The antichrist and his order referred to in the New Testament are
misunderstood and misinterpreted by some Christians. The system of the
antichrist described in the New Testament that will appear to be
peaceful but will then engage in cruelty is atheist Freemasonry. And
the Masonic system described in the New Testament is also in full
agreement with the hadith handed down from our Prophet (saas). As
described in the hadith of our Prophet (saas) and in the New
Testament, a false prophet known as the antichrist will appear in the
final age of the world and will deceive people by appearing to be
religiously devout, and there will be a person beside him, who will
also come in sight a false prophet. As it is stated in the New
Testament and also in the hadith, the antichrist, will bring the whole
world under his rule, will trail masses of people by the virtue of his
devout guise, but willactually inflict cruelty on the world. He will
be recognized through this oppression.
One of the hadith of our Prophet (saas) concerning the antichrist
reads as follows:
There has not been a prophet before me who did not frighten his
community with the antichrist. His left eye will be askew and there
will be a membrane overhis right eye. And the word "kafir (infidel)"
will be written on his brow. There will be two valleys beside him
known as Paradise and Hell. What he calls Paradise is the Hell, and
what he calls Hell is the Paradise.
There will be two angels beside him dressed as prophets , one on his
right and one on his left.This unity is to test people.
The antichrist will ask them:
"—Am I not your Lord? I slay and I resurrect."
One of the angels will say:
"—You are lying!"
However none but the angel beside him will hear these words. The
second angel will say to the first:
"—You speak the truth."
The words of the second angel will be heard by the people there and
they will conjecture that those words are spoken to confirm the
antichrist.This is also to test people. He will then march on to
Medina. When he could not enter, he says; "This is his country!" He
will then march on to Damascus, where Allah will destroy him at the
place known as "Akabet-ul Efik."
(Hadith related by Safina(RA), Ramûz al- Ahâdith. 140/11)
The New Testament describes the antichrist who will appear as a false
prophet as :
"Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies
gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and his
army. But the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who
had performed the miraculous signs on his behalf. With these signs he
had deluded those who had received the mark of the beast and worshiped
his image. The two of them were thrown alive into the fiery lake of
burning sulfur. The rest of them were killed with the sword that came
out of the mouth of the rider on the horse, and all the birds gorged
themselves on their flesh. (Revelation 19/19-21)
" Beware of false prophets , who come to you in sheep's clothing but
inwardly are ravenous wolves." (Mathews 7:15)
"At that time if anyone says to you, 'Look, here is the Christ!' or,
'There he is!' do not believe it. For false Christs and falseprophets
will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the
elect—if that were possible. See, I have told you ahead of time.
(Matthew 24/ 23-25)
"..The whole world was astonished and followedthe beast. Men worshiped
the dragon because he had given authority to the beast , and they also
worshipedthe beast and asked, 'Who is like the beast? Who can make war
against him?'" (Revelation 13/3-4)
The current system of the antichrist is under the management of
atheist freemasonry. The leader of world atheist freemasonry is at
work and the false prophet beside the antichrist is the leader of the
masonic Moonies sect. He has at this time declared his own
prophethood. Together they have been dragging the world to a gradually
increasing heresy and corruption. The dominion of the Masonic system
upon theworld is still going on.
This means that, the prophecies in the New Testament have thus come
true, as has what Rasulullah says in the hadith. However this didnot
happen in the way that certain Christians interpreted. Because these
certain Christians should understand that these prophecies in the New
Testament in fact do carry very different meanings.
The antichrist, which hasbeen mentioned in the prophecies of the New
Testament, which actually is the blood shedding idea which needs to be
opposed intellectually is the "atheist freemasonry and the Moonies
sect affiliated to it." World atheist freemasonry and its leader and
the leader of the Moonies sect, whofalsely claims to be a prophet, are
at work and acting together. Both claim to be acting in the name of
peace and love, but have actually led people to heresy.
The communism, fascism, Darwinism and atheism that global atheist
freemasonry has inflicted on the world have always claimed to have
positive objectives, but in fact they have deceived vast masses of
people and shed blood by inciting war and conflict. Atheist
freemasonry led the wayto mass slaughter and inflicted degeneration on
societies by using all these heretical ideologies. It claimed to be
acting in the name of peace, love and brotherhood but actually swamped
the world in corruption. Freemasonry still dominates the world. And
still claims to support peace. However people like Marx, Stalin,
Lenin, Hitler, Mussolini, Franco and Darwin, who dragged the world
into a tumult, were all high-ranking Masons. These people either
shedblood themselves at the command of the antichrist or caused blood
to be shed. They caused utter confusion in the world and were
responsible for the deaths of 250 million people across the world. The
true face of the antichrist only became apparent after the assumption
of global dominion. The system of the antichrist is today recognizable
from the oppression and perversion for which it isresponsible.
This century is the world's last. According toall three revealed
religions, the remaining life span of the world is just 150 years.
After that will come Doomsday. All of the prophecies mentioned in the
New Testament have come true.
The time for salvation has now come. The age we are living in is a
very holy one in which the Prophet Jesus will returnto earth and
Hazrat Mahdi (as) will appear. Ifall believers, no matter what their
faith, supportone another this will totally thwart the antichrist's
plan. By Allah's leave, unity among devout Christians, Jews and
Muslims will bestow justice, peace, love and friendship on the world,
and thus the influence ofthe antichrist will be brought to a complete
end. War and conflict will come to an end and moral virtues will rule
the world. This is the promise of our Lord.
BELIEVERS MUST NOT FALL INTO MASONS' VILE TRAPS>>>
THE PLACE WHERE THE SYSTEM OF ANTICHRIST - ATHEIST FREEMASONRY - HAS
SETTLED IN TO PREVENT RELIGIOUS OBLIGATIONS IS THE SOLOMON'S MASJID
>>>
ATHEIST FREEMASONRY, THE SYSTEM OF THE ANTICHRIST (DAJJAL), DECEIVES
PEOPLE PRETENDING TO BE DEVOUT >>>
FOR OTHER RELATED ARTICLES PLEASE VISIT
http://www.mahdi-antichrist-freemasonry.com/ - - ▓███▓
Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
"GENERAL ARTICLES"
- Tamil -- Urdu -- Kannada -- Telugu --*-
Share
"BISMILLA HIRRAHMAAN NIRRAHEEM"
WELCOME! - AS'SALAMU ALAIKUM!!
******** *****
*****
[All] praise is [due] to Allah, Lord of the worlds; -
Guide us to the straight path
*- -*
* * In this Blog; More Than Ten Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah} - Most Usefull Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And All Articles & Get Benifite!
* Visit :-
"INDIA "- Time in New Delhi -
*- WHAT ISLAM SAYS -*
-
Islam is a religion of Mercy, Peace and Blessing. Its teachings emphasize kind hear tedness, help, sympathy, forgiveness, sacrifice, love and care.Qur’an, the Shari’ah and the life of our beloved Prophet (SAW) mirrors this attribute, and it should be reflected in the conduct of a Momin.Islam appreciates those who are kind to their fellow being,and dislikes them who are hard hearted, curt, and hypocrite.Recall that historical moment, when Prophet (SAW) entered Makkah as a conqueror. There was before him a multitude of surrendered enemies, former oppressors and persecutors, who had evicted the Muslims from their homes, deprived them of their belongings, humiliated and intimidated Prophet (SAW) hatched schemes for his murder and tortured and killed his companions. But Prophet (SAW) displayed his usual magnanimity, generosity, and kind heartedness by forgiving all of them and declaring general amnesty...Subhanallah. May Allah help us tailor our life according to the teachings of Islam. (Aameen)./-
''HASBUNALLAHU WA NI'MAL WAKEEL''
-
''Allah is Sufficient for us'' + '' All praise is due to Allah. May peace and blessings beupon the Messenger, his household and companions '' (Aameen) | | |
| | |
|
Share
Follow Me | |
**
Share
-
-*- *: ::->
*
Thursday, May 9, 2013
The concealment of Cambrian fossils for 70 years is a deception
The Cambrian Period is one of the oldest in natural history and took
place 543-490 million years ago. Prior to that, life consisted of
single-celled organisms and a few multi-celled organisms, but during
it the whole extraordinary variety of life emerged suddenly, in fully
formedand perfect states. All of these life forms have
extraordinarily complex features, totally unlike those that went
before them and of the kind belonging to living things today. This
meansthat the Cambrian Perioddeals another deadly blow to the theory
of evolution.
