The deception that there was no oxygen in the primeval atmosphere

Celal Şengör has claimed that life began with anaerobic bacteria that
breathe in an oxygen-free environment, that oxygen appeared gradually
on Earth and that oxygen-breathing bacteria then emerged as a result.
This is an explanation meant to support the claim that there was no
atmosphere in the primeval atmosphere. But such claim is wrong.
Darwinists maintain thatthere was no oxygen in the period when life
emerged, and that oxygen formed subsequently. Because the existence of
oxygen will entirely repudiate all their claims about thebeginning of
life. Darwinists know that when an amino acid forms in the primeval
atmosphere, in the way they maintain, oxygen will immediately burn it
up and destroy it. For that reason, they are unable to use oxygen in
experiments concerning the origin of life. And all experiments
conducted without oxygen have failed. The famous StanlyMiller
conducted his experiment in an oxygen-free environment, and he
subsequently had to admit that his conditionsdid not match those of
the real atmosphere.
Celal Şengör supports this deception that Darwinists have been putting
forward for many years now and claims that oxygen appeared on Earth
later. But this is wrong, because:
Rocks dating back 3.5 billion years have been discovered in geological
excavations. That is the time when Darwinists claim that life first
began. Traces of OXIDIZED IRON AND URANIUM have been found in the se
rocks. The oxygen level determined here is far greater than that
claimed by Darwinists for the period.
In addition, research has shown that the level of ultraviolet rays
reaching the Earth in that period was 10 timesgreater than that
estimated by Darwinists. This intense ultraviolet light must have
separated water vapor and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and have
given rise to oxygen.
If, as Darwinists claim, there were no oxygen inthe primeval
atmosphere then neitherwould there have been any ozone layer to
protect the Earth againstultraviolet radiation. In that case, it is
obvious that no organic moleculecould form in a world exposed to such
high levels of ultraviolet. I n conclusion, the presenceor absence of
oxygen in either case means an environment hostile to amino acids and
totally eliminates all Darwinist claims about the beginning of life.
The late American physicist Philip Abelson had this to say on this matter:
No ozone layer. If there were no oxygen in the atmosphere, there would
be no ozone either. Without the ozone layer, ultraviolet light would
destroy whatever life was formed. Ultraviolet light. Ironically, it
could do more damage in an atmosphere without oxygen. Just as oxygen
in the air would destroy the chemicals of life, ultraviolet light
beamingin through a sky unshielded by ozone would be deadly!
Recentstudies of the ozone layer have revealed that,without it, most
living organisms now on our planet would die within an hour, and many
within a second or two! Not with or without. Evolutionists are locked
into a situation here thatthey cannot escape from. Spontaneous
generation could not occur with oxygen, and it could not occur without
it! (Abelson, Some Aspects of Paleobiochemistry, Annals of the New
York Academy of Science, 69, 1957, p. 275) - - ▓███▓
Translator:-> http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -