Darwinists' great shame over their claims of chance

Darwinists taking part inthe program Sansursuz , broadcast on the
Haberturk channel on 14 August, 2009, resorted tothe most familiar
Darwinist tactic of recenttimes and attempted to retract their claims
of chance.
Having claimed, ever since the time of Darwin,that chance was the
onlyforce responsible for all of life, Darwinists have recently
performed an abrupt U-turn and changed their position, saying that
they never meant to refer to chanceat all. The reason for thisis that
the entire world has now realized the illogicality of chance andthat
Darwinists have justbeen embarrassing themselves because of it.
They therefore began producing new terms, hiding behind such concepts
as "let us say random rather than chance." In the light of these
claims, THEY IMAGINE THEY CAN SAVE THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION, an
unconscious process based on the unconscious activity of totally
unconscious atoms, THROUGH FALSE NAMES AND NOVEL TERMS THAT IN FACT
MEAN EXACTLY THE SAME THING.
Darwinists' tactic of reinventing the subject of "chance" is the same
as reinventing the subject of the "ape forebear." Darwinism is a
heretical belief that denies creation, the Creator (surely Allah is
beyond that) and therefore the conscious, the intelligence and the
design in living things, and that thus ascribes everything to blind
chance and random, haphazard and uncontrolled phenomena. Despite
Darwinism having no other definition, despite all Darwinists' accounts
being based on chance and despite their explicitdiscussions of chance
in all their publications, they still now say, "we did not really
refer to chance at all." This is just chance by another name.
In the same way that Darwinists have tried to change the name of the
"ape ancestor," they are now trying to change the name of chance. They
knew the humiliating position they put themselves in when they said
"we are descended from apes," and also know how it belittles them to
say thatthings "happened by chance." They are therefore trying to
change the name of this nonsense and are claiming "we never referred
to chance." When asked "so did a conscious entity do it all?" they
still say, "No." And when one asks them"Were all events under the
control of a consciousness, a mind?" they again say, "No."
THIS IS A DECEPTION. A thing either exists, or it does not. There is
either a plate on the table, or there is not. There is no third
possibility. Darwinists must therefore put an end to all their
demagoguery. All humanity is watching,in a state of utter
astonishment, the way they degrade themselvesby turning up such an
infantile dead-end. - - ▓███▓ Translator:->
http://translate.google.com/m/ ▓███▓ - -