The fossils of Cambrian Period life forms providespecimens of 55
different phyla , including those in existence today. ( Phylum : the
largest category after the "world" in the classification of living
things according to theirbasic physical characteristics.) To put it
another way, present-day living things and even more were around with
all their perfect basic physical structures 540 million years ago.
(The current number of phyla is 35.) Cambrian life forms are identical
to present-day living things that exhibit a flawless complexity. This
repudiates Darwin's fictitious evolutionary tree and overturns the
false development set out for this mythical process. According to
Darwin's theory of evolution, following the formation of the first
cellby chance, single-celled organisms must have ruled the world.
After that, the active life that began with simple structured
multi-celled organisms must continue in the form of asingle, water
dwelling phylum . The number of phyla should increase gradually, and
the number of species should grow in proportion. But the reality
revealed by the Cambrian findings is very different. Things happened
in the exact reverse to Darwin's imaginary evolutionary tree, with a
greater diversity than that in existence today appearing right from
the beginning of naturalhistory, immediately after single-celled
organisms. (For details see The Cambrian Evidence That Darwin Failed
to Comprehend, Harun Yahya )
It will certainly be devastating for someoneutterly devoted to
Darwinist ideology to discover this. As one of the most loyal
followers of this heretical religion Charles Doolittle Walcott,a
paleontologist and also director of the Smithsonian Institute, one of
the best-known museums in the United States, was appalled by the
diversity in the Cambrian fossils he began discovering in 1909. During
his research, which he continued until 1917, he collected a total of
65,000 fossils. These all belonged to complex Cambrian life forms.
Bearing in mind Darwinist frauds, it comes as no surprise that these
fossils, which heralded the destructionof Darwinism, were immediately
hidden away by the same Darwinist who found them. Walcott decided
toconceal these fossils, which so terrified him asthey threatened to
demolish the superstitious faith of which he was a member and so
contradicted his own beliefs. He locked the photographs he had taken
and other documentation away in drawers in the Smithsonian Museum.
These special and important fossils would only see the light of day 70
years later.
The Israeli scientist Gerald Schroeder comments:
Had Walcott wanted, he could have hired a phalanx of graduate students
to work on the fossils. But he chose not to rock the boat of
evolution. Today fossil representatives of the Cambrian era have been
found in China, Africa, the British Isles, Sweden,Greenland. The
explosion [in the Cambrian Period] was worldwide. But before itbecame
proper to discuss the extraordinary nature of the explosion, the data
were simply not reported. 1
The Cambrian fossils found by Walcott in Burgess Shale were
re-examined decades after his death. A team of experts known as the
"Cambridge Group" made up of Harry Blackmore Whittington, Derek Briggs
and Simon Conway Morris conducted a detailed analysis of the fossils
in the 1980s. And they concluded that the fauna was much more diverse
and extraordinary than Walcott had determined.They announced their
opinion that some of thefossils could not be classified under the
categories of life known today, for which reason they represented
different phyla from those currently in existence. Life forms emerged
suddenly, in perfect and complex states, in the Cambrian Period
490-543 million years ago.
