Friday, June 20, 2014

For children, - Akhlaq, Islamic Behavior, Good Conduct, Morality, Good Manners, Holy Prophet Muhammad (saw)




ShareShare

Akhlaq is an Arabic term referring to the practice of virtue, morality and good manners in Islamic Theology and Philosophy (Falsafah). It is most commonly translated in English as; islamic behavior, disposition, good conduct, nature, temper, ethics, morals or character (of a person).
Akhlaq is the plural for the word Khulq which means disposition. "Disposition" is that faculty (Malakah) of the soul (Nafs) which is the source of all those activities that man performs spontaneously without thinking about them. Malakah is a property of the soul which comes into existence through exercise and repetitive practice and is not easily destroyed.
A particular disposition (Malakah) may appear in human beings because of one of the following reasons:
1.Natural and physical make up (Fitrah): It is observed that some people are patient while others are touchy and nervous. Some are easily disturbed and saddened while others show greater resistance and resilience.
2.Habit (Ada): It is formed because of continual repetition of certain acts and leads to the emergence of a certain disposition.
3.Practice and conscious effort: Which if continued long enough will eventually lead to the formation of a disposition.
Even though the physical make-up of an individual produces certain dispositions in him, it is by no means true that man has no choice in the matter and is absolutely compelled to abide by the dictates of his physical make-up. On the contrary, since man has the power to choose, he can overcome the dictates of his physical nature through practice and effort, and can acquire the disposition of his choice.
Of course, it should be admitted that those dispositions which are caused by the mental faculties such as intelligence, memory, mental agility and the like, are not alterable. All other dispositions, however, may be changed according to man's will. Man can control his lust, anger and other emotions and desires, and channel them to edify himself and propel himself along the path of perfection and wisdom.
When we speak of man's capacity to bring about changes in his dispositions, we do not mean that man should destroy his instincts of reproduction or self-preservation. Man could not exist without these instincts. What we mean is that one should avoid going to either extremes in regard to them, and maintain a condition of balance and moderation so that they may perform their functions properly. Just as the seed of a date grows into a fruitful tree through proper care, or a wild horse is trained to serve his master, so also can man attain perfection and wisdom through self-discipline and intelligent perseverance.
Human perfection has many levels. The greater the amount of self-discipline and effort on the part of the individual, the higher the level of perfection that he would attain. In other words, he stands between two extreme points, the lowest of which is below the level of beasts and the highest of which surpasses even the high station of angels. The human movement between these two extremes is discussed by ilm al-Akhlaq (Science of Ethics). It is the goal of ethics to raise and guide man from the lowest animal state to that exalted position superior to that of the angels.
In a hadith from Imam Ali (as)is related as saying, Allah (SWT) created Angels with intellect but without anger or desire. And created animals with anger and desire but without intellect. And created man with intellect (reason), anger and desire. If man's reason over powers his anger and desires, he rises to the status of that higher than angels. But if his anger and desires overpower his intellect and reason he becomes lower in status than that of an animal.
The importance of ethics is thus revealed. And it is because of the reasons mentioned above that ethics is considered to be the most exalted and valuable of sciences; Moreover, we know that man is the noblest of creatures, the ultimate purpose of whose existence is to attain perfection; therefore, it follows that ethics is the noblest of all sciences.




ShareShare

Fathwa, - A wife is entitled to have a separa..




ShareShare


/- -*-
ShareShare


** Note:- if you like to donate; send through Paypal. Paypal Email ID - aydnajimudeen@gmail.com/-
-

-
Regards
NAJIMUDEEN M


ShareShare
-*- \ Question
Asslam.o.alaikum. I married two years ago .my husband was aware of the fact that i want to live abroad and he said he will do so.i have a daughter mashaAllah. Ive been,very depressed while living with in laws.i,asked my husband many times for a separate accomodation as i want no interference,in my life.with the start of this year fights started between me n,my husband.my mother always scolded me for not being dominant,still i was happy.i told my husband that my mom scolds me .i was so stressed out.i had depression as i felt neglected by husbAnd.i left his home as i was tired of his parents behaviour and he never said his parents are wrong.one month later my hubsnad came,to meet,us.i was living with my mother.he wished if we go back.i said ill come back after i recover from depression.my daughter got ill,husband called me up that he is coming to pick me up.i said,no.when will she recover then come.its not good for a sick baby to travel for 4 hours.he,stopped talking to me.2 days later i said ok come.till then to 2 month laters he never picked up my call nor replied to my messages.now i told,him after his exam,was over that,i want to come back.his father askd,my father that i shouldnt come.and my hsband told my family that i used to say mom scolds,me.and i said,ill commit suicide...i feel so lonely niw.as he dint keep my secrets.please help me.i dont want,my daughter to Live without faher but he is,making it,difficult,for me..please help
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad, is His slave and messenger.
We advise you to seek reconciliation and ask wise family members from among your relatives to sit together and investigate the issue in order to set the grounds for reaching a solution for your problem for the sake of attaining marital stability in the future. Allaah, The Exalted, says )what means(: }And if a woman fears from her husband contempt or evasion, there is no sin upon them if they make terms of settlement between them - and settlement is best. And present in ]human[ souls is stinginess. But if you do good and fear Allaah - then indeed Allaah is ever, with what you do, Acquainted.{ ]Quran 4:128[
We would like to point out some matters:
First, as a wife, you are entitled to have a separate accommodation for your own, even if it is rented. A wife is not obliged to live with her in-laws as per the Islamic Sharee'ah. In fact, living with the husband’s parents in the same house often incurs problems; therefore, husbands should pay attention to that issue. Please, refer to Fatwa 86132.
Second, one of your due rights over your husband is to live with you on a footing of kindness as enjoined by Allaah, The Exalted. We have underlined that in Fataawa 86618and 88304.
Third, it is impermissible for a woman to leave her house without the consent of her husband. This is considered recalcitrance on her part; please, refer to Fatwa 90507. If she went out of the house without the permission of her husband for a valid and legitimate reason, such as that of accommodation or the like, there is no harm in that.
Fourth, if the husband asks his wife to go back to the marital house, it is incumbent on her to obey him because the wife is enjoined to obey her husband as long as it does not involve disobedience to Allaah. If she is prevented from obeying her husband because of a legitimate impediment, like the accommodation problem in your case or the like, there is no harm in that. In fact, spouses should reach a mutual understanding in such a case.
Fifth, your mother did wrong when she asked you to dominate your husband and so did you when you informed your husband of that. Verily, this was not in your best interest; it even incurred harm on you.
Allaah Knows best.
/- -*-
ShareShare


** Note:- if you like to donate; send through Paypal. Paypal Email ID - aydnajimudeen@gmail.com/-
-

-
Regards
NAJIMUDEEN M


ShareShare
-*- \



ShareShare

Fathwa, - You should be deliberate regarding..




ShareShare

/- -*-
ShareShare


** Note:- if you like to donate; send through Paypal. Paypal Email ID - aydnajimudeen@gmail.com/-
-

-
Regards
NAJIMUDEEN M


ShareShare
Question
Salaam alaikum I am asking this question on behalf of my friend. My friend mentioned to me that another of his friend approached him to see if he would be interested to marry his sister who is unhappily married and would like to come out of that marriage. My question is would it be permissible for a woman to divorce a man if she find no love, happiness, comfort in that relationship. And given that the underlying issue are essentially that of compatibility. Specifics to this case as follows: 1. She has been married for 19 years with 3 teenage children. She is pious and hijabi. 2. She has made efforts in these past years and sought ways to bring love and has made every attempt to bridge gap to make the relationship work. 3. Her husband, according to her, is good person but lives in his own world and steeped in his ways. 4. The mental compatibility gap is as such due to different personalities but further widened by cultural difference, upbringing though both are Muslims. 5. The relationship in the past years has been cold and the couple have drifted further apart. Please advice
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammadis His slave and messenger.
It is not permissible for a wife to ask her husband for divorce except for a legitimate reason. For more information on the valid reasons for seeking divorce, please refer to Fatwa 131953.
The mere fact that there is no love between the spouses in their married life is not a valid reason for the wife to seek divorce. Also, it is forbidden to urge a woman to seek divorce from her husband and to spoil their relationship as we have already clarified in Fatwa 92056.
Homes are not only built on love as previously stated in Fatwa 86796. In fact, there are many other interests that can be achieved through marriage, among which are those children with whom Allaah blessed this husband and wife. The children are in need of an upbringing and good guidance from both their parents so that they can be raised in a good manner and be pleasing to their parents in this worldly life and in the Hereafter.
In addition to this, love can be achieved by having a good marital relationship and mutual respect between the spouses as well as through the fulfillment of the marital rights towards each other. For more information on the rights between spouses, please refer to Fataawa 83157and 85308.
If a wife hates her husband and fears that this will lead her to neglect his rights, then it is permissible for her to ask him for Khul’ in return for compensation. For more information on the rulings on Khul’, please refer to Fatwa 89039.
Finally, our advice to you is to be deliberate regarding the matter of asking for divorce or Khul’ and to endeavor to reconcile if possible.Allaah Knows best.
/- -*-
ShareShare


** Note:- if you like to donate; send through Paypal. Paypal Email ID - aydnajimudeen@gmail.com/-
-

-
Regards
NAJIMUDEEN M


ShareShare





ShareShare

Fathwa, - He fathered a daughter from his fir..




