mechanism" in the 1800s.
Natural selection is in other words "natural choosing". The idea of
natural selection is based on the idea that powerful life forms well
adapted to their natural surroundings will survive. For example, in a
herd of zebra menacedby lions, it is those zebra that run fastest that
will survive.
Natural selection is certainly a mechanism observed among living
things in nature. But it does not possess the ability as imagined by
evolutionists of bestowing new features on life forms and thus
creating new species. 1
We can clarify this with an example: Let us imagine that in a
geographical region somewhere there are two similar kinds of dog,one
with longer fur and the other with relatively shorter. If the
temperature in this region falls significantly for some ecological
reason, then the longer haired dogs will be moreresistant than the
shorter haired ones. As aresult, the longer haired dogs will gradually
cometo have an advantage, meaning that they will live longer, and
reproduce and find foodeasier. After a while, the number of shorter
haired dogs will decrease considerably, and they will either migrate
to warmer climates or else become extinct. In other words, the longer
haired dogs will be favored by natural selection.
But note that no new breed of dog emerges during this process. One of
the two breeds that were already in existence acquired an advantage
through natural selection. It is not the case that as a result of
natural selection long haired dogs appeared where there had been none
before. It is in any case absolutely impossible forthese dogs to turn
into another species.
In short, new species and new characteristics do not appear by way
ofnatural selection, only the chances of survival of already existing
increasing species rise. Since no new species or characteristic form,
it is impossible to speak of "evolution" taking place.To put it
another way, no "evolution" comes about through natural selection.
Indeed, Darwin himself admittedas much:
Natural selection is incompetent to account for the incipient stages
of useful structures.
The well-known British evolutionist and paleontologist Colin Patterson
makes this confession on the subject:
No one has ever produced a species by mechanisms of natural selection.
No one has ever got near it and most of the current argument in
neo-Darwinism is about this question. 2
Natural selection is not amechanism that produces anything new and
thus causes species to change, one that works miracles, such as
causing a reptile to gradually turn into a bird. In the words of the
well-known biologist D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson, "... We see in natural
selection is not to create but to destroy—to weed, to prune, to cut
down and to cast into the fire." 3
Darwinists are therefore lying when they describe natural selection as
an evolutionary mechanism. Even thoughthey know full well that natural
selection does not bring evolution about, they still try to impose
this deception. Adopting the legacy inherited from Darwin and not
being able to invent a new mechanismfor their imaginary scenario make
them so devoted to this outdatedclaim, this terrible falsehood. There
are still Darwinist scientists today who adhere to this terrible lie.
Those who have seen that this lie cannot be maintainedhave come up
with another one. That is the idea that "mutations cause evolution."
1. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, 6th edition, 1859 (London:
J.M. Dent and Sons Ltd.,1971) - Nicholas Comninellis, Creative
Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, p. 84
2. Colin Patterson, "Cladistics", Interview by Brian Leek, Peter
Franz, 4 March 1982, BBC
3. Lee M. Spetner, Not By Chance, Shattering the Modern Theory of
Evolution, The Judaica Press Inc., 1997, p. 175 - - ▓███▓
Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -
No comments:
Post a Comment