The conclusion was so unexpected for Darwinists that
scientistsreferred to this sudden activity as an "explosion." The
"Cambrian Explosion" was one of the most incomparable and inexplicable
phenomenain the history of science for evolutionist scientists. As a
result of these findings confronting theoreticians of evolution, who
were already at a dead-end in all areas, they should have put an end
to the tales they developed for propaganda purposes and returned to
the "problem of the beginning of life." (Of course, this was a problem
for Darwinists, who had no rational andscientific explanation forthe
origin of life. Anyoneacting logically and scientifically can clearly
see that life and the universe are the work ofAlmighty Allah.)
Darwin'simaginary tree of life had been turned upside down, and the
position was now in total conflictwith the fundamental logic of the
theory of evolution.
Darwinists are still silent on the subject on the Cambrian Explosion
that exhibits higher life forms and Allah's magnificent Creation.
Darwinists have gone very quiet in the face of these extraordinary
findings and behave literally as if they did notexist. They publish
countless deceptive scenarios they have dreamed up about the history
of life in scientific journals, but try to avoid reminding people of
this huge phenomenon of 540 million years ago and how it totally
refutes thetheory of evolution. Charles Doolittle Walcott,who did this
quite blatantly, is the greatest proof and instance of the dimensions
that the deception of Darwinism can assume.
If Darwinism were really a science, if the proponents of Darwinism
really were scientists, then findings of such enormous scientific
value, such a huge discovery, would be highlighted and discussed as a
matter of urgency on scientific websites and in books and articles.
The fact that the opposite applies, the reason for this eagerness to
hide concrete scientific findings away, stems from Darwinism not being
a science but rather a false religion that has emerged as a stratagem
on the part of the antichrist. Built on a lie, this theory tries to
survive through falsehoods. The concealment of the Cambrian fossils is
just one of the scientific deceptions perpetrated in the name of
Darwinism.
1 Gerald Schroeder, "Evolution: Rationality vs. Randomness,"
http://www.geraldschroeder.com/evolution.htm - - ▓███▓
Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
place 543-490 million years ago. Prior to that, life consisted of
single-celled organisms and a few multi-celled organisms, but during
it the whole extraordinary variety of life emerged suddenly, in fully
formedand perfect states. All of these life forms have
extraordinarily complex features, totally unlike those that went
before them and of the kind belonging to living things today. This
meansthat the Cambrian Perioddeals another deadly blow to the theory
of evolution.
The fossils of Cambrian Period life forms providespecimens of 55
different phyla , including those in existence today. ( Phylum : the
largest category after the "world" in the classification of living
things according to theirbasic physical characteristics.) To put it
another way, present-day living things and even more were around with
all their perfect basic physical structures 540 million years ago.
(The current number of phyla is 35.) Cambrian life forms are identical
to present-day living things that exhibit a flawless complexity. This
repudiates Darwin's fictitious evolutionary tree and overturns the
false development set out for this mythical process. According to
Darwin's theory of evolution, following the formation of the first
cellby chance, single-celled organisms must have ruled the world.
After that, the active life that began with simple structured
multi-celled organisms must continue in the form of asingle, water
dwelling phylum . The number of phyla should increase gradually, and
the number of species should grow in proportion. But the reality
revealed by the Cambrian findings is very different. Things happened
in the exact reverse to Darwin's imaginary evolutionary tree, with a
greater diversity than that in existence today appearing right from
the beginning of naturalhistory, immediately after single-celled
organisms. (For details see The Cambrian Evidence That Darwin Failed
to Comprehend, Harun Yahya )
It will certainly be devastating for someoneutterly devoted to
Darwinist ideology to discover this. As one of the most loyal
followers of this heretical religion Charles Doolittle Walcott,a
paleontologist and also director of the Smithsonian Institute, one of
the best-known museums in the United States, was appalled by the
diversity in the Cambrian fossils he began discovering in 1909. During
his research, which he continued until 1917, he collected a total of
65,000 fossils. These all belonged to complex Cambrian life forms.
