~
Darwinist claims have always been anything but scientific, and they
have always used mere demagoguery and false evidence to prop their
theories up. They deceive people by employing terminology that has
nothing to do with the subject at hand, simply producing words without
saying anything scientific at all. These are well-known evolutionist
characteristics. But there has recently been another addition to
Darwinists' demagoguery.
Terms such as "perfect, magnificent, flawless," used to emphasize the
superior aspects of the structures in living things, alarm Darwinists.
They respond by saying things like, "These are not scientific terms,
they are personalized terms; there is no such thing as a perfect cell.
What criteria are involved?"
The reason is this: Darwinists are aware that they cannot account in
terms of the theory of evolution for the extraordinary order and
behavior in living things, such as the golden ratio, symmetry,
division of labor or planning. Their latest feeble move, a defense
mechanism, is to attack these terms. In short,Darwinists are in such a
wretched position as to suggest that the use of these terms is
improper.
Why do Darwinists rejectthe concept of "perfection"?
"Perfection" is a scientific term because living structures exhibit a
perfection that exceeds human abilities and sometimes even human
comprehension. For example, the stages involved in plant
photosynthesis are still not yet fully understood. no machine capable
of making photosynthesis has thus far ever been constructed. We still
do not fully understand how tiny birds weighing just a few grams can
migrate thousands of kilometers, how they navigate, and where they
obtain the strength to do this. The majestic nature of the order
within the bee hive, how the regular hexagonsin the honeycomb came
about and the glory of theventilation system in termite nests are all
absolutely stunning.
In fact, Darwinists know perfectly well that the features in living
things are perfect and that they cannot explain them in terms of
evolution. But they still do all they can toreject the concept of
"perfection." The sole reason for this is that, in their eyes, it is
impossible for there to be perfection in a structure they maintain
came about by chance.
Chance cannot produce perfection. It cannot understand symmetry or the
golden ratio. It cannot give rise to entire systems that engage in a
division of labor at the molecular level, take precautions, leave no
deficiencies and test for, and even correct, errors. All chance can
produce is either nothing, or else deformed, twisted, irregular,
crippled and sickly structures. That is why Darwinists are so alarmed
by the use of words such as "perfect," "extraordinary" and "flawless."
The truth is clear, even if Darwinists try to hide from it
The fact that Darwinists try to avoid with their policy of silencing
argument is this:
Proteins serve very different functions inside the cell. Every protein
knows where to go and what to do at the momentit comes into being. One
enfolds DNA, another indicates the location of the code in protein
synthesis, one becomes a hormone and permits communication while
another becomes an enzyme and catalyzes reactions. Darwinists can
never succeed in performing one of the jobsof one of the thousands
ofproteins inside the cell. FURTHERMORE, THEY CAN NEVER EXPLAIN HOW A
SINGLE PROTEIN MIGHT HAVE FORMED. Such a structure that so
exceedshuman abilities is, in a word, perfect.
DNA is a work of art. Some two meters long and divided into 46
chromosomes, it is folded into the cell nucleus a mere one to two
microns in size using the most complex folding techniquein the world.
It is enzymesand proteins that do this folding. If Darwinists claim
there is no perfection in this, then they have to be able to do
something similar, orat least make a copy of it.
The chloroplast inside a leaf performs photosynthesis, the mechanism
of which we still do not fully understand, with an amazing expertise.
If Darwinists maintain thatthis system is not perfect, they need to be
able to make a copy or to be able to do something similar.
A moon fish living in Antarctica can survive at temperatures as low as
minus 56 degrees and dive down to great depths. Yet it is unaffectedby
sudden and intense changes in pressure, because in contrast to many
mammals, its respiratory tract is flat-oval in shape, rather than
round, and is capableof immediately closing under high pressure. It
canalso close its lungs instantaneously. This characteristic is
perfection.
--
:-> :->
No comments:
Post a Comment