4a]
already provide hints about the nature of these technological
developments and the kind of abundance that they will bring.
In the End Times, the prevailing Qur'anic morality will ensure that
everyone will receive their just share of goods. In fact,these goods
will be so abundant that everyone will receive all that they ask for,
and much more besides. At all times, Allah grants to His servants
whodisplay this moral excellence an abundant life and promises them
great blessings both in thisworld and beyond.
Anyone who acts rightly, male or female, being a believer, We will
give them a good life and recompense them according to the best of
what they did. (Surat an-Nahl, 97)
In the Golden Age, technology will serve humanity, and its
blessingswill be allocated evenly among all people regardless of
ethnicity, community, and country. Nations that are far from one
another, as well as societies of dissimilar cultures, will benefit
from these sources evenly, and everyone will enjoy a just
administration. Adherence to the Qur'an's morality in its true sense
will ensure the maintenance of this Paradise-like order on Earth. The
just administration of sincere Muslims, who turn to Allahfor every
deed they perform, will secure peace and security, as well as
continued blessings.
The İnvalidity Of The ClaimThat ''Transitional Forms Do Not Mean
Deformed Living Things''
After the fact that 99% of mutations are harmful, one of the most
difficult and problematic subjects for Darwinists is the total absence
of the fictitious fossils known as transitional forms.
Darwinists have sought to explain the absence of transitional forms in
other ways, in order to neutralize this fact that is so embarrassing
for them, and say instead that "transitional fossils are different to
what you imagine."
· First and foremost, this needs to be made
crystal clear: the concept of the "transitional form" is one produced
by Darwinists themselves. It was Darwinists who came up with the idea
that countless transitional forms must have resulted from unsuccessful
mutations between two life forms, and that the majority of these
fictitious life forms would have been eliminated while only a very few
survived. According to this tale, there must have been a time when a
fish would supposedly grow feet or when reptiles' arms wouldbe wings.
But this mythicalperiod DOES NOT EXIST in the fossil record.
· There is therefore no question of "aconcept that
we think of as transitional forms." All descriptions of the entities
referred to as transitional forms come from Darwinists. For years,
paleontologists have sought but failed to find the transitional form
described by Darwin himself. According to that description,
transitional forms are DEFORMED AND MONSTROUS living things. It is
impossible, according to that description, for them to be anything
else.
· Were the theory of evolution true, there is no
doubt that traces of these fictitious intermediate periods should be
found in the fossil record. Fish spendingmillions of years as its fins
supposedly turned into legs, as evolutionists maintain, should exist
in this alleged "intermediate state" in the fossil record.
· And that is not all. Bearing that 99% of
mutations are harmful, there should also be many more examples of all
the failed stages pertinent to alife form. There should be millions or
even billions of odd-looking life forms thatemerged as a result of
failed mutations everywhere on Earth.
· Bearing in mind that mutations are blind and
random processes and are inevitably harmful, then, no matter how
unwilling Darwinists may be to admit the fact, all these supposedly
successful or supposedly unsuccessful transitional forms would all
have been deformed and twisted, with legs coming out of ears,
half-fins and half-legs, with three ears instead of two...
· Yet not one such deformed living things, nor any
transitionalform of the kind imagined by evolutionists, has ever been
found among the more than 300 million fossils that have so far been
unearthed. Indeed, what troubles Darwinists most is that all fossils
are completely regularly, symmetrical and fully formed; in other
words, that FOSSILS REFUTE EVOLUTION.
· As readers will recall, Darwin's greatest worry
was that transitional forms would not be "IN A STATE OF CONFUSION" and
that everything in nature HAS APERFECT REGULARITY AND SYMMETRY:
HY, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine
gradations, DO WE NOT EVERYWHERE SEE INNUMERABLE TRANSITIONAL FORMS?
WHY IS NOT ALL NATURE IN CONFUSION INSTEAD OFTHE SPECIES BEING, AS
WESEE THEM, WELL DEFINED? . . 1
· MUTATIONS DO NOT PRODUCE SYMMETRY.. THEY KNOW
NOTHING OF HARMONY, :->
No comments:
Post a Comment