Bearing in mind Darwinist frauds, it comes as no surprise that these
fossils, which heralded the destructionof Darwinism, were immediately
hidden away by the same Darwinist who found them. Walcott decided
toconceal these fossils, which so terrified him asthey threatened to
demolish the superstitious faith of which he was a member and so
contradicted his own beliefs. He locked the photographs he had taken
and other documentation away in drawers in the Smithsonian Museum.
These special and important fossils would only see the light of day 70
years later.
The Israeli scientist Gerald Schroeder comments:
Had Walcott wanted, he could have hired a phalanx of graduate students
to work on the fossils. But he chose not to rock the boat of
evolution. Today fossil representatives of the Cambrian era have been
found in China, Africa, the British Isles, Sweden,Greenland. The
explosion [in the Cambrian Period] was worldwide. But before itbecame
proper to discuss the extraordinary nature of the explosion, the data
were simply not reported. 1
The Cambrian fossils found by Walcott in Burgess Shale were
re-examined decades after his death. A team of experts known as the
"Cambridge Group" made up of Harry Blackmore Whittington, Derek Briggs
and Simon Conway Morris conducted a detailed analysis of the fossils
in the 1980s. And they concluded that the fauna was much more diverse
and extraordinary than Walcott had determined.They announced their
opinion that some of thefossils could not be classified under the
categories of life known today, for which reason they represented
different phyla from those currently in existence. Life forms emerged
suddenly, in perfect and complex states, in the Cambrian Period
490-543 million years ago.
The conclusion was so unexpected for Darwinists that
scientistsreferred to this sudden activity as an "explosion." The
"Cambrian Explosion" was one of the most incomparable and inexplicable
phenomenain the history of science for evolutionist scientists. As a
result of these findings confronting theoreticians of evolution, who
were already at a dead-end in all areas, they should have put an end
to the tales they developed for propaganda purposes and returned to
the "problem of the beginning of life." (Of course, this was a problem
for Darwinists, who had no rational andscientific explanation forthe
origin of life. Anyoneacting logically and scientifically can clearly
see that life and the universe are the work ofAlmighty Allah.)
Darwin'simaginary tree of life had been turned upside down, and the
position was now in total conflictwith the fundamental logic of the
theory of evolution.
Darwinists are still silent on the subject on the Cambrian Explosion
that exhibits higher life forms and Allah's magnificent Creation.
Darwinists have gone very quiet in the face of these extraordinary
findings and behave literally as if they did notexist. They publish
countless deceptive scenarios they have dreamed up about the history
of life in scientific journals, but try to avoid reminding people of
this huge phenomenon of 540 million years ago and how it totally
refutes thetheory of evolution. Charles Doolittle Walcott,who did this
quite blatantly, is the greatest proof and instance of the dimensions
that the deception of Darwinism can assume.
If Darwinism were really a science, if the proponents of Darwinism
really were scientists, then findings of such enormous scientific
value, such a huge discovery, would be highlighted and discussed as a
matter of urgency on scientific websites and in books and articles.
The fact that the opposite applies, the reason for this eagerness to
hide concrete scientific findings away, stems from Darwinism not being
a science but rather a false religion that has emerged as a stratagem
on the part of the antichrist. Built on a lie, this theory tries to
survive through falsehoods. The concealment of the Cambrian fossils is
just one of the scientific deceptions perpetrated in the name of
Darwinism.
1 Gerald Schroeder, "Evolution: Rationality vs. Randomness,"
http://www.geraldschroeder.com/evolution.htm - - ▓███▓
Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
The claim that archaeopteryx is the ancestor of birds is a deception
The fossil bird discovered in Germany in 1860 and given the name
Archaeopteryx harbored certain characteristics unlike those of
today's birds. Darwinists used the teeth in its jaw, claws onits wings
and long tail astools for speculation andthe bird was hastily compared
to reptiles and heralded, in the absence of any scientific foundation,
as a reptile-bird transitional form.
But this claim was a terrible deception.
Soon after Darwinists had mythologized Archaeopteryx as a false
transitional form, the fossil bones were examined in detail, and it
emerged that this life form was not in fact a "primitive bird"
exhibiting an imaginary passage from reptiles to birds, that its
skeleton and feather structure were actually ideally suited to flight,
and that the features compared to those of reptiles were actually to
be found in birds that had lived in the past and even in some that
were still alivetoday. The pro-Darwinistjournal Science openly stated
this fact:
Archaeopteryx probably cannot tell us much about the early origins of
feathers and flight in true protobirds because Archaeopteryx was, in a
modern sense, a bird." 1
Archaeopteryx is a mosaic life form containing characteristics from
different species. Mosaic forms interest scientists with their complex
structures and are described as living things harboring features
belonging to various species. The deception that Darwinists
perpetrated regarding Archaeopteryx stems from the fact the fossil
belongs to a mosaic form. The fact is, however, that like all thelife
forms in existence today, mosaic organismsare complex examples
ofCreation. The French biophysicist Pierre Lecomte du Nouy makes this
admission on the subject:
We are not even authorized to consider the exceptional case of the
Archaeopteryx as a true link. By link, we mean a necessary stage of
transition between classes such as reptiles and birds, or between
smaller groups. An animal displaying characters belonging to two
different groups cannot be treated as a true link as long as the
intermediary stages have not been found, and as long as the mechanisms
of transition remain unknown. 2
Many Darwinist circles have actually made that admission. Two of the
20th century's best known Darwinists, Stephen Jay Gould and Niles
Eldredge, who were responsible for thepunctuated evolution deception,
also agree that Archaeopteryx cannot be regarded as a transitional
form. 3 Jonathan Wells admits the fact that the fossil does not
constitute evidence for evolution and that scientific circleshave
agreed this in the words "The world's mostbeautiful fossil, the
specimen Ernst Mayr called 'the almost perfectlink between reptiles
and birds,' has been quietly shelved, and the search for missing
links continues as though Archaeopteryx had neverbeen found." 4 But
the interesting thing is that although Darwinists scientists have made
that confession, efforts are still made to depict the Archaeopteryx
fossil as a transitional form in Darwinist publications. Jonathan
Wells sets out the position:
Some biology textbooks continue to present Archaeopteryx as the
classic example of missing link. Mader's 1998 Biology calls it "a
transitional link between reptiles and birds," and William Schraer and
Herbert Stolte's 1999 Biology : The Study of Life tells students that
"many scientists believe it represents an evolutionary link between
reptiles and birds. 5
There can be no doubt that this stems from a desire to persist in this
huge fraud. Because Darwinists are unable to abandon their theories in
the absence of any transitional forms, they instead try to produce
false ones. That explains the desperate and fraudulent attempts to
keep Archaeopteryx on the agenda.
______________________________________
1 Hank Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws"What Evolutionists Don't Want You To
Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, p. 19
2 Hank Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws"What Evolutionists Don't Want You To
Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, p. 22
3 Hank Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws"What Evolutionists Don't Want You To
Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, p. 22
4 Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, Regnery Publishing, Inc., p. 135
5 Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, Regnery Publishing, Inc., p. 134
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ -
-
Archaeopteryx harbored certain characteristics unlike those of
today's birds. Darwinists used the teeth in its jaw, claws onits wings
and long tail astools for speculation andthe bird was hastily compared
to reptiles and heralded, in the absence of any scientific foundation,
as a reptile-bird transitional form.
But this claim was a terrible deception.