ShareShare


/- -*-
ShareShare


** Note:- if you like to donate; send through Paypal. Paypal Email ID - aydnajimudeen@gmail.com/-
-

-
Regards
NAJIMUDEEN M


ShareShare
Question
My friend married a hindu lady and had a daughter with her about 15 years back , he stayed with her for some years and divorced her and then married another muslim pious lady , he told the second wife that his parents had forced him into his first marriage which was a lie and that the marriage lasted only 2 months and lied that he did not have a daughter , he used to tell her that his sexual desire was much , so he wants to marry again , the second wife did not agree so he married another muslim woman hiding the fact that he was already married twice and showing his age 12 years younger than his actual age . Is anyone who helped him find his partner]wife[ wrong in supporting him done wrong , a major grave sin according to allah swt ? Its been known that he ill treated his previous wives. He is very sweet with words and easily manipulates all people.
Answer
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammadis His slave and messenger.
The marriage of that man to the Hindu woman is invalid because it is not permissible for a Muslim man to marry a non-Muslim woman except a woman who belongs to the People of the Book ]i.e. a Christian or a Jew[ according to the consensus of the Muslims. For more information, please refer to Fatwa 88531.
However, his daughter bears his name if he had believed that his marriage to her was valid.Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyahsaid: “The Muslims have agreed that if a Muslim consummates a marriage )has sexual intercourse( with his wife in any marriage which he believes to be valid, then his children bear his name, and they inherit from each other according to the agreement of all the Muslims, even though this marriage is invalid according to the consensus of the Muslims … the confirmation of family lineage does not require the validity of marriage; rather, the child belongs to the owner of the bed, as the Prophetsaid: “The child belongs to the owner of the bed )legitimate husband( and the stone is for the adulterer." ]Al-Bukhaari and Muslim[.”
If that man lied to his second wife about not having married that other woman and not having a daughter with her, then he is sinful and he is obliged to repent. He is also obliged to repent for lying to his third wife. For more information on the conditions of repentance, please refer to Fatwa 86527.
Helping that man to marry a second or third wife does not entail sharing the sin of lying with him, unless one listened to him as he was lying and did not censure him.
On the other hand, if that man is a bad person, then whoever helps him in this marriage and does not clarify the truth about him to the family of his wife, is a deceiver who has not fulfilled the obligation of sincere advice. Verily, advice is an obligation that is due upon a Muslim for his Muslim brother, and he should not refrain from advising Muslims whenever this is possible.
An-Nawawisaid when interpreting the Hadeeth reported by Muslim: “Giving advice is necessary according to one’s ability if the person who gives advice knows that his advice will be accepted and is safe from what is harmful. In case he fears harm, then he is not required to do so.” ]End of quote[
The obligation is even more emphasized if one’s advice is requested.Abu Hurayrahreported that the Prophetsaid: “The rights of a Muslim to another Muslim brother are six." It was said: What are they, O Messenger of Allaah? He said: “If you meet him, you should greet him with Salaam, if he invites you, you should accept his invitation, if he asks you for advice, you should give him sincere advice, if he sneezes and praises Allaah, you should say to him: 'Yarhamuka Allaah )may Allaah have mercy upon you(', if he falls sick, you should visit him, and if he dies, you should attend his funeral.” ]Muslim[
Daleel Al-Faaliheen li Turuq Riyaadh As-Saaliheen reads: “If he seeks your advice, i.e., if he requests you to advise him regarding what is likely to achieve an interest whether it is an action or word, then you should advise him and it is an obligation on you to say to him what is of interest to him. His request is not a condition for deeming giving him advice obligatory or recommended. It is obligatory in some cases and recommended in others, for whoever requests it or does not request it. However, giving advice when it is requested makes the obligation more emphasized.” ]End of quote[
Al-Hasan Al-Basrisaid: “You will find a believer to be nothing other than a sincere adviser, and you never find him a cheater.” ]End of quote[Allaah Knows best.
/- -*-
ShareShare


** Note:- if you like to donate; send through Paypal. Paypal Email ID - aydnajimudeen@gmail.com/-
-

-
Regards
NAJIMUDEEN M


ShareShare




ShareShare

Welcome to Islam, - The amazing Quran - II




ShareShare
Only has been divinely revealed
They chose, as it happened, a non-Muslim who is a professor of embryology at the University of Toronto. His name is Keith Moore, and he is the author of textbooks on embryology - a world expert on the subject. They invited him to Riyadh and said: “This is what the Quran says about your subject. Is it true? What can you tell us?” While he was in Riyadh, they gave him all of the help that he needed in translation and all of the cooperation for which he asked. And he was so surprised at what he found that he changed his textbooks. In fact, in the second edition of one of his books called "Before We Are Born...", about the history of embryology, he included some material that was not in the first edition because of what he found in the Quran. Truly this illustrates that the Quran was ahead of its time and that those who believe in the Quran know what other people do not know.
I had the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Keith Moore for a television presentation, and we talked a great deal about this - it was illustrated by slides and so on. He mentioned that some of the things that the Quran states about the growth of the human being were not known until thirty years ago. In fact, he said that one item in particular - the Quran's description of the human being as a "leech-like clot" )'alaqah( at one stage - was new to him; but when he checked on it, he found that it was true, and so he added it to his book.
He said: "I never thought of that before," and he went to the zoology department and asked for a picture of a leech. When he found that it looked just like the human embryo, he decided to include both pictures in one of his textbooks. Dr. Moore also wrote a book on clinical embryology, and when he presented this information in Toronto, it caused quite a stir throughout Canada. It was on the front pages of some of the newspapers across Canada, and some of the headlines were quite funny. For instance, one headline read: "SURPRISING THING FOUND IN ANCIENT BOOK"! It seems obvious from this example that people do not clearly understand what it is all about. As a matter of fact, one newspaper reporter asked Professor Moore, "Don't you think that maybe the Arabs might have known about these things - the description of the embryo, its appearance and how it changes and grows? Maybe there were not scientists, but maybe they did something crude dissections on their own - carved up people and examined these things."
The professor immediately pointed out to him that he ]i.e., the reporter[ had missed a very important point - all of the slides of the embryo that had been shown and had been projected in the film had come from pictures taken through a microscope. He said: "It does not matter if someone had tried to discover embryology fourteen centuries ago, they could not have seen it!" All of the descriptions in the Quran of the appearance of the embryo are of the item when it is still too small to see with the naked eye; therefore, one needs a microscope to see it. Since such a device had only been around for little more than two hundred years, Dr. Moore taunted, "Maybe fourteen centuries ago someone secretly had a microscope and did this research, making no mistakes anywhere. Then he somehow taught Muhammad, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam and convinced him, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam to put this information in his, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam book. Then he destroyed his equipment and kept it a secret forever. Do you believe that? You really should not unless you bring some proofs because it is such a ridiculous theory." In fact, when he was asked: "How do you explain this information in the Quran?" Dr. Moore's reply was: "It could only have been divinely revealed."
Although the aforementioned example of man researching information contained in the Quran deals with a non-Muslim, it is still valid because he is one of those who is knowledgeable in the subject being researched. Had some layman claimed that what the Quran says about embryology is true, then one would not necessarily have to accept his word. However, because of the high position, respect, and esteem man gives scholars, one naturally assumes that if they research a subject and arrive at a conclusion based on that research, then the conclusion is valid.
One of Professor Moore's colleagues, Marshall Johnson, deals extensively with geology at the University of Toronto. He became very interested in the fact that the Quran's statements about embryology are accurate, and so he asked Muslims to collect everything contained in the Quran which deals with his specialty. Again people were very surprised at the findings. Since there are a vast number of subjects discussed in the Quran, it would certainly require a large amount of time to exhaust each subject. It suffices for the purpose of this discussion to state that the Quran makes very clear and concise statements about various subjects while simultaneously advising the reader to verify the authenticity of these statements with research by scholars in those subjects.
