6a]
Everyone, whether or not they take a great interest in this reality,
is by now well aware of it; the subject of Hazrat Mahdi (as) is being
discussed on domestic and foreign television and radio stations, on
chat programs, in newspapers and magazines, at conferences and on web
sites. There is no doubt that this is an important sign revealed in
the hadiths and foretelling the coming of Hazrat Mahdi (as):
"HAZRAT MAHDI (AS) WILL APPEAR, EVERYONE WILL SPEAK ONLY OF HIM, DRINK
OF HIS LOVE AND SPEAK OF NOTHING ELSE ." (Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi,
Al-Burhan fi Alamat al-Mahdi Akhir az-Zaman, p. 33)
People have not had thehonor of seeing a "Prophet" for the last 14
centuries. They have been unable to meet and see such a holy person
and to witness his deep faith, fear of Allah and superior moral
virtues. By Allah's leave, this time isnow the age when people will be
honored by a "Prophet" after 1400 years. Allah will send the Prophet
Jesus (as) back to Earth to support Hazrat Mahdi (as) in his struggle
against denial. On this second coming, the Prophet Jesus(as) will
adhere to the Qur'an and will be instrumental in the wholeChristian
world also obeying the Qur'an. The Prophet Jesus (as) will follow
Hazrat Mahdi (as) and they will establish theglobal dominion of
Islamic moral values under Hazrat Mahdi's (as) spiritual leadership.
This isa great blessing from Allah for people living in the current
century.
The İnvalidity Of TheClaim That ''Rna İs The Forebear Of Life''
The RNA world thesis is a supposed savior launched by Darwinists out
of a sense of despair at the failure of all experiments regarding the
beginning of life. But everyone who understands science and the
complexity of the cell will inevitably find it illogical for
Darwinists, who have never manufactured even a single protein, to make
such a claim. In the absence of a single protein of the first
imaginary cell they claim for the beginning of life, Darwinists claim
that RNA is responsible for the whole thing, in all its wondrous
complexity. Butwhen it comes to how RNA itself first appeared, they
are again, as always, silent.
· According to the RNA world thesis, a
hypothetical RNA molecule that came into being by chance manufactured
proteins in some way, after which DNA appeared by chance out of a need
for a secondmolecule to store all this protein information.
Darwinists, with their powerful imaginations, are still trying to
produce a single peptide bond in the laboratory, but seek to mislead
people by shamelessly propagating this impossible and unbelievable
scenario.
· Extraordinary complexity is a huge and insoluble
dilemma for Darwinists who are unable to account for how even a single
RNA nucleotide might have come into being.
· Even if we assume that the impossible happened
and came about by chance, proteins are still essential in order for
this entire mechanism to function. Inother words, RNA cannot perform
its function of producing a protein without proteins already being in
existence. Just like other proteins, in order for DNA and RNA to exist
and function, it is essential for the cell to exist beforehand, fully
equipped and with all its proteins and other organelles.
· A second major deception on this subject is the
claims maderegarding the function of RNA. RNA only contains
information about the structure of protein alone.RNA has no mechanism
tomanufacture protein.
· A protein is manufactured in an organelle called
the ribosome with the assistance of many enzymes as the result of
highly complex processes.The ribosome is a complex cell organelle
again made up of proteins. This therefore leads to the impossible
assumption that the ribosome, the proteins serving within it, DNA
andRNA all came about spontaneously at exactly the same time.
· The RNA world thesis, spoken of with
embarrassment by many scientists, is one of the most illogical
theoriesyet espoused by Darwinists, who are in a despairing state when
it comes to explaining the origin of life. Casually bringing up such
an illogical claim and depicting it as major scientific evidence is
another element of Darwinist demagoguery.
The eminent University of San Diego California evolutionist Dr. Leslie
Orgel, a colleague of Stanley Miller and Francis Crick, refers to the
possibility of "life beginning with the RNA world" as a "scenario."
Orgel sets out the characteristics that RNA would have to possess and
the impossibility of its doing so in an article titled "The Origin of
Life on the Earth" in the October 1994 issue of American Scientist:
This scenario could have occurred, we noted, if prebiotic RNA had two
properties not evident today:
No comments:
Post a Comment