Soon after Darwinists had mythologized Archaeopteryx as a false
transitional form, the fossil bones were examined in detail, and it
emerged that this life form was not in fact a "primitive bird"
exhibiting an imaginary passage from reptiles to birds, that its
skeleton and feather structure were actually ideally suited to flight,
and that the features compared to those of reptiles were actually to
be found in birds that had lived in the past and even in some that
were still alivetoday. The pro-Darwinistjournal Science openly stated
this fact:
Archaeopteryx probably cannot tell us much about the early origins of
feathers and flight in true protobirds because Archaeopteryx was, in a
modern sense, a bird." 1
Archaeopteryx is a mosaic life form containing characteristics from
different species. Mosaic forms interest scientists with their complex
structures and are described as living things harboring features
belonging to various species. The deception that Darwinists
perpetrated regarding Archaeopteryx stems from the fact the fossil
belongs to a mosaic form. The fact is, however, that like all thelife
forms in existence today, mosaic organismsare complex examples
ofCreation. The French biophysicist Pierre Lecomte du Nouy makes this
admission on the subject:
We are not even authorized to consider the exceptional case of the
Archaeopteryx as a true link. By link, we mean a necessary stage of
transition between classes such as reptiles and birds, or between
smaller groups. An animal displaying characters belonging to two
different groups cannot be treated as a true link as long as the
intermediary stages have not been found, and as long as the mechanisms
of transition remain unknown. 2
Many Darwinist circles have actually made that admission. Two of the
20th century's best known Darwinists, Stephen Jay Gould and Niles
Eldredge, who were responsible for thepunctuated evolution deception,
also agree that Archaeopteryx cannot be regarded as a transitional
form. 3 Jonathan Wells admits the fact that the fossil does not
constitute evidence for evolution and that scientific circleshave
agreed this in the words "The world's mostbeautiful fossil, the
specimen Ernst Mayr called 'the almost perfectlink between reptiles
and birds,' has been quietly shelved, and the search for missing
links continues as though Archaeopteryx had neverbeen found." 4 But
the interesting thing is that although Darwinists scientists have made
that confession, efforts are still made to depict the Archaeopteryx
fossil as a transitional form in Darwinist publications. Jonathan
Wells sets out the position:
Some biology textbooks continue to present Archaeopteryx as the
classic example of missing link. Mader's 1998 Biology calls it "a
transitional link between reptiles and birds," and William Schraer and
Herbert Stolte's 1999 Biology : The Study of Life tells students that
"many scientists believe it represents an evolutionary link between
reptiles and birds. 5
There can be no doubt that this stems from a desire to persist in this
huge fraud. Because Darwinists are unable to abandon their theories in
the absence of any transitional forms, they instead try to produce
false ones. That explains the desperate and fraudulent attempts to
keep Archaeopteryx on the agenda.
______________________________________
1 Hank Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws"What Evolutionists Don't Want You To
Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, p. 19
2 Hank Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws"What Evolutionists Don't Want You To
Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, p. 22
3 Hank Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws"What Evolutionists Don't Want You To
Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, p. 22
4 Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, Regnery Publishing, Inc., p. 135
5 Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, Regnery Publishing, Inc., p. 134
- - ▓███▓ Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ -
-
Fathwa, - Ruling on Swallowing Blood during Prayer
Question
What is the ruling if one, who has a cut on the inside of his mouth,
swallows blood during prayer ?
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
, is His Slave and Messenger.
Swallowing blood from cuts in the mouth and tongue during prayer does
not invalidate the prayer, if it was done unintentionally. In such
acase, there is no harm in it and the prayer is valid. However, if the
worshipper swallows blood intentionally, the prayer is invalid. If one
swallows a very small amount of blood outside of prayer, there is no
harm in it, whereas it is better to spit it out. If theamount of blood
was significant, he is obliged to spit it out.
Allaah Knows best. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
What is the ruling if one, who has a cut on the inside of his mouth,
swallows blood during prayer ?
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify
that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad
, is His Slave and Messenger.
Swallowing blood from cuts in the mouth and tongue during prayer does
not invalidate the prayer, if it was done unintentionally. In such
acase, there is no harm in it and the prayer is valid. However, if the
worshipper swallows blood intentionally, the prayer is invalid. If one
swallows a very small amount of blood outside of prayer, there is no
harm in it, whereas it is better to spit it out. If theamount of blood
was significant, he is obliged to spit it out.
Allaah Knows best. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)