculations upon it. However this foot print dating back to 1.5
million years, has the potency to remove all Darwinist speculations.
There are millions of fossils refuting Darwinism. However, as is
seen openly, even a single one of them has the potency to totally
eliminate this obsolete theory.
It is High Time DarwinistsShould Put an End to Homo Erectu s Hoax
Despite this definite, clear and perfect fact, some of the Darwinist
publications have not neglected to continue evolutionist propaganda,
which theyhave made a tradition of, and claimed that these footprints
belong to Homo Erectus . HOWEVER, THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT LIE.
Homo Erectus story is thefalse ring required by the fraudulent
sequence made up by Darwinists for the imaginary evolution of man.
Darwinists deceived people for years by placing Austrolapitecus ,
which is in its real sense an ape lineage, in this imaginary sequence,
and Homo Erectus , which is no different from contemporary man,between
man and ape.
The most important references of evolutionists in calling Homo Erectus
"primitive"are its skull's volume (900-1100 cc.), which is smaller
than contemporary man's average skull volume, and its thick eyebrow
protrusion. However, there are also many people living in our day
having the same average skull volume with Homo Erectus (for instance,
pigmy) and there are also eyebrow protrusions in various races. (for
instance Australian Aborigines). Itis a known fact that intelligence
changes not according to the brain's volume but according to the
organization within the brain. Consequently, it is not possible to
label Homo Erectus as "primitive."
In this particular example it is clear that readers are face to face
with Darwinist propaganda. The fossil in question is a footprint. We
can understand the basic features of the living being mentioned above
from the footprint and itprovides important information. However, itis
not possible to determine the skull volume of a human or the thickness
of eyebrow protrusion from this footprint. As mentioned before, even
if the living being possesses the features inquestion, this will not
show that it is different from contemporary man.It will only show that
it isthe same with one of theraces in our day, that is all.
Homo Erectus story is an outdated claim that is not even advocated by
Darwinists themselves. Making up such a great lie even in the case of
such an important footprint fossil related tothe fraudulent nature of
the story of the evolution of man, simplymeans to disdain readers and
scientists, and is a grave accusation directed toward them. The
scientific evidence refuting Darwinism will no longer be removed with
the same fake methods.
Conclusion:
The process that began with the emergence of 100 million fossils
proving Creation, which Darwinists strive to hide with care, is going
on today with acceleration. The scenario of human evolution Darwinists
try to inculcate in people's minds for years by displaying fake skull
s hasended in an amazing defeat. By the hands of Darwinist scientists,
Allahunearthed an extraordinary evidence from the soil. In an
undeniable way, Allah showed them that no living being, including
human beings, has ever changed. Darwinist scientists have
confessedthis in Darwinist publications in their own words. Allah,
with His name al-Jabbar (The Powerful, the Irresistible) made them
confess Darwinism's collapse. THIS IS AN INEVITABLE END OF DARWINISM.
THIS IS THE PROMISE OF OUR LORD. The Glorious Allah will eliminate
this deviant hoax and definitely solidify the truth.
... By His Words Allah wipes out the false and confirms the truth. He
knows what the heart contains. (Surat ash-Shura, 24)
1 http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE51P82420090227?feedType=nl&feedName=usmorningdigest
2 http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE51P82420090227?feedType=nl&feedName=usmorningdigest
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ -
-

