1a]
Many people are unawareof this truth and think that their lives will be more comfortable if they disregard the Qur’an’s morality out of concern that it will restrict their enjoyment of life’s pleasures. However, such great errors and deceptions obscure the fact that such morality is easy to follow, for Allah, Who created humanity, is fully aware of what system of morality is best for His creation. Actually, what is difficult is to live in a society composed of individuals who do not know the boundaries thatAllah has set.
The İnvalidity Of TheFamous Darwinist Claim That ''Useful Mutations Do Exist.''
The false idea that useful mutations exist is a classicDarwinist claim. Although the whole scientific world knows, with absolute scientific evidence, that mutations have a destructive or fatal effect, this claim is still persistently made, out of a fear of humiliation. Because Darwinism is a theory that depends totally on mutations. All Darwinists know that if the destructive effect were to be mentioned just once, that would spellthe end of Darwinism. It isfor that reason they try togive the impression, citinginvalid and utterly pitiful examples, that mutations can be beneficial. But this is a complete deception.
· As we have set out many times before, mutations have a net harmful effect, with only 1% being neutral, though the latest scientific research has shown that even these can produce long-term damage in the organism. [1] The net harmful effect of mutations is not a psychological defense mechanism, but an explicit truth revealed by science.
· If Darwinists object to this, then they are directly flying in the face of science. Because this is not a matter of opinion, but an absolute scientific fact.
· It is impossible for mutations to bestow any useful characteristic. Under normal conditions, everything in a living body exhibits complete regularity, order and symmetry. In addition, these systems co-exist with the most delicate balances and exhibit a glorious complexity right down to the finest detail. Mutations are random interventions, such as with radiation, and mean breakages, impairments and dislocations. They INEVITABLY DAMAGE theseextraordinarily complex systems, with their regularity, symmetry and order. It is illogical and a violation of science to maintain anything else.
· The results atChernobyl, Nagasaki and Hiroshima were all the results of mutations. Under the effect of mutations, organisms with regular structures either died or suffered severe damage, and this harmful effect even manifested itself in subsequent generations.
· Darwinists generally cite various examples of immunity in order to try to corroborate their claims that “beneficial mutationsdo exist.” But these examples all consist of a variation or impairment in bacteria or immune cells.
· Sometimes, adislocation in a single DNAnucleotide, or base, can bestow immunity to an antibiotic on a micro-organism. But although this may be useful to the micro-organism, IT IS NOTA BENEFICIAL MUTATION. Because the mutation in question has actually harmed the micro-organism. The ribosome sequence belonging to the micro-organism has been impaired, and it prevents the antibiotic binding to the organism by damaging the lock andkey harmony. In other words, rather than there being any novelty in the micro-organism, we are looking at a loss of information.
· Mutations are literally like firing at a regular structure with a machine gun. Opening fireon a healthy structure willentirely do away with that structure. The fact that one bullet has no effect or destroys an existing infection in the body changes nothing. The organism will alreadyhave been killed by the other 99 bullets hitting it.
· The example that Darwinists cite with such examples is like a bullet healing the body bydestroying a single infection. The organism is devastated by mutations, but Darwinists concentrate on the one that heals this infection.
· Since the subject of mutations constitutes one of the most damaging points forDarwinists they engage indemagoguery by depicting minor instances of variation or the effects examined above as major evidence. The fact is, however, that the adherents of evolution, who maintain that all living things acquired their present symmetrical and complex structures byway of evolution, have to be able to cite examples of mutations that take place one after the other and are all beneficial, and that also bestow new information on the organism. :->
No comments:
Post a Comment