As illustrated, the Quran has clearly emerged authentic. Undoubtedly, there is an attitude in the Quran which is not found anywhere else. It is interesting how when the Quran provides information, it often tells the reader: "You did not know this before." Indeed, there is no scripture that exists which makes that claim. All of the other ancient writings and scriptures that people have, do give a lot of information, but they always state where the information came from.
For example, when the Bible discusses ancient history, it states that this king lived here, this one fought in a certain battle, another one had so many sons, etc. Yet it always stipulates that if you want more information, then you should read the book of so and so because that is where the information came from. In contrast to this concept, the Quran provides the reader with information and states that this information is something new. Of course, there always exists the advice to research the information provided and verify its authenticity. It is interesting that such a concept was never challenged by non-Muslims fourteen centuries ago. Indeed, the Makkans who hated the Muslims, time and time again they heard such revelations claiming to bring new information; yet, they never spoke up and said: "This is not new. We know where Muhammad got this information. We learned this at school."
For instance, the telephone book is accurate, but that does not mean that it is divinely revealed. The real problem lies in that one must establish some proofs of the source the Quran's information. The emphasis is on the reader. One cannot simply deny the Quran's authenticity without sufficient proof. If, indeed, one finds a mistake, then he has the right to disqualify it. This is exactly what the Quran encourages. Once a man came up to me after a lecture I delivered in South Africa. He was very angry about what I had said, and so he claimed: "I am going to go home tonight and find a mistake in the Quran." Of course, I said: "Congratulations. That is the most intelligent thing that you have said." Certainly, this is the approach Muslims need to take with those who doubt the Quran's authenticity, because the Quran itself offers the same challenge.
An inevitably, after accepting its challenge and discovering that it is true, these people will come to believe it because they could not disqualify it. In essence, the Quran earns their respect because they themselves have had to verify its authenticity. An essential fact that cannot be reiterated enough concerning the authenticity of the Quran is that one's inability to explain a phenomenon himself does not require his acceptance of the phenomenon's existence or another person's explanation of it.
Specifically, just because one cannot explain something does not mean that one has to accept someone else's explanation. However, the person's refusal of other explanations reverts the burden of proof back on himself to find a feasible answer. This general theory applies to numerous concepts in life, but fits most wonderfully with the Quranic challenge, for it creates a difficulty for one who says: "I do not believe it." At the onset of refusal, one immediately has an obligation to find an explanation himself if he feels others' answers are inadequate. In fact, in one particular Quranic verse which I have always seen mistranslated into English, Allaah mentions a man who heard the truth explained to him. It states that he was derelict in his duty because after he heard the information, he left without checking the verity of what he had heard. In other words, one is guilty if he hears something and does not research it and check to see whether it is true.
One is supposed to process all information and decide what is garbage to be thrown out and what is worthwhile information to be kept and benefited from at a later date. One cannot just let it rattle around in his head. It must be put in the proper categories and approached from that point of view. For example, if the information is still speculatory, then one must discern whether it's closer to being true or false. But if all of the facts have been presented, then one must decide absolutely between these two options. And even if one is not positive about the authenticity of the information, he is still required to process all of the information and make the admission that he just does not know for sure.
Although this last point appears to be futile, in actuality, it is beneficial to the arrival at a positive conclusion at a later time in that it forces the person to at least recognize, research and review the facts. This familiarity with the information will give the person "the edge" when future discoveries are made and additional information is presented. The important thing is that one deals with the facts and does not simply discard them out of empathy and disinterest.






ShareShare

Welcome to Islam, - The amazing Quran -I




ShareShare

Calling the Quran amazing is not something done only by Muslims, who have an appreciation for the Book and who are pleased with it; it has been labeled amazing by non-Muslims as well. In fact, even people who hate Islam very much have still called it amazing.
One thing which surprises non-Muslims who are examining the Book very closely is that the Quran does not appear to them to be what they expected. What they assume is that they have an old book which came fourteen centuries ago from the Arabian desert; and they expect that the book should look something like that - an old book from the desert. And then they find out that it does not resemble what they expected at all. Additionally, one of the first things that some people assume is that because it is an old book which comes from the desert, it should talk about the desert. Well, the Quran does talk about the desert - some of its imagery describes the desert; but it also talks about the sea - what it's like to be in a storm on the sea.
Some years ago, the story came to us in Toronto about a man who was in the merchant marine and made his living on the sea. A Muslim gave him a translation of the Quran to read. The merchant marine knew nothing about the history of Islam but was interested in reading the Quran. When he finished reading it, he brought it back to the Muslim and asked, "This Muhammad, was he a sailor?" He was impressed at how accurately the Quran describes a storm on a sea. When he was told, "No, as a matter of fact, Muhammad, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, lived in the desert," that was enough for him. He embraced Islam on the spot. He was so impressed with the Quran's description because he had been in a storm on the sea, and he knew that whoever had written that description had also been in a storm on the sea. Allaah Says )what means(:“Or ]they are[ like darkness within an unfathomable sea which is covered by waves, upon which are waves, over which are clouds darkness…”]Quran 24:40[, this description was not what someone imagining a storm on a sea to be like would have written; rather, it was written by someone who knew what a storm on the sea was like. This is one example of how the Quran is not tied to a certain place and time. Certainly, the scientific ideas expressed in it also do not seem to originate from the desert fourteen centuries ago.
Smaller than the atom:
Many centuries before the onset of Muhammad's, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, Prophethood, there was a well-known theory of atomism advanced by the Greek philosopher, Democritus. He and the people who came after him assumed that matter consists of tiny, indestructible, indivisible particles called atoms. The Arabs too, used to deal in the same concept; in fact, the Arabic word "tharrah" commonly referred to the smallest particle known to man. Now, modern science has discovered that this smallest unit of matter )i.e., the atom, which has all of the same properties as its element( can be split into its component parts. This is a new idea, a development of the last century; yet, interestingly enough, this information had already been documented in the Quran, Allaah Says )what means(:" And not absent from your Lord is any ]part[ of an atom’s weight )488( within the earth or within the heaven or ]anything[ smaller than that…”]Quran, 10:61[. Undoubtedly, fourteen centuries ago that statement would have looked unusual, even to an Arab. For him, the "tharrah" was the smallest thing there was. Indeed, this is a proof that the Quran is not outdated.
In honey there is healing
Another example of what one might expect to find in an "old book" that touches upon the subject of health or medicine is outdated remedies or cures. Various historical sources state that the Prophet, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, gave some advice about health and hygiene, yet most of these pieces of advice are not contained in the Quran.
At first glance, to the non-Muslims this appears to be a negligent omission. They cannot understand why Allaah would not "include" such helpful information in the Quran. Some Muslims attempt to explain this absence with the following argument: "Although the Prophet's, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, advice was sound and applicable to the time in which he lived, Allaah, in His infinite Wisdom, knew that there would come later medical and scientific advances which would make the Prophet's, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, advice appear outdated. When later discoveries occurred, people might say that such information contradicted that which the Prophet, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, had given. Thus, since Allaah would never allow any opportunity for the non-Muslims to claim that the Quran contradicts itself or the teachings of the Prophet, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, He only included in the Quran information and examples which could stand the test of time."
However, when one examines the true realities of the Quran in terms of its existence as a divine revelation, the entire matter is quickly brought into its proper perspective, and the error in such argumentation becomes clear and understandable. It must be understood that the Quran is a divine revelation, and as such, all information in it is of divine origin. Allaah revealed the Quran from Himself. It is the Speech of Allaah, nothing can be added, subtracted or altered.
There was no "home remedies" in the Quran which one could claim to be outdated; nor does it contain any man's view about what is beneficial to health, what food is best to eat, or what will cure this or that disease. In fact, the Quran only mentions one item dealing with medical treatment, and it is not in dispute by anyone. It states that in honey there is healing. And certainly, I do not think that there is anyone who will argue with that!
Not from Muhammads's, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam mind
If one assumes that the Quran is the product of a man's mind, then one would expect it to reflect some of what was going on in the mind of the man who "composed" it. In fact, certain encyclopedias and various books claim that the Quran was the product of hallucinations that Muhammad, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, underwent. If these claims are true - if it indeed originated from some psychological problems in Muhammad's, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, mind - then evidence of this would be apparent in the Quran. Is there such evidence? In order to determine whether or not there is, one must first identify what things would have been going on in his mind at that time and then search for these thoughts and reflections in the Quran.
It is common knowledge that Muhammad, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, had a very difficult life. All of his daughters died before him except one, and he had a wife, may Allaah be pleased with her, of several years who was dear and important to him, who proceeded him in death at a very critical period of his life. As a matter of fact, she must have been quite a woman because when the first revelation came to him, he, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam ran home to her afraid. Certainly, even today one would have a hard time trying to find an Arab who would tell you: "I was so afraid that I ran home to my wife." They just aren't that way.
Yet Muhammad, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, felt comfortable enough with his wife to be able to do that. That's how influential and strong woman she was. Although these examples are only a few of the subjects that would have been on Muhammad's, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, mind, they are sufficient in intensity to prove my point. The Quran does not mention any of these things - not the death of his children, not the death of his beloved companions and wife, may Allaah be pleased with them, not his fear of the initial revelations, which he so beautifully shared with his wife - nothing; yet, these topics must have hurt him, bothered him, and caused him pain and grief during periods of his psychological reflections, then these subjects, as well as others, would be prevalent or at least mentioned throughout.
Test of falsification
A truly scientific approach to the Quran is possible because the Quran offers something that is not offered by other religious scriptures, in particular, and other religions, in general. It is what scientists demand. Today there are many people who have ideas and theories about how the universe works. These people are all over the place, but the scientific community does not even bother to listen to them. This is because within the last century the scientific community has demanded a test of falsification. They say: "If you have theory, do not bother us with it unless you bring with that theory a way for us to prove whether you are wrong or not."
Such a test was exactly why the scientific community listened to Einstein towards the beginning of the century. He came with a new theory and said: "I believe the universe works like this; and here are three ways to prove whether I am wrong!" So the scientific community subjected his theory to the tests, and within six years it passed all three. Of course, this does not prove that he was great, but it proves that he deserved to be listened to because he said: "This is my idea; and if you want to try to prove me wrong, do this or try that." This is exactly what the Quran has - falsification tests. Some are old )in that they have already been proven true(, and some still exist today.
Basically it states: "If this book is not what it claims to be, then all you have to do is this or this or this to prove that it is false." Of course, in 1400 years no one has been able to do "This or this or this, "and thus it is still considered true and authentic. I suggest to you that the next time you get into dispute with someone about Islam and he claims that he has the truth and that you are in darkness, you leave all other arguments at first and make this suggestion. Ask him: "Is there any falsification test in your religion? Is there anything in your religion that would prove you are wrong if I could prove to you that it exists - anything?" Well, I can promise right now that people will not have anything - no test, no proof, nothing! This is because they do not carry around the idea that they should not only present what they believe but should also offer others a chance to prove they're wrong. However, Islam does that. A perfect example of how Islam provides man with a chance to verify its authenticity and "prove it is wrong" occurs in the 4th chapter. And quiet honestly, I was surprised when I first discovered this challenge. Allaah Says )what means(:“Then do they not reflect upon the Qur’an? If it had been from ]any[ other than Allaah, they would have found within it much contradiction.”]Quran 4:82[
This is a clear challenge to the non-Muslim. Basically, it invites him to find a mistake. As a matter of fact, the seriousness and difficulty of the challenge aside, the actual presentation of such a challenge in the first place is not even in human nature and is inconsistent with man's personality. One doesn't take an exam in school and after finishing the exam, write a note to the instructor at the end saying: "This exam is perfect. There are no mistakes in it. Find one if you can!" One just doesn't do that. The teacher would not sleep until he found a mistake!
And yet this is the way the Quran approaches people. Another interesting attitude that exists in the Quran repeatedly deals with its advice to the reader. The Quran informs that reader about different facts and then gives the advice: "If you want to know more about this or that, or if you doubt what is said, then you should ask those who have knowledge." This too is a surprising attitude. It is not usual to have a book that comes from someone without training in geography, botany, biology, etc., who discusses these subjects and then advises the reader to ask men of knowledge if he doubts anything.
Yet in every age there have been Muslims who have followed the advice of the Quran and made surprising discoveries. If one looks to the works of Muslim scientists many centuries ago, one will find them full of quotations from the Quran. These works state that they did research in such a place, looking for something. And they affirm that the reason they looked in such and such a place was that the Quran pointed them in that direction. For example, the Quran mentions man's origin and then tells the reader, "Research it!" It gives the reader a hint where to look and then states that one should find out more about it. This is the kind of thing that Muslims today largely seem to overlook - but not always, as illustrated in the following example. A few years ago, a group of men in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia collected all of the verses in the Quran which discuss embryology - the growth of the human being in the womb. They said: "Here is what the Quran says. Is it the truth?" In essence, they took the advice of the Quran, Allaah Says )what means(:“So ask the people of the message ]i.e. former scriptures[ if you do not know.”]Quran 16:43[





ShareShare

Dought & clear, - Ruling on saying the Talbiyah together in unison




ShareShare

Is it permissible for one person to recite the Talbiyah after entering ihraam and the people who are doing ‘Umrah to repeat it after him, or what?.
Praise be to Allaah.
Reciting the Talbiyah in unison, when the people doing ‘Umrah all start to recite the Talbiyah together and end it together in one voice is one of the mistakes that many people commit today. It is not known that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or his companions recited the Talbiyah in unison. Rather each of them should recite the Talbiyah by himself, whether it coincides with the voices of other pilgrims who are reciting the Talbiyah or not.
See the answer to question no. 33746.
The Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwaa was asked: What is the ruling on pilgrims reciting the Talbiyah together, where one recites it and the others repeat after him?
They replied:
That is not permissible, because it was not narrated from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or from his successors, the Rightly Guided Caliphs (may Allaah be pleased with them); rather it is an innovation (bid’ah). End quote.
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
The words of Anas (may Allaah be pleased with him): “We did Hajj with the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and some of us were reciting takbeer (‘Allaahu akbar’) and some of us were reciting tahleel (‘La ilaaha ill-Allaah’)” (agreed upon) indicate that they did not recite the Talbiyah in unison. If they had been reciting the Talbiyah in unison then they would all have been reciting tahleel or takbeer, but some of them were reciting takbeer and some of them were reciting tahleel, but each of them was remembering his Lord according to his situation. End quote.
Al-Sharh al-Mumti’(7/111)
And Allaah knows best.




ShareShare

Dought & clear, - If he does the farewell tawaaf, he should go out walking normally and should not walk with his face towards the Ka’bah




ShareShare

Some of the pilgrims, after performing the farewell tawaaf, do not turn their backs towards the Ka’bah, rather they walk backwards, with their faces towards the Ka’bah, until they exit the Mosque. Is this part of the Sunnah?.
Praise be to Allaah.
This action is not part of the Sunnah, rather it is a reprehensible innovation. This is what some people do, claiming to venerate the Ka’bah thereby. If this was really a sign of respect for the Ka’bah, you would find that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and the Sahaabah did that, but there are no reports to suggest that.
Shaykh Ibn Baaz said:
When (the pilgrim) has finished bidding farewell to the House and wants to leave the mosque, he should walk normally, facing forwards, until he exits. He should not walk backwards, because there is no report that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or his companions did this, rather it is an innovation (bid’ah). The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, “Whoever does any action that is not part of this matter of ours (i.e., Islam) will have it rejected.” Narrated by Muslim, 1718. And he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Beware of newly-invented matters, for every newly-invented matter is an innovation and every innovation is a going astray.” Narrated by Abu Dawood, 4607; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani inSaheeh Abi Dawood. We ask Allaah to make us steadfast in adhering to His religion, and to keep us safe from anything that goes against it, for He is the Most Generous, Most Kind.
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen said, when listing the mistakes that some people make during the farewell tawaaf:
Some of them exit the mosque, after the farewell tawaaf, walking backwards, claiming that they are venerating the Ka’bah thereby. This goes against the Sunnah, rather it is the kind of innovation (bid’ah) against which the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) warned us when he said: “Every innovation is a going astray.” Innovation (bid’ah) means everything that has been invented in ‘aqeedah (belief) or ‘ibaadah (worship) that goes against the way of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and his Rightly-Guided Caliphs. Does this person who walks backwards and claims to be venerating the Ka’bah think that he is venerating it more than the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did? Or does he think that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and the Rightly-Guided Caliphs did not know that this was an act of veneration towards the Ka’bah?!
Manaasik al-Hajj wa’l-‘Umrah, p. 135.
Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz, 16/98.




ShareShare

Dought & clear, - Remembering Allaah by repeating a single name such as “Allaah”




ShareShare

Using the names of Allah as Dhikr counts as Bid’ah or counting on fingers or beats? & using the names of Allah as for the specific benefit counts as Bid’ah?
Praise be to Allaah.
With regard to the ruling on the masbahah (“prayer beads”), this had already been discussed in Question no. 3009.
With regard to remembering Allaah by saying a single name such as “Allaah” repeatedly, this is not narrated in sharee’ah, and there is no proof for that from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or from any of his companions. If it was something good they would have done it before us.
All goodness is in following those who came before us, and all evil is in the innovations of those who came later.
The Standing Committee was asked about someone who remembers Allaah by saying “Ya Lateef” repeatedly.
They replied:
That is not permissible because it was not narrated from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). Rather it was proven that he said: “Whoever innovates something in this matter of ours (i.e., Islam) that is not part of it, will have it rejected.” According to another version: “Whoever does any action that is not part of this matter of ours will have it rejected.”
Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 2/379
With regard to the questioner saying that they say, “Hu, Hu, Hu” – those people are adding to their bid’ah because they are calling Allaah by a word by which He did not call Himself. “Hu” is not one of the names of Allaah.
See Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 2/185
And Allaah knows best.





ShareShare