The Vatican has surrendered to Darwinists

The Vatican, the symbol of Christianity, HAS OFFICIALLY SURRENDERED TO
THE DARWINIST DICTATORSHIP.
Instead of praising Almighty Allah (God), introducing the
beautiescreated by Him and joyfully reaching out to people and
remembering our Lord as the One and Only by showing Allah's sublime
creative power, THE VATICAN IS MAKING PROPAGANDA FOR DARWINISM, which
is currently leading the world toward atheism and a system of
repression.
The Vatican HAS SUBMITTED TO THE THREATS OF THE DARWINIST
DICTATORSHIP,which has taken over the whole world with threats and
despotism.
The way the Vatican plays host to Darwinist propaganda is truly
disgraceful. Not only has the Vatican hosted the best-known
representatives of Darwinist propaganda and supported their ideas, it
has also led the way IN SILENCING proponents of Creation during an
activity it arranged under the name of a scientific conference. At
this conference, held at the Vatican and the scene of evident and
blatant atheist propaganda, PROPONENTS OF THE FACT OF CREATION WERE
PREVENTED FROM TAKING PART, THE MICROPHONE WAS TAKEN AWAY FROM
PROPONENTS OF CREATIONwho wished to ask questions during the
proceedings, and those people WERE EVEN ESCORTED OUT OF THE HALL. The
only reason forthis utterly unscientific and despotic behavior is that
Darwinists cannot tolerate the question "Do you have a single piece of
transitional fossil evidence?" that they have no answer to give to it
AND HAVE BEEN DEFINITELY VANQUISHED IN THE FACE OF IT. Under the
effect of their total rout, Darwinists sought asolution in completely
uncivilized behavior andimagined that they could secure victory, not
with scientific evidence, but by taking microphones away and trying to
have their intellectual adversaries thrown out of the conference hall.
According to the Reuters report, however, "charges of censorship,
undemocratic and unacademic behaviour began flying," and the Vatican
blatantly sided with Darwinism instead of with faith in Allah.
The Vatican is making a terrible mistake by playing host to such major
Darwinist propaganda. Terrified by the threats of Freemasons, atheists
andcircles intent on inflicting irreligiousness and oppression on the
world, it defended a deviant religion instead of the truth. It made
the mistake of thinking that these forces that act out of falsehood
are actuallyvery powerful. Yet they failed to consider that they have
no power at all in the face of the Omnipotence of Almighty Allah, and
that they are supporting a cause that has been defeated right from the
very start. And the Vatican IS FALLING INTO AGRAVE ERROR with that
attitude. It has rocked true believers' trust in it. The whole world
now knows, through the evidence provided in the Atlas of Creation ,
that evolution is a lie. By claiming that evolution is not
incompatible with Christianity and, moreover, being a mere spectator
to the silencing of proponents of Creation by the Darwinist
dictatorship inits own home, the Vatican has attracted thecriticism of
the whole Christian world.
Almighty Allah will definitely protect sincerebelievers who strive on
His path and definitely grant them victory. The Vatican, which has
forgotten this under pressure from a superstitious ideology, must put
matters right. Itmust not forget that no power other than Allah can
bestow any good or harm, and it must espouse belief in Allah by
opposing Darwinism.
Darwinists imagine they can succeed with these sinister plains aimed
against the Christian world. Yet all their activities of this kind
have always ended in people turning to Allah and embracing Him more
closely. Indeed, that seems to be what is happening now from the
global reactions to the Vatican. Darwinists and those across the world
who have undertaken to espouse Darwinism and atheism HAVE BEEN ROUTED.
By Allah's leave, they will see the signs of that defeat in an even
more powerful manner in the days ahead. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -

How can Dawkins explain the perfect eye in our brains?

The main reason why Darwin said, "the thought of the eye mademe cold
all over" is the fact he had no explanation to offer in the face of
the eye's extraordinary complexity. But the fact is that Darwin knew
verylittle about the eye. Genetics had not been discovered in his day,
there were no electron microscopes and nobodyeven dreamed what
microbiology was to reveal. Subsequent scientific advances revealed
the extraordinary structure of the eye in all its glory. Since even
the level of knowledge of the 19th century was sufficient toalarm
Darwin, who knows what he would have done had he known what we know
today.
Modern-day Darwinists are silent in the face of this extraordinarily
complex structure. Underthe burden of this defeat, the atheist Richard
Dawkins is trying to supposedly offer an explanation for the
complexity of the eye. He maintains that an organ such as the eye,
which possesses irreducible complexity and can only function when 40
components are all present and fully formed, can actually function if
not fully formed, despite this being scientifically impossible.
The fact is that the eye ceases to function entirely even in the
absence of ocular fluid alone. It is deprived of all function if there
are no eyelashes, no oil producing glands inside the eye or if the
optical focusing function ceases.If the eye is to function as an eye
it is essential that it have its perfect structure together with all
its component parts.
However, the really essential matter, and that which inflicts the
greatest defeat on Darwinists when it comes to the eye, is that IT IS
NOT IN FACT THE EYE THAT SEES AT ALL. Dawkins and other Darwinists
appear quite certain that it is the eye that sees and seek to bring a
materialist explanation to bear. But they are mistaken.
It is the photon that strikes the eye, and an electric signal that
travels from the eye to the brain. Departing from the eye, the
electricsignal reaches an area the size of a lentil known as the
visual cortex. And an image forms in this lentil-sized area. THERE IS
AN EYE thatsees the image that forms here. AND THAT "EYE" IS THE
ACTUAL PERFECT EYE. That eye sees the electricity reaching it. And it
perceives it with a perfect sense of depth, vividly, in motion and in
three dimensions, in bright colors and flawlessly. Yet that area is
totally dark. The place the signal is transmitted to, the visual
cortex and the interior of the brain are all in pitch darkness. But
the eye there sees a vivid image, clearer and more perfect than any
produced by even the most advanced technology. And it interprets these
images, feels sadness, joy, love and liking, performs analyses,
remembers things and draws conclusions. How is Dawkins supposed to
account for this eye?
It is impossible for Dawkins to account for itat all.
That is because the eye that perceives this moving, colored and
three-dimensional worldin our brains is OUR SOUL . The soul is
completely metaphysical and cannotbe explained in terms of any
material concept. That is why materialists, atheists and Darwinists,
who seek to account for the existence of the soul and everything in
material terms are in a state of panic. The soul bestowed on human
beings by Allah (God) totally demolishes Darwinism and all
intellectual systems espoused by Darwinists. That is why all atheists,
such as Dawkins, avoid all face-to-face discussion of the subject.It
is understandable for them to seek a solution by avoiding the issue
because they will alwaysbe defeated in the face of the perfection of
the seeing eye in our brains and the soul created by Allah